Search

De onde vem essa carência na esquerda, especialmente da webmilitância? Depois de adotarem o ministro Alexandre de Moraes, o Xandão do Temer, como seu herói, agora setores ditos progressistas batendo palmas para Carmen Lúcia, cujo voto em 2018 mandou Lula para a cadeia? Sério? #Esquerda #Política #WebMilitância

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office has seized 12 websites that were selling deepfake porn videos of 1,200 people, highlighting concerns about the privacy and security issues posed by the illegal use of artificial intelligence in creating non-consensual sexual content. (translated)

L' ATTACCO DI FOGGIA - FRANCESCO GRAVINA'S TEATRO-EDICOLA, THE WORLD'S SMALLEST THEATRE, BECOMES THE SUBJECT OF A CASE STUDY AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Teatro-Edicola Foyer '97 Becomes an International Case Study for the Stanford Social Innovation Review SAN SEVERO, 16 September 2026 - From a derelict newsstand of four square metres in Via Tondi to a paradigm of social innovation examined by Stanford University. Such is the trajectory of the Teatro Edicola Foyer '97, the cultural project realized by the Foyer '97 company under the artistic direction of Francesco Gravina, which in the space of a few months has transcended national boundaries. The news, reported today by La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, is that the prestigious "Stanford Social Innovation Review", the cultural journal of Stanford University dedicated to social innovation, will publish in September, both on its website and in its Fall 2026 print edition, the reportage "The Six-Seat Revolution", authored by Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella and overseen editorially by Deputy Editor David V. Johnson. The project was inaugurated on 27 March last, on the occasion of World Theatre Day, when a former newsstand, shuttered for years, was transmuted into a diminutive theatre: six seats, a stage of fewer than two square metres, performances lasting but a few minutes, with actors and audience separated by less than a metre. A formula at once essential and original that has taken all by surprise: more than sixty spectators in a single afternoon and full houses throughout the three days of the inaugural season. A success that has evinced the public's appetite for a cultural proposition beyond the conventional circuits. It is for this reason that the SSIR has elected to analyse it as a potential model of low-cost urban regeneration, conceivably replicable across the thousands of disused newsstands throughout Italy and Europe. Enquiries regarding its replication have already been received from other cities, including Lucca and Rome. At its heart, as Gravina explains, lies a simple notion: "The theatre comes to the street where you walk every day". The newsstand, once a locus of daily information, changes its function and becomes a place of encounter with artists. An accolade that brings a reality born in the Province of Foggia to the centre of the international discourse on social innovation. What appeared to be a four-square-metre wager may now become a model to be exported far beyond San Severo.

LA GAZZETTA DEL MEZZOGIORNO - SAN SEVERO'S TEATRO EDICOLA FOYER '97 ON THE STANFORD SOCIAL INNOVATION REVIEW The Teatro-Edicola Foyer '97 Becomes an International Case Study for the Stanford Social Innovation Review SAN SEVERO, 16 September 2026 - From a derelict newsstand of four square metres in Via Tondi to a paradigm of social innovation examined by Stanford University. Such is the trajectory of the Teatro Edicola Foyer '97, the cultural project realized by the Foyer '97 company under the artistic direction of Francesco Gravina, which in the space of a few months has transcended national boundaries. The news, reported today by La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, is that the prestigious Stanford Social Innovation Review, the cultural journal of Stanford University dedicated to social innovation, will publish in September, both on its website and in its Fall 2026 print edition, the reportage "The Six-Seat Revolution", authored by Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella and overseen editorially by Deputy Editor David V. Johnson. The project was inaugurated on 27 March last, on the occasion of World Theatre Day, when a former newsstand, shuttered for years, was transmuted into a diminutive theatre: six seats, a stage of fewer than two square metres, performances lasting but a few minutes, with actors and audience separated by less than a metre. A formula at once essential and original that has taken all by surprise: more than sixty spectators in a single afternoon and full houses throughout the three days of the inaugural season. A success that has evinced the public's appetite for a cultural proposition beyond the conventional circuits. It is for this reason that the SSIR has elected to analyse it as a potential model of low-cost urban regeneration, conceivably replicable across the thousands of disused newsstands throughout Italy and Europe. Enquiries regarding its replication have already been received from other cities, including Lucca and Rome. At its heart, as Gravina explains, lies a simple notion: "The theatre comes to the street where you walk every day". The newsstand, once a locus of daily information, changes its function and becomes a place of encounter with artists. An accolade that brings a reality born in the Province of Foggia to the centre of the international discourse on social innovation. What appeared to be a four-square-metre wager may now become a model to be exported far beyond San Severo.

