Graslik8 wrote after the match against Slavia that he was considering the future of the club and coach Jindřich Trpišovský. He criticized his long-term reliance on favored players, among which he included Jan Bořil, Standa Tecl, Ondřej Kolář, Tomáš Holeš, Lukáš Provod, and Tomáš Chorý. According to the author, some of them were given opportunities despite poor performances, while other players were not given a chance. He pointed to Provod and Chorý as current examples. Provod, he said, was one of the best players in the league when in top form, but this season he was far from his best, even though his playing time did not decrease. Graslik8 stated that Slavia had alternatives in the form of Ayaosi and Šturm, but the coach preferred to deploy Šturm in the wing-back position. The author compared the use of Chorý in European competitions to the repeated testing of the non-functioning duo Král–Souček. He wrote that Chorý could help Slavia in the league, but he did not believe he was suitable for the Champions League. At the same time, he questioned the claim that the club could not acquire a quality striker: he pointed out the spending of twelve million on N’Guessan and Diakité, of whom the former, according to him, played sporadically, and the latter almost not at all. He believed that the coaching staff did not want to deprive Chorý of his place. Graslik8 acknowledged that Slavia dominated the league and was heading for another title and a hat trick, and he praised Trpišovský's ability to develop players and sell them for high amounts. However, he stated that if the club wanted to succeed in cups and compete with strong teams, it was increasingly evident that this would not be achieved with Trpišovský at the helm. He wrote that Slavia would eventually have to make a difficult choice. #SlaviaPraga #fotbal #JindřichTrpišovský (translated)
