Search

Madness, axe robbery, assault on a police officer who was left disabled. I warned and shared videos about him back in 2021. But he is still in the country, and why is that? Well, a huge naive majority in the Parliament has granted him citizenship. Remember that Alex Vanopslagh, Inger Støjberg, Mona Juul, and many more have NEVER voted against granting citizenship. I wonder if the parties that have ensured that Danes are forced to encounter him again... actually feel any shame and guilt? They should! (translated)

The name everyone should remember. He is known as the reckless driver from Aarhus and previously stated in 2021: "I drive very recklessly myself. I am known as a reckless driver around here. I run red lights all the time." He seems almost proud. He should be ashamed. On June 18, 2021, he hit police officer Stefan Nymann at over 80 km/h and disabled him for life. Stefan was thrown into the air, went into a coma, and was in life-threatening condition. Mohamad left him on the road and was wanted for two days. Stefan suffered around 50 brain hemorrhages, serious lung damage, a hip fracture, and damaged nerves in his brain. Today he is brain damaged, partially paralyzed, and sitting in a wheelchair. He has impaired vision, severe speech problems, and primarily receives food through a feeding tube. In court, the shameless Mohamad pleaded not guilty. In June 2022, he received four years in prison for ruining Stefan's life. During his sentence, he received another sentence of eight months for, among other things, violence, threats, and deprivation of liberty. Nevertheless, he was released on probation in 2024. Completely crazy with that history. And it turned out to be a huge mistake. Just six months later, he committed an attempted robbery along with three other men. Armed with an axe, tear gas, and a crowbar, they approached a 21-year-old man and demanded 200,000 kr. If he did not pay in cash, he would "pay with blood." When he refused, they abducted him. The abduction was stopped two hours later when the police halted the vehicle. The Western High Court has just increased Mohamad's sentence from two years to two years and six months. Now you’re probably thinking: Isn’t he going to be deported? No. Mohamad Tarek Younes was born in Denmark and has Danish citizenship. He likely got it as a secondary person when his father was granted our Danish citizenship in 2001. What a gain for Denmark. (translated)

Today, the Parliament showed its ugliest side. Before the election, Pelle Dragsted promised that his first political proposal would be to reinstate Great Prayer Day. An hour ago, when we voted on the Danish People's Party's proposal to reinstate Great Prayer Day now and not in 2030, the Unity List voted against it. Before the election, Pia Olsen Dyhr promised the students that she would not cut their student grants. Now she and the Socialist Party are cutting the student grants to finance the government's budget. Before the election, Mette Frederiksen promised that the punishment should fit the crime. Nevertheless, the Social Democrats voted against it when we voted an hour ago on the Danish People's Party's proposal that murderers like Elias Shegow, who stoned a 13-year-old girl, should not receive a reduced sentence. And do you know what the worst part is? That these arrogant politicians probably don't even feel the slightest shame over their blatant lies and voter deception. Just think... They stand on nationwide TV and promise the Danish people one thing. And when the election is over, they go right down to the Parliament and vote the exact opposite, hoping that the Danes won't notice it. They should be ashamed. (translated)

"Što se Ronalda tiče, jedno pitanje je premalo, a tri su previše. Dopustit ću samo dva. Ronaldo nije glavni razlog zašto sam ovdje. Glavni razlog je Danska, a ja sam tu kao izbornik"Jesus je demantirao napise da je Ronaldo odbio trenirati. #CristianoRonaldo #PortugalskaReprezentacija #JorgeJesus

There is no one like @NadjaIsaksen in the Danish Parliament. The way she gets the whole choir going from the soft right wing all the way to the communists, both in due time and at inappropriate moments, is simply fantastic. She ends up making the conditions in the expulsion centers so unbearable that all the residents voluntarily go home😂 And that is just one of many areas where she excels completely and utterly. The success of a politician on the national patriotic right wing should be measured by the amount of negative press in the red media, and no one does it better than Nadja (shoutout to @LBMathiesen and @AllanFeldt_ too). That definitely deserves a follow if you aren't already doing so. (translated)

26.09.2026 DESINFORMANTER Jeg ved ikke hvad der er galt med de her sølvpapirshatte der mere tror på den russiske Ambassadør end på danske ministre Disinformationen Misinformation og en hel del trolde der er falske profiler I min læring for Værnepligtige fra dengang står der om 5. Kolonne ’det er en skjult gruppe af mennesker der arbejder aktivt for fjenden.’ og det må være femte kolonne i letvægtsudgaven der kommenterer på de sociale medier. Er det dem eller er det hyrede kriminelle eller er det russere der har punkteret mine dæk ødelagt mit kamera smadret min eksterne harddisk?

