Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the court did not acknowledge the appeal presented by the consortium operator Fla-Flu in the dispute over the use of Maracanã by Vasco. As a result, the appeal did not pass the admissibility phase and the merits were not analyzed. The profile stated that J. Américo had anticipated the possibility of inadmissibility due to a lack of jurisdiction. However, since the decision was not yet fully available, it claimed it was not possible to confirm whether this was the justification adopted by Judge Salomão. According to Attention, Vascaínos!, the legal dispute involved the holding of the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana at Maracanã between Vasco and Boca Juniors. #Justiça #Maracanã #FlaFlu (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that CONMEBOL confirmed Maracanã as the venue for the semifinal of the 2026 Copa Sul-Americana between Vasco and Boca Juniors, scheduled for Tuesday, October 20, at 9:30 PM. According to the report, in an official letter sent to CBF, with a copy to Vasco, on Tuesday (13), the entity made the choice definitive and stated that it would not accept new requests for changes made by the club, without excluding decisions made by CONMEBOL within its regulatory powers. The publication added that if legal, administrative, or operational impediments prevented the match from taking place at Maracanã, the entity could designate another location, including a neutral city. In this event, Vasco would remain responsible for the costs of organization and transfer, including additional expenses of CONMEBOL and the visiting club. It would also be the responsibility of the host to ensure the availability of the stadium and compliance with regulatory, technical, operational, and safety requirements. #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco #BocaJuniors (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Fla Flu Serviços appealed to the STJ in Brasília, and that this measure could complicate the return match at Maracanã. According to the publication, Vasco's management was preparing for the demand and was cautious due to the poor relationship with Paulo Salomão, former vice of Pedrinho and nephew of the STJ president, Minister Luís Felipe Salomão. The publication added that the board did not believe that this relationship would influence such an important decision. It also stated that the CONMEBOL website indicated the game for Rio de Janeiro, at Maracanã, on the 20th, and asked if there could be another turn of events. #Futebol #Vasco #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reconsidered, on the morning of Tuesday (13), the decision that suspended the release of Maracanã and reestablished the order for the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make the stadium available for Vasco x Boca, for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20. According to the profile, the magistrate recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to authorize the match, cited favorable opinions from security agencies, and took into account the sale of more than 46,000 tickets. The judge also considered that the preservation of the field should not take precedence over public safety and determined the change of location or time of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the same day at Maracanãzinho. Attention, Vasco fans! It was added that the process would still be analyzed by the Special Body of the TJRJ on the eve of the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Institute of Cooperation, Human and Social Development (CODHES) presented, on Monday (12), a factual news item to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro, requesting urgent measures regarding the denial of use of the Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors. The match was scheduled for October 20, for the semifinals of the Copa Sudamericana. According to the publication, the document, signed by the president of the institute, José Roberto da Costa Junior, requested that the responsibilities of the presidents of Flamengo and Fluminense and the administrators of the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. be investigated. CODHES also requested clarifications regarding the powers of the concessionaire and about a possible influence of sports rivalry on the decision. The entity further requested that the Public Prosecutor's Office examine the situation of Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, who, according to journalistic information cited in the statement, was in the Netherlands when she suspended the authorization for the match. The request included clarifications about the trip, any functional suspension, and the exercise of the magistrate's duties during that period. The publication stated that the document mentioned more than 45,000 tickets sold and requested an assessment of possible losses for fans in terms of travel, accommodations, and transportation. The institute pointed out the possibility of compensation for material damages and potential collective moral damages, if the legal requirements were met, in addition to requesting measures to prevent clashes and risks related to the uncertainty of the stadium. According to Attention, Vasco fans!, CODHES also admitted the possibility of filing a collective lawsuit and resorting to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights if it identified violations attributable to the Brazilian state and if the legal requirements were fulfilled. #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. submitted a statement to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro on Monday (12) against Vasco's requests. The company requested that the injunction that suspended the authorization for the club to use Maracanã in the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20, be maintained. According to the concessionaire, Vasco had started ticket sales and confirmed the stadium to CONMEBOL after obtaining a favorable decision on October 9, although knowing that it could be reversed. Fla-Flu also alleged that the club continued sales after the suspension of the decision on October 10, and that this conduct worsened the urgency of the case. The company stated that CONMEBOL's deadline to indicate the stadium had been extended until October 13 at 12 PM, and argued that Vasco should use this period to reorganize the match. The concessionaire cited a document from the Military Police dated October 4, which, according to them, acknowledged conditions for the game at Estádio Nilton Santos. They also criticized the recommendation from the Public Ministry in favor of Maracanã, claiming that it did not consider this subsequent document. Fla-Flu further argued that the writ of security was legally appropriate and questioned the favorable decision to Vasco, granted on October 9, claiming that it altered a previous understanding without new facts and by an authority that, in the company's interpretation, did not have the competence to do so. #FlaFlu #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that hundreds of Vasco fans were picking up tickets for the match the next day. According to the publication, the lines showed the unconditional support of the fans and the strength of the Cruzmaltina crowd in Buenos Aires. https://t.co/6uuxoBFsgX #Vasco #Torcida #Futebol (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Rio de Janeiro requested that the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro reconsider the suspension of the authorization for the semifinal of the Copa Sudamericana between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. The Attorney General, Antonio José Campos Moreira, advocated for the stadium to be made available to Vasco, subject to technical, legal, and security requirements. According to the publication, the Public Prosecutor's Office pointed out evaluations from the Military Police that indicated Maracanã as the preferred option, citing public safety, mobility, infrastructure, and crowd organization. The concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. had refused Vasco's request due to maintenance issues and the condition of the pitch; after a decision authorized the game to take place at the stadium, a court injunction suspended its effects. The publication added that, according to the statement, nearly 50,000 tickets had already been sold and fans from different states and Argentina were mobilized. The Public Prosecutor's Office warned of possible logistical difficulties and legal insecurity if the stadium were changed, in addition to mentioning the Conmebol deadline to confirm the venue and the possibility of transferring the match. Attention, Vasco fans! emphasized that this was a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office, not a final decision from the Court. #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, fans of Vasco! It was reported that Vasco da Gama presented a 32-page manifestation to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro and asked the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto to reconsider the ruling that suspended the authorization to use Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20. According to the publication, the club pointed out the extension, by CONMEBOL, until October 13, at noon, of the deadline to confirm the stadium. It also questioned the writ of security from the conceding company Fla-Flu, invoked the priority of official football games provided for in the concession agreement, and cited assessments from the Military Police and statements from the Public Ministry regarding security and logistics. Vasco acknowledged that Estádio Nilton Santos could host the match but argued that this did not justify preventing the use of Maracanã. The publication added that the club requested the restoration of the decision by judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from October 9, which had authorized the game in Maracanã, and contested the adequacy of the writ of security from the conceding company. The request still depended on a new court decision, the profile reported. #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that part of the Vasco team visited patients at the National Cancer Institute (INCA) on Friday. According to the publication, the photo showed Piton, Léo Jardim, Puma, and Lescano. https://t.co/SydeqEuFL9 #Vasco #Solidariedade #Câncer (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, determined that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. should make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The decision was granted this Friday (9), after a request from Vasco against the concessionaire's refusal, which had alleged technical issues related to the maintenance and restoration of the field. According to the publication, the magistrate considered statements from the Military Police and the Public Ministry of Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out the stadium as a preferred alternative due to structural, logistical, and operational conditions, as well as issues of safety and urban mobility. He also mentioned previous disputes between the club and the concessionaire regarding the use of the stadium. The decision also determined that the Maracanã should be offered to Vasco under commercial and operational conditions equal to those practiced for Flamengo and Fluminense, respecting legal, technical, and safety requirements. The publication stated that compliance was urgent, as Vasco needed to inform CONMEBOL by October 10 which stadium would host the match, and that the concessionaire could still present its defense. #Maracanã #Vasco #SulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the striker Bruno Duarte posted an image on social media to reassure the fans after leaving, still in the first half, the victory by 2 to 1 over Botafogo. According to the post, he received an involuntary blow to the chest, lost his breath, and needed to leave the match. The player reportedly described the incident as just a "scare." #Futebol #BrunoDuarte #Torcida (translated)

