Array ( [0] => {{short description|Microbial community assemblage and activity}} [1] => {{Hatnote|Compare [[biome]] (biota).}} [2] => {{good article}} [3] => {{Use British English|date=August 2021}} [4] => {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}} [5] => {{microbiomes}} [6] => [7] => A '''microbiome''' ({{etymology|grc|''{{wikt-lang|grc|μικρός}}'' (mikrós)|small||''{{wikt-lang|grc|βίος}}'' (bíos)|life}}) is the [[community of microorganisms]] that can usually be found living together in any given [[habitat]]. It was defined more precisely in 1988 by Whipps ''et al.'' as "a characteristic microbial community occupying a reasonably well-defined habitat which has distinct physio-chemical properties. The term thus not only refers to the microorganisms involved but also encompasses their theatre of activity". In 2020, an international panel of experts published the outcome of their discussions on the definition of the microbiome. They proposed a definition of the microbiome based on a revival of the "compact, clear, and comprehensive description of the term" as originally provided by Whipps ''et al.'', but supplemented with two explanatory paragraphs. The [[#First explanatory paragraph|first explanatory paragraph]] pronounces the dynamic character of the microbiome, and the [[#Second explanatory paragraph|second explanatory paragraph]] clearly separates the term ''microbiota'' from the term ''microbiome''. [8] => [9] => The [[microbiota]] consists of all living members forming the microbiome. Most microbiome researchers agree [[bacteria]], [[archaea]], [[fungi]], [[algae]], and small [[protist]]s should be considered as members of the microbiome. The integration of [[phage]]s, [[virus]]es, [[plasmid]]s, and mobile genetic elements is more controversial. Whipps's "theatre of activity" includes the essential role [[secondary metabolite]]s play in mediating complex interspecies interactions and ensuring survival in competitive environments. [[Quorum sensing]] induced by small molecules allows bacteria to control cooperative activities and adapts their [[phenotype]]s to the biotic environment, resulting, e.g., in cell-cell adhesion or [[biofilm]] formation. [10] => [11] => All animals and plants form associations with microorganisms, including protists, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses. In the ocean, animal–microbial relationships were historically explored in single host–symbiont systems. However, new explorations into the diversity of microorganisms associating with diverse marine animal hosts is moving the field into studies that address interactions between the animal host and the multi-member microbiome. The potential for microbiomes to influence the health, physiology, behaviour, and ecology of marine animals could alter current understandings of how marine animals adapt to change. This applies to especially the growing climate-related and anthropogenic-induced changes already impacting the ocean. The [[plant microbiome]] plays key roles in plant health and food production and has received significant attention in recent years. Plants live in association with diverse [[microbial consortia]], referred to as the [[plant microbiota]], living both inside (the [[endosphere]]) and outside (the episphere) of plant tissues. They play important roles in the ecology and physiology of plants. The core plant microbiome is thought to contain keystone microbial taxa essential for plant health and for the fitness of the [[plant holobiont]]. Likewise, the mammalian [[gut microbiome]] has emerged as a key regulator of host physiology, and coevolution between host and microbial lineages has played a key role in the adaptation of mammals to their diverse lifestyles. [12] => [13] => Microbiome research originated in microbiology back in the seventeenth century. The development of new techniques and equipment boosted microbiological research and caused paradigm shifts in understanding health and disease.{{Citation |last1=Boctor |first1=Joseph |title=Comprehensive Guideline for Microbiome Analysis Using R |date=2023 |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-3072-3_20 |work=Metagenomic Data Analysis |volume=2649 |pages=393–436 |editor-last=Mitra |editor-first=Suparna |access-date=2023-11-24 |place=New York, NY |publisher=Springer US |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-1-0716-3072-3_20 |isbn=978-1-0716-3071-6 |last2=Oweda |first2=Mariam |last3=El-Hadidi |first3=Mohamed|pmid=37258874 }} The development of the first microscopes allowed the discovery of a new, unknown world and led to the identification of microorganisms. Infectious diseases became the earliest focus of interest and research. However, only a small proportion of microorganisms are associated with disease or pathogenicity. The overwhelming majority of microbes are essential for healthy ecosystem functioning and known for beneficial interactions with other microbes and organisms. The concept that microorganisms exist as single cells began to change as it became increasingly obvious that microbes occur within [[Microbial consortium|complex assemblages]] in which [[species interaction]]s and communication are critical. Discovery of [[DNA]], the development of [[sequencing technologies]], [[Polymerase chain reaction|PCR]], and [[cloning]] techniques enabled the investigation of microbial communities using cultivation-independent approaches. Further paradigm shifts occurred at the beginning of this century and still continue, as new sequencing technologies and accumulated sequence data have highlighted both the ubiquity of microbial communities in association within higher organisms and the critical roles of microbes in human, animal, and plant health. These have revolutionised [[microbial ecology]]. The analysis of [[genome]]s and [[metagenome]]s in a [[high-throughput sequencing|high-throughput]] manner now provide highly effective methods for researching the functioning of both individual microorganisms as well as whole microbial communities in natural habitats. [14] => [15] => ==Background== [16] => [17] => ===History=== [18] => Microbiome research originated in microbiology and started back in the seventeenth century. The development of new techniques and equipment has boosted microbiological research and caused paradigm shifts in understanding health and disease. Since infectious diseases have affected human populations throughout most of history, [[medical microbiology]] was the earliest focus of research and public interest. Additionally, [[food microbiology]] is an old field of empirical applications. The development of the first [[microscope]]s allowed the discovery of a new, unknown world and led to the identification of [[microorganism]]s.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0|title = Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges|year = 2020|last1 = Berg|first1 = Gabriele|authorlink1 = Gabriele Berg|last2 = Rybakova|first2 = Daria|last3 = Fischer|first3 = Doreen|last4 = Cernava|first4 = Tomislav|last5 = Vergès|first5 = Marie-Christine Champomier|last6 = Charles|first6 = Trevor|last7 = Chen|first7 = Xiaoyulong|last8 = Cocolin|first8 = Luca|last9 = Eversole|first9 = Kellye|last10 = Corral|first10 = Gema Herrero|last11 = Kazou|first11 = Maria|last12 = Kinkel|first12 = Linda|last13 = Lange|first13 = Lene|last14 = Lima|first14 = Nelson|last15 = Loy|first15 = Alexander|last16 = MacKlin|first16 = James A.|last17 = Maguin|first17 = Emmanuelle|last18 = Mauchline|first18 = Tim|last19 = McClure|first19 = Ryan|last20 = Mitter|first20 = Birgit|last21 = Ryan|first21 = Matthew|last22 = Sarand|first22 = Inga|last23 = Smidt|first23 = Hauke|last24 = Schelkle|first24 = Bettina|last25 = Roume|first25 = Hugo|last26 = Kiran|first26 = G. Seghal|last27 = Selvin|first27 = Joseph|last28 = Souza|first28 = Rafael Soares Correa de|last29 = Van Overbeek|first29 = Leo|last30 = Singh|first30 = Brajesh K.|journal = Microbiome|volume = 8|issue = 1|page = 103|pmid = 32605663|pmc = 7329523|display-authors = 4 | doi-access=free }} [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. [19] => [20] => [21] => File:Microbiome paradigm shifts.png|Shift of paradigm from microbes as unsocial organisms causing diseases to a holistic view of microorganisms as the centre of the [[One Health Concept]] interconnecting all areas of human lives. [22] => [23] => [24] => Access to the previously invisible world opened the eyes and the minds of the researchers of the seventeenth century. [[Antonie van Leeuwenhoek]] investigated diverse [[bacteria]] of various shapes, [[fungi]], and [[protozoa]], which he called [[animalcule]]s, mainly from water, mud, and dental plaque samples, and discovered [[biofilm]]s as a first indication of microorganisms interacting within [[Complex system|complex communities]]. [[Robert Koch]]'s explanation of the origin of human and animal diseases as a consequence of microbial infection and development of the concept of [[pathogenicity]] was an important milestone in microbiology. These findings shifted the focus of the research community and the public on the role of microorganisms as disease-forming agents that needed to be eliminated. [25] => [26] => However, comprehensive research over the past century has shown only a small proportion of microorganisms are associated with disease or pathogenicity. The overwhelming majority of [[microbe]]s are essential for [[ecosystem|ecosystem functioning]] and known for beneficial interactions with other microbes as well as macroorganisms. In fact, maintaining a healthy microbiome is essential for human health and may be a target for new therapeutics.Merchak A, Gaultier A. Microbial metabolites and immune regulation: New targets for major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Nov 2;9:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100169. PMID 34589904; PMCID: PMC8474524. At the end of the nineteenth century, [[microbial ecology]] started with the pioneering work by [[Martinus W. Beijerinck]] and [[Sergei Winogradsky]]. The newly established science of [[environmental microbiology]] resulted in another paradigm shift: microorganisms are everywhere in natural environments, often associated with [[Host (biology)|hosts]] and, for the first time, beneficial effects on their hosts were reported.Hiltner L. (1902) "Die Keimungsverhältnisse der Leguminosensamen und ihre Beeinflussung durch Organismenwirkung". In: Parey P and Springer J (Eds.) ''Arb Biol Abt Land u Forstw K Gsndhtsamt'', '''3''', Berlin. Pages 1–545.Metchnikoff E. The prolongation of life: optimistic studies. GP Putnam's Sons; 1908. [27] => [28] => Subsequently, the concept that microorganisms exist as single cells began to change as it became increasingly obvious that microbes occur within complex assemblages in which species interactions and communication are critical to population dynamics and functional activities.Bassler, B.L. (2002) "Small talk: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria". ''Cell'', '''109'''(4): 421–424. {{doi|10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00749-3}}. Discovery of [[DNA]], the development of [[sequencing technologies]], [[Polymerase chain reaction|PCR]], and [[Cloning|cloning techniques]] enabled the investigation of microbial communities using cultivation-independent, DNA and [[RNA]]-based approaches.Brul, S., Kallemeijn, W. and Smits, G. (2008) "Functional genomics for food microbiology: molecular mechanisms of weak organic-acid preservative adaptation in yeast". ''CAB Rev'', '''3''': 1–14. {{doi|10.1079/PAVSNNR20083005}}. [29] => [30] => A further important step was the introduction of [[phylogenetic marker]]s such as the [[16S rRNA]] gene for microbial community analysis by [[Carl Woese]] and [[George E. Fox]] in 1977.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088|title = Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms|year = 1977|last1 = Woese|first1 = C. R.|last2 = Fox|first2 = G. E.|journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume = 74|issue = 11|pages = 5088–5090|pmid = 270744|pmc = 432104|bibcode = 1977PNAS...74.5088W|doi-access = free}} Nowadays biologists can [[DNA barcoding|barcode]] bacteria, [[archaea]], [[fungi]], [[algae]], and [[protist]]s in their natural habitats, e.g., by targeting their 16S and [[18S rRNA]] genes, [[internal transcribed spacer]] (ITS), or, alternatively, specific functional regions of genes coding for specific enzymes.Uksa, M., Schloter, M., Endesfelder, D., Kublik, S., Engel, M., Kautz, T., Köpke, U. and Fischer, D. (2015) "Prokaryotes in subsoil—evidence for a strong spatial separation of different phyla by analysing co-occurrence networks". ''Frontiers in microbiology'', '''6''': 1269. {{doi|10.3389/fmicb.2015.01269}}.Maritz, J.M., Rogers, K.H., Rock, T.M., Liu, N., Joseph, S., Land, K.M. and Carlton, J.M. (2017) "An 18S rRNA workflow for characterizing protists in sewage, with a focus on zoonotic trichomonads". ''Microbial ecology'', '''74'''(4): 923–936. {{doi|10.1007/s00248-017-0996-9}}.Purahong, W., Wubet, T., Lentendu, G., Schloter, M., Pecyna, M.J., Kapturska, D., Hofrichter, M., Krüger, D. and Buscot, F. (2016) "Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition". ''Molecular Ecology'', '''25'''(16): 4059–4074. {{doi|10.1111/mec.13739}}. [31] => [32] => Another major paradigm shift was initiated at the beginning of this century and continues through today, as new sequencing technologies and accumulated sequence data have highlighted both the ubiquity of [[microbial communities]] in association within higher organisms and the critical roles of microbes in human, animal, and plant health.Lozupone, C.A., Stombaugh, J.I., Gordon, J.I., Jansson, J.K. and Knight, R. (2012) "Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota". ''Nature'', '''489'''(7415): 220–230. {{doi|10.1038/nature11550}}. These new possibilities have revolutionized [[microbial ecology]], because the analysis of [[genome]]s and [[metagenome]]s in a high-throughput manner provides efficient methods for addressing the functional potential of individual microorganisms as well as of whole communities in their natural habitats.Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K.E., Nelson, W. and Fouts, D.E. (2004) "Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea". ''Science'', '''304'''(5667): 66–74. {{doi|10.1126/science.1093857}}.Liu, L., Li, Y., Li, S., Hu, N., He, Y., Pong, R., Lin, D., Lu, L. and Law, M. (2012) "Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems". ''BioMed Research International'', '''2012''': 251364. {{doi|10.1155/2012/251364}}. [[Multiomics]] technologies including meta[[transcriptome]], meta[[proteome]] and [[metabolome]] approaches now provide detailed information on microbial activities in the environment. Based on the rich foundation of data, the cultivation of microbes, which was often ignored or underestimated over the last thirty years, has gained new importance, and high throughput [[Culturomics (microbiology)|culturomics]] is now an important part of the toolbox to study microbiomes. The high potential and power of combining multiple "omics" techniques to analyze host-microbe interactions are highlighted in several reviews.Stegen, J.C., Bottos, E.M. and Jansson, J.K. (2018) "A unified conceptual framework for prediction and control of microbiomes". ''Current Opinion in Microbiology'', '''44''': 20–27. {{doi|10.1016/j.mib.2018.06.002}}.Knight, R., Vrbanac, A., Taylor, B.C., Aksenov, A., Callewaert, C., Debelius, J., Gonzalez, A., Kosciolek, T., McCall, L.I., McDonald, D. and Melnik, A.V. (2018) "Best practices for analysing microbiomes". ''Nature Reviews Microbiology'', '''16'''(7): 410–422. {{doi|10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9}}. [33] => [34] => {{clear}} [35] => [36] => {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible autocollapse" [37] => |- [38] => ! colspan=5 width=700px align=center style=background:#ddf8f8 | Timeline of microbiome research from the seventeenth century to the present{{hsp}} [39] => |- [40] => ! {{align|right|Technological advances}} [41] => ! width=70px | Year [42] => ! {{align|left|Scientific discoveries}} [43] => ! Scientists [44] => ! Sources [45] => |- [46] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=4 | [[microscopy]] [47] => | align=center valign=top | 1670 [48] => | valign=top | [[Van Leeuwenhoek's microscopic discovery of microbial life|discovery of microorganisms]] [49] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Antonie van Leeuwenhoek]]
father of microbiology [50] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1098/rstb.2014.0344|title = The unseen world: Reflections on Leeuwenhoek (1677) 'Concerning little animals'|year = 2015|last1 = Lane|first1 = Nick|journal = Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume = 370|issue = 1666|pmid = 25750239|pmc = 4360124}} [51] => |- [52] => | align=center | 1729 [53] => | [[:it:Pier Antonio Micheli#Manoscritti ed erbario|classification of plants and fungi]] [54] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Pier Antonio Micheli]] [55] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1080/00837792.2016.1147210|title = Pier Antonio Micheli (1679–1737) and Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778)|year = 2016|last1 = Jarvis|first1 = Charles E.|journal = Webbia|volume = 71| issue=1 |pages = 1–24| bibcode=2016Webbi..71....1J |s2cid = 88308313}} [56] => |- [57] => | align=center | 1796 [58] => | [[Vaccination#History|first vaccination]] [59] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Edward Jenner]] [60] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028|title = Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination|year = 2005|last1 = Riedel|first1 = Stefan|journal = Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings|volume = 18|issue = 1|pages = 21–25|pmid = 16200144|pmc = 1200696}} [61] => |- [62] => | align=center | 1837 [63] => | [[Theodor Schwann#Yeast, fermentation, and spontaneous generation|yeast in alcoholic fermentation]] [64] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Charles Cagniard de la Tour|Charles de la Tour]]