“TEATRO EDICOLA” OF SAN SEVERO BECOMES AN INTERNATIONAL CASE STUDY IN THE “STANFORD SOCIAL INNOVATION REVIEW (SSIR)” — STANFORD UNIVERSITY SOURCE: https://l1nq.com/rruntbb LA GAZZETTA DI SAN SEVERO SAN SEVERO (FG) — Six persons enter a news kiosk. Before them lie no newspapers, magazines, or tobacco, but a theatrical stage measuring less than two square metres. The actors stand but a few paces from the spectators, with scarce any separation betwixt those who perform and those who behold. It is in this manner that in San Severo a place abandoned for years hath begun to live anew. And today that diminutive theatrical experiment hath fallen beneath the glare of international attention. It is the story of the “Teatro Edicola”, the project realised by the company Foyer ’97, under the artistic direction of Francesco Gravino, which hath transformed an old news kiosk in Via Tondi into one of the smallest stages ever conceived. The project commenced on 27th March last, with a formula as simple as it is original: six seats, a stage of most exiguous dimensions, and performances lasting but a few minutes. A minimal distance betwixt public and performers that doth wholly alter the traditional relationship betwixt spectator and theatre. The wager, however, was forthwith rewarded by the public. More than 60 persons attended the performances in a single afternoon, and the three days of the inaugural season registered a complete sold-out. From a local experiment, the “Teatro Edicola” hath thus become a case capable of attracting attention far beyond the confines of the Province of Foggia. In September 2026, the Stanford Social Innovation Review (SSIR), the journal of Stanford University, shall publish upon its website and in its Fall 2026 print edition the reportage “The Six-Seat Revolution”, authored by Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella and edited by Deputy Editor David V. Johnson. The interest of the American review concerneth not merely the originality of the theatrical proposition. The Teatro Edicola is, in fact, observed as a potential paradigm of social innovation and low-cost urban regeneration. Become a Medium member The idea is particularly compelling in a country such as Italy, wherein numerous news kiosks have ceased their activity and risk becoming vacant interstices within the urban fabric. The question, at bottom, is simple: can a place born to sell newspapers become once more a locus of encounter? In San Severo, the answer hath been entrusted to the theatre. The kiosk hath not been merely restored in a physical sense. It hath changed its function, transforming itself into a place where artists encounter the public directly and where the performance becometh part of the quotidian life of the street. “The theatre cometh into the street wherein thou walkest every day,” Francesco Gravino hath explained, thus synthesising the philosophy underpinning the project. And it is precisely this aspect that hath rendered the experience interesting also upon the plane of its potential replicability. Initial requests for information have already arrived from other cities, amongst them Lucca and Rome, interested in learning of the model and the modalities for its realisation. The strength of the Teatro Edicola resideth also in its apparent disproportion: a minimal investment and space to produce a cultural effect far greater. There is no need for a grand theatre, an auditorium of hundreds of seats, or complex structures. An unused space sufficeth, together with an idea and the will to restore it to the community. That old kiosk in Via Tondi, therefore, recounteth something that goeth beyond the theatre. It recounteth the possibility of rethinking the spaces of our cities, restoring a social function to places that seemed to have definitively lost it.