CONSELHO ANALISA O Vasco comunica a liberação do contrato da nova saf para a apreciação dos conselheiros. Pedido é para análise até antes do dia 6 de outubro para a votação. Segue o comunicado: “Informamos que por determinação do presidente do Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama, Pedro Paulo de Oliveira, os conselheiros receberam, na manhã deste sábado (26/09), acesso ao Memorando de Entendimentos (MoU) referente à operação envolvendo a Vasco da Gama SAF – Projeto Caravela. O documento está disponível para consulta em ambiente virtual seguro (Data Room).” #VascoDaGama #Futebol #SAF

MAIS UM "NÃO" Uma pessoa ligada ao Consórcio Maracanã nos garantiu que o estádio não será liberado para o Vasco disputar o jogo contra o Boca Juniors, pela semifinal da Sul-americana, no dia 20 de outubro. A resposta "extra-oficial", inclusive, já foi comunicada à Conmebol. A diretoria do Vasco ainda tem o artifício de buscar a liberação via judicial. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana

MAIS UM "NÃO" Uma pessoa ligada ao Consórcio Maracanã nos garantiu que o estádio não será liberado para o Vasco disputar o jogo contra o Boca Juniors, pela semifinal da Sul-americana, no dia 22 de outubro. A resposta "extra-oficial", inclusive, já foi comunicada à Conmebol. A diretoria do Vasco ainda tem o artifício de buscar a liberação via judicial. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana

