Search

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Vasco fans were already in the mood for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors at São Januário, and they were singing that Tuesday would be "war." https://t.co/J4uysrkIZA #Vasco #SulAmericana #Futebol (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that the Justice of Rio de Janeiro had accepted, on that day, an appeal from Vasco and ordered the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors. According to the profile, the appellate judge considered public safety and the protection of fans to be more relevant than the issues regarding the pitch claimed by the consortium. The publication stated that the decision took into account favorable expressions from the Public Ministry and the Military Police, a memorandum between the parties regarding the use of the stadium by Vasco, and the deadline set by Conmebol, which would expire the following day. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, determined that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. should make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The decision was granted this Friday (9), after a request from Vasco against the concessionaire's refusal, which had alleged technical issues related to the maintenance and restoration of the field. According to the publication, the magistrate considered statements from the Military Police and the Public Ministry of Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out the stadium as a preferred alternative due to structural, logistical, and operational conditions, as well as issues of safety and urban mobility. He also mentioned previous disputes between the club and the concessionaire regarding the use of the stadium. The decision also determined that the Maracanã should be offered to Vasco under commercial and operational conditions equal to those practiced for Flamengo and Fluminense, respecting legal, technical, and safety requirements. The publication stated that compliance was urgent, as Vasco needed to inform CONMEBOL by October 10 which stadium would host the match, and that the concessionaire could still present its defense. #Maracanã #Vasco #SulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that the judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, president of the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of TJRJ, granted a preliminary injunction requested by Vasco and ordered the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make Maracanã available for the semifinal of the South American Cup on 10/20, between Vasco and Boca. According to Tutinha, the magistrate prioritized public safety over the conditions of the pitch, mentioned statements from the Military Police and the Public Prosecutor's Office, and stated that the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire seemed to indicate a "personal issue." The decision would also guarantee the club equal commercial and operational conditions to those of Flamengo and Fluminense, with immediate compliance, including by a court official on duty. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Lescano, from Vasco, considered it would be better to play the semifinals of the South American Cup at home against Boca Juniors, although he claimed to know it would be difficult to play at São Januário. He stated that the team would try to adapt to the location of the match, whether at Nilton Santos, Maracanã, or São Januário. https://t.co/gwWMO7Vbju #Vasco #BocaJuniors #SulAmericana (translated)

Planet Football published statements from Raul Plasmann, former goalkeeper of Cruzeiro, Flamengo, and the Brazilian national team, who compared the Copa Sudamericana to the Serie B of the Libertadores. He said that competing in the tournament indicated that a team had not done a good job and classified the situation as a defeat. Plasmann also joked that there could be a world champion from Serie B. The statements were made to Basticast365. https://t.co/xilGgBd6rm #SulAmericana #Libertadores #Futebol (translated)

Futebol Planet informed that Vasco consulted the Amazon Arena about the possibility of holding the semifinals of the Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors and the classic against Flamengo for the Brasileirão in Manaus. According to the publication, Sedel stated that the stadium was suitable and authorized the games if the club chose the location. The inquiry occurred after another denial from the Justice regarding the immediate release of Maracanã, which is still subject to appeal. #Vasco #ArenaDaAmazônia #SulAmericana (translated)

Planet Football reported that the court had denied, on the 5th, Vasco's request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors for the South American tournament, in a match scheduled for October 20. According to the profile, the judge considered technical arguments from the Fla-Flu Consortium that the pitch could not withstand the sequence of games, and there was still room for appeal. The profile added that Vasco had until that day to inform Conmebol if they would play outside the municipality of Rio and until Saturday (10) to indicate another stadium in the city. It also stated that São Januário did not meet the minimum requirement of 30,000 seats. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

Planet Football reported that the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors for the semifinals of the South American Cup was set to take place at Nilton Santos. According to the publication, the courts had denied the use of Maracanã, while Vasco was waiting for a decision from the Military Police about increasing the capacity of São Januário to 24,000 spectators. Conmebol expected the stadium designation by Monday and required a capacity of over 30,000 people, the page added, attributing the information to Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #SulAmericana (translated)

The Football Planet reported, citing ESPN Brazil, that the court denied a request from a Vasco fan to open Maracanã for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors. According to the profile, the judge understood that the action did not demonstrate discrimination, diversion of purpose, or harm to public interest. The profile added that the decision applied only to the fan's process. In another action, filed by Vasco against the Fla-Flu Consortium to try to play at the stadium, the court had ordered a 20-day suspension. The club appealed and requested an urgent decision, but, according to the Football Planet, the request had not yet been analyzed. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

Colidio stated to TNT Sports Brazil that he considered it unfair to be out of the South American Cup and argued that Conmebol should review the regulations. He said he understood the rules, but argued that he hadn't played for River in the round of 16, and therefore found it illogical not to be able to play for Vasco. https://t.co/tlOuTusIln #Conmebol #SulAmericana #Futebol (translated)