Hanover Institute – propaganda designed for artificial intelligence For decades, influence operations had one primary target: people. Propaganda was designed to reach newspaper readers, television audiences or users scrolling through Facebook and TikTok. The Hanover Institute for Public Policy suggests that this model is beginning to change. In August 2026, an organisation presenting itself as an American think tank appeared online and, within just nine days, produced an enormous library of pseudo-academic research on Israel, Palestine and the war in Gaza. Yet the intended audience may not have been people at all. The material appears to have been designed, at least in part, to reach systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. The Hanover Institute looked professional. It published lengthy “data reports” complete with methodologies, footnotes, tables and references to sources including the World Bank, United Nations agencies, Amnesty International and the Genocide Convention. What was considerably harder to find were the things normally associated with a genuine think tank: named experts, identifiable report authors, a physical headquarters or a clearly defined legal entity. There was, however, a much more revealing trail. Documents filed with the US Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act link Piro Inc., via Havas Media Germany, to Israel's Government Advertising Agency, known as LaPam. Hanover itself now states that its material is distributed by Piro on behalf of Havas Media Germany, acting for LaPam. 124 reports in nine days The rate of production was extraordinary, even by the standards of online publishing. Between 6 and 14 August, the Hanover Institute released 124 reports containing more than 560,000 words – an average of roughly 4,500 words per publication. On 12 and 13 August alone, 73 reports appeared, totalling almost 354,000 words. More revealing than the volume was the way the material was structured. Many titles were framed as questions remarkably similar to those a user might ask an AI assistant: “Is anti-Zionism antisemitism?”, “Did Israel expel Palestinians from their land?”, “Is Israel committing genocide in Gaza?”, “Is there a starvation policy in Gaza?” or “Is the IDF the world's most moral army?” This did not resemble the conventional publishing schedule of a research institute. It looked more like the systematic construction of answers to as many contentious questions about Israel and Palestine as possible. The presentation mattered too. These were not crude propaganda leaflets. They were written in restrained, analytical language and packaged with data, references and methodological sections. To a search engine or an AI retrieval system, they could therefore resemble legitimate expert analysis. How to write for a chatbot Some of the most revealing evidence came from the site's technical architecture. Hanover maintained an llms.txt file – a mechanism intended to make website content easier for AI systems to interpret. Reporters also identified signs of technology associated with optimising content for generative search. Piro's own marketing is equally significant. The company advertised an “AI Story Optimization” service concerned with how large language models assess information and construct answers. Its co-founder Daniel Rosenberg has written about understanding how systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity formulate responses – and how to ensure that an AI system knows the story a client wants to tell. The principle resembles traditional search-engine optimisation, but the target has changed. SEO tries to make a webpage rank highly in Google. Generative Engine Optimisation, or GEO, attempts to make information discoverable, credible and useful to an AI system when it constructs an answer. The chain is potentially straightforward. A user asks a chatbot a question about Israel or Gaza. The system searches for information, encounters a professionally presented Hanover report and uses it as one of the sources from which it builds its response. Propaganda no longer has to reach the user directly. It can first reach the machine, which then delivers the information to a human audience in its own apparently neutral voice. Did it actually work? This is where an important qualification is necessary. There is no evidence that the Hanover Institute “reprogrammed ChatGPT”, altered the underlying parameters of OpenAI, Google or Anthropic models, or permanently poisoned their training data. Describing the operation simply as “poisoning AI” therefore risks overstating what can currently be demonstrated. There is, however, evidence of something more specific. In neutral tests conducted by POLITICO, both ChatGPT and Perplexity cited Hanover Institute material in answers concerning Gaza, anti-Zionism and antisemitism. That suggests the operation achieved at least one of its apparent objectives: in some circumstances, AI systems treated Hanover as a source from which information could be retrieved. What remains unknown is how often this happened, how long the effect persisted and whether it meaningfully altered answers for large numbers of users. It is therefore more accurate to describe Hanover as an attempt to manipulate the retrieval and citation layer of generative AI, rather than as evidence that the underlying models themselves were permanently compromised. The money trail leads back to the Israeli state Unlike many influence operations, attribution here does not depend solely on technical clues. There is a documented financial trail. Piro Inc. registered its US activities under FARA registration number 7732. Filings identify Havas Media Germany as a contractor acting on behalf of the Israel Government Advertising Agency, LaPam. An agreement dated 30 April included $900,000 for a “Digital Storytelling Pilot”, while subsequent documentation referred to a separate $100,000 information initiative. Precision matters. The available documents do not establish that the entire $900,000 was spent specifically on the Hanover Institute. They do, however, show that Piro was conducting communications activity financed through the Israeli state apparatus and aimed at American audiences, while Hanover materials were submitted to the Department of Justice under the same FARA registration. Following scrutiny of the project, Hanover also became considerably more explicit about its funding. Its website now identifies Piro, Havas Media Germany and LaPam. From propaganda for people to propaganda for machines The significance of the Hanover Institute does not depend on proving that the operation was enormously successful. Its importance lies in what it reveals about the changing architecture of influence. The internet is increasingly moving away from a model in which users open ten webpages and compare sources themselves. Instead, they ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or Perplexity a question and receive a synthesised answer. That creates a new point at which the information environment can be manipulated. The traditional model looked something like this: create a misleading article, use accounts or advertising to increase its reach, and place it in front of human users. Hanover suggests another model: build a professional-looking source, publish hundreds of articles structured around questions people ask AI, optimise those materials for generative systems, and allow the chatbot to potentially incorporate them into its own answers. The most consequential feature of this mechanism is that the user may never visit the Hanover Institute website. They may never even know that the organisation exists. Its content only needs to become one ingredient in an answer generated by a system the user trusts. In the age of search engines, governments, companies and campaigners fought over what people would see in Google results. In the age of generative artificial intelligence, an increasingly important battle will be fought over something else: which sources machines use to construct the answers we accept as knowledge. Sources The Guardian – “Fake US thinktank set up and funded by Israel sought to game AI for propaganda” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/26/fake-thinktank-israel-ai-propaganda POLITICO – “Israeli PR wants to answer your ChatGPT questions” https://archive.ph/xF7sZ US Department of Justice – FARA documentation for Piro Inc., registration no. 7732 https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7732-Exhibit-AB-20260602-0.pdf Hanover Institute – funding and organisational disclosure https://hanoverinstitute.com/about Responsible Statecraft – “Israel creates fake think tank in likely attempt to dupe AI chatbots” https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-influence-chatgpt/ AIthropology Lab – “Manufacturing the source to manufacture the answer” https://aithropologylab.org/en/radar/2026-09-02/ #Disinformation #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #HanoverInstitute #Israel #Gaza #Palestine #ChatGPT #Claude #Gemini #GenerativeAI #AIPropaganda #Propaganda #InfluenceOperations #InformationWarfare #GenerativeEngineOptimization #GEO #LLM #MediaManipulation #DigitalInfluence #WRLD

