Search

DataFut wrote that Estadão verified the statements and arguments of the candidates in the debate held the night before on Band. According to the results presented by the profile, Lula (PT) had 8 true statements, 2 misleading, 2 exaggerated, and 1 inaccurate. Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) had 1 true, 5 misleading, 2 false, 1 exaggerated, 5 lacking sufficient context, and 1 classified as understated. DataFut indicated that the link to the article was below. #Debate2023 #Fatos #Eleições (translated)

Mafe Carrascal Rojas stated that she would continue on the streets defending citizens' rights and would show her credentials, as she believed her duty as a member of the Chamber was to represent the people and not remain in an office. She said she prioritized dialogue, but that did not mean remaining silent in the face of abuses or failing to demand explanations for reports of disproportionate actions by the Public Force against protesters. Carrascal maintained that she would defend the right of young people to express themselves and protest, and that she would not abandon those exercising those rights. She also noted that fulfilling the authorities' duty meant protecting rights and acting within the bounds of the Constitution and the law, not using weapons against the population. The representative affirmed that she would continue to raise her voice and questioned recent attempts to portray all mobilizations as violent. She added that one should not generalize or stigmatize those who protested peacefully, that no decree could supersede the Constitution, and that any possible abuse by the authorities should be investigated. She argued that social protest was not a crime and that defending that right was part of her responsibility. #DerechosHumanos #ProtestaPacífica #LibertadesCivil (translated)

Pablo Iglesias stated that insults and reactions of hate against Irene Montero had become common again in progressive circles, media, and among party affiliates. According to what he wrote, the criticisms focused on attributing ambition, egotism, and a desire to retain a position to her, arguments that, he said, may have stopped being heard since 2024. Iglesias shared an article by Raúl Solís that, as he explained, gathered examples of those arguments to point out a double standard regarding other political figures. https://t.co/voTl2pr5Nc #IreneMontero #Política #Progresismo (translated)

Cláudia Teixeira stated that five commentators distinguished themselves by thinking for themselves, unlike others who, according to her, repeated an ideological line. She wrote that the five voices questioned and dismantled arguments and had the courage to expose what many tried to hide, adding that this made them uncomfortable and made a difference. #Opinião #LiberdadeDeExpressão #VozesAutênticas (translated)

Root Conservative Banido stated that the PT would address the pandemic again at 9 AM the following day, with the release of a campaign video by Lula in which Dona Dea would talk about her son, Paulo Gustavo, who died of Covid-19. He said that the initiative would indicate a lack of arguments and requested that the response be made politely and without mockery. https://t.co/ZVyaC07S2O #Pandemia #Educação #Lula (translated)

Repentant followers of Milei shared an exchange in which a person named Marcos argued that seeing posters of Cristina at a university seemed like indoctrination to him. The other person responded that, as an adult, if a poster made him feel indoctrinated, he had a problem. The author stated that this situation illustrated what happens when Twitter arguments are brought into real life. https://t.co/tXSmrWoPNg #Adoctrinamiento #Universidad #Debate (translated)

A newscolina reported that the president of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, rejected the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decisions that allowed the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the publication, in a 11-page decision, Salomão assessed that the company, managed by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not demonstrate a public interest that justified the request, nor proved concrete risks to safety or presented evidence that the sequence of games would harm the pitch. The minister also considered it inappropriate to use the judicial instrument as a substitute for an appeal and rejected the claim that the authorization could encourage new actions against the consortium. The newscolina added that the decision upheld the determinations favorable to the semifinal at the stadium, although there was still room for appeal. The publication mentioned A Vascainos and credited the photo to Matheus Lima. #STJ #Futebol #Vasco (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

André Janones thanked Minister Kassio Nunes Marquez for the assistance he received in his office the previous afternoon. According to Janones, the minister listened to his arguments and stated that he would express his opinion in the records. He stated that he disagreed with several decisions made by Nunes Marquez and other ministers, but said he prefers to express his indignation with technical arguments, instead of using his visibility to attack the reputation of judges. Janones stated that ministers are not politicians and have less space to defend themselves publicly. He also said he did not want to reproduce bolsonarism "with the signs reversed" and accused the movement of having spent eight years attacking the Supreme Court and weakening institutions as part of a fascist project. According to him, the ideological division between members of the institutions and the population's opposition to them could lay the groundwork for the end of democracy. Finally, Janones stated that he would move forward until victory on the 25th and pointed to Flávio Nantes Bolsonaro as his opponent. #Justiça #Democracia #Política (translated)