[[Friedrich Traugott Kützing|Friedrich Kützing]]
[[Theodor Schwann]] [65] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1080/09571269308717966|title = Origin and domestication of the wine yeast ''Saccharomyces'' cerevisiae|year = 1993|last1 = Martini|first1 = Alessandro|journal = Journal of Wine Research|volume = 4|issue = 3|pages = 165–176}} [66] => |- [67] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=6 | [[Microbiological culture|cultivation based approaches]] [68] => | align=center | 1855
-1857 [69] => | [[Pasteurization#History|pasteurisation]], [[Fermentation#History of the use of fermentation|fermentation]],
[[Rabies vaccine#History|vaccine against rabies]] [70] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Louis Pasteur]] [71] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal | last=Berche | first=P. | title=Louis Pasteur, from crystals of life to vaccination | journal=Clinical Microbiology and Infection | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=18 | year=2012 | issn=1198-743X | doi=10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03945.x | pages=1–6| pmid=22882766 | doi-access=free }} [72] => |- [73] => | align=center | 1875 [74] => | [[Bacterial taxonomy#Early formal classifications|foundation for bacteriological taxonomy]] [75] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Ferdinand Cohn]] [76] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [77] => |- [78] => | align=center | 1884 [79] => | [[Koch's postulates]] [80] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Robert Koch]] [81] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | Evans, A.S. (1976) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2595276/ "Causation and disease: the Henle-Koch postulates revisited]. ''The Yale journal of biology and medicine'', '''49'''(2): 175. [82] => |- [83] => | align=center | 1888 [84] => | [[Microbial ecology#History|start of microbial ecology]]
[[nitrification]], [[nitrogen-fixation]], [[soil microbiology]], life cycle [85] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Sergei Winogradsky]] [86] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00299.x|title = Sergei Winogradsky: A founder of modern microbiology and the first microbial ecologist|year = 2012|last1 = Dworkin|first1 = Martin|last2 = Gutnick|first2 = David|journal = FEMS Microbiology Reviews|volume = 36|issue = 2|pages = 364–379|pmid = 22092289|url = http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/11299/119577/1/WinoFEMSsubmitted.pdf}} [87] => |- [88] => | align=center | 1892 [89] => | [[Tobacco mosaic virus#History|tobacco mosaic virus extraction from leaves]] [90] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Dmitri Ivanovsky]]
[[Martinus Beijerinck]] [91] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [92] => |- [93] => | align=center | 1904 [94] => | [[Rhizosphere|concept of the rhizosphere]] [95] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[:de:Lorenz Hiltner|Lorenz Hiltner]] [96] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1007/s11104-007-9514-z|title = Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research|year = 2008|last1 = Hartmann|first1 = Anton|last2 = Rothballer|first2 = Michael|last3 = Schmid|first3 = Michael|journal = Plant and Soil|volume = 312|issue = 1–2|pages = 7–14| bibcode=2008PlSoi.312....7H |s2cid = 4419735}} [97] => |- [98] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=1 | [[fluorescence microscopy]] [99] => | align=center | 1911 [100] => | [101] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [102] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite web |url=http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/microscopes/fluorescence/ |title=The Fluorescence Microscope |publisher=[[The Nobel Foundation]] |work=Microscopes—Help Scientists Explore Hidden Worlds |access-date=2008-09-28}} [103] => |- [104] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=4 | [[History of mass spectrometry|mass spectrometry]] [105] => | align=center | 1919 [106] => |   [107] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc| [[Francis Aston]] [108] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | Borman, S., Russell, H. and Siuzdak, G., (2003) "A Mass Spec Timeline Developing techniques to measure mass has been a Nobel pursuit. ''Todays Chemist at Work'', '''12'''(9): 47–50. [109] => |- [110] => | align=center | 1922 [111] => | [[chemolithotrophy]] [112] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Sergei Winogradsky]] [113] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.118.3054.36|title = Sergei Nikolaevitch Winogradsky: 1856-1953|year = 1953|last1 = Waksman|first1 = Selman A.|journal = Science|volume = 118|issue = 3054|pages = 36–37|pmid = 13076173|bibcode = 1953Sci...118...36W}} [114] => |- [115] => | align=center | 1928 [116] => | [[Griffith's experiment|transformation of genetic information
to offspring]] [117] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Frederick Griffith]] [118] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1017/S0022172400031879|title = The Significance of Pneumococcal Types|year = 1928|last1 = Griffith|first1 = Fred|journal = Journal of Hygiene|volume = 27|issue = 2|pages = 113–159|pmid = 20474956|pmc = 2167760}}Hayes, W. (1966) "Genetic Transformation: a Retrospective Appreciation", First Griffith Memorial Lecture. ''Microbiology'', '''45'''(3): 385–397. [119] => |- [120] => | align=center | 1928 [121] => | [[History of penicillin|discovery of antibiotics]] [122] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Alexander Fleming]] [123] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | American Chemical Society (1999) [https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/flemingpenicillin/the-discovery-and-development-of-penicillin-commemorative-booklet.pdf ''Discovery and Development of Penicillin, 1928–1945'']. International Historic Chemical Landmarks, The Alexander Fleming Laboratory Museum, London. [124] => |- [125] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=4 | [[Scanning electron microscope|scanning electron microscopy]] [126] => | align=center | 1931
-1938 [127] => | [128] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [129] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1002/anie.198705953|title = The Development of the Electron Microscope and of Electron Microscopy(Nobel Lecture)|year = 1987|last1 = Ruska|first1 = Ernst|journal = Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English|volume = 26|issue = 7|pages = 595–605}} [130] => |- [131] => | align=center | 1944 [132] => | [[History of DNA biochemistry|DNA as carrier of genetic information]] [133] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Oswald Avery]]
[[Colin Munro MacLeod|Colin Macleod]]
[[Maclyn McCarty]] [134] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1084/jem.149.2.297|title = Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types. Inductions of transformation by a desoxyribonucleic acid fraction isolated from pneumococcus type III|year = 1979|last1 = Avery|first1 = O. T.|last2 = MacLeod|first2 = C. M.|last3 = McCarty|first3 = M.|journal = Journal of Experimental Medicine|volume = 149|issue = 2|pages = 297–326|pmid = 33226|pmc = 2184805}} [135] => |- [136] => | align=center | 1946 [137] => | [[Transduction (genetics)|"sexual reproduction" of bacteria]] [138] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Joshua Lederberg]]
[[Edward Tatum]] [139] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1007/s10739-017-9493-8|title = The Experimental Study of Bacterial Evolution and Its Implications for the Modern Synthesis of Evolutionary Biology|year = 2018|last1 = o'Malley|first1 = Maureen A.|journal = Journal of the History of Biology|volume = 51|issue = 2|pages = 319–354|pmid = 28980196|s2cid = 4055566}} [140] => |- [141] => | align=center | 1953 [142] => | [[Nucleic acid double helix|3D-double-helix structure]]{{hsp}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/nsb0403-247|title = The double helix: A tale of two puckers|year = 2003|last1 = Rich|first1 = Alexander|journal = Nature Structural & Molecular Biology|volume = 10|issue = 4|pages = 247–249|pmid = 12660721|s2cid = 6089989}} [143] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[James Watson]]
[[Francis Crick]] [144] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [145] => |- [146] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=1 | ''in situ'' hybridisation iSIS [147] => | align=center | 1969 [148] => |   [149] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [150] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.04.006|title = Developments in in situ hybridisation|year = 2014|last1 = Cassidy|first1 = Andrew|last2 = Jones|first2 = Julia|journal = Methods|volume = 70|issue = 1|pages = 39–45|pmid = 24747923}} [151] => |- [152] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=1 | [[HPLC]] [153] => | align=center | 1970s [154] => | [[central dogma of molecular biology]]{{hsp}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/227561a0|title = Central Dogma of Molecular Biology|year = 1970|last1 = Crick|first1 = Francis|journal = Nature|volume = 227|issue = 5258|pages = 561–563|pmid = 4913914|bibcode = 1970Natur.227..561C|s2cid = 4164029}} [155] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Francis Crick]] [156] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc |{{cite book | last=Meyer | first=Veronika | title=Practical high-performance liquid chromatography | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ODRYwLsJy3AC | publisher=Wiley | publication-place=Hoboken, N.J | year=2013 | isbn=978-1-118-68134-3 | oclc=864917338}} [157] => |- [158] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=1 | [[Array hybridization|DNA array]]/[[Colony hybridization|colony hybridisation]] [159] => | align=center | 1975 [160] => |   [161] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [162] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1073/pnas.72.10.3961|title = Colony hybridization: A method for the isolation of cloned DNAs that contain a specific gene|year = 1975|last1 = Grunstein|first1 = M.|last2 = Hogness|first2 = D. S.|journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume = 72|issue = 10|pages = 3961–3965|pmid = 1105573|pmc = 433117|bibcode = 1975PNAS...72.3961G|doi-access = free}} [163] => |- [164] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=4 | [[Sanger sequencing]] [165] => | align=center | 1977 [166] => | [167] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Frederick Sanger]] [168] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463|title = DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors|year = 1977|last1 = Sanger|first1 = F.|last2 = Nicklen|first2 = S.|last3 = Coulson|first3 = A. R.|journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume = 74|issue = 12|pages = 5463–5467|pmid = 271968|pmc = 431765|bibcode = 1977PNAS...74.5463S|doi-access = free}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.11.003|title = The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA|year = 2016|last1 = Heather|first1 = James M.|last2 = Chain|first2 = Benjamin|journal = Genomics|volume = 107| issue=1 |pages = 1–8|pmid = 26554401| pmc=4727787 |s2cid = 27846422|url = https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475547/1/1-s2.0-S0888754315300410-main.pdf}} [169] => |- [170] => | align=center | 1977 [171] => | discovery of [[Archaea]] [172] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Carl Woese]]
[[George E. Fox]] [173] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.133|title = Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes|year = 2017|last1 = Eme|first1 = Laura|last2 = Spang|first2 = Anja|last3 = Lombard|first3 = Jonathan|last4 = Stairs|first4 = Courtney W.|last5 = Ettema|first5 = Thijs J. G.|journal = Nature Reviews Microbiology|volume = 15|issue = 12|pages = 711–723|pmid = 29123225|s2cid = 8666687}} [174] => |- [175] => | align=center | 1977 [176] => | first [[full genome sequence]] of a [[Virus#Genome|virus]] [177] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [178] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/260500a0|title = Complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage MS2 RNA: Primary and secondary structure of the replicase gene|year = 1976|last1 = Fiers|first1 = W.|last2 = Contreras|first2 = R.|last3 = Duerinck|first3 = F.|last4 = Haegeman|first4 = G.|last5 = Iserentant|first5 = D.|last6 = Merregaert|first6 = J.|last7 = Min Jou|first7 = W.|last8 = Molemans|first8 = F.|last9 = Raeymaekers|first9 = A.|last10 = Van Den Berghe|first10 = A.|last11 = Volckaert|first11 = G.|last12 = Ysebaert|first12 = M.|journal = Nature|volume = 260|issue = 5551|pages = 500–507|pmid = 1264203|bibcode = 1976Natur.260..500F|s2cid = 4289674}} [179] => |- [180] => | align=center | 1982 [181] => | [[Prion#History|discovery of prions]] [182] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Stanley B. Prusiner]] [183] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.6801762 [184] => |title = Novel Proteinaceous Infectious Particles Cause Scrapie [185] => |year = 1982 [186] => |last1 = Prusiner [187] => |first1 = Stanley B. [188] => |journal = Science [189] => |volume = 216 [190] => |issue = 4542 [191] => |pages = 136–144 [192] => |pmid = 6801762 [193] => |bibcode = 1982Sci...216..136P [194] => }} [195] => |- [196] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=1 | [[Polymerase chain reaction|PCR technique]] [197] => | align=center | 1983 [198] => |   [199] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [200] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | Mullis, K.B. (1990) [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24996713 "The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction"]. ''Scientific American'', '''262'''(4): 56–65.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/nbt0993-1026|title = Kinetic PCR Analysis: Real-time Monitoring of DNA Amplification Reactions|year = 1993|last1 = Higuchi|first1 = Russell|last2 = Fockler|first2 = Carita|last3 = Dollinger|first3 = Gavin|last4 = Watson|first4 = Robert|journal = Nature Biotechnology|volume = 11|issue = 9|pages = 1026–1030|pmid = 7764001|s2cid = 5714001}} [201] => |- [202] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=2 | [[fluorescence in situ hybridisation|fluorescence ''in situ'' hybridisation]] [203] => | align=center | 1988 [204] => |   [205] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [206] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc |{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90530-2|title = Sensitive, high-resolution chromatin and chromosome mapping in situ: Presence and orientation of two closely integrated copies of EBV in a lymphoma line|year = 1988|last1 = Bentleylawrence|first1 = J.|last2 = Villnave|first2 = C. A.|last3 = Singer|first3 = R. H.|journal = Cell|volume = 52|issue = 1|pages = 51–61|pmid = 2830981|s2cid = 17565963}}{{cite journal | last1=Huber | first1=D. | last2=Voith von Voithenberg | first2=L. | last3=Kaigala | first3=G.V. | title=Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): History, limitations and what to expect from micro-scale FISH? | journal=Micro and Nano Engineering | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=1 | year=2018 | issn=2590-0072 | doi=10.1016/j.mne.2018.10.006 | pages=15–24| doi-access=free }} [207] => |- [208] => | align=center | 1991 [209] => | [[Hologenome theory of evolution|theory of the holobiont]] [210] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Eugene Rosenberg]]
Ilana Zilber-Rosenberg [211] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite book | last=Margulis | first=Lynn | author-link=Lynn Margulis | title=Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation : speciation and morphogenesis | url= https://books.google.com/books?id=3sKzeiHUIUQC | publisher=MIT Press | publication-place=Cambridge, Mass | year=1991 | isbn=978-0-262-13269-5 | oclc=22597587}} [212] => |- [213] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=2 | [[Real-time polymerase chain reaction|quantitative real-time PCR]] [214] => | align=center | 1993 [215] => |   [216] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [217] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal | last1=Zhang | first1=Tong | last2=Fang | first2=Herbert H. P. | title=Applications of real-time polymerase chain reaction for quantification of microorganisms in environmental samples | journal=Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=70 | issue=3 | year=2006 | issn=0175-7598 | doi=10.1007/s00253-006-0333-6 | pages=281–289| pmid=16470363 | s2cid=206934494 }} [218] => |- [219] => | align=center | 1993 [220] => | the complex structure of [[biofilm]]s [221] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[:de:Hans-Curt Flemming|Hans-Curt Flemming]] [222] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.2166/wst.1993.0528|title = Biofilms and Environmental Protection|year = 1993|last1 = Flemming|first1 = Hans-Curt|journal = Water Science and Technology|volume = 27|issue = 7–8|pages = 1–10}}{{cite book | author=Flemming | title=Biofilm highlights | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1azigYOg8woC | publisher=Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg | publication-place=Heidelberg New York | year=2011 | isbn=978-3-642-19940-0 | oclc=769756150}} [223] => |- [224] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=2 | full cycle [[Ribosomal RNA|rRNA approach]] [225] => | align=center | 1995 [226] => |   [227] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [228] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995|title = Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation|year = 1995|last1 = Amann|first1 = R. I.|last2 = Ludwig|first2 = W.|last3 = Schleifer|first3 = K. H.|journal = Microbiological Reviews|volume = 59|issue = 1|pages = 143–169|pmid = 7535888|pmc = 239358}} [229] => |- [230] => | align=center | 1995 [231] => | first full [[genome]] sequencing
