Search

The President of the Supreme Court, Damjan Orož, emphasized that the Slovenian judiciary is preparing for significant changes; however, he disagrees with the diminishing importance of the rule of law and warns of the need to understand the difference between the independence and irresponsibility of judges. #Slovenija #sodstvo #pravnaDržava (translated)

Bojan Požar accused Urška Klakočar Zupančič of having ended her judicial career at the lowest level, as a district judge, and politically, according to him, she did not succeed after one term in parliament. He wrote that he had been acquitted in the matter under consideration and that Hakl and Todorović, the then owners of Večer, had filed three criminal charges against him, which they lost in a final judgment. Požar also mentioned that the Supreme Court annulled the decision of Gabrijel Horvat and two other judges, one of whom was a judge, as illegal. He noted that Horvat admitted the mistake before the Judicial Council. Klakočar Zupančič also accused him of discrediting and primitive posts on Facebook and added that voters had already expressed their opinion and sent her out of parliament. #sodstvo #politika #pravica (translated)

Sebastjan Jeretič, director of Ukom, expressed his belief in the necessity of democratic deratization of the judiciary after the rejection of the candidate for the Supreme Court judge, which drew warnings from the Judicial Council about the importance of respecting all branches of power and irregularities in his rhetoric. #sodstvo #demokracija #odgovornost (translated)

Ciril noted that the group he derogatorily referred to as Kučan's mafia failed to appoint another of its loyal candidates to the Supreme Court. He believed that a person with a controversial reputation should not become a Supreme Court judge, while attributing a statement to Andreja Katič, a member of the SD party, claiming that it is about undermining the foundations of democracy. He added that such a reaction is typical of the left and accused the candidate of violating human rights. He questioned how many controversial people are already on the Supreme Court and also criticized the composition of the Constitutional Court. #demokracija #sodstvo #Slovenija (translated)

Sara Stepanjan wrote to Bojan Požar that the senate of the Supreme Court met on Friday evening, and noted that the court members often meet. She reminded that in 1984, according to her record, nine innocent musicians, including her father, were sentenced based on a 132-page fictional verdict. The court was supposed to stop the procedure on December 31, 2002, and her father died on January 19, 2003. She left it to the readers to judge whether it was a coincidence and noted that such behavior would continue until there is a reform of the judiciary and the prosecution. #sodstvo #reforma #slovenija (translated)

BrutusReloaded sarcastically wrote that the Judicial Council could appoint Supreme Court judges on its own, and the National Assembly should not oppose it. He described the Judicial Council as privileged, while the National Assembly was viewed as the expression of the will of the people. He added that people can pay, but they do not have the right to decide, and he strongly opposed such an arrangement. https://t.co/c5NdYuyAgg #sodstvo #pravosodje #demokracija (translated)

Klemen Jaklič pointed out, regarding the proposal that regular judges in the National Assembly be elected by a two-thirds majority, the public justification for this solution from 2023. He mentioned judges Deisinger, Petrič, Zobec, Svetlič, Šorli, himself, and many others as its supporters. He wrote that they misunderstood the proposal at the time and even eliminated the elections for Supreme Court judges. https://t.co/RSv3sV0ts0 #sodstvo #volitve #pravosodje (translated)

Klemen Jaklič stated that someone – among others Romania, Kosovo or Serbia – was building a Slovenian rule of law. He described the phenomenon as constitutionally interesting and wondered whether it involves external implementation of the rule of law. #pravnaDržava #ustavnoPravo #sodstvo (translated)

Bojan Požar assessed that Robert Golob could still defend himself in the court case against Janez Janša with the argument that the controversial words were spoken during a political debate. In the case of the orthopedist Kavčič, however, Požar estimated that he would almost certainly be in trouble, as Kavčič is not a politician and did not run for office, while Golob was said to have personally insulted him. Požar also noted that, in his opinion, Golob had no self-control at all. #politika #slovenija #sodstvo (translated)

Igor Muzevic referred to the Romanian judge in a post about the show Tarča as the "king." He wrote that the lawyer had proposed the release from custody also because the detainee had not been previously convicted, but the court rejected the proposal and stated that this alone was not a civic achievement. #pravo #sodstvo #odvetnik (translated)

Gašper Blažič wrote that he read about the court hearing of Dominika Š. P. this week, during which her mobile phone allegedly rang. He compared the security checks at the courts in Celje and Ljubljana, noting that visitors and also journalists in Ljubljana had to deposit their electronic devices in a locker. He wondered whether the former Minister of Justice perhaps entered through a special entrance and avoided the check. He connected the event with the counting of votes in referendums and noted that Kovinotehna is making a comeback in fashion. https://t.co/pv1vKQ8Poy... #sodstvo #varnost #mediji (translated)

Suzana Kos recorded that a new criminal case had been opened against Robert Golob. She stated that the judicial panel rejected the objection from his lawyer Stojan Zdolski and that the main hearing was scheduled for December 18. She described the judge as quite notorious. https://t.co/uXSvdsPR4D #RobertGolob #sodstvo #pravosodje (translated)

Marko Kiauta has proposed a collective lawsuit against Nika Kovač due to her statement that the current government or the parties elected by voters are genocidal. He asked lawyers whether they would take on the lawsuit and wrote that he himself and many others would finance it. According to him, this would contribute to order; he estimated that the lawsuit would either succeed or the judiciary would lose even more legitimacy. The publication ended with a call "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!". #pravosodje #tuzba #vlada (translated)

Klemen Jaklič wrote that diversity in the media, judiciary, and constitutional court, in law enforcement and oversight, education, and capital management is essential for a free democratic society, in his opinion. He labeled efforts for monopolies as opposition to the constitution and Slovenia. https://t.co/HPYjPnibMZ #demokracija #pluralizem #svoboda (translated)

Igor Derenda recorded that director Tomi Cegnar pointed out that his banking activities had been reviewed three times. According to Derenda, Cegnar was the recipient of a fee for a documentary based on Rado Pezdir's bestseller about the post-war secret economic system of the UDBA and money laundering, which is why he came under the scrutiny of Vonta's investigative commission, although according to the author's words, he was not a direct target. Derenda stated that the commission, with more than 20 resolutions and the expansion of the investigation beyond the judiciary, examined more than 170 bank accounts and around 80 companies and sole proprietors. https://t.co/olTUw5SxhA #dokumentarec #pranjeDenarja #preiskava (translated)