Search

The profile Só Quem é LULA 2026 stated that Daniela Lima had informed that Janones was doing well and that he would return to the campaign. According to the author, Janones felt unwell after a debate, had an arrhythmia, and was hospitalized in an ICU in São Paulo; the profile linked the episode to the fatigue from the intense campaign. The author also mentioned that, in a video published the day before, Janones assessed that the effort had been worthwhile and that the digital competition was no longer dominated by just one side. He added that Janones had apologized in case he failed, seemed tired, but had fulfilled his role. The profile asserted that he would return and that the campaign would continue. In the publication, the author also associated themes and names such as Flávio, Army, Lula, Haddad, Collor, Fred Bruno, Marcelo Aguiar, Pavanato, Piauí, Vila Nova Star Hospital, Daniella Marques, Marabá, and Instituto Lula with a series of hashtags and keywords. He also mentioned Ana Clara, Fran, Joong, Mica, Ana Bruna, Eagles, Oruam, BLEACH, KHOM KHLANG EP7, and Jalen Hurts, in addition to terms related to cocaine and overdose. In the end, he stated that Janones' determination would persist despite the fatigue and that the election was still waiting for him. #Força #Determinação #Eleição (translated)

The Elections Research informed that Daniella Marques, economic coordinator of Flávio Bolsonaro's (PL-RJ) campaign, said that the proposal established a two-year transition period for beneficiaries to find formal employment or start a business. According to her, after that period, families would leave the program but could automatically return if the attempt was unsuccessful. #FlávioBolsonaro #Economia #Emprego (translated)

In the last week of the electoral campaign, Lula da Silva challenges the bolsonarist stronghold in Rio Grande do Sul, trying to reduce a disadvantage of 1.3 million votes before the second round of the presidential elections. #Eleições2026 #LulaDaSilva #RioGrandeDoSul (translated)

Renato Souza stated that the economic coordinator of Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign anticipated that families would leave the Bolsa Família program after two years of receiving the benefit. According to him, they could return to the program later if they proved their lack of resources. #BolsaFamília #FlávioBolsonaro #Política (translated)

Poponze wrote that Flávio Bolsonaro had proposed a two-year period for beneficiaries of Bolsa Família to leave the program. According to the author, Daniella Marques, coordinator of the economic section of the campaign, stated in an interview with CBN Bahia that the period would allow beneficiaries to look for a job or start their own business. #BolsaFamília #Emprego #EducaçãoFinanceira (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 claimed that Dani Lima had exposed lies of Flávio Bolsonaro during a debate. According to the author, Flávio avoided direct questions about money and real estate, did not explain the origin of a house valued at 6 million, and did not open the confidentiality. The author stated that Flávio's own campaign registered the phrase "without answer, runaway." The publication reported that Lula demanded explanations during the debate and compared his apartment, valued at 1.5 million, with the 6 million house and other properties he attributed to Flávio, supposedly bought in cash. According to the author, Lula also asked Flávio to open the confidentiality to clarify who the thief would be. The author claimed he did not do so and alleged that internal research by the PL showed that voters had perceived what he called a farce. In the rest of the publication, Only Who is LULA 2026 mentioned hashtags and topics related to Haddad, Collor, Fred Bruno, Marcelo Aguiar, Piauí, Vila Nova Star Hospital, Ana Clara, Marabá, Fran, Jalen Hurts, Google, JoongDunk, Eagles, Ana Bruna, AouBoom, Oruam, KHOM KHLANG EP7, and Fred Desimpedidos, in addition to terms like cocaine, flour, and overdose. The author concluded that Flávio did not respond because he had no answer and stated that the ballot would decide the outcome. #FlavioMiliciano #AbreOSigiloFlavio #ExercitoDoLula (translated)

The profile "Only Who is LULA 2026" stated that internal surveys indicated that Flávio Bolsonaro's aggressive stance would have alienated decisive voters. According to the author, Daniela Lima had presented the information first at Pulso Político. He also mentioned that Flávio's campaign acknowledged that the candidate had come close to crossing the line and that surveys from the PL itself highlighted that he did not answer questions, with the expression “No answer. Runs away.” The author wrote that Lula, who he attributed 80 years to, would exploit Flávio's stance and would contest the narrative on corruption. He mentioned cash purchases of properties, a second investigation for money laundering, and properties valued at 6 million and 1.5 million, demanding that Flávio lift the confidentiality to show the origin of the funds. The publication also listed topics and names that it claimed were trending, among them Janones, Collor, Haddad, Fred Bruno, Marcelo Aguiar, Piauí, Marabá, Carla Zambelli, Hospital Vila Nova Star, Ana Clara, Google, Jalen Hurts, Eagles, and Oruam. In the end, the author recommended that followers not comment, share, or interact with publications from the far-right, saying that the algorithm would recommend them to more people. He also stated that the opposing campaign would not achieve a knockout and that the decision would rest with the polls. #Eleições2024 #FlávioBolsonaro #Lula (translated)