PROCURADOR DO ESTADO DE SANTA CATARINA ENTRA NA BRIGA PELO MARACANÃ! Phelipe Monteiro Mastra Fontoura, advogado, atuando em nome próprio e na condição de cidadão apresentou uma representação ao Ministério Público do Estado do Rio de Janeiro datada de 19 de setembro de 2026. A representação é dirigida contra Clube de Regatas do Flamengo, Fluminense Football Club, Estado do Rio de Janeiro — por meio da Secretaria de Estado da Casa Civil — e Fla-Flu Serviços S.A., concessionária do Complexo Maracanã. O autor pede ainda que Vasco da Gama SAF e Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama sejam notificados como interessados no procedimento. O ponto central é a alegação de que o Maracanã, embora seja um bem público estadual, estaria sendo administrado de maneira que favoreceria Flamengo e Fluminense, apesar de o contrato de concessão proibir utilização exclusiva e tratamento discriminatório ou sem critérios técnicos aos demais clubes. A representação sustenta que negativas ao Vasco vêm sendo justificadas principalmente pela necessidade de preservação do gramado. O documento cita episódios de 2022, 2023 e 2026. Em três situações anteriores — Vasco x Sport, Vasco x Palmeiras e Vasco x Atlético-MG — decisões judiciais autorizaram o uso do estádio e questionaram as justificativas apresentadas para impedir as partidas. Em agosto de 2026, houve nova negativa para Vasco x Vitória, pela Copa do Brasil, desta vez com referência a “janelas técnicas” para recuperação do gramado e à partida da NFL. A representação também questiona a coerência dos critérios relacionados ao gramado. Segundo os argumentos e documentos citados pelo autor, Flamengo e Fluminense realizaram sequências intensas de partidas no estádio, inclusive com intervalos reduzidos. O texto sustenta que o calendário seria preenchido pelos próprios gestores e que, posteriormente, a saturação do gramado seria utilizada para justificar a impossibilidade de receber jogos de terceiros. Outro ponto é o Memorando de Entendimentos firmado entre Flamengo, Fluminense e Vasco, que previa quatro mandos anuais do Vasco em 2025 e 2026, além dos clássicos, estabelecendo que eventual negativa deveria ser baseada em critérios técnicos e operacionais. A representação menciona decisão do Tribunal de Justiça segundo a qual a tentativa de afastar os efeitos desse entendimento poderia configurar comportamento contraditório contrário à boa-fé objetiva. O autor ainda pede investigação sobre possíveis conflitos de interesse na fiscalização da concessão, citando vínculos profissionais descritos no documento entre pessoas ligadas à fiscalização estadual, à concessionária e ao Flamengo. É importante destacar que a própria representação afirma expressamente que não imputa ilícito a essas pessoas, mas solicita que as circunstâncias sejam apuradas. O que é pedido ao Ministério Público? Phelipe Fontoura solicita, entre outras medidas, que o MP recomende a criação e publicação de critérios objetivos e uniformes para cessão do Maracanã, incluindo intervalo mínimo entre jogos, limite mensal de partidas, laudos assinados por profissionais identificados com ART e justificativa escrita para eventuais negativas. Também pede processo sancionatório relativo às negativas de 2026 e, caso a situação persista, eventual ação civil pública para impedir recusas sem laudo técnico independente e fundamentação escrita. O procurador do estado de Santa Catarina pede ainda a abertura de inquérito civil, obtenção de calendários, pedidos de utilização do estádio, laudos, cronogramas de manutenção, relatórios do Verificador Independente e documentos referentes à multa aplicada à concessionária. Também requer investigação dos possíveis conflitos de interesse e a participação do Vasco para fornecer documentos relativos às negativas recebidas desde 2022. Este documento, não é uma ação ajuizada pelo Vasco. É uma representação feita pelo cidadão e advogado Phelipe Monteiro Mastra Fontoura ao Ministério Público #Maracanã #Futebol #Justiça

MP NA PAREDE PELO MARACANÃ O sócio do Vasco da Gama Pablo Ramadas da Cruz apresentou ao Ministério Público do Rio de Janeiro um pedido de apuração sobre a concessão e a administração do Complexo Maracanã. O documento questiona se Flamengo e Fluminense, integrantes do consórcio concessionário, recebem tratamento privilegiado em relação ao Vasco e a outros clubes interessados em utilizar o estádio. Os principais pontos são: Verificar se existem critérios objetivos e isonômicos para autorizar jogos de clubes que não integram a concessionária. Apurar eventuais pedidos do Vasco em 2026, as respostas recebidas e os fundamentos técnicos de possíveis negativas. Comparar preços, custos operacionais e condições oferecidas a Vasco, Flamengo e Fluminense. Analisar as 77 datas apresentadas pelo Consórcio Fla-Flu na licitação e a meta contratual de 70 jogos. Solicitar o calendário completo de 2026, incluindo jogos, eventos comerciais, períodos de manutenção e datas sem utilização. Requisitar o Plano de Manutenção, cronogramas, ordens de serviço e laudos sobre o gramado. Verificar se a manutenção foi usada como justificativa técnica válida para impedir partidas de terceiros. Avaliar o impacto da partida da NFL sobre o gramado e sua compatibilidade com o calendário do futebol. Solicitar relatórios do Estado e do Verificador Independente sobre fiscalização, manutenção e utilização esportiva. O pedido não afirma que houve irregularidade nem reivindica utilização automática do estádio pelo Vasco. Ele solicita que o Ministério Público investigue se houve tratamento discriminatório, restrição indevida de acesso a um equipamento público, descumprimento contratual ou falha na fiscalização da concessão. #Maracanã #VascoDaGama #FutebolBrasileiro