of ''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' [232] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | [[Craig Venter]]
and colleagues [233] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.7542800 [234] => |title = Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd [235] => |year = 1995 [236] => |last1 = Fleischmann [237] => |first1 = Robert D. [238] => |last2 = Adams [239] => |first2 = Mark D. [240] => |last3 = White [241] => |first3 = Owen [242] => |last4 = Clayton [243] => |first4 = Rebecca A. [244] => |last5 = Kirkness [245] => |first5 = Ewen F. [246] => |last6 = Kerlavage [247] => |first6 = Anthony R. [248] => |last7 = Bult [249] => |first7 = Carol J. [250] => |last8 = Tomb [251] => |first8 = Jean-Francois [252] => |last9 = Dougherty [253] => |first9 = Brian A. [254] => |last10 = Merrick [255] => |first10 = Joseph M. [256] => |last11 = McKenney [257] => |first11 = Keith [258] => |last12 = Sutton [259] => |first12 = Granger [260] => |last13 = Fitzhugh [261] => |first13 = Will [262] => |last14 = Fields [263] => |first14 = Chris [264] => |last15 = Gocayne [265] => |first15 = Jeannine D. [266] => |last16 = Scott [267] => |first16 = John [268] => |last17 = Shirley [269] => |first17 = Robert [270] => |last18 = Liu [271] => |first18 = Li-lng [272] => |last19 = Glodek [273] => |first19 = Anna [274] => |last20 = Kelley [275] => |first20 = Jenny M. [276] => |last21 = Weidman [277] => |first21 = Janice F. [278] => |last22 = Phillips [279] => |first22 = Cheryl A. [280] => |last23 = Spriggs [281] => |first23 = Tracy [282] => |last24 = Hedblom [283] => |first24 = Eva [284] => |last25 = Cotton [285] => |first25 = Matthew D. [286] => |last26 = Utterback [287] => |first26 = Teresa R. [288] => |last27 = Hanna [289] => |first27 = Michael C. [290] => |last28 = Nguyen [291] => |first28 = David T. [292] => |last29 = Saudek [293] => |first29 = Deborah M. [294] => |last30 = Brandon [295] => |first30 = Rhonda C. [296] => |journal = Science [297] => |volume = 269 [298] => |issue = 5223 [299] => |pages = 496–512 [300] => |pmid = 7542800 [301] => |bibcode = 1995Sci...269..496F [302] => |display-authors = 1 [303] => }} [304] => |- [305] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=2 | [[next-generation sequencing]] [306] => | align=center | 2005 [307] => |   [308] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [309] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite book |doi = 10.5772/61964|chapter = Next-Generation Sequencing — an Overview of the History, Tools, and "Omic" Applications|title = Next Generation Sequencing - Advances, Applications and Challenges|year = 2016|last1 = Kulski|first1 = Jerzy K.|isbn = 978-953-51-2240-1| s2cid=86041893 | url=https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/nextgeneration-sequencing--an-overview-of-the-history-tools-and-omic-applications(08c0444b-aa1c-4b50-a93b-e9e945cc75e5).html }} [310] => |- [311] => | align=center | 2005 [312] => | HMP: [[Human Microbiome Project]] [313] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [314] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1101/gr.138297.112|title = CRISPR targeting reveals a reservoir of common phages associated with the human gut microbiome|year = 2012|last1 = Stern|first1 = A.|last2 = Mick|first2 = E.|last3 = Tirosh|first3 = I.|last4 = Sagy|first4 = O.|last5 = Sorek|first5 = R.|journal = Genome Research|volume = 22|issue = 10|pages = 1985–1994|pmid = 22732228|pmc = 3460193}} [315] => |- [316] => | align=right valign=top rowspan=3 | [[third-generation sequencing]] [317] => | align=center | 2008 [318] => |   [319] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [320] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1093/hmg/ddq416|title = A window into third-generation sequencing|year = 2010|last1 = Schadt|first1 = E. E.|last2 = Turner|first2 = S.|last3 = Kasarskis|first3 = A.|journal = Human Molecular Genetics|volume = 19|issue = R2|pages = R227–R240|pmid = 20858600|doi-access = free}} [321] => |- [322] => | align=center | 2008 [323] => | TerraGenome:
Reference Soil Metagenome Project [324] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [325] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/nrmicro2119|title = Terra ''Genome'': A consortium for the sequencing of a soil metagenome|year = 2009|last1 = Vogel|first1 = Timothy M.|last2 = Simonet|first2 = Pascal|last3 = Jansson|first3 = Janet K.|last4 = Hirsch|first4 = Penny R.|last5 = Tiedje|first5 = James M.|last6 = Van Elsas|first6 = Jan Dirk|last7 = Bailey|first7 = Mark J.|last8 = Nalin|first8 = Renaud|last9 = Philippot|first9 = Laurent|journal = Nature Reviews Microbiology|volume = 7|issue = 4|page = 252|s2cid = 2144462|doi-access = free}} [326] => |- [327] => | align=center | 2010 [328] => | [[Earth Microbiome Project]] [329] => | style=background:#edfcfc | [330] => | align=center style=background:#edfcfc | {{cite journal |doi = 10.4056/aigs.1443528|title = The Earth Microbiome Project: Meeting report of the "1st EMP meeting on sample selection and acquisition" at Argonne National Laboratory October 6th 2010|year = 2010|last1 = Gilbert|first1 = Jack A.|last2 = Meyer|first2 = Folker|last3 = Jansson|first3 = Janet|last4 = Gordon|first4 = Jeff|last5 = Pace|first5 = Norman|last6 = Tiedje|first6 = James|last7 = Ley|first7 = Ruth|last8 = Fierer|first8 = Noah|last9 = Field|first9 = Dawn|last10 = Kyrpides|first10 = Nikos|last11 = Glöckner|first11 = Frank-Oliver|last12 = Klenk|first12 = Hans-Peter|last13 = Wommack|first13 = K. Eric|last14 = Glass|first14 = Elizabeth|last15 = Docherty|first15 = Kathryn|last16 = Gallery|first16 = Rachel|last17 = Stevens|first17 = Rick|last18 = Knight|first18 = Rob|journal = Standards in Genomic Sciences|volume = 3|issue = 3|pages = 249–253|pmid = 21304728|pmc = 3035312}} [331] => |- [332] => |} [333] => [334] => ===Etymology=== [335] => The word '''microbiome''' (from the [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] ''micro'' meaning "small" and ''bíos'' meaning "life") was first used by J.L. Mohr in 1952 in [[The Scientific Monthly]] to mean the [[microorganism]]s found in a specific environment.{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=BioConcepts|url=http://www.biological-concepts.com/views/search.php?term=1442|access-date=2020-12-18|website=www.biological-concepts.com|archive-date=4 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230604001414/http://www.biological-concepts.com/views/search.php?term=1442|url-status=dead}}{{Cite OED|term=microbiome|id=365863|access-date=2020-12-18}} [336] => [337] => === Definitions === [338] => Microbial communities have commonly been defined as the collection of microorganisms living together. More specifically, microbial communities are defined as multi-species assemblages, in which (micro) organisms interact with each other in a contiguous environment.Konopka, A. (2009) "What is microbial community ecology?" ''The ISME Journal'', '''3'''(11): 1223–1230. Konopka, A., 2009. What is microbial community ecology?. The ISME journal, 3(11), pp.1223–1230. {{doi|10.1038/ismej.2009.88}}. In 1988, Whipps and colleagues working on the ecology of [[rhizosphere]] microorganisms provided the first definition of the term microbiome. They described the microbiome as a combination of the words ''micro'' and ''biome'', naming a "characteristic microbial community" in a "reasonably well-defined habitat which has distinct physio-chemical properties" as their "theatre of activity". This definition represents a substantial advancement of the definition of a microbial community, as it defines a microbial community with distinct properties and functions and its interactions with its environment, resulting in the formation of specific ecological niches. [339] => [340] => However, many other microbiome definitions have been published in recent decades. By 2020 the most cited definition was by [[Joshua Lederberg|Lederberg]], and described microbiomes within an ecological context as a community of [[commensal]], [[symbiotic]], and [[pathogenic]] microorganisms within a body space or other environment. Marchesi and Ravel focused in their definition on the [[genome]]s and microbial (and viral) [[gene expression]] patterns and [[proteome]]s in a given environment and its prevailing [[Biotic component|biotic]] and [[abiotic]] conditions. All these definitions imply that general concepts of macro-ecology could be easily applied to microbe-microbe as well as to microbe-host interactions. However, the extent to which these concepts, developed for macro-[[eukaryote]]s, can be applied to [[prokaryote]]s with their different lifestyles regarding [[dormancy]], variation of [[phenotype]], and [[horizontal gene transfer]]Prosser, J.I., Bohannan, B.J., Curtis, T.P., Ellis, R.J., Firestone, M.K., Freckleton, R.P., Green, J.L., Green, L.E., Killham, K., Lennon, J.J. and Osborn, A.M. (2007) "The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology". ''Nature Reviews Microbiology'', '''5'''(5): 384–392. {{doi|10.1038/nrmicro1643}}. as well as to micro-eukaryotes that is not quite clear. This raises the challenge of considering an entirely novel body of conceptual ecology models and theory for microbiome ecology, particularly in relation to the diverse hierarchies of interactions of microbes with one another and with the host biotic and abiotic environments. Many current definitions fail to capture this complexity and describe the term microbiome as encompassing the genomes of microorganisms only. [341] => [342] => {| class="wikitable collapsible" [343] => |- [344] => ! colspan=2| Microbiome definitions{{hs}} [345] => |- [346] => ! Definition type [347] => ! Examples [348] => |- [349] => ! rowspan=2 | Ecological [350] => | style="text-align:left; background:#ddf8f8;"| Definitions based on ecology describe the microbiome following the concepts derived from the ecology of multicellular organisms. The main issue here is that the theories from the macro-ecology do not always fit the rules in the microbial world. [351] => |- [352] => | [353] => * "A convenient ecological framework in which to examine biocontrol systems is that of the microbiome. This may be defined as a characteristic microbial community occupying a reasonably well-defined habitat which has distinct physio-chemical properties. The term thus not only refers to the microorganisms involved but also encompasses their theatre of activity".Whipps J., Lewis K. and Cooke R. (1988) "Mycoparasitism and plant disease control". In: Burge M (Ed.) ''Fungi in Biological Control Systems'', Manchester University Press, pages 161–187. {{ISBN|9780719019791}}. [354] => * "This term refers to the entire habitat, including the microorganisms (bacteria, archaea, lower and higher eurkaryotes, and viruses), their genomes (i.e., genes), and the surrounding environmental conditions. This definition is based on that of “biome,” the biotic and abiotic factors of given environments. Others in the field limit the definition of microbiome to the collection of genes and genomes of members of a microbiota. It is argued that this is the definition of metagenome, which combined with the environment constitutes the microbiome. The microbiome is characterized by the application of one or combinations of metagenomics, metabonomics, metatranscriptomics, and metaproteomics combined with clinical or environmental metadata".Marchesi, J.R. and Ravel, J. (2015) "The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal". ''Microbiome'', '''3'''(31). {{doi|10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5}}. [355] => * "others use the term microbiome to mean all the microbes of a community, and in particular, for the plant microbiome, those microbial communities associated with the plant which can live, thrive, and interact with different tissues such as roots, shoots, leaves, flowers, and seeds".del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M., del Carmen Rocha-Granados, M., Glick, B.R. and Santoyo, G. (2018) "Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms". ''Microbiological Research'', '''208''': 25–31. {{doi|10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.005}}. [356] => * "Ecological community of commensal, symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms within a body space or other environment".Lederberg, J. and McCray, A.T. (2001) "'Ome Sweet'Omics—A genealogical treasury of words". ''The Scientist'', '''15'''(7): 8. [357] => |- [358] => ! rowspan=2 | Organisms/host-dependent [359] => | style="text-align:left; background:#ddf8f8;"| The host-dependent definitions are based on the microbial interactions with the host. The main gaps here concern the question whether the microbial-host interaction data gained from one host can be transferred to another. The understanding of coevolution and selection in the host-dependent definitions is also underrepresented. [360] => |- [361] => | [362] => * "A community of microorganisms (such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses) that inhabit a particular environment and especially the collection of microorganisms living in or on the human body".Merriam-Webster Dictionary – [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/microbiome microbiome]. [363] => * "Human Microbiome Project (HMP): [...] The Human Microbiome is the collection of all the microorganisms living in association with the human body. These communities consist of a variety of microorganisms including eukaryotes, archaea, bacteria and viruses".[https://hmpdacc.org Human Microbiome Project]. Accessed 25 Aug 2020. [364] => |- [365] => ! rowspan=2 | Genomic/ method-driven [366] => | style="text-align:left; background:#ddf8f8;" | There is a variety of microbiome definitions available that are driven by the methods applied. Mostly, these definitions rely on DNA sequence-based analysis and describe microbiome as a collective genome of microorganisms in a specific environment. The main bottleneck here is that every new available technology will result in a need for a new definition. [367] => |- [368] => | [369] => * "The collective genomes of microorganisms inhabiting a particular environment and especially the human body". [370] => * "The microbiome comprises all of the genetic material within a microbiota (the entire collection of microorganisms in a specific niche, such as the human gut). This can also be referred to as the metagenome of the microbiota".Nature.com: [https://www.nature.com/subjects/microbiome Microbiome]. Accessed 25 August 2020. [371] => * "Microbiome is a term that describes the genome of all the microorganisms, symbiotic and pathogenic, living in and on all vertebrates. The gut microbiome consists of the collective genome of microbes inhabiting the gut including bacteria, archaea, viruses, and fungi".ScienceDirect: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/microbiome Microbiome] Accessed 25 August 2020. [372] => * "Different approaches to define the population provide different information. a | Microbiota: 16S rRNA surveys are used to taxonomically identify the microorganisms in the environment. b | Metagenome: the genes and genomes of the microbiota, including plasmids, highlighting the genetic potential of the population. c | Microbiome: the genes and genomes of the microbiota, as well as the products of the microbiota and the host environment".Arevalo, P., VanInsberghe, D., Elsherbini, J., Gore, J. and Polz, M.F. (2019) "A reverse ecology approach based on a biological definition of microbial populations". ''Cell'', '''178'''(4): 820–834. {{doi|10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.033}}. [373] => * "Totality of genomes of a microbiota. Often used to describe the entity of microbial traits (=functions) encoded by a microbiota."Schlaeppi, K. and Bulgarelli, D. (2015) "The plant microbiome at work". ''Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions'', '''28'''(3): 212–217. {{doi|10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0334-FI}}. [374] => |- [375] => ! rowspan=2 | Combined [376] => | style="text-align:left; background:#ddf8f8;"| There are some microbiome definitions available that fit several categories with their advantages and disadvantages. [377] => |- [378] => | [379] => * "A microbiome is the ecological community of commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic microorganisms that literally share our body space."Rogers Y-H and Zhang C. (2016) [https://books.google.com/books?id=3ylOBQAAQBAJ&dq=%22Genomic+Technologies+in+Medicine+and+Health%22&pg=PA15 "Genomic Technologies in Medicine and Health: Past, Present, and Future"]. In: Kumar D and Antonarakis S. (Eds.) ''Medical and Health Genomics''. Oxford: Academic Press, pages 15–28. {{ISBN|9780127999227}}. [380] => * "The microbiome is the sum of the microbes and their genomic elements in a particular environment".Ho, H.E. and Bunyavanich, S. (2018) "Role of the microbiome in food allergy". ''Current allergy and asthma reports'', '''18'''(4): 27. {{doi|10.1007/s11882-018-0780-z}}. [381] => * "The genes and genomes of the microbiota, as well as the products of the microbiota and the host environment".Whiteside, S.A., Razvi, H., Dave, S., Reid, G. and Burton and J.P. (2015) "The microbiome of the urinary tract—a role beyond