Berlingske has found 58 humiliation videos on social media, where Danish youth are beaten and humiliated. The phenomenon is far more widespread than previously assumed. If only we knew which group was committing these atrocities, so that something could be done about it. Performative political outrage, where politicians insist that "such things have no place in Denmark," and that they are "appalled" and "outraged," after which absolutely nothing happens. In 3, 2, 1 .. #dkpol (translated)

The residents of Kærshovedgård and other departure centers should not have free dental care. That is my clear stance. After a call from Berlingske, where the journalist questioned me for over 30 minutes in every conceivable way, I feel we should lay the facts on the table. I had a clear impression that a political narrative had been set up in advance, into which my answers were to be forced: that my stance was to be portrayed as both inhumane and heartless. But the matter is actually quite simple. The residents of, among other places, Kærshovedgård should leave Denmark. They should not be here. Either because they are rejected asylum seekers or because they have been convicted of serious crimes and expelled from Denmark. Most of them repeatedly. They can roam freely in society. I do not believe they should have free dental care. I believe they should go home. And in light of the fact that since 2016 we have spent over 4.7 million kroner on dental treatment for residents, it is reasonable to examine how that money is used. I must simply refer to reading the Aliens Act § 42 a, section 2. Here, the key word is: "necessary." According to the law, it is indeed expenses for necessary health services that are covered. Dental treatment may be included, but that does not mean that every conceivable service at the dentist is necessary. Therefore, I have asked the minister whether public funds have been used for unnecessary expenses such as anesthesia. For one treatment, anesthesia may be unnecessary, while for another, it may be painful or irresponsible to forego it. So this is not about whether the residents may or may not receive anesthesia. It is simply about whether the Aliens Act § 42 a, section 2, is actually being complied with. Thus, it is entirely legitimate to investigate whether public funds have been used for something that was not necessary, including whether anesthesia is routinely offered to patients without reservation and without regard to the rules. Fundamentally, this is NOT about whether residents in departure centers may receive anesthesia. It is also NOT about whether anyone may go to the dentist. The question is who should pay the bill. It is absurd that Danes are paying dental bills for people who are to go home. It should not be controversial to think so. After all, there is no one preventing voluntary organizations or others from raising funds for dental treatment for the residents if they cannot pay themselves. For example, the Red Cross offers swimming pool trips to the residents of Kærshovedgård. Perhaps dental assistance could be something one chooses to prioritize instead. (translated)

Jeg har egentlig for længst besluttet ikke at svare på Poyas perfide personangreb eller hans skriverier om en region, han intet ved om eller har nogen som helst erfaring med at dække – men selvmålet er simpelthen for stort til ikke at pointere det håbløst absurde i, at han velvilligt og utrætteligt de sidste par år har gentaget udokumenterede påstande fra Hamas. Det er f.eks. helt okay at videreformidle historier og tabstal fra Hamas’ “sundhedsministerium”, som ikke skelner mellem kombattanter og civile (Hamas er en valid kilde, må man forstå -modsat IDF der jævnligt publicerer dokumentation for deres påstande). Altså Hamas, som selv offentliggør nekrologer over barnesoldater, der alle ryger i statistikken over dræbte i Gaza – men som civile, selvfølgelig. For et par år tilbage ville jeg være røget i flæsket på Poya over hans ekstremt provokerende og nedladende angreb – både på min person og mit professionelle virke. Over, at han vitterligt ingen respekt har for den erfaring, jeg har som journalist, eller de historier, jeg har dækket og stadig dækker for store internationale medier. At jeg ofte sætter livet på spil for at viderebringe de historier til jer derhjemme. Han deklarerede hånligt på et tidspunkt, at den værste krigsskade, jeg havde pådraget mig, var en solforbrænding i Tel Aviv. Et opslag, som folketingsmedlemmer fra Enhedslisten og Radikale Venstre rask væk likede i deres iver efter at nedgøre mig. Men i dag vælger jeg at holde igen med den tirade af modangreb, jeg ellers mener 100% på sin plads – specielt når det kommer til Poyas faglige kunnen eller mangel på samme. For den slags angreb har skadet mig langt mere, end de har gavnet mig har jeg lært med tiden. Derfor ligger jeg heller ikke længere i åbne slagsmål på sociale medier, hvilket nogle af jer måske har noteret. Jeg vælger derfor i stedet at skrive, at jeg oprigtigt har ondt af Poya. Virkelig. Det må ikke være sjovt at blive så indigneret over, at en dansk journalist viderebringer information fra en part i en krig, alt imens man lystigt viderebringer information fra en af verdens mest ondskabsfulde terrorgrupper. Jeg har sagt det før, Poya - jeg har absolut ingen interesse i at hverken skrive eller diskutere med dig. Det er langt under mit niveau. Jeg håber derfor du vil kanalisere din vrede en anden vej. Det ville klæde dig. #Journalistik #Mellemøsten #Ytringsfrihed

