I don't understand, let's see if someone explains it to me: the Court decided to analyze the substance of the issue in the Milani case, which is about whether he signed or not, at 21 years old, a record regarding the (false) desertion of soldier Ledo.... but did not address the substance of the issue in the case of Cristina Kirchner in Vialidad, convicting a political leader and disqualifying her for life..... They are disgraceful. (translated)