infection". ''Nature Reviews Urology'', '''12'''(2): 81–90. {{doi|10.1038/nrurol.2014.361}}. [382] => |- [383] => |} [384] => [385] => In 2020, a panel of international experts, organised by the EU-funded MicrobiomeSupport project,[https://www.microbiomesupport.eu/ MicrobiomeSupport project] published the results of their deliberations on the definition of the microbiome. The panel was composed of about 40 leaders from diverse microbiome areas, and about one hundred further experts from around the world contributed through an online survey. They proposed a definition of the microbiome based on a revival of what they characterised as the "compact, clear, and comprehensive description of the term" as originally provided by Whipps ''et al''. in 1988, amended with a set of recommendations considering subsequent technological developments and research findings. They clearly separate the terms microbiome and [[microbiota]] and provide a comprehensive discussion considering the composition of microbiota, the heterogeneity and dynamics of microbiomes in time and space, the stability and resilience of microbial networks, the definition of core microbiomes, and functionally relevant keystone species as well as co-evolutionary principles of microbe-host and inter-species interactions within the microbiome. [386] => [387] => [[File:Microbiome as microbiota plus their theatre of activity.webp|alt=A schematic highlighting the composition of the term microbiome containing both the microbiota (community of microorganisms) and their “theatre of activity” (structural elements, metabolites/signal molecules, and the surrounding environmental conditions)|thumb|upright=2.4| The term microbiome encompasses both the [[microbiota]] (community of microorganisms) and their "theatre of activity" (structural elements, [[metabolite]]s/[[signal molecule]]s, and the surrounding environmental conditions.]] [388] => [389] => The panel extended the Whipps ''et al''. definition, which contains all important points that are valid even 30 years after its publication in 1988, by two explanatory paragraphs differentiating the terms microbiome and microbiota and pronouncing its dynamic character, as follows: [390] => [391] => [392] => * The ''microbiome'' is defined as a characteristic microbial community occupying a reasonable well-defined habitat which has distinct physio-chemical properties. The microbiome not only refers to the microorganisms involved but also encompass their theatre of activity, which results in the formation of specific ecological niches. The microbiome, which forms a dynamic and interactive micro-ecosystem prone to change in time and scale, is integrated in macro-ecosystems including eukaryotic hosts, and here crucial for their functioning and health. [393] => [394] => [395] => * The ''microbiota'' consists of the assembly of microorganisms belonging to different kingdoms (prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea), eukaryotes (algae, protozoa, fungi etc), while "their theatre of activity" includes microbial structures, metabolites, mobile genetic elements (such as transposons, phages, and viruses), and relic DNA embedded in the environmental conditions of the habitat. [396] => [397] => {{clear}} [398] => [399] => ==Membership== [400] => ===Microbiota=== [401] => {{main|microbiota}} [402] => [403] => The microbiota comprises all living members forming the microbiome. Most microbiome researchers agree bacteria, archaea, fungi, algae, and small protists should be considered as members of the microbiome. The integration of [[phage]]s, [[virus]]es, [[plasmid]]s, and mobile genetic elements is a more controversial issue in the definition of the microbiome. There is also no clear consensus as to whether extracellular DNA derived from dead cells, so-called "relic DNA", belongs to the microbiome.Carini, Paul (2016) [https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/14107-a-census-of-the-dead-the-story-behind-relic-dna-in-soil A census of the dead: the story behind microbial 'relic DNA' in soil] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210928132400/https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/14107-a-census-of-the-dead-the-story-behind-relic-dna-in-soil |date=28 September 2021 }} ''Nature Research: Microbiology''. Relic DNA can be up to 40% of the sequenced DNA in soil,Carini, P., Marsden, P.J., Leff, J.W., Morgan, E.E., Strickland, M.S. and Fierer, N. (2016) "Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity". ''Nature Microbiology'', '''2'''(3): 1–6. {{doi|10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.242}}. and was up to 33% of the total bacterial DNA on average in a broader analysis of habitats with the highest proportion of 80% in some samples.Lennon, J.T., Muscarella, M.E., Placella, S.A. and Lehmkuhl, B.K. (2018) "How, when, and where relic DNA affects microbial diversity". ''mBio'', '''9'''(3). {{doi|10.1128/mBio.00637-18}}. Despite its omnipresence and abundance, relic DNA had a minimal effect on estimates of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity. [404] => [405] => When it comes to the use of specific terms, a clear differentiation between microbiome and microbiota helps to avoid the controversy concerning the members of a microbiome. Microbiota is usually defined as the assemblage of living microorganisms present in a defined environment. As phages, viruses, plasmids, prions, viroids, and free DNA are usually not considered as living microorganisms,Dupré JO, O'Malley MA (2009) "Varieties of living things: life at the intersection of lineage and metabolism". In: Normandin S and Wolfe C (Eds.) ''Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science 1800–2010''. Dordrecht: Springer, pages 311–344. {{ISBN|9789400724457}}. they do not belong to the microbiota. [406] => [407] => The term microbiome, as it was originally postulated by Whipps and coworkers, includes not only the community of the microorganisms but also their "theatre of activity". The latter involves the whole spectrum of molecules produced by the microorganisms, including their structural elements (nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, polysaccharides), metabolites (signalling molecules, toxins, organic, and inorganic molecules), and molecules produced by coexisting hosts and structured by the surrounding environmental conditions. Therefore, all mobile genetic elements, such as phages, viruses, and "relic" and extracellular DNA, should be included in the term microbiome, but are not a part of microbiota. The term microbiome is also sometimes confused with the [[metagenome]]. Metagenome is, however, clearly defined as a collection of genomes and genes from the members of a microbiota. [408] => [409] => Microbiome studies sometimes focus on the behaviour of a specific group of microbiota, generally in relation to or justified by a clear hypothesis. More and more terms like [[bacteriome]], [[archaeome]], [[mycobiome]], or [[virome]] have started appearing in the scientific literature, but these terms do not refer to biomes (a regional ecosystem with a distinct assemblage of (micro) organisms, and physical environment often reflecting a certain climate and soil) as the microbiome itself. Consequently, it would be better to use the original terms (bacterial, archaeal, or fungal community). In contrast to the microbiota, which can be studied separately, the microbiome is always composed by all members, which interact with each other, live in the same habitat, and form their ecological niche together. The well-established term ''virome'' is derived from virus and genome and is used to describe viral shotgun [[metagenome]]s consisting of a collection of nucleic acids associated with a particular ecosystem or [[holobiont]].McDaniel, L., Breitbart, M., Mobberley, J., Long, A., Haynes, M., Rohwer, F. and Paul, J.H., 2008. Metagenomic analysis of lysogeny in Tampa Bay: implications for prophage gene expression. PLoS One, 3(9), p.e3263. {{doi|10.1371/journal.pone.0003263}}. ''Viral metagenomes'' can be suggested as a semantically and scientifically better term. [410] => [411] => ===Networks=== [412] => [413] => File:Microbial interactions visualized through microbial co-occurrence networks.webp|'''[[Co-occurrence network]]s help visualising microbial interactions'''
Nodes usually represent taxa of microorganisms, and edges represent statistically significant associations between nodes.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Testing of the hypotheses resulted from the network analyses is required for a comprehensive study of microbial interactions. [414] => [415] => [416] => Microbes interact with one another, and these symbiotic interactions have diverse consequences for microbial fitness, population dynamics, and functional capacities within the microbiome.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1|title = Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning|year = 2018|last1 = Banerjee|first1 = Samiran|last2 = Schlaeppi|first2 = Klaus|last3 = Van Der Heijden|first3 = Marcel G. A.|journal = Nature Reviews Microbiology|volume = 16|issue = 9|pages = 567–576|pmid = 29789680|s2cid = 46895123|url = https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/168373/8/Banerjee_et_al_Revised_NRM_Manuscript.pdf}} The microbial interactions can either be between microorganisms of the same species or between different species, genera, families, and domains of life. The interactions can be separated into positive, negative, and neutral types. Positive interactions include [[mutualism (biology)|mutualism]], [[synergism]], and [[commensalism]]. Negative interactions include [[amensalism]], [[predation]], [[parasitism]], [[Antagonism (phytopathology)|antagonism]], and competition. Neutral interactions are interactions where there is no observed effect on the functional capacities or fitness of interacting species microbial life strategy concepts.{{cite journal |last1=Kern |first1=Lara |last2=Abdeen |first2=Suhaib K |last3=Kolodziejczyk |first3=Aleksandra A |last4=Elinav |first4=Eran |title=Commensal inter-bacterial interactions shaping the microbiota |journal=Current Opinion in Microbiology |date=October 2021 |volume=63 |pages=158–171 |doi=10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.011|pmid=34365152 }} [417] => [418] => [419] => File:Co-occurrence networks showing difference in gut microbiota between herbivorous and carnivorous cichlids.webp| '''Co-occurrence networks show difference in gut microbiota between herbivorous and carnivorous [[cichlid]]s'''
Nodes coloured according to phylum. The herbivore network has higher complexity (156 nodes and 339 edges) compared to the carnivore network (21 nodes and 70 edges).{{cite journal | last1=Riera | first1=Joan Lluís | last2=Baldo | first2=Laura | title=Microbial co-occurrence networks of gut microbiota reveal community conservation and diet-associated shifts in cichlid fishes | journal=Animal Microbiome | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=2 | issue=1 | date=29 September 2020 | page=36 | issn=2524-4671 | doi=10.1186/s42523-020-00054-4| pmid=33499972 |pmc=7807433 | doi-access=free }} [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. [420] => [421] => {{clear left}} [422] => [423] => Microbiomes exhibit different [[adaptive strategies]]. [[Oligotroph]]s are organisms that can live in an environment offering very low levels of [[nutrient]]s, particularly [[carbon]]. They are characterised by slow growth, low rates of metabolism, and generally low population density. Oligotrophic environments include deep oceanic sediments, caves, glacial and polar ice, deep subsurface soil, aquifers, ocean waters, and leached soils. In contrast are the [[copiotroph]]s, which thrive in much higher carbon concentrations, and do well in high organic substrate conditions such as sewage lagoons.{{cite journal | last=Koch | first=Arthur L. | title=Oligotrophs versus copiotrophs | journal=BioEssays | publisher=Wiley | volume=23 | issue=7 | year=2001 | issn=0265-9247 | doi=10.1002/bies.1091 | pages=657–661| pmid=11462219 | s2cid=39126203 }}{{cite journal | last1=Ho | first1=Adrian | last2=Lonardo | first2=D. Paolo Di | last3=Bodelier | first3=Paul L. E. | title=Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology | journal=FEMS Microbiology Ecology | publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) | date=22 January 2017 | volume=93 | issue=3 | issn=1574-6941 | doi=10.1093/femsec/fix006 | page=fix006| pmid=28115400 | hdl=20.500.11755/97637b47-779a-413c-8397-81f77393a479 | hdl-access=free }} [424] => [425] => In addition to oligotrophic and copiotrophic strategists, the [[C-S-R Triangle theory|competitor–stress tolerator–ruderals framework]] can influence the outcomes of interactions.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1093/femsec/fix006|title = Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology|year = 2017|last1 = Ho|first1 = Adrian|last2 = Lonardo|first2 = D. Paolo Di|last3 = Bodelier|first3 = Paul L. E.|journal = FEMS Microbiology Ecology|volume = 93|issue = 3|pages = fix006|pmid = 28115400|doi-access = free|hdl = 20.500.11755/97637b47-779a-413c-8397-81f77393a479|hdl-access = free}} For example, microorganisms competing for the same source can also benefit from each other when competing for the same compound at different [[trophic level]]s. Stability of a complex microbial ecosystem depends on trophic interactions for the same substrate at different concentration levels. As of 2020 [[Microbial cooperation|microbial social adaptations]] in nature have been understudied. Here [[molecular marker]]s can provide insight into social adaptations by supporting the theories, e.g., of [[Altruism (biology)|altruists]] and [[Cheating (biology)|cheaters]] in native microbiomes.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1|title = Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning|year = 2018|last1 = Banerjee|first1 = Samiran|last2 = Schlaeppi|first2 = Klaus|last3 = Van Der Heijden|first3 = Marcel G. A.|journal = Nature Reviews Microbiology|volume = 16|issue = 9|pages = 567–576|pmid = 29789680|s2cid = 46895123|url = https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/168373/8/Banerjee_et_al_Revised_NRM_Manuscript.pdf}} [426] => [427] => {{clear}} [428] => [429] => ===Coevolution=== [430] => [431] => File:Shift of microbial-host coevolution from separation theories to a holistic approach.webp|{{center|'''from "separation" theories to a holistic approach'''}} In a holistic approach, the hosts and their associated microbiota are assumed to have coevolved with each other{{hsp}}|alt=from "separation" theories to a holistic approach In a holistic approach, the hosts and their associated microbiota are assumed to have coevolved with each other [432] => [433] => {{see also|Holobiont|Hologenome theory of evolution}} [434] => [435] => According to the "separation" approach, the microorganisms can be divided into pathogens, neutral, and symbionts, depending on their interaction with their host. The coevolution between host and its associated microbiota may be accordingly described as antagonistic (based on negative interactions) or mutualistic (based on positive interactions).{{Cite journal|last1=Leftwich|first1=Philip T.|last2=Edgington|first2=Matthew P.