Search

David Lisnard wrote that Corentin and Romain observed, in their own words, that he appeared everywhere on their social media. He added that Corentin mentioned a "filter bubble effect" that could reinforce some in their convictions. Lisnard put forward two explanations: Corentin and Romain, employees of Franceinfo, could be close to his ideas because of this algorithmic effect, or their exposure to his content could reflect the actual progress of his approach, online as well as on the ground. He thanked Corentin and Laurent for their interest in his candidacy and for their publication. #ilsepassequelquechose #réseauxsociaux #bullesdefiltres #candidature (translated)

Dr. Jérôme Barriere estimated that the strong progress of David Lisnard in a voting intention poll was a major fact, despite the limitations of this type of survey. He suggested that this rise could be explained by his speech in favor of reduced spending, by a growing activist base that he described as respectful, by his energy, and by his positioning on the right, which he presented as a hope to block the RN. He also emphasized that Lisnard was not accountable for the past record, which he considered an asset with the French people. Barriere wondered how far this progress would go and whether David Lisnard would be invited more to television shows and included in polls, believing that pollsters had deliberately excluded him until now. #Politique #Sondage #Élections (translated)

The author contested the account of an opposition between the police and the high school students. He stated that the official report, in the Place de la République and elsewhere, mentioned 715 injuries among the law enforcement forces, and then cited the figure of 215 without specifying its meaning. (translated)