Search

🚨OPINION: Renan can squawk as much as he wants, but he is not above the law. TV Globo's decision is correct The candidate could have been launched by another party, but decided to form his own and already wants to sit by the window. NOVO, founded in 2015, participated in the station's first debate only in 2020. Just like right-wing, center, and even communist parties, the right to participation is limited to surpassing the barrier clause. NOVO has 5 parliamentarians in Congress and, therefore, obtained authorization from the TSE. Renan Santos and his party should elect their parliamentarians before claiming a right that does not belong to them today. (translated)

Dirceuzinho from MBL creates all this confusion about the debate to avoid irrelevance, but the rule is clear: the broadcaster must allow participation for those who have at least 5 parliamentarians. If the criterion is not met, the broadcaster can invite, but is not obligated to. (translated)

🚨 ⚖️ ATTENTION: Minister Cármen Lúcia (STF) REJECTS Renan Santos' action to ensure his participation in the Globo debate for understanding that the ADPF is not the appropriate procedural instrument to challenge his exclusion; however, she did not analyze the merits of the dispute. (translated)

URGENT: Cármen Lúcia REJECTS the request from Missão to ensure Renan Santos in the presidential debate on Globo. The minister of the STF decided not to consider the ADPF presented by the party, stating that the action used an "inappropriate procedural route" and did not meet the requirement of subsidiarity. Missão had requested a preliminary injunction to force Globo to include Renan in the debate this Thursday (1st), at 9:30 PM. Cármen Lúcia, however, did not judge the merits of Renan's exclusion: the decision blocks the action for procedural issues. As a result, the party suffers a new judicial defeat after Nunes Marques also denied, in the TSE, the injunction that sought to guarantee the candidate's participation. (translated)

🚨 📺 ATTENTION: In the competition for participation in Globo's presidential debate, Renan Santos has support behind the scenes from STF ministers and the government; the candidate's absence is classified as "absurd" by interlocutors, who assess that it benefits Flávio Bolsonaro. (translated)

🚨 Renan Santos reacts to Nunes Marques' decision and goes on the attack. After the minister denied his request to participate in the Globo debate, the candidate from Missão posted a video on social media in which he accuses Nunes Marques of involvement in the Banco Master case and states that the minister "should be in jail." Renan also questions the decision that allowed Romeu Zema to participate in the debate and relates it to the fact that Zema is, according to him, an ally of Flávio Bolsonaro. (translated)

Officials of a municipal company in Vila Nova de Gaia were accused by the Public Ministry of crimes related to abuse of power, forgery of documents, and financial participation in business between 2015 and 2017, in the context of contracts for works in the municipality. (translated)

NOW: Kim Kataguiri, lawyer for Renan Santos, asks the STF to FORCE Globo to include the candidate in the debate and accuses the network of possible “MANIPULATION OF THE ELECTION.” In the action, the defense argues that the exclusion of Renan, while another candidate with lower performance in the polls was invited, represents arbitrary treatment. The request seeks a preliminary decision determining Renan's participation in Globo's presidential debate this Thursday (1st) at 9:30 PM, on equal conditions with the other candidates. The petition, signed by deputy and lawyer Kim Kataguiri, even states that Renan's absence has the “intention of manipulating the election.” The accusation is a defense argument and will still be analyzed by the STF. (translated)

Renan Santos will remain in Rio de Janeiro throughout Thursday for a possible last-minute participation in Globo's presidential debate; if Flávio Bolsonaro drops out, Renan will be just minutes away from the broadcaster and will make himself available to participate in the event. (translated)

Aging with dignity, autonomy, and quality of life must be a commitment of the entire society. In a Europe where we are living more and more years, it is essential to ensure adequate responses in health, social protection, support for caregivers, and the active participation of people. (translated)

I was really curious to know the official explanation from MBL and the first impression is horrible, as it already starts with an easily verifiable lie. I haven't watched the entire podcast yet, but in this excerpt here, Arthur is objectively lying. The case 1505278-93.2026.8.26.0454 is accessible to any lawyer. I was able to access it through mine and asked her to explain it to me. The case is NOT about Nazism and the profile The Phallic Man is NOT among the accused! In fact, it is exactly the OPPOSITE! The legal group of MBL says NOT TO INVESTIGATE Phallic Man because they already knew he was Emanuel and even say that he is with the movement! The reported profiles are: - Ian Lucas - Robberbaron - Hansa And the police report is for extortion, absolutely NOTHING TO DO with Nazism! If there really is a request for investigation into Nazism regarding the Phallic Man profile by MBL, this document has simply never been presented, at least as far as I know. The only document I know that talks about him is this one, and it seems to be the one Arthur is talking about because he cites the fact that the document identifies Phallic Man as Emanuel. “If Phallic Man was not accused, why is he in the document?” Because there were records of interaction between him and some investigated profiles, including participation in Spaces, and that is why the legal group of MBL appears to clarify that there is no need to worry about him because he is with MBL. In other words, the document that Arthur uses as “evidence” that they are not with the guy because they reported him actually proves exactly the opposite, that they did not want to report the guy because they are together! Arthur says in the podcast “don’t believe me, you can research” - but he knows that the party’s supporters will not research anything and will only repeat the lie. Those who really research will see that he is inverting reality. It's concerning that they are lying dramatically about something so serious. (translated)

✅ 📺 Although the TSE denied Renan Santos' request to compel Globo to invite him to the presidential debate, Kassio Nunes Marques acknowledged that the candidate met the criteria established by the broadcaster for a possible invitation, as he was the highest positioned in the Quaest survey among candidates without mandatory participation. (translated)

URGENT: Nunes Marques DENIES Renan Santos' request to participate in the presidential debate on Globo. The president of the TSE recognized that Renan met the criteria established by the broadcaster for a possible invitation, but concluded that this did NOT guarantee his participation. According to Nunes Marques, there is no evidence in the documents presented that Globo actually invited Renan to the debate. The minister emphasized that the broadcaster's own rule stated that Globo "may, at its sole discretion" invite the highest-ranked candidate in Quaest. Thus, Nunes Marques denied the urgent guardianship requested by Missão. (translated)

🚨NOW: Renan Santos' request to PARTICIPATE in the Globo debate is in the hands of CÁRMEN LÚCIA at the STF. In addition to the action presented to the TSE, Renan and the Missão Party also appealed to the Supreme Court to try to guarantee the candidate's presence in the last presidential debate before the first round. At the STF, the case is under the responsibility of Cármen Lúcia. Meanwhile, at the TSE, the action presented by Missão is under the responsibility of Kassio Nunes Marques. The defense argues that Globo created a "legitimate expectation" for Renan's participation by including him in prior stages of the electoral coverage and requests an urgent decision given the proximity of the debate. (translated)

🚨 PEOPLE! LET'S SPREAD AND MAKE A LOT OF NOISE! Share it on all your networks, WhatsApp groups, status... the participation of President Lula in the Flow Podcast. It will be tomorrow (Thursday), 20:45, at the time of the debate on Globo. GO LULA! (translated)