|last3=Chapman|first3=Tracey|date=2020-09-09|title=Transmission efficiency drives host–microbe associations|url= |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|language=en|volume=287|issue=1934|pages=20200820|doi=10.1098/rspb.2020.0820|issn=0962-8452|pmc=7542779|pmid=32873208}} [436] => [437] => As of 2020, the emergence in publications about [[opportunistic pathogen]]s and [[pathobiont]]s has produced a shift towards a holistic approach in the coevolutions theory. The holistic approach sees the host and its associated microbiota as one unit (the so-called [[holobiont]]), that coevolves as one entity. According to the holistic approach, holobiont's disease state is linked to [[dysbiosis]], low diversity of the associated microbiota, and their variability: a so-called [[pathobiome]] state. The healthy state, on the other hand, is accompanied with [[eubiosis]], high diversity, and uniformity of the respective microbiota. [438] => [439] => {{clear}} [440] => [441] => ==Types== [442] => [443] => ===Marine=== [444] => [445] => File:Marine animal host-microbiome relationships.jpg|Relationships are generally thought to exist in a symbiotic state, and are normally exposed to environmental and animal-specific factors that may cause natural variations. Some events may change the relationship into a functioning but altered symbiotic state, whereas extreme stress events may cause [[dysbiosis]] or a breakdown of the relationship and interactions.Apprill, A. (2017) "Marine animal microbiomes: toward understanding host–microbiome interactions in a changing ocean". ''Frontiers in Marine Science'', '''4''': 222. {{doi|10.3389/fmars.2017.00222}}. [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. [446] => [447] => {{main|Marine microbiome}} [448] => [449] => All animals on Earth form associations with microorganisms, including protists, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses. In the ocean, animal–microbial relationships were historically explored in single host–symbiont systems. However, new explorations into the diversity of microorganisms associating with diverse marine animal hosts is moving the field into studies that address interactions between the animal host and a more multi-member microbiome. The potential for microbiomes to influence the health, physiology, behavior, and ecology of marine animals could alter current understandings of how marine animals adapt to change, and especially the growing climate-related and anthropogenic-induced changes already impacting the ocean environment. [450] => [451] => The microbiomes of diverse marine animals are currently under study, from simplistic organisms including spongesWebster, N.S., Negri, A.P., Botté, E.S., Laffy, P.W., Flores, F., Noonan, S., Schmidt, C. and Uthicke, S. (2016) "Host-associated coral reef microbes respond to the cumulative pressures of ocean warming and ocean acidification". ''Scientific reports'', '''6''': 19324. {{doi|10.1038/srep19324}}. and ctenophores Daniels, C. and Breitbart, M. (2012) "Bacterial communities associated with the ctenophores ''Mnemiopsis leidyi'' and ''Beroe ovata''". ''FEMS Microbiology Ecology'', '''82'''(1): 90–101. {{doi|10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01409.x}}. to more complex organisms such as sea squirtsBlasiak, L.C., Zinder, S.H., Buckley, D.H. and Hill, R.T. (2014) "Bacterial diversity associated with the tunic of the model chordate ''Ciona intestinalis''". ''The ISME Journal'', '''8'''(2): 309–320. {{doi|10.1038/ismej.2013.156}}. and sharks.Givens, C.E., Ransom, B., Bano, N. and Hollibaugh, J.T. (2015) "Comparison of the gut microbiomes of 12 bony fish and 3 shark species". ''Marine Ecology Progress Series'', '''518''': 209–223. {{doi|10.3354/meps11034}}. [452] => [453] => The relationship between the [[Hawaiian bobtail squid]] and the bioluminescent bacterium ''[[Aliivibrio fischeri]]'' is one of the best studied symbiotic relationships in the sea and is a choice system for general symbiosis research. This relationship has provided insight into fundamental processes in animal-microbial symbioses, and especially biochemical interactions and signaling between the host and bacterium.McFall-Ngai, M.J. (2000) "Negotiations between animals and bacteria: the 'diplomacy'of the squid-vibrio symbiosis". ''Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology'', ''Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology'', '''126'''(4): 471–480. {{doi|10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00233-6}}.McFall-Ngai, M. (2014) "Divining the essence of symbiosis: insights from the squid-vibrio model". ''PLoS Biology'', '''12'''(2): e1001783. {{doi|10.1371/journal.pbio.1001783}}. [454] => [455] => The gutless marine [[oligochaete]] worm ''[[Olavius algarvensis]]'' is another relatively well-studied marine host to microbes. These three centimetre long worms reside within shallow marine sediments of the Mediterranean Sea. The worms do not contain a mouth or a digestive or excretory system, but are instead nourished with the help of a suite of extracellular bacterial endosymbionts that reside upon coordinated use of sulfur present in the environment.Dubilier, N., Mülders, C., Ferdelman, T., de Beer, D., Pernthaler, A., Klein, M., Wagner, M., Erséus, C., Thiermann, F., Krieger, J. and Giere, O. (2001) "Endosymbiotic sulphate-reducing and sulphide-oxidizing bacteria in an oligochaete worm". ''Nature'', '''411'''(6835): 298–302. {{doi|10.1038/35077067}}. This system has benefited from some of the most sophisticated 'omics and visualization tools.Woyke, T., Teeling, H., Ivanova, N.N., Huntemann, M., Richter, M., Gloeckner, F.O., Boffelli, D., Anderson, I.J., Barry, K.W., Shapiro, H.J. and Szeto, E. (2006) "Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium". ''Nature'', '''443'''(7114): 950–955. {{doi|10.1038/nature05192}}. For example, multi-labeled probing has improved visualization of the microbiomeSchimak, M.P., Kleiner, M., Wetzel, S., Liebeke, M., Dubilier, N. and Fuchs, B.M. (2016) "MiL-FISH: Multilabeled oligonucleotides for fluorescence in situ hybridization improve visualization of bacterial cells". ''Applied and Environmental Microbiology'', '''82'''(1): 62–70. {{doi|10.1128/AEM.02776-15}}. and transcriptomics and proteomics have been applied to examine host–microbiome interactions, including energy transfer between the host and microbesKleiner, M., Wentrup, C., Lott, C., Teeling, H., Wetzel, S., Young, J., Chang, Y.J., Shah, M., VerBerkmoes, N.C., Zarzycki, J. and Fuchs, G. (2012) "Metaproteomics of a gutless marine worm and its symbiotic microbial community reveal unusual pathways for carbon and energy use". ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'', '''109'''(19): E1173–E1182. {{doi|10.1073/pnas.1121198109}}. and recognition of the consortia by the worm's innate immune system.Wippler, J., Kleiner, M., Lott, C., Gruhl, A., Abraham, P.E., Giannone, R.J., Young, J.C., Hettich, R.L. and Dubilier, N. (2016) "Transcriptomic and proteomic insights into innate immunity and adaptations to a symbiotic lifestyle in the gutless marine worm ''Olavius algarvensis''". ''BMC Genomics'', '''17'''(1): 942. {{doi|10.1186/s12864-016-3293-y}}. The major strength of this system is that it does offer the ability to study host–microbiome interactions with a low diversity microbial consortium, and it also offers a number of host and microbial genomic resourcesRuehland, C., Blazejak, A., Lott, C., Loy, A., Erséus, C. and Dubilier, N. (2008) "Multiple bacterial symbionts in two species of co‐occurring gutless oligochaete worms from Mediterranean sea grass sediments". ''Environmental microbiology'', '''10'''(12): 3404–3416. {{doi|10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01728.x}}. [456] => [457] => [[File:Stylophora pistillata coral and Endozoicomonas bacteria.webp|thumb|upright=1.7| ''[[Stylophora pistillata]]'' coral colony and the bacteria ''[[Endozoicomonas]]'' (Ez) probed cells (yellow) within the tentacles of ''S. pistillata'' residing in aggregates (Ez agg) as well as just outside the aggregate (b).Neave, M.J., Apprill, A., Ferrier-Pagès, C. and Voolstra, C.R. (2016) "Diversity and function of prevalent symbiotic marine bacteria in the genus ''Endozoicomonas''". ''Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology'', '''100'''(19): 8315–8324. {{doi|10.1007/s00253-016-7777-0}}.]] [458] => [459] => [[Coral]]s are one of the more common examples of an animal host whose symbiosis with microalgae can turn to dysbiosis, and is visibly detected as bleaching. Coral microbiomes have been examined in a variety of studies, which demonstrate how variations in the ocean environment, most notably temperature, light, and inorganic nutrients, affect the abundance and performance of the microalgal symbionts, as well as [[calcification]] and physiology of the host.Dubinsky, Z. and Jokiel, P.L. (1994) "Ratio of energy and nutrient fluxes regulates symbiosis between zooxanthellae and corals". ''Pacific Science'', '''48'''(3): 313–324.Anthony, K.R., Kline, D.I., Diaz-Pulido, G., Dove, S. and Hoegh-Guldberg, O.(2008) "Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders". ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'', '''105'''(45): 17442–17446. {{doi|10.1073/pnas.0804478105}}. Studies have also suggested that resident bacteria, archaea, and fungi additionally contribute to nutrient and organic matter cycling within the coral, with viruses also possibly playing a role in structuring the composition of these members, thus providing one of the first glimpses at a multi-domain marine animal symbiosis.Bourne, D.G., Morrow, K.M. and Webster, N.S. (2016) "Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems". ''Annual Review of Microbiology'', '''70''': 317–340. {{doi|10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095440}}. The [[gammaproteobacterium]] ''[[Endozoicomonas]]'' is emerging as a central member of the coral's microbiome, with flexibility in its lifestyle.Neave, M.J., Michell, C.T., Apprill, A. and Voolstra, C.R. (2017) "Endozoicomonas genomes reveal functional adaptation and plasticity in bacterial strains symbiotically associated with diverse marine hosts". ''Scientific Reports'', '''7''': 40579. {{doi|10.1038/srep40579}}. Given the recent mass bleaching occurring on reefs,Hughes, T.P., Kerry, J.T., Álvarez-Noriega, M., Álvarez-Romero, J.G., Anderson, K.D., Baird, A.H., Babcock, R.C., Beger, M., Bellwood, D.R., Berkelmans, R. and Bridge, T.C. (2017) "Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals". ''Nature'', '''543'''(7645): 373–377. {{doi|10.1038/nature21707}}. corals will likely continue to be a useful and popular system for symbiosis and dysbiosis research. [460] => [461] => [[Sponge]]s are common members of the ocean's diverse benthic habitats and their abundance and ability to filter large volumes of seawater have led to the awareness that these organisms play critical roles in influencing benthic and pelagic processes in the ocean.Bell, J.J. (2008) "The functional roles of marine sponges". ''Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science'', '''79'''(3): 341–353. {{doi|10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.002}}. They are one of the oldest lineages of animals, and have a relatively simple body plan that commonly associates with bacteria, archaea, algal protists, fungi, and viruses.Webster, N.S. and Thomas, T. (2016) "The sponge hologenome". ''mBio'', '''7'''(2). {{doi|10.1128/mBio.00135-16}}. Sponge microbiomes are composed of specialists and generalists, and complexity of their microbiome appears to be shaped by host phylogeny.Thomas, T., Moitinho-Silva, L., Lurgi, M., Björk, J.R., Easson, C., Astudillo-García, C., Olson, J.B., Erwin, P.M., López-Legentil, S., Luter, H. and Chaves-Fonnegra, A. (2016) "Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome". ''Nature Communications'', '''7'''(1): 1–12. {{doi|10.1038/ncomms11870}}. Studies have shown that the sponge microbiome contributes to nitrogen cycling in the oceans, especially through the oxidation of ammonia by archaea and bacteria.Bayer, K., Schmitt, S. and Hentschel, U. (2008) "Physiology, phylogeny and in situ evidence for bacterial and archaeal nitrifiers in the marine sponge ''Aplysina aerophoba''". ''Environmental Microbiology'', '''10'''(11): 2942–2955. {{doi|10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01582.x}}.Radax, R., Hoffmann, F., Rapp, H.T., Leininger, S. and Schleper, C. (2012) "Ammonia‐oxidizing archaea as main drivers of nitrification in cold‐water sponges". ''Environmental Microbiology'', '''14'''(4): 909_923. {{doi|10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02661.x}}. [462] => Most recently, microbial symbionts of tropical sponges were shown to produce and store polyphosphate granules,Zhang, F., Blasiak, L.C., Karolin, J.O., Powell, R.J., Geddes, C.D. and Hill, R.T. (2015) "Phosphorus sequestration in the form of polyphosphate by microbial symbionts in marine sponges". ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'', '''112'''(14): 4381–4386. {{doi|10.1073/pnas.1423768112}}. perhaps enabling the host to survive periods of phosphate depletion in oligotrophic marine environments.Colman, A.S. (2015) "Sponge symbionts and the marine P cycle". ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'', '''112'''(14): 4191–4192. {{doi|10.1073/pnas.1502763112}}. The microbiomes of some sponge species do appear to change in community structure in response to changing environmental conditions, including temperatureSimister, R., Taylor, M.W., Tsai, P., Fan, L., Bruxner, T.J., Crowe, M.L. and Webster, N. (2012) "Thermal stress responses in the bacterial biosphere of the Great Barrier Reef sponge, ''Rhopaloeides odorabile''. ''Environmental Microbiology'', '''14'''(12): 3232–3246. {{doi|10.1111/1462-2920.12010}}. and ocean acidification,Morrow, K.M., Bourne, D.G., Humphrey, C., Botté, E.S., Laffy, P., Zaneveld, J., Uthicke, S., Fabricius, K.E. and Webster, N.S. (2015) "Natural volcanic CO 2 seeps reveal future trajectories for host–microbial associations in corals and sponges". ''The ISME Journal'', '''9'''(4): 894–908. {{doi|10.1038/ismej.2014.188}}.Ribes, M., Calvo, E., Movilla, J., Logares, R., Coma, R. and Pelejero, C. (2016) "Restructuring of the sponge microbiome favors tolerance to ocean acidification''. ''Environmental Microbiology Reports'', '''8'''(4): 536–544. {{doi|10.1111/1758-2229.12430}}. as well as synergistic impacts.Lesser, M.P., Fiore, C., Slattery, M. and Zaneveld, J. (2016) "Climate change stressors destabilize the microbiome of the Caribbean barrel sponge, ''Xestospongia muta''". ''Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology'', '''475''': 11–18. {{doi|10.1016/j.jembe.2015.11.004}}. [463] => [464] => [465] => File:Whale_blow_sampling_with_drone.png| Collecting a sample of blow from a [[blue whale]] using a helicopter drone{{hsp}}{{cite journal | vauthors = Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Rocha-Gosselin A, Gendron D | title = A novel non-invasive tool for disease surveillance of free-ranging whales and its relevance to conservation programs. | journal = Animal Conservation | date = April 2010 | volume = 13 | issue = 2 | pages = 217–225 | doi = 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00326.x | s2cid = 86518859 }}|alt=Collecting a sample of blow from a blue whale using a helicopter drone [466] => File:Cetacean_blow's_bacteria.png| Relative abundance of bacterial classes from whale blow, air and seawater samples.{{cite journal | vauthors = Pirotta V, Smith A, Ostrowski M, Russell D, Jonsen ID, Grech A, Harcourt R | title = An economical custom-built drone for assessing whale health. | journal = Frontiers in Marine Science | date = December 2017 | volume = 4 | pages = 425 | doi = 10.3389/fmars.2017.00425 | doi-access = free }} [467] => [468] => [469] => [[Cetacean microbiome]]s can be difficult to assess because of difficulties accessing microbial samples. For example, many whale species are rare and are deep divers. There are different techniques for sampling a [[cetacean]]'s gut microbiome. The most common is collecting fecal samples from the environment and taking a probe from the center that is non-contaminated.{{cite journal | vauthors = Suzuki A, Ueda K, Segawa T, Suzuki M | title = Fecal microbiota of captive Antillean manatee Trichechus manatus manatus | journal = FEMS Microbiology Letters | volume = 366 | issue = 11 | pages = | date = June 2019 | pmid = 31210263 | doi = 10.1093/femsle/fnz134 | url = }} [470] => The [[skin]] is a barrier protecting marine mammals from the outside world. The epidermal microbiome on the skin is an indicator of how healthy the animal is, and is also an ecological indicator of the state of the surrounding environment. Knowing what the microbiome of the skin of marine mammals looks like under typical conditions allows understanding of how these communities different from free microbial communities found in the sea.{{cite journal | vauthors = Apprill A, Mooney TA, Lyman E, Stimpert AK, Rappé MS | title = Humpback whales harbour a combination of specific and variable skin bacteria | journal = Environmental Microbiology Reports | volume = 3 | issue = 2 | pages = 223–232 | date = April 2011 | pmid = 23761254 | doi = 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00213.x | bibcode = 2011EnvMR...3..223A }} [[Cetacea]]ns are in danger because they are affected by multiple stress factors which make them more vulnerable to various diseases. They have been high susceptibility to airway infections, but little is known about their respiratory microbiome. Sampling the exhaled breath or "blow" of cetaceans can provide an assessment of their state of health. Blow is composed of a mixture of [[microorganism]]s and [[Organic matter|organic material]], including [[lipid]]s, [[protein]]s , and cellular debris derived from the linings of the airways which, when released into the relatively cooler outdoor air, condense to form a visible mass of vapor, which can be collected. There are various methods for collecting exhaled breath samples, one of the most recent is through the use of aerial drones. This method provides a safer, quieter, and less invasive alternative and often a cost-effective option for monitoring fauna and flora. Blow samples are taken to the laboratory where the respiratory tract microbiota are amplified and sequenced. The use of aerial drones has been more successful with large cetaceans due to slow swim speeds and larger blow sizes.{{cite journal | vauthors = Vendl C, Ferrari BC, Thomas T, Slavich E, Zhang E, Nelson T, Rogers T | title = Interannual comparison of core taxa and community composition of the blow microbiota from East Australian humpback whales | journal = FEMS Microbiology Ecology | volume = 95 | issue = 8 | pages = | date = August 2019 | pmid = 31260051 | doi = 10.1093/femsec/fiz102 | doi-access = free }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Centelleghe C, Carraro L, Gonzalvo J, Rosso M, Esposti E, Gili C, Bonato M, Pedrotti D, Cardazzo B, Povinelli M, Mazzariol S | title = The use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to sample the blow microbiome of small cetaceans | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 15 | issue = 7 | pages = e0235537 | date = 2020 | pmid = 32614926 | pmc = 7332044 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0235537 | bibcode = 2020PLoSO..1535537C | doi-access = free }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Geoghegan JL, Pirotta V, Harvey E, Smith A, Buchmann JP, Ostrowski M, Eden JS, Harcourt R, Holmes EC | title = Virological Sampling of Inaccessible Wildlife with Drones | journal = Viruses | volume = 10 | issue = 6 | date = June 2018 | page = 300 | pmid = 29865228 | pmc = 6024715 | doi = 10.3390/v10060300 | doi-access = free }} [471] => [472] => {{clear}} [473] => [474] => ===Terrestrial=== [475] => [476] => ====Plant==== [477] => [478] => File:Microbiome in plant ecosystem.jpg|'''Microbiomes in the plant ecosystem'''{{hsp}}|alt=Microbiomes in the plant ecosystem [479] => [480] => {{main|Plant microbiome}} [481] => [482] => The [[plant microbiome]] plays roles in plant health and food production and has received significant attention in recent years.