HØJESTERET HAR TALT Den 4. september sad jeg i Højesteret og fulgte sagen om en arabisk kvinde, der havde snydt sig til dansk indfødsret i 2015. I 2013 havde hun i ansøgningsskemaet nemlig afgivet en tro- og loveerklæring på, at hun ikke havde begået kriminelle forhold. I 2016 blev hun og ægtefællen imidlertid sigtet for at have udøvet grov vold mod sin på tidspunktet 4 årige datter. I 2017 blev hun og ægtefællen dømt for volden mod datteren. Det betyder, at kvinden, da hun ansøgte om dansk indfødsret, fortiede, at hun havde begået strafbare forhold og dermed afgav en falsk erklæring til myndighederne. Spørgsmålet for Højesteret var, om frakendelse vil være i strid med Danmarks internationale forpligtelser, herunder EMRK artikel 8. Højesteret har i dag stadfæstet, at hun frakendes sin danske indfødsret. Det glæder mig. Dommen er rigtig. Men efter min opfattelse bør loven ændres. Hvis en ansøger ikke opfyldte betingelserne, da Folketinget vedtog loven om indfødsret, bør indfødsretten anses for aldrig at være gyldigt erhvervet. Nullitet fra begyndelsen, ex tunc. Det bør skrives klart ind i indfødsretsloven og kommende love om indfødsrets meddelelse, så forventnings- og indrettelseshensyn ikke kan bruges til at fastholde en indfødsret opnået på et urigtigt grundlag. For man skal ikke kunne opnå ved domstolene, hvad man aldrig ville have fået af Folketinget, hvis sandheden havde været kendt. Det er alene Folketinget, der efter grundlovens § 44, stk. 1, bestemmer, hvem der kan opnå dansk indfødsret. Sprogkravet og indfødsretsprøven bør samtidig skærpes markant. Ved min overværing af sagen i retten undrede jeg mig meget over, hvordan hun kunne opfylde sprogkravet og bestå indfødsretsprøven, når en arabisk tolk måtte oversætte hele retsmødet for hende. Højesteret bemærker da også i dommen, at hun kun forstår og taler dansk i meget begrænset omfang. For hvis hun efter 27 år i Danmark ikke kan begå sig på dansk, hvordan kunne hun så opfylde kravene for 12 år siden. Måske er der givet dispensation. Det mangler jeg fortsat svar på. Og det leder mig hen til, at det bør være sådan, at ansøgernes identitet kontrolleres biometrisk ved deltagelse i prøven, så myndighederne senere kan kontrollere, om den, der tog prøven, er den samme som den, der får udstedt et dansk pas. Men altså, vi bør bare lade være med at massedele vores indfødsret ud som bolsjer. Jeg minder om, at der pt. er over 19.000 ansøgninger om dansk indfødsret. Det er hovedrystende. #Indfødsret #Danmark #Rettigheder

82 % af bandemedlemmerne har udenlandsk baggrund. Her tæller 3. generations udlændinge ikke med. De optælles som dansk oprindelse. Så tallet er endnu højere. Stram udlændingepolitik? Yeah right. #dkpol https://t.co/FPMIvWfPJB #udlændingepolitik #bandekriminalitet #danmark

WHAT, dagens underligste: At SF og Radikale har sagt ja til at finansiere finansloven ved at skære i SU'en. Ved de partier, hvem der har stemt på dem? #dkpol #danskpolitik #SU #finanslov

I ruslands officielle udenrigspolitik er Danmark klassificeret som en fjende af rusland. Dansk territorium erklæret "en trussel mod ruslands nationale sikkerhed". Det er offentligt bekræftet information. Hvordan kan en dansker sige: Rusland er ikke min fjende⁉️ #Rusland #Danmark #Udenrigspolitik

DRAMA I FOLKETINGET: THOMAS SKRIVER FORSVINDER? På et møde i Folketinget går Socialdemokratiets Thomas Skriver til frontalangreb på Dansk Folkeparti. Han kalder mig og Dansk Folkeparti en “SKAMPLET”, fordi vi viser et billede af Beate, der blev dræbt af en udvisningsdømt kriminel. Straks herefter forsvinder Thomas Skriver ud af mødet. Han undgår dermed at blive konfronteret med, at Dansk Folkeparti selvfølgelig har fået tilladelse til at bruge billedet. Beates død er den sørgelige konsekvens af Socialdemokratiets insisteren på, at udvisningsdømte kriminelle skal have ret til at vandre frit rundt i Danmark. Har man tid til at kalde andre en “skamplet” på demokratiet, bør man også blive og høre svaret - og måske sætte sig ind i sagerne, før man slynger om sig med anklager. Beate og andre ofre for udvisningdømtes kriminalitet fortjener bedre end disse arrogante Socialdemokratiske vredesudbrud. #Folketinget #Socialdemokratiet #DanskFolkeparti