🚨EITA: ALEXANDRE, O GRANDE, humilhou André Mendonça, em decisão que acabou de ser publicada no website do @STF_oficial: “A tentativa de Golpe de Estado ainda persiste, mas os atores políticos foram modificados, e podem estar dentro do @STF_oficial, inclusive”. Parabéns pelo comunicado contundente. Alexandre de Moraes. Mesmo trazendo à tona esse elogio, reforço a necessidade que TODOS (inclusive, Alexandre de Moraes) que sejam suspeitos de terem relacionamentos inapropriados com Vorcaro sejam investigados!🇧🇷👍 🗞️Pessoal, a fonte de todos esses documentos é o @rodolfoprado. SIGAM o excelente @rodolfoprado, para mais atualizações amanhã!♥️ #STF #GolpeDeEstado #Justiça

🇨🇦 Aaron Irving nebude pokračovat ve Spartě. Kanadský obránce odehrál v našem dresu tři sezony. Nyní se jeho cesta se Spartou uzavírá. Aarone, děkujeme za společné roky a přejeme hodně štěstí v další hokejové kariéře! 🤝 Více informací na našem webu. https://t.co/mG9zmWn8iC #Hokej #Sparta #Kanada

Amigas he tenido hasta un pequeño ataque de ansiedad porque me hicisteis desconfiar hasta a mí. La web es oficial, lo han subido a su Instagram y, por si acaso, he llamado al Metropolitano y un chico muy majo ha calmado mi ansiedad. Jamás haría nada en vuestra contra de verdad # ansiedad # confianza # apoyo

The first video shared by Meghan Markle after the surprising return of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to the United Kingdom has gone viral, showing moments of family serenity with their children Archie and Lilibet, despite the media tensions and the court's statement reaffirming their status as private citizens within the royal family. (translated)

