The author stated that journalism should audit the functioning power and pose questions that challenge the system. He added that this is how a discussion had begun at #FILZOCALO2026. (translated)
The author pointed out that a ten-year debt above 4% was serious because it made state financing more expensive: as it renewed its loans, it paid more interest and had less room for services and investment. He added that, with a lot of debt and little growth, the pressure to raise taxes and cut spending increased. (translated)
The author stated that he refused to participate in the constant political confrontation. He maintained that, although it generated headlines and prominence, it did not contribute to coexistence, and he advocated for respect and harmony. He also noted that, in his opinion, societies did not advance when they were divided. (translated)
The author argued that health could not be separated from housing and linked the uncertainty about where to live with anxiety, insomnia, and depression. He also described the housing market as speculative and compared its dynamics to gambling, stating that it jeopardized life projects. (translated)
The author described the PSOE list as a group of people protected by parliamentary immunity and silenced. He claimed that Pedro Sánchez had privately referred to Margarita Robles with a derogatory term and that she did not applaud him in public. He also accused both of them of complicity in corruption, prostitution, degradation, and invasion, and asked why they had concealed something that he did not identify. (translated)
The author argued that there had been no talk of effort, but of sacrifice, and stated that the people around his interlocutors were already giving hints about who would bear the burden: pensioners, those earning the minimum wage, and workers in general. He also warned that, in his opinion, they would put an end to the welfare state and would come with a chainsaw. (translated)
The author asked what risks the implementation of the European digital ID could entail and how it would affect individual freedom. He also questioned why so little was said about the issue despite considering its imminent launch and raised whether the promised efficiency would compensate for the surrender of personal sovereignty. (translated)