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209|title = The plant microbiome|year = 2013|last1 = Turner|first1 = Thomas R.|last2 = James|first2 = Euan K.|last3 = Poole|first3 = Philip S.|journal = Genome Biology|volume = 14|issue = 6|page = 209|pmid = 23805896|pmc = 3706808 | doi-access=free }}{{cite journal |doi = 10.3389/fpls.2018.01563|title = Plant Microbiome and Its Link to Plant Health: Host Species, Organs and Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae Infection Shaping Bacterial Phyllosphere Communities of Kiwifruit Plants|year = 2018|last1 = Purahong|first1 = Witoon|last2 = Orrù|first2 = Luigi|last3 = Donati|first3 = Irene|last4 = Perpetuini|first4 = Giorgia|last5 = Cellini|first5 = Antonio|last6 = Lamontanara|first6 = Antonella|last7 = Michelotti|first7 = Vania|last8 = Tacconi|first8 = Gianni|last9 = Spinelli|first9 = Francesco|journal = Frontiers in Plant Science|volume = 9|page = 1563|pmid = 30464766|pmc = 6234494| doi-access=free }}. [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. Plants live in association with diverse [[microbial consortia]]. These microbes, referred to as the plant's [[microbiota]], live both inside (the [[endosphere]]) and outside (the [[episphere]]) of [[plant tissue]]s, and play important roles in the ecology and physiology of plants.Dastogeer, K.M., Tumpa, F.H., Sultana, A., Akter, M.A. and Chakraborty, A. (2020) "Plant microbiome–an account of the factors that shape community composition and diversity". ''Current Plant Biology'': 100161. {{doi|10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100161}}. [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. "The core plant microbiome is thought to comprise keystone microbial taxa that are important for plant fitness and established through evolutionary mechanisms of selection and enrichment of microbial taxa containing essential functions genes for the fitness of the plant holobiont."Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H. and Sessitsch, A. (2019) "A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application". ''Journal of advanced research'', '''19''': 29_37.{{doi|10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004}}. [483] => [484] => Plant microbiomes are shaped by both factors related to the plant itself, such as genotype, organ, species and health status, as well as factors related to the plant's environment, such as management, land use and climate.{{cite journal |doi = 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00486|title = Pivotal roles of phyllosphere microorganisms at the interface between plant functioning and atmospheric trace gas dynamics|year = 2015|last1 = Bringel|first1 = Franã§Oise|last2 = Couã©e|first2 = Ivan|journal = Frontiers in Microbiology|volume = 06|page = 486|pmid = 26052316|pmc = 4440916| doi-access=free }} The health status of a plant has been reported in some studies to be reflected by or linked to its microbiome.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001|title = The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health|year = 2012|last1 = Berendsen|first1 = Roeland L.|last2 = Pieterse|first2 = Corné M.J.|last3 = Bakker|first3 = Peter A.H.M.|journal = Trends in Plant Science|volume = 17|issue = 8|pages = 478–486|pmid = 22564542|hdl = 1874/255269| s2cid=32900768 |hdl-access = free}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00491|title = The plant microbiome and its importance for plant and human health|year = 2014|last1 = Berg|first1 = Gabriele|last2 = Grube|first2 = M.|last3 = Schloter|first3 = M.|last4 = Smalla|first4 = K.|journal = Frontiers in Microbiology|volume = 5|page = 491|pmid = 25278934|pmc = 4166366| doi-access=free }} [485] => [486] => Plant and plant-associated microbiota colonise different niches on and inside the plant tissue. All the above-ground plant parts together, called the [[phyllosphere]], are a continuously evolving habitat due to [[ultraviolet]] (UV) radiation and altering climatic conditions. It is primarily composed of leaves. Below-ground plant parts, mainly roots, are generally influenced by soil properties. Harmful interactions affect the plant growth through pathogenic activities of some microbiota members. On the other hand, beneficial microbial interactions promote plant growth.Shelake, R.M., Pramanik, D. and Kim, J.Y. (2019) "Exploration of plant-microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture in CRISPR era". ''Microorganisms'', '''7'''(8): 269. {{doi|10.3390/microorganisms7080269}}. [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. [487] => [488] => {{clear}} [489] => [490] => ====Animal==== [491] => [492] => File:Principal-coordinate analysis of animal microbiome data sets.jpg|'''[[Principal coordinate analysis]] of animal gut microbiome data'''{{hsp}}|alt=Principal coordinate analysis of animal gut microbiome data [493] => [494] => [495] => The mammalian gut microbiome has emerged as a key regulator of host [[physiology]],{{cite journal |doi = 10.1073/pnas.1218525110|title = Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences|year = 2013|last1 = McFall-Ngai|first1 = Margaret|last2 = Hadfield|first2 = Michael G.|last3 = Bosch|first3 = Thomas C. G.|last4 = Carey|first4 = Hannah V.|last5 = Domazet-Lošo|first5 = Tomislav|last6 = Douglas|first6 = Angela E.|last7 = Dubilier|first7 = Nicole|last8 = Eberl|first8 = Gerard|last9 = Fukami|first9 = Tadashi|last10 = Gilbert|first10 = Scott F.|last11 = Hentschel|first11 = Ute|last12 = King|first12 = Nicole|last13 = Kjelleberg|first13 = Staffan|last14 = Knoll|first14 = Andrew H.|last15 = Kremer|first15 = Natacha|last16 = Mazmanian|first16 = Sarkis K.|last17 = Metcalf|first17 = Jessica L.|last18 = Nealson|first18 = Kenneth|last19 = Pierce|first19 = Naomi E.|last20 = Rawls|first20 = John F.|last21 = Reid|first21 = Ann|last22 = Ruby|first22 = Edward G.|last23 = Rumpho|first23 = Mary|last24 = Sanders|first24 = Jon G.|last25 = Tautz|first25 = Diethard|last26 = Wernegreen|first26 = Jennifer J.|journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume = 110|issue = 9|pages = 3229–3236|pmid = 23391737|pmc = 3587249|bibcode = 2013PNAS..110.3229M|doi-access = free|display-authors = 4}} and coevolution between host and microbial lineages has played a key role in the adaptation of mammals to their diverse lifestyles. Diet, especially [[herbivory]], is an important correlate of microbial diversity in mammals.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.1155725|title = Evolution of Mammals and Their Gut Microbes|year = 2008|last1 = Ley|first1 = Ruth E.|last2 = Hamady|first2 = Micah|last3 = Lozupone|first3 = Catherine|last4 = Turnbaugh|first4 = Peter J.|last5 = Ramey|first5 = Rob Roy|last6 = Bircher|first6 = J. Stephen|last7 = Schlegel|first7 = Michael L.|last8 = Tucker|first8 = Tammy A.|last9 = Schrenzel|first9 = Mark D.|last10 = Knight|first10 = Rob|last11 = Gordon|first11 = Jeffrey I.|journal = Science|volume = 320|issue = 5883|pages = 1647–1651|pmid = 18497261|pmc = 2649005|bibcode = 2008Sci...320.1647L}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1126/science.1198719|title = Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and within Humans|year = 2011|last1 = Muegge|first1 = Brian D.|last2 = Kuczynski|first2 = Justin|last3 = Knights|first3 = Dan|last4 = Clemente|first4 = Jose C.|last5 = González|first5 = Antonio|last6 = Fontana|first6 = Luigi|last7 = Henrissat|first7 = Bernard|last8 = Knight|first8 = Rob|last9 = Gordon|first9 = Jeffrey I.|journal = Science|volume = 332|issue = 6032|pages = 970–974|pmid = 21596990|pmc = 3303602|bibcode = 2011Sci...332..970M}} Most mammalian microbiomes are also strongly correlated with host [[phylogeny]], despite profound shifts in diet.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/s41396-018-0175-0|title = Evolutionary trends in host physiology outweigh dietary niche in structuring primate gut microbiomes|year = 2019|last1 = Amato|first1 = Katherine R.|last2 = g. Sanders|first2 = Jon|last3 = Song|first3 = Se Jin|last4 = Nute|first4 = Michael|last5 = Metcalf|first5 = Jessica L.|last6 = Thompson|first6 = Luke R.|last7 = Morton|first7 = James T.|last8 = Amir|first8 = Amnon|last9 = j. Mckenzie|first9 = Valerie|last10 = Humphrey|first10 = Gregory|last11 = Gogul|first11 = Grant|last12 = Gaffney|first12 = James|last13 = l. Baden|first13 = Andrea|last14 = a.o. Britton|first14 = Gillian|last15 = p. Cuozzo|first15 = Frank|last16 = Di Fiore|first16 = Anthony|last17 = j. Dominy|first17 = Nathaniel|last18 = l. Goldberg|first18 = Tony|last19 = Gomez|first19 = Andres|last20 = Kowalewski|first20 = Martin M.|last21 = j. Lewis|first21 = Rebecca|last22 = Link|first22 = Andres|last23 = l. Sauther|first23 = Michelle|last24 = Tecot|first24 = Stacey|last25 = a. White|first25 = Bryan|last26 = e. Nelson|first26 = Karen|last27 = m. Stumpf|first27 = Rebecca|last28 = Knight|first28 = Rob|last29 = r. Leigh|first29 = Steven|journal = The ISME Journal|volume = 13|issue = 3|pages = 576–587|pmid = 29995839|pmc = 6461848| bibcode=2019ISMEJ..13..576A }}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/ncomms14319|title = Unraveling the processes shaping mammalian gut microbiomes over evolutionary time|year = 2017|last1 = Groussin|first1 = Mathieu|last2 = Mazel|first2 = Florent|last3 = Sanders|first3 = Jon G.|last4 = Smillie|first4 = Chris S.|last5 = Lavergne|first5 = Sébastien|last6 = Thuiller|first6 = Wilfried|last7 = Alm|first7 = Eric J.|journal = Nature Communications|volume = 8|page = 14319|pmid = 28230052|pmc = 5331214|bibcode = 2017NatCo...814319G}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/ncomms9285|title = Baleen whales host a unique gut microbiome with similarities to both carnivores and herbivores|year = 2015|last1 = Sanders|first1 = Jon G.|last2 = Beichman|first2 = Annabel C.|last3 = Roman|first3 = Joe|last4 = Scott|first4 = Jarrod J.|last5 = Emerson|first5 = David|last6 = McCarthy|first6 = James J.|last7 = Girguis|first7 = Peter R.|journal = Nature Communications|volume = 6|page = 8285|pmid = 26393325|pmc = 4595633|bibcode = 2015NatCo...6.8285S}} This suggests host factors that themselves change across host phylogeny, such as gut physiology, play an important role in structuring the gut microbiomes across mammals. The vertebrate [[adaptive immune system]] is even speculated to have evolved as just such a factor for selective maintenance of symbiotic [[homeostasis]].{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/445153a|title = Care for the community|year = 2007|last1 = McFall-Ngai|first1 = Margaret|journal = Nature|volume = 445|issue = 7124|page = 153|pmid = 17215830|s2cid = 9273396|doi-access = free}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1128/mBio.02901-19|title = Comparative Analyses of Vertebrate Gut Microbiomes Reveal Convergence between Birds and Bats|year = 2020|last1 = Song|first1 = Se Jin|last2 = Sanders|first2 = Jon G.|last3 = Delsuc|first3 = Frédéric|last4 = Metcalf|first4 = Jessica|last5 = Amato|first5 = Katherine|last6 = Taylor|first6 = Michael W.|last7 = Mazel|first7 = Florent|last8 = Lutz|first8 = Holly L.|last9 = Winker|first9 = Kevin|last10 = Graves|first10 = Gary R.|last11 = Humphrey|first11 = Gregory|last12 = Gilbert|first12 = Jack A.|last13 = Hackett|first13 = Shannon J.|last14 = White|first14 = Kevin P.|last15 = Skeen|first15 = Heather R.|last16 = Kurtis|first16 = Sarah M.|last17 = Withrow|first17 = Jack|last18 = Braile|first18 = Thomas|last19 = Miller|first19 = Matthew|last20 = McCracken|first20 = Kevin G.|last21 = Maley|first21 = James M.|last22 = Ezenwa|first22 = Vanessa O.|last23 = Williams|first23 = Allison|last24 = Blanton|first24 = Jessica M.|last25 = McKenzie|first25 = Valerie J.|last26 = Knight|first26 = Rob|journal = mBio|volume = 11|issue = 1|pmid = 31911491|pmc = 6946802 |display-authors = 4}} [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]. [496] => [497] => The importance of phylogeny-correlated factors to the diversity of vertebrate microbiomes more generally is still poorly understood. [[Phylosymbiosis]], or the observation that more closely related host species have more similar microbiomes,{{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01454.x|title = The Roles of Host Evolutionary Relationships (Genus: Nasonia) and Development in Structuring Microbial Communities|year = 2012|last1 = Brucker|first1 = Robert M.|last2 = Bordenstein|first2 = Seth R.|journal = Evolution|volume = 66|issue = 2|pages = 349–362|pmid = 22276533|s2cid = 13850805|doi-access = free}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000225|title = Phylosymbiosis: Relationships and Functional Effects of Microbial Communities across Host Evolutionary History|year = 2016|last1 = Brooks|first1 = Andrew W.|last2 = Kohl|first2 = Kevin D.|last3 = Brucker|first3 = Robert M.|last4 = Van Opstal|first4 = Edward J.|last5 = Bordenstein|first5 = Seth R.|journal = PLOS Biology|volume = 14|issue = 11|pages = e2000225|pmid = 27861590|pmc = 5115861 | doi-access=free }} has been described in a number of nonmammalian taxa.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/mec.12611|title = Stability and phylogenetic correlation in gut microbiota: Lessons from ants and apes|year = 2014|last1 = Sanders|first1 = Jon G.|last2 = Powell|first2 = Scott|last3 = Kronauer|first3 = Daniel J. C.|last4 = Vasconcelos|first4 = Heraldo L.|last5 = Frederickson|first5 = Megan E.|last6 = Pierce|first6 = Naomi E.|journal = Molecular Ecology|volume = 23|issue = 6|pages = 1268–1283|pmid = 24304129| bibcode=2014MolEc..23.1268S |s2cid = 8854653}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/s41467-018-07275-x|title = Coral-associated bacteria demonstrate phylosymbiosis and cophylogeny|year = 2018|last1 = Pollock|first1 = F. Joseph|last2 = McMinds|first2 = Ryan|last3 = Smith|first3 = Styles|last4 = Bourne|first4 = David G.|last5 = Willis|first5 = Bette L.|last6 = Medina|first6 = Mónica|last7 = Thurber|first7 = Rebecca Vega|last8 = Zaneveld|first8 = Jesse R.|journal = Nature Communications|volume = 9|issue = 1|page = 4921|pmid = 30467310|pmc = 6250698|bibcode = 2018NatCo...9.4921P}} Other analyses have found substantial variation in phylosymbiotic signals among mammalian taxa,{{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/mec.14473|title = Rates of gut microbiome divergence in mammals|year = 2018|last1 = Nishida|first1 = Alex H.|last2 = Ochman|first2 = Howard|journal = Molecular Ecology|volume = 27|issue = 8|pages = 1884–1897|pmid = 29290090|pmc = 5935551| bibcode=2018MolEc..27.1884N }} sometimes with conflicting results.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05568.x|title = Microbiome analysis among bats describes influences of host phylogeny, life history, physiology and geography|year = 2012|last1 = Phillips|first1 = Caleb D.|last2 = Phelan|first2 = Georgina|last3 = Dowd|first3 = Scot E.|last4 = McDonough|first4 = Molly M.|last5 = Ferguson|first5 = Adam W.|last6 = Delton Hanson|first6 = J.|last7 = Siles|first7 = Lizette|last8 = Ordóñez-Garza|first8 = Nicté|last9 = San Francisco|first9 = Michael|last10 = Baker|first10 = Robert J.|journal = Molecular Ecology|volume = 21|issue = 11|pages = 2617–2627|pmid = 22519571| bibcode=2012MolEc..21.2617P |s2cid = 12320060|display-authors = 4|citeseerx = 10.1.1.258.9368}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00447|doi-access = free|title = Phyllostomid bat microbiome composition is associated to host phylogeny and feeding strategies|year = 2015|last1 = Carrillo-Araujo|first1 = Mario|last2 = Taåÿ|first2 = Neslihan|last3 = Alcã¡Ntara-Hernã¡Ndez|first3 = Rocio J.|last4 = Gaona|first4 = Osiris|last5 = Schondube|first5 = Jorge E.|last6 = Medellãn|first6 = Rodrigo A.|last7 = Jansson|first7 = Janet K.|last8 = Falcã³n|first8 = Luisa I.|journal = Frontiers in Microbiology|volume = 6|page = 447|pmid = 26042099|pmc = 4437186}} The presence of a robust phylosymbiotic correlation implies that host factors control [[microbial assembly]]. Even if the specific mechanisms are unknown, variation in the strength or presence of a measurable phylosymbiotic signal across host phylogeny could prove useful for identifying such mechanisms through comparative studies. However, as of 2020 most studies have focused on just a few taxa at a time, and variable methods for both surveying the microbiome and measuring phylosymbiosis and host specificity (or the restriction of microbes to specific host lineages) have made generalisations difficult. [498] => [499] => Without broader evolutionary context, it is unclear how universally conserved patterns of host-microbe phylosymbiosis actually are. Growing evidence indicates that the strong patterns identified in mammals are the exception rather than the rule in vertebrates. [[Meta-analyses]] of fish{{hsp}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05552.x|title = Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: A meta-analysis|year = 2012|last1 = Sullam|first1 = Karen E.|last2 = Essinger|first2 = Steven D.|last3 = Lozupone|first3 = Catherine A.|last4 = o'Connor|first4 = Michael P.|last5 = Rosen|first5 = Gail L.|last6 = Knight|first6 = ROB|last7 = Kilham|first7 = Susan S.|last8 = Russell|first8 = Jacob A.|journal = Molecular Ecology|volume = 21|issue = 13|pages = 3363–3378|pmid = 22486918|pmc = 3882143| bibcode=2012MolEc..21.3363S }} and birds{{hsp}}{{cite journal |doi = 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00673|doi-access = free|title = Exploring the avian gut microbiota: Current trends and future directions|year = 2015|last1 = Waite|first1 = David W.|last2 = Taylor|first2 = Michael W.|journal = Frontiers in Microbiology|volume = 6|page = 673|pmid = 26191057|pmc = 4490257}} have failed to detect the strength of correlations to diet and phylogeny reported in mammals. A recent analysis of samples from more than 100 vertebrate species also found the strength of phylogenetic correlation to be much higher in mammals than in birds, reptiles, amphibians, or fish.