Irene wrote that she has returned to intervene after following the discussions in silence and criticized the reactions to an ironic TikTok published by two people. According to her, some users did not grasp the irony and tried to determine what was appropriate to publish and what could be laughed at. She added that a previous TikTok had surpassed a million views. Irene argued that the criticisms were mainly directed at the lightness and complicity shown in the video. She also invited those who were outraged to watch Zeudi's live streams, stating that they would find foul language and reproaches directed at the viewers. In her opinion, the indignant reactions were selective. Referring to the man involved in the TikTok, Irene said he was laughing, perhaps more than the woman, and questioned those who sought to protect him or decide for him, reminding that he was an adult. She described the video as an ironic invitation to "go screw yourself" and wrote that, although it had been removed, the message got through and its authors had won. She concluded by accusing the critics of inconsistency and hypocrisy. #ironia #TikTok #indignazione (translated)
