The author addressed the protesters, who gathered in the squares and those who supported the cause of housing from home. He told them that they would also win that struggle and pointed out that that of their grandparents had been democracy and that of their parents, the welfare state, before leaving the comparison unfinished. (translated)
The author accused the progressive judges of refusing to support Judge Biedma, who, he wrote, had suffered threats and brutal pressure and had been the subject of a conspiracy against her life for fulfilling her duty. He added that, in his opinion, they could hardly sink any lower. (translated)
The author described AI’s ability to make cognitive empathy more practical as an overlooked benefit, writing that biases such as confirmation bias and the curse of knowledge often made it difficult for people to see another person’s perspective. They began to suggest that AI could help with material available as text, but the post ended before the thought was complete.
The author claimed that polls were giving more than 200 seats to parties that, he said, could commit all kinds of abuses and were already revealing some of their intentions. He also maintained that Feijóo's fear of the electoral call pointed to changes, although he did not specify which. (translated)
The author argued that there was no room for equidistant positions and stated that a victory for the PP and Vox would mean an unacceptable reduction of rights in favor of privileged elites. He also defended the formation of a progressive government with clear and courageous objectives. (translated)
The author said conversations revealed in the Cornel rape case, involving men at a prestigious university, showed how so-called elites helped enable the rise of the manosphere. They described the case as reflecting a broader shift towards what they called “the thinly veiled”, but the post ended mid-sentence.