The author believed that hunting should be banned, mentioning joggers who feared being targeted and pellets in cars parked in front of houses. (translated)
The author stated that, until then, the consequences of serious mistakes had fallen solely on those who had not committed them, and argued that the bill had already arrived. (translated)
The author described the effects of fanaticism as horrifying, saying people expressed anger through extreme violence without considering the consequences. They compared the behaviour to medieval crowds becoming excited while watching public hangings.
The author urged people to avoid watching the footage involving a priest, saying it showed someone being violently killed and was being shared as casually as a cat video.
The author believed that we are now at the brink of a civil war. The message was associated with the hashtags #CNEWS and #LaMatinaleWE. (translated)
The author cited a finding that higher lithium concentrations in drinking water were associated with more frequent diagnoses of Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome in children, suggesting a possible link.
The author criticized those who prioritized the preservation of the heritage of previous generations at the expense of the future of the young. (translated)
The author wrote that the organization Genocide Watch had published a report concluding that the ten characteristic stages of genocide — classification, symbolization, discrimination, dehumanization, organization, polarization, preparation, persecution, extermination, and denial — were present. (translated)
The author expressed his support for the young people who were fighting to make their voices heard. He wrote that he belonged to a generation that grew up with the feeling of not being listened to and encouraged them to persevere, to stay united, and to take care of one another, adding that their voices and their future mattered. (translated)
The author accompanied the link to the full editorial of *il Fatto Quotidiano* with the caption "Ballistic missiles" and invited readers to consult it. (translated)
The author argued that the men would not have responded that way to women discussing the importance of single-sex spaces if they were women themselves or had respect or empathy for women.
The author wrote that state surveillance does not always require a complicated technical attack, as commercial companies are already collecting and trading personal location and usage data. Fewer data meant fewer easy paths for intelligence services. He also referred to a link to intelligence services. (translated)
The author accused another man of trying to gain access to women-only spaces and said he was portraying enforcement of their intended use as confusing.
The author believed that a major political change could have occurred in the country that day. He added that no political or social force had taken this possibility seriously, nor the need to reflect on it and support it. (translated)
The author argued that the way people protested showed whether they were fit to live as citizens, portraying some as predatory, violent and prone to looting.
The author advocated for dismantling networks of political violence by strengthening territorial intelligence and investigations into illegal financing and preparations for confrontations. (translated)
The author believed that far-left riots threatened the Republic and called for the immediate implementation of six measures to restore order. (translated)
The author referred to someone they said viewed single-sex spaces for rape victims as making trans people miserable.
The author stated that, without provocation, he considered it essential that people commonly believed that the inflation of state currency is an irreversible economic phenomenon. (translated)
The author addressed journalists and wrote that looting, attacks on police officers, arson, and the hunting of people are not demonstrations. (translated)