Jak moc lze klesnout? V hlavní roli Šídlo a Seznam Zprávy Seznam Zprávy byly kdysi kvalitní médium, dokud jej vedl Jiří Kubík a reportáže se mohly politikům příčit, ale kvalitu jim upřít nešlo. Dnes jde o manipulativní bulvár, faktické dno a bez větší nadsázky lze některé počiny Seznam Zpráv označit přímo za účelové dezinformace. Uvedu dva nezpochybnitelné příklady. Jindřich Šídlo dnes zesměšňuje sněmovní vyšetřovací komisi ke kauze Dozimetr. Rajchl je prý neschopný a Dozimetr šetří kvůli odměně za členství v komisi. Doprovodná grafika nemůže vynechat porno, jizvy a další s Dozimetrem nesouvisející ponížení nenáviděného poslance. https://t.co/1s04YGYzwO S Rajchlem je však v komisi dalších 12 poslanců. Mimo jiné Renáta Vesecká, Pavel Žáček nebo Tomáš Helebrant. Jde o zkušené zákonodárce či osobnosti znalé práce státního zastupitelství. Je téma k smíchu? Rozhodně není - stačí se podívat na některé zdokumentované výpovědí. “Já ti říkám, Jirko, žádný strachy, když přijdem do Prahy, můžem krást.” Tato slova pronáší Michal Redl k Jiřímu Fremrovi, pravé ruce Jiřího Pospíšila. Ten obžalován nebyl, ačkoli s Redlem trávil dovolené, Fremr jakbysmet. https://t.co/e6FakLl1F2 TOP 09 měla podle odposlechů inkasovat 50 % podíl ze zmanipulovaných zakázek. Strana však také vyšetřovaná není. https://t.co/P8EfEGD1Oo "Souhlasím s jejich politikou a znám dobře pana Polčáka. A občas s nimi něco konzultuji. Shání (Polčák, pozn. redakce) nějaké schopné lidi do různých společností… Poněvadž se pohybuji tady ve Zlíně delší dobu, tak v tom jim napomáhám.“ Tato slova pronesl Petr Redl pro Český rozhlas v roce 2017. Pro Stanislava Polčáka vybíral "schopné" lidi do státních firem. https://t.co/DEEQWHMbkS Vít Rakušan v tom pokračoval. Vyslal Redla na schůzku s ředitelem České pošty, jakmile bylo jasné, že ovládne resort vnitra. Do čela nejutajenější rozvědky ÚZSI vyslal Petra Mlejnka, který se s Redlem pravidelně setkával. Rakušan o všem věděl, jak přiznal České televizi. Sabina Slonková, jen těžko označitelná za dezinformátorku, následně odhalila i únik z vyšetřovacího týmu, díky němuž Rakušan o zásahu policie věděl měsíce předem. Věc se nevyšetřuje na straně policie, ale ani na straně Rakušana. https://t.co/QuTDUpiZof Financování politických stran TOP 09 a STAN z organizovaného zločinu? Obvinění i svědci systém několikrát popsali, věc se nevyšetřuje. Je tedy komise opravdu k smíchu? Je postup Vrchního státního zastupitelství v Praze v pořádku? Je to ostatně jen a pouze státní zastupitelství, které může rozhodnout o poskytnutí či neposkytnutí podkladů. Žalobci se rozhodli neposkytnout jediný papír. Pokud by se zjistilo, že v kauze Dozimetr účelově přehlíželi trestnou činnost popsanou ve výpovědích svědků, padaly by hlavy na nejvyšších místech. Ha, ha, ha, směje se Jindřich Šídlo a připravuje další podcast s Janem Dobrovským, největším sponzorem hnutí STAN. Pojďme se všichni pořádně zasmát, jak je Rajchl neschopný. Padni, komu padni? Nezávislá a objektivní žurnalistika? Jakékoli další obranné manévry proti útokům Andreje Babiše na Seznam Zprávy nebudou fungovat. Viníkem je vedení Seznam Zpráv, nikdo jiný. Kdyby výše uvedené nestačilo, mám tu druhý příklad. Nedávno na Novinkách vyšel článek o plánovaném převratu v Černé hoře, který měli plánovat Rusové. Součástí celého komplotu bylo usmrcení proevropského a proaliančního politika Mila Djukanoviče. https://t.co/sEzauWWZWf? "V podivném převratu hráli roli Rusové, uniformy se našly v Srbsku" Z textu by se skoro zdálo, jako by Rusové převrat a usmrcení Djukanoviče také plánovali. Střih, klapka, přesouváme se do let 2018 a 2019. Denník N vydává rozsáhlou reportáž o tom, že převrat ve skutečnosti plánoval marketér Zuzany Čaputové (!!!). Světe, div se, totožný marketér měl zajišťovat i kampaň Petra Pavla. Denník N 1 - https://t.co/7CX4HpRElP Denník N 2 - https://t.co/xDQX7xwLtE Jde o Arona Shaviva, izraelského podnikatele, který podle reportáží Denníku N (!!!) do Černé hory dovážel zbraně, pronajal konspirační byty a celou akci logisticky řídil. Společníkem v jeho firmě byl John Assad, bývalý vysoký důstojník CIA se zkušenostmi z Balkánu a Blízkého východu. Aron Shaviv byl obžalován a USA jej do Černé hory odmítly vydat. Jen díky tomu je zřejmě dnes i na svobodě. Na Shavivově výplatní pásce byli Michal Repa a Martin Burgr. https://t.co/jKicWKsCD5 Oba se podíleli na kampani Zuzany Čaputové, Petra Pavla, ale i Víta Rakušana (ach, ty náhody) v roce 2025. https://t.co/o7fRxUdljc Aron Shaviv svůj podíl na Pavlově kampani zmiňuje na vlastních webových stránkách vedle "úspěchů" ve volbách v Kambodži, Kongu, Bangladéši nebo v zemích afrického Sahelu - samé výkvěty demokracie. Odkaz na webový archiv https://t.co/CSuhB5mMZV - https://t.co/0ifTNX8gWm Ale ne, Shaviv neexistuje, Repa s Burgrem dnes provozují "hodnotový" marketing a za vše mohou Rusové a Srbové. Jen škoda, jsou tehdejší články Denníku N a dalších balkánských zdrojů archivované. Už vidím, jak by mne ředitel Deníku N znovu označil za konspirátora a šmejda. https://t.co/yXFyWFv1dm Pojďme se tedy s Jindrou Šídlem zasmát, jak je Rajchl neschopný a v souvislosti se můžeme zasmát i celému Dozimetru - hodíme tam porno, to lidi baví. Kdyby to nestačilo, lze si vzpomenout, jak se Rusové a Srbové rozhodli bez jakékoli účasti "hodnotových" marketérů zabít proevropského politika. Akorát, že vůbec. Píší to ale Seznam Zprávy, renomované médium, šířící "pravdu a lásku", tak to musí být kvalitní informace, nebo snad ne? Kvalitu bylo na Seznamu možné naposledy hledat tak před 3 až 4 lety. Dnes jde o nejhlubší dno novinářské práce v čele s Jindřichem Šídlem, Jiřím Nádobou a Marií Bastlovou. Zůstává jen osamělý Martin Čaban, jehož erudované analýzy vyčnívají jako zdravý strom uprostřed kůrovcem napadeného lesa. Je to škoda, ale Seznam Zprávy se společně s Novinkami každým dnem propadají hlouběji a hlouběji do bažiny angažovaného PR plátku, podobně jako Deník N. Kdo by snad nevěřil, může si dva uvedené texty otevřít a kontext si nezávislé ověřit skrze dobové zdroje. Počítejte však s tím, že se vám při ověřování informací udělá z "nezávislé a objektivní" práce Seznam Zpráv značně nevolno. Šalom. Foto Šídlo: Wiki Foto Pavel: Wik Foto Rakušan: Wiki #Žurnalistika #Dezinformace #Politika