A POPTime stated that Flávio Bolsonaro's stance in the Band debate received strong criticism from his own voters in a post by coach Pablo Marçal, cited by the publication as one of those responsible for the campaign. https://t.co/yXINcLOx6E #FlávioBolsonaro #Debate #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Renato Rovai stated that the Fórum website was under attack, with at least 50 networks trying to invade it simultaneously. In an ironic tone, he said that this would be a coincidence and that it would have no relation to the campaign of an unidentified candidate. He explained that a redirect message displayed to visitors would serve to mitigate the attack and asked for the publication to be widely shared. #AtaqueCibernético #SegurançaDigital #Fórum (translated)

Renan Augusto assessed that the debate had ended the chances of the Bolsonarist campaign and stated that Lula would win. According to him, it became evident to the population that Flávio had neither a project nor commitment to Brazil. Augusto added that the week would be crucial, but said that Flávio had harmed his own campaign without needing much effort from the opponent. #Lula #Eleições2022 #Brasil (translated)

Orlando Calheiros wrote that the conditions of the debates were discussed with the candidates' teams and that the campaign did not propose the presence of fact-checking. He also criticized those who defended the people responsible for the debates, stating that they were paid to do a low-quality job. #debate #checagemdefatos #política (translated)

The article analyzes the unpredictability of the Brazilian elections, highlighting the unexpected victory of Flávio Bolsonaro in the first round and Lula's recovery in the second, as well as the intense and dramatic dynamics of the electoral campaign and the debates. #EleiçõesBrasil #FlávioBolsonaro #Luladasilva (translated)

Sérgio Santos reported that Soraya Thronicke said that Jair Bolsonaro threatened to expose his son's gender transition during the 2022 campaign, using a comparison between before and after images. According to Santos, Thronicke also mentioned the respect shown by Lula regarding the issue. Santos used strongly critical language to refer to the Bolsonaro family. (translated)

The Central Right evaluated that Flávio Bolsonaro started the debate better by greeting the participants and addressing public security, but Lula had a slight advantage in the first block by putting him on the defensive with questions. According to the author, Flávio avoided directly answering some of them and resorted to rhetorical questions to speak to the audience. In the evaluation of the Central Right, Flávio had a significant advantage in the second block and won the third by a small margin. The author highlighted the candidate's proposals on public security and family indebtedness and said that he also used the discussion to criticize Lula's statements about the people of Rio and his defense of early prison releases. In the final considerations, marked by interruptions, Flávio was said to have performed better, while Lula made mistakes and got flustered. The author stated that Lula dedicated a lot of time to attacks and presented few proposals. He said the president mentioned once the end of the 6x1 shift, but did not address the exemption of income tax for those earning up to R$ 5,000, the end of betting, the adjustment of Bolsa Família, or the free bus rides on weekends. The Central Right rated Flávio Bolsonaro 5.0 and Lula 4.0. Despite this, it stated that it did not expect the debate to significantly alter voting intentions. It also recommended that Flávio focus on the topics he masters and on presenting proposals. Regarding age, it said it preferred not to enter the merit but stated that the debate highlighted difficulties of one of the candidates related to that factor, which it considered concerning. #Debate2023 #SegurançaPública #EleiçõesBrasileiras (translated)

Deltan Dallagnol stated that, during the Band debate, Sidônio Palmeira, whom he described as the Minister of Secom and Lula's campaign strategist, interrupted the broadcast and disrespected journalists who were trying to maintain the program's rules. According to Dallagnol, the episode showed desperation behind the scenes of a campaign where Lula was confronted live and lost control of the narrative. He said that the end of the Lula era was scheduled for October 25. He also stated that Flávio finished the first round ahead and that the PT relied on the complacency of voters. Dallagnol urged votes for Flávio Bolsonaro, number 22, and for the video to be sent to people who did not vote or chose another candidate. #Lula #Eleição2023 #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)