Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

BARCELONA considered that the match would have been different if the Clásico had not been played on Sunday or if it had not been a playoff. It noted that Rodri was not a starter and that Pedri, whom it described as the owner of the match, was substituted in the 60th minute, just like Raphinha, despite the fact that, as it wrote, the latter was playing poorly but usually had opportunities. It clarified that it could not know if they would have won this way, but maintained that the script would have changed quite a bit. #Fútbol #Clásico #Liga (translated)

BARCELONA criticized those who, as he wrote, just four minutes after the start and after two bad passes in the ball's exit, were already saying that Pedri was not good enough and always failed on big nights. He added that the people who followed the club needed psychiatric attention. https://t.co/xBGHu4ZCiz #Fútbol #Deportes #FCBarcelona (translated)

BARCELONA wrote that the Barça match had many positive aspects, although there were also mistakes that needed to be reviewed, and it considered that it was not the time to look for guilty parties or to make a destructive criticism. It added that, until the tie, the result could have swung in favor of either team and that the opponent had been better and more effective, which meant that Barça needed to improve for the next match. #Fútbol #Barça #CríticaConstructiva (translated)