La cosa più divertente in assoluto senza alcuna ombra di dubbio è vedere gli HACKER con il corpo completamente tatuato, piercing, cappellino nero sempre su, magliette solo nere, pantaloni neri, bandiera col teschio in tutta la casa, vivono in cantina, hanno 30 processori raffreddati ad acqua, lavorano solo su macchine linux modificate, hanno sette vpn, nella vita commerciano roba trovata sul deep web, entrano nelle telecamere dei pc delle casalinghe, hanno i numeri di carta di credito del vicino, entrano nelle macchine Dominion per il conteggio dei voti, modificano le distro dopo un'ora che sono uscite, che adesso dicono che l'IA è pericolosa, che deve pensarci lo Stato, che ci vogliono le leggi, che l'open source non va bene e che bisogna fermarsi se no qualche malintenzionato potrebbe fare cose brutte. L'equivalente dei centri sociali che controllavano il greenpass per la mescita di vini bio ma ancora più ridicoli. Ecco questi sono veramente il vertice del comico... #Hacker #Tecnologia #Umorismo

O EFEITO FACHIN Pela lógica de FACHIN hoje, MORAES jamais poderia ter sido relator das safadezas contra Daniel Silveira. O Advogado Paulo Faria ARGUIU O IMPEDIMENTO de Moraes (suposta vítima do vídeo), e sua a SUSPEIÇÃO (inimigo íntimo e interesse na causa). Ambas foram REJEITADAS cerca de UM ANO APÓS a interposição. Acessem e vejam os absurdos registrados: Arguição de Impedimento - AI 67 - ajuizada em 11/04/2022, e julgada em 02/04/2023 (UM ANO DEPOIS): https://t.co/u0bHWJjZsb Arguição de Suspeição - AS 114 - ajuizada em 11/04/2022, e julgada em 02/04/2023 (UM ANO DEPOIS): https://t.co/OQhlgmzKW3 Também foram arguídos os demais ministros mencionados no vídeo, mas, quem acabou julgando o impedimento e suspeição, UM ANO DEPOIS, foi a suspeita e impedida ROSA WEBER. Então, pelo entendimento de FACHIN, Moraes não poderia atuar em nenhum processo de Daniel Silveira. Nem Moraes, e nem os demais. TUDO, ABSOLUTAMENTE, NULO! #Justiça #Direito #Política