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/s41467-019-10191-3|title = Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades|year = 2019|last1 = Youngblut|first1 = Nicholas D.|last2 = Reischer|first2 = Georg H.|last3 = Walters|first3 = William|last4 = Schuster|first4 = Nathalie|last5 = Walzer|first5 = Chris|last6 = Stalder|first6 = Gabrielle|last7 = Ley|first7 = Ruth E.|last8 = Farnleitner|first8 = Andreas H.|journal = Nature Communications|volume = 10|issue = 1|page = 2200|pmid = 31097702|pmc = 6522487|bibcode = 2019NatCo..10.2200Y}} It is increasingly appreciated in nonvertebrate animals that fundamental aspects of the host's relationship to its symbiotic community can change drastically between taxa: many insects depend entirely on microbes for key [[metabolite]]s, while others seem to be devoid of resident gut microbes.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1093/femsle/fnz117|title = Not all animals need a microbiome|year = 2019|last1 = Hammer|first1 = Tobin J.|last2 = Sanders|first2 = Jon G.|last3 = Fierer|first3 = Noah|journal = FEMS Microbiology Letters|volume = 366|issue = 10|pmid = 31132110}} [500] => [501] => ====Human==== [502] => {{main|Human microbiome}} [503] => [504] => The [[human microbiome]] is the aggregate of all [[microbiota]] that reside on or within human tissues and [[biofluid]]s along with the corresponding anatomical sites in which they reside, including the skin, mammary glands, seminal fluid, uterus, ovarian follicles, lung, saliva, [[oral mucosa]], [[conjunctiva]], [[biliary tract]], and [[human gastrointestinal tract|gastrointestinal tract]]. Types of [[List of human microbiota|human microbiota]] include [[Bacterium|bacteria]], [[archaea]], [[Fungus|fungi]], [[protist]]s and [[viruses]]. Though [[micro-animal]]s can also live on the human body, they are typically excluded from this definition. In the context of [[genomics]], the term ''human microbiome'' is sometimes used to refer to the collective [[genome]]s of resident microorganisms;{{Cite book | vauthors = Sherwood L, Willey J, Woolverton C |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=sBCSRAAACAAJ}} |title=Prescott's Microbiology |publisher=McGraw Hill |year=2013 |isbn=9780073402406 |edition=9th |location=New York |pages=713–721 |oclc=886600661 |name-list-style=vanc}} the term ''[[metagenome|human metagenome]]'' has the same meaning.{{cite journal | vauthors = Marchesi JR, Ravel J | title = The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal | journal = Microbiome | volume = 3 | pages = 31 | date = 2015 | pmid = 26229597 | pmc = 4520061 | doi = 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5 | quote =
Microbiome
This term refers to the entire habitat, including the microorganisms (bacteria, archaea, lower and higher eurkaryotes, and viruses), their genomes (i.e., genes), and the surrounding environmental conditions. This definition is based on that of “biome,” the biotic and abiotic factors of given environments. Others in the field limit the definition of microbiome to the collection of genes and genomes of members of a microbiota. It is argued that this is the definition of [[Metagenomics|metagenome]], which combined with the environment constitutes the microbiome. | doi-access = free }} [505] => [506] => Humans are colonised by many microorganisms, with approximately the same order of magnitude of non-human cells as human cells.{{Cite journal |vauthors=Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R |date=January 2016 |title=Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans |journal=Cell |volume=164 |issue=3 |pages=337–40 |doi=10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013 |pmid=26824647 |doi-access=free}} Some microorganisms that colonize humans are [[commensalism|commensal]], meaning they co-exist without harming or benefiting humans; others have a [[Mutualism (biology)|mutualistic]] relationship with their human hosts.{{rp|700}}{{Cite journal |vauthors=Quigley EM |date=September 2013 |title=Gut bacteria in health and disease |journal=Gastroenterology & Hepatology |volume=9 |issue=9 |pages=560–9 |pmc=3983973 |pmid=24729765}} Conversely, some non-[[pathogenic]] microorganisms can harm human hosts via the [[metabolites]] they produce, like [[trimethylamine]], which the human body converts to [[trimethylamine N-oxide]] via [[FMO3]]-mediated oxidation.{{Cite journal |vauthors=Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Raes J |date=2015 |title=Microbiology Meets Big Data: The Case of Gut Microbiota-Derived Trimethylamine |journal=Annual Review of Microbiology |volume=69 |pages=305–21 |doi=10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104422 |pmid=26274026 |quote=we review literature on trimethylamine (TMA), a microbiota-generated metabolite linked to atherosclerosis development.|doi-access=free }}{{Cite journal |vauthors=Gaci N, Borrel G, Tottey W, O'Toole PW, Brugère JF |date=November 2014 |title=Archaea and the human gut: new beginning of an old story |journal=World Journal of Gastroenterology |volume=20 |issue=43 |pages=16062–78 |doi=10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16062 |pmc=4239492 |pmid=25473158 |quote=Trimethylamine is exclusively a microbiota-derived product of nutrients (lecithin, choline, TMAO, L-carnitine) from normal diet, from which seems originate two diseases, trimethylaminuria (or Fish-Odor Syndrome) and cardiovascular disease through the proatherogenic property of its oxidized liver-derived form. |doi-access=free }} Certain microorganisms perform tasks that are known to be useful to the human host, but the role of most of them is not well understood. Those that are expected to be present, and that under normal circumstances do not cause disease, are sometimes deemed ''normal flora'' or ''normal microbiota''. [507] => [508] => The [[Human Microbiome Project]] (HMP) took on the project of sequencing the genome of the human microbiota, focusing particularly on the microbiota that normally inhabit the skin, mouth, nose, digestive tract, and vagina. It reached a milestone in 2012 when it published its initial results.{{Cite web |url=http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jun2012/nhgri-13.htm |title=NIH Human Microbiome Project defines normal bacterial makeup of the body |date=13 June 2012 |publisher=NIH News}} [509] => [510] => ==Assessment== [511] => Currently available methods for studying microbiomes, so-called [[multi-omics]], range from high throughput isolation ([[culturomics]]) and visualization ([[microscopy]]), to targeting the taxonomic composition ([[metabarcoding]]), or addressing the metabolic potential ([[metabarcoding]] of functional genes, [[metagenomics]]) to analyze microbial activity ([[metatranscriptomics]], [[metaproteomics]], [[metabolomics]]). Based on metagenome data, microbial [[genome]]s can be reconstructed. While first metagenome-assembled genomes were reconstructed from environmental samples,{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/ncomms13219|title = Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system|year = 2016|last1 = Anantharaman|first1 = Karthik|last2 = Brown|first2 = Christopher T.|last3 = Hug|first3 = Laura A.|last4 = Sharon|first4 = Itai|last5 = Castelle|first5 = Cindy J.|last6 = Probst|first6 = Alexander J.|last7 = Thomas|first7 = Brian C.|last8 = Singh|first8 = Andrea|last9 = Wilkins|first9 = Michael J.|last10 = Karaoz|first10 = Ulas|last11 = Brodie|first11 = Eoin L.|last12 = Williams|first12 = Kenneth H.|last13 = Hubbard|first13 = Susan S.|last14 = Banfield|first14 = Jillian F.|journal = Nature Communications|volume = 7|page = 13219|pmid = 27774985|pmc = 5079060|bibcode = 2016NatCo...713219A|display-authors = 4}} in recent years, several thousands of bacterial genomes were binned without culturing the organisms behind. For example, 154,723 microbial genomes of the global [[human microbiome]] were reconstructed in 2019 from 9,428 metagenomes.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001|title = Extensive Unexplored Human Microbiome Diversity Revealed by over 150,000 Genomes from Metagenomes Spanning Age, Geography, and Lifestyle|year = 2019|last1 = Pasolli|first1 = Edoardo|last2 = Asnicar|first2 = Francesco|last3 = Manara|first3 = Serena|last4 = Zolfo|first4 = Moreno|last5 = Karcher|first5 = Nicolai|last6 = Armanini|first6 = Federica|last7 = Beghini|first7 = Francesco|last8 = Manghi|first8 = Paolo|last9 = Tett|first9 = Adrian|last10 = Ghensi|first10 = Paolo|last11 = Collado|first11 = Maria Carmen|last12 = Rice|first12 = Benjamin L.|last13 = Dulong|first13 = Casey|last14 = Morgan|first14 = Xochitl C.|last15 = Golden|first15 = Christopher D.|last16 = Quince|first16 = Christopher|last17 = Huttenhower|first17 = Curtis|last18 = Segata|first18 = Nicola|journal = Cell|volume = 176|issue = 3|pages = 649–662.e20|pmid = 30661755|pmc = 6349461|display-authors = 4}} [512] => [513] => [514] => File:Methods for assessing microbial functioning.webp| {{center|'''Methods for assessing microbial functioning'''}} Complex microbiome studies cover various areas, starting from the level of complete microbial cells ([[microscopy]], [[culturomics]]), followed by the DNA ([[single cell genomics]], [[metabarcoding]], [[metagenomics]]), RNA ([[metatranscriptomics]]), protein ([[metaproteomics]]), and metabolites ([[metabolomics]]). In that order, the focus of the studies shifts from the microbial potential (learning about available microbiota in the given habitat) over the metabolic potential (deciphering available genetic material) towards microbial functioning (e.g., the discovery of the active [[metabolic pathway]]s). [515] => [516] => {{clear}} [517] => [518] => [[Computational modeling]] of microbiomes has been used to complement experimental methods for investigating microbial function by utilizing [[Multiomics|multi-omic]] data to predict complex inter-species and host-species dynamics.{{Cite journal|last1=Kumar|first1=Manish|last2=Ji|first2=Boyang|last3=Zengler|first3=Karsten|last4=Nielsen|first4=Jens|date=2019-07-23|title=Modelling approaches for studying the microbiome|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0491-9|journal=Nature Microbiology|volume=4|issue=8|pages=1253–1267|doi=10.1038/s41564-019-0491-9|pmid=31337891 |s2cid=198193092 |issn=2058-5276}}{{Cite journal|last=Borenstein|first=Elhanan|date=May 15, 2012|title=Computational systems biology and in silico modeling of the human microbiome|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs022|journal=Briefings in Bioinformatics|volume=13|issue=6 |pages=769–780|doi=10.1093/bib/bbs022 |pmid=22589385 }} A popular ''[[in silico]]'' method is to combine [[Metabolic network modelling|metabolic network models]] of microbial taxa present in a community and use a mathematical modeling strategy such as [[flux balance analysis]] to predict the metabolic function of the microbial community at a taxon and community-level.{{Cite journal|last1=Colarusso|first1=Analeigha V.|last2=Goodchild-Michelman|first2=Isabella|last3=Rayle|first3=Maya|last4=Zomorrodi|first4=Ali R.|date=2021-06-04|title=Computational modeling of metabolism in microbial communities on a genome-scale|journal=Current Opinion in Systems Biology|volume=26|pages=46–57|doi=10.1016/j.coisb.2021.04.001|issn=2452-3100|doi-access=free}}{{Cite journal|last1=Biggs|first1=Matthew B.|last2=Medlock|first2=Gregory L.|last3=Kolling|first3=Glynis L.|last4=Papin|first4=Jason A.|date=2015-06-24|title=Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1308|journal=Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine|volume=7|issue=5|pages=317–334|doi=10.1002/wsbm.1308|pmid=26109480 |issn=1939-5094|pmc=4575871}} [519] => [520] => As of 2020, understanding remains limited due to missing links between the massive availability of microbiome [[DNA sequence|DNA sequence data]] on the one hand and limited availability of [[Genetic isolate|microbial isolates]] needed to confirm metagenomic predictions of gene function on the other hand. Metagenome data provides a playground for new predictions, yet much more data is needed to strengthen the links between sequence and rigorous functional predictions. This becomes obvious when considering that the replacement of one single [[amino acid residue]] by another may lead to a radical functional change, resulting in an incorrect functional assignment to a given gene sequence.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1073/pnas.0901522106|title = In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution|year = 2009|last1 = Bloom|first1 = J. D.|last2 = Arnold|first2 = F. H.|journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume = 106| issue=Suppl 1 |pages = 9995–10000|pmid = 19528653|pmc = 2702793| doi-access=free }} Additionally, cultivation of new strains is needed to help identify the large fraction of unknown sequences obtained from metagenomics analyses, which for poorly studied ecosystems can be more than 70%. Depending on the applied method, even in well-studied microbiomes, 40–70% of the annotated genes in fully sequenced microbial genomes have no known or predicted function.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.tim.2017.11.002|title = Human Gut Microbiome: Function Matters|year = 2018|last1 = Heintz-Buschart|first1 = Anna|last2 = Wilmes|first2 = Paul|journal = Trends in Microbiology|volume = 26|issue = 7|pages = 563–574|pmid = 29173869| s2cid=36033561 }} As of 2019, 85 of the then established 118 phyla had not had a single species described, presenting a challenge to understanding prokaryotic [[Functional group (ecology)|functional diversity]] .{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.08.009|title = Relevance of phenotypic information for the taxonomy of not-yet-cultured microorganisms|year = 2019|last1 = Overmann|first1 = Jörg|last2 = Huang|first2 = Sixing|last3 = Nübel|first3 = Ulrich|last4 = Hahnke|first4 = Richard L.|last5 = Tindall|first5 = Brian J.|journal = Systematic and Applied Microbiology|volume = 42|issue = 1|pages = 22–29|pmid = 30197212| s2cid=52176496 }} [521] => [522] => The number of prokaryotic phyla may reach hundreds, and archaeal ones are among the least studied. The growing gap between the diversity of Bacteria and Archaea held in [[pure culture]] and those detected by [[molecular methods]] has led to the proposal to establish a formal nomenclature for not-yet cultured taxa, primarily based on sequence information.{{cite journal |doi = 10.1038/ismej.2017.113|title = Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy|year = 2017|last1 = Konstantinidis|first1 = Konstantinos T.|last2 = Rosselló-Móra|first2 = Ramon|last3 = Amann|first3 = Rudolf|journal = The ISME Journal|volume = 11|issue = 11|pages = 2399–2406|pmid = 28731467|pmc = 5649169| bibcode=2017ISMEJ..11.2399K }}{{cite journal |doi = 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.07.003|title = The importance of designating type material for uncultured taxa|year = 2019|last1 = Chuvochina|first1 = Maria|last2 = Rinke|first2 = Christian|last3 = Parks|first3 = Donovan H.|last4 = Rappé|first4 = Michael S.|last5 = Tyson|first5 = Gene W.|last6 = Yilmaz|first6 = Pelin|last7 = Whitman|first7 = William B.|last8 = Hugenholtz|first8 = Philip|journal = Systematic and Applied Microbiology|volume = 42|issue = 1|pages = 15–21|pmid = 30098831|doi-access = free|hdl = 21.11116/0000-0005-C21D-0|hdl-access = free}} According to this proposal, the concept of [[Candidatus|''Candidatus'' species]] would be extended to the groups of closely related genome sequences, and their names would be published following established rules of [[bacterial nomenclature]]. [523] => [524] => {{clear}} [525] => [526] => Each microbiome system is suited to address different types of questions based on the culturability of microbes, genetic tractability of microbes and host (where relevant), ability to maintain system in laboratory setting, and ability to make host/environment germfree. [527] => [528] => [529] => File:Tradeoffs between experimental questions and complexity of microbiome systems.jpg| '''Tradeoffs between experimental questions and complexity of microbiome systems'''{{hsp}}Chevrette, M.G., Bratburd, J.R., Currie, C.R. and Stubbendieck, R.M. (2019 "Experimental Microbiomes: Models Not to Scale". ''mSystems'', '''4'''(4): e00175-19. {{doi|10.1128/mSystems.00175-19}}.
(A) Pairwise interactions between the soil bacteria ''[[Bacillus subtilis]]'' and ''[[Streptomyces]]'' spp. are well-suited for characterizing the functions of secondary metabolites in microbial interactions.
(B) The symbiosis between [[bobtail squid]] and the [[marine bacterium]] ''[[Aliivibrio fischeri]]'' is fundamental to understanding host and microbial factors that influence colonization.
(C) The use of [[gnotobiotic]] mice is crucial for making links between host diet and the effects on specific microbial taxa in a community. [530] => [531] => {{clear}} [532] => [533] => ==See also== [534] => * [[Earth Microbiome Project]] [535] => * [[Human microbiome]] [536] => * [[Initial acquisition of microbiota]] [537] => * [[Microbial population biology]] [538] => * [[Microbiomes of the built environment]] [539] => * [[Mycobiome]] [540] => [541] => ==References== [542] => {{reflist}} [543] => [544] => == External links == [545] => {{Sister project links |wikt=microbiome |commons=Category: Microbiomes |b=no |n=no |q=no |s=no |v=Microbiome and Mental Health |voy=no |species=no |d=no |display= Microbiomes }} [546] => * [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8uC-7Dnogc/ Documentary: Microbiomes - The Great Role of Small Creatures] [547] => [548] => {{Scholia|topic|microbiome}} [549] => [550] => {{microorganisms|state=expanded}} [551] => [552] => [[Category:Microbiomes|Microbiomes]] [] => )
good wiki

Microbiome

A microbiome is the community of microorganisms that can usually be found living together in any given habitat. It was defined more precisely in 1988 by Whipps et al.

More about us

About

Expert Team

Vivamus eget neque lacus. Pellentesque egauris ex.

Award winning agency

Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur elitorceat .

10 Year Exp.

Pellen tesque eget, mauris lorem iupsum neque lacus.

You might be interested in

Bacteria

Bacteria are single-celled microorganisms that have a wide range of shapes and sizes.

Carbon

Carbon is a chemical element with the symbol C and atomic number 6.

Cetacea

Cetacea is a group of marine mammals that includes whales, dolphins, and porpoises.

Coral

Coral is a type of marine invertebrate that belongs to the phylum Cnidaria.

DNA

DNA, also known as deoxyribonucleic acid, is a molecule that carries the genetic instructions used in the growth, development, functioning, and reproduction of all known living organisms and many viruses.

Ecosystem

An ecosystem is a community of living organisms in conjunction with the nonliving components of their environment, interacting as a system.

Eukaryote

Eukaryotes are complex organisms whose cells contain a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles.

Fungi

Fungi are a diverse group of organisms that belong to the kingdom Fungi.

Fungus

Fungi are a diverse group of organisms that belong to the kingdom Fungi.

Genome

The Wikipedia page for "Genome" provides a comprehensive overview of what a genome is, its structure, function, and significance.

Genomics

Genomics is a branch of biology that focuses on the structure, function, evolution, and mapping of genomes.

Homeostasis

Homeostasis is the ability of living organisms to maintain a stable internal environment despite changes in their external surroundings.

Metabolomics

Metabolomics is the scientific study of chemical processes involving metabolites, the small molecule substrates, intermediates, and products of cell metabolism.

Metagenomics

Metagenomics is the study of genetic material recovered directly from environmental or clinical samples by a method called sequencing.

Microorganism

A microorganism is a living organism that is too small to be seen by the naked eye.

Microscopy

Microscopy is a scientific technique that allows researchers to observe and study objects that are too small to be seen with the naked eye.

Nutrient

Nutrients are substances found in food that are essential for the growth, development, and maintenance of the body.

Physiology

Physiology is the scientific study of the functions and processes of living organisms.

Prokaryote

A prokaryote is a type of cell that lacks a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles.

Protein

Proteins are macromolecules found in all living organisms.

RNA

RNA (Ribonucleic acid) is a molecule that is essential for life and plays a crucial role in protein synthesis, gene regulation, and other cellular processes.

Streptomyces

Streptomyces is a genus of Gram-positive bacteria that belong to the actinobacteria phylum.

Transcriptome

The transcriptome is the set of all RNA transcripts, including coding and non-coding, in an individual or a population of cells.