André Janones thanked Minister Kassio Nunes Marquez for his attention in his office the previous afternoon. According to Janones, the minister listened to his arguments and stated that he would express himself in the case files. The author said he disagreed with several decisions made by the magistrate and other ministers, but defended presenting his indignation through technical arguments in the proceedings. Janones stated that he would not use his visibility to attack the reputation of judges for decisions contrary to his interests. He also said that ministers of the Supreme Court should respect their position and remain above political debate, as, according to him, judges do not have the same space to defend themselves as politicians do. He declared that he did not want to reproduce a "Bolsonarism with a swapped signal" and accused the movement of having spent eight years attacking the Supreme Court and turning the population against Justice. Janones stated that weakening institutions would be part of a fascist plan and claimed that ideological division among members of institutions could threaten democracy. Finally, Janones said he would move forward until victory on the 25th and pointed to Flávio Nantes Bolsonaro as the opponent against whom he intended to direct his actions. #Justiça #STF #Democracia (translated)

Rodney criticized members of the Workers' Party who, according to him, presented their side as if they wanted to elect a figure like Mother Teresa of Calcutta. He stated that Bolsonarism was a reaction to the election of a former president convicted in three instances and claimed that R$ 42 billion had been diverted from Petrobras. He also stated that, after the group returned to power, R$ 6 billion would have been diverted from INSS retirees. He said that this case was more serious because it involved poor and elderly people and claimed that another R$ 1 billion from workers' pension funds could have been diverted if a scheme involving Vorcaro had progressed. Rodney also criticized members of the Workers' Party for accusing the other side of not accepting arguments and acting like a cult. He said they should reflect on their own stance. #Política #Brasil #Corrupção (translated)

Erika Hilton stated that a decision she classified as unprecedented by the president of the TSE, Kássio Nunes Marques, shut down the channel "Lula's Army." She claimed that Flávio Bolsonaro did not like seeing 4 million people mobilized to defeat him with arguments and political articulation, and said that the channel did not resort to lies, AI montages, or electoral hoaxes. Hilton stated that these people would remain active on social media and in the streets, organizing the downfall of Bolsonaro, the end of the 6x1 scale, and the victory of President Lula. She also criticized Flávio, saying that he demonstrated an inability to handle those who think differently, and asked Deputy André Janones to appeal the decision to restore the channel. The congresswoman added that the channel "Tropa da Erika Hilton" remained active and mobilizing people against Bolsonarism. #NinguemCalaOExercitoDoLula #LulaPeloFimDa6x1 #Lula #Bolsonarismo #LiberdadeDeExpressao (translated)

In fact, it was considered a reproach that Sánchez said in an interview on Ser at the beginning of September that there were "sufficient arguments and reasons" for the King to "finally" do so, something he emphasized had not happened on the part of the Crown in 20 years, neither with PSOE nor PP presidents. #ReyesDeEspaña #Marruecos #CeutaYMelilla (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto rejected the argument of the Fla-Flu Consortium that the process had lost its object after the deadline to inform Conmebol of the match stadium. According to the publication, the magistrate stated that the entity granted a new deadline, which was met by Vasco, and that the sale of more than 46,000 tickets made it unfeasible to transfer the fans to another stadium. The publication added that Almeida Neto criticized the previous decision for mentioning a basketball game at Maracanãzinho and said that the consortium's arguments contradicted the technical assessments of the security agencies. The judge stated that changing the location would create a “serious and insurmountable” security risk. According to the report, the Public Prosecutor's Office expressed itself twice in favor of holding the game at Maracanã. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

The author stated that yesterday's concentration in Sol had left her calm. She described it as a display of well-off young people, with designer bags and conservatively styled vests, and argued that there were no arguments or workers among the attendees, whom she identified as young people from wealthy families in Madrid. https://t.co/rUl4JjHaKB #Madrid #Política #Sociedad (translated)

The News Admiral claimed that the sale of more than 46,000 tickets was one of the arguments for the judiciary to reconsider the decision and allow the Maracanã, since a change of venue would be difficult. The profile described the argument as a "masterclass." https://t.co/L1cZY7S39l #Maracanã #Justiça #Ingressos (translated)