Ulrich Vosgerau questioned whether it is the role of a federal president to keep the political opposition in check through legal means. He also criticized Udo di Fabio, whom he described as the intellectual author of the Merz model. Vosgerau wrote that the already ousted Bundestag had loosened the debt brake using extensive special funds and prioritized climate protection in order to win the Greens' support. Later, di Fabio had stated on Phoenix as a neutral constitutional expert that the procedure was constitutionally permissible, without mentioning that, according to Vosgerau, he himself had designed it. Vosgerau also argued that the final decision on the constitutional amendment in the third reading was unconstitutional – contrary to the legal opinion of the Federal Constitutional Court. Since the composition of the new Bundestag was already established, he saw no understandable reason to convene the old Bundestag. A female president of the Bundestag does not have the political right to decide which Bundestag she convenes to enforce certain goals, he wrote. #Bundestag #Verfassungsrecht #Politik (translated)