⚠️ SCENARIO ON THE MANDATE FOR THE SUL-AMERICANA SEMIFINAL AGAINST BOCA JUNIORS: - The club is trying to reach an agreement with Boca Juniors and Conmebol to play at São Januário. Vasco is working on all possibilities to ensure the match takes place at the Historic Hill. - This depends on Conmebol's approval regarding the rule of capacity above 30,000 (a "controllable" problem), but mainly on Boca's acceptance regarding visitors. The rule states 4,000 tickets. There is an attempt to reduce this number, with Vasco having the same amount at La Bombonera, but there is still no agreement. AND MARACANÃ? - The first attempt was Maracanã. Vasco exhausted all friendly possibilities to play there. With another "no" from the consortium, the next possibility is only in 2026 (Vitória and Palmeiras in the Copa do Brasil), the club is already working on the possibility of taking it to court. This is on the board's table and can be activated at any moment, based on the notice. - Playing at Maracanã is not a problem for the group of players. They also feel at home there. But in order of preference, São Januário is number 1 for the squad. - One attempt does not negate the other. Vasco does not want to be hostage to just one possibility. With the "no" from the consortium, São Januário is a priority. However, the possibility of legal action regarding Maracanã occurs in parallel. The third option is Nilton Santos Stadium, both for the board and for the athletes' preference. #CanaldoPedrosa #CanaldoPedrosa #Vasco #SulAmericana #BocaJuniors (translated)

🚨 AGORA! Consórcio Fla-Flu recusa pedido do Vasco para enfrentar o Boca Juniors no Maracanã pela semifinal da Sul-Americana. É o terceiro "NÃO" que o Cruzmaltino recebe do Consórcio neste ano. A administração alega grande quantidade de partidas e desgaste do gramado. O Vasco não descarta ir à JUSTIÇA, mas há um grande incômodo da diretoria com o tema. O presidente Pedrinho entende que o clube está sendo impedido de exercer um direito. Por isso, uma corrente no Vasco defende levar a partida para São Januário, atualmente VETADO pela Conmebol por não atender à exigência de capacidade. 🗞️ @geglobo | @brunomurito 📸 Matheus Lima/CRVG #Vasco #SulAmericana #Futebol

"Nós estamos à beira, talvez, de conquistar duas copas: a Sul-Americana e a Copa do Brasil. E não vamos cair de jeito nenhum. A gente já está fora da zona de rebaixamento e vai continuar fora." 🎙️ Mário Junqueira, sócio de Marcos Lamacchia na compra da SAF do Vasco. 🎥 @btbsportsbr_ https://t.co/dJFVpQkZdf #Vasco #CopaDoBrasil #SulAmericana

MAIS UM "NÃO" Uma pessoa ligada ao Consórcio Maracanã nos garantiu que o estádio não será liberado para o Vasco disputar o jogo contra o Boca Juniors, pela semifinal da Sul-americana, no dia 20 de outubro. A resposta "extra-oficial", inclusive, já foi comunicada à Conmebol. A diretoria do Vasco ainda tem o artifício de buscar a liberação via judicial. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana

MAIS UM "NÃO" Uma pessoa ligada ao Consórcio Maracanã nos garantiu que o estádio não será liberado para o Vasco disputar o jogo contra o Boca Juniors, pela semifinal da Sul-americana, no dia 22 de outubro. A resposta "extra-oficial", inclusive, já foi comunicada à Conmebol. A diretoria do Vasco ainda tem o artifício de buscar a liberação via judicial. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana

“O Atlético-MG tem a obrigação de ganhar a Sul-Americana. Os outros dois (Vasco e Boca Juniors) são fracos, são ‘babas’.” — Thiago Fernandes, jornalista da imprensa mineira. https://t.co/VnJsdGPzzr #AtléticoMG #SulAmericana #Futebol

🚨 AGORA! Vasco formaliza pedido para jogar no Maracanã contra o Boca Juniors pela Sul-Americana. O Cruzmaltino fez a solicitação ao Consórcio Fla-Flu, que administra o estádio. A Conmebol já confirmou a data (20 de outubro), mas aguarda a indicação do local, que precisa ter capacidade superior a 30 mil pessoas. Por isso, São Januário não é opção, e o Nilton Santos é o plano B. A liberação depende das condições do Maracanã, incluindo o gramado. O Vasco aposta que a pausa da Data FIFA será suficiente para recuperar o piso. Em caso de "não" de Flamengo e Fluminense, o Vasco deve levar novamente a questão à JUSTIÇA. O Maracanã receberá Fluminense x Palmeiras pela Libertadores em 14 de outubro e Flamengo x Estudiantes no dia 22, dois dias depois de Vasco x Boca. Antes disso, no próximo domingo, será palco de um jogo da NFL. 🗞️ @OGlobo_Esportes | @diogodantas 📸 Matheus Lima/CRVG #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana