Search

DI MARCO OPERADORA MENTIROSA QUE ELIGE LA MENTIRA ANTES QUE EL INDEC La operadora mentirosa Laura Di Marco se pregunta de dónde saca el Presidente Milei los datos que citó en distintas entrevistas acerca de que el consumo alcanzó su máximo histórico. La respuesta es sencilla y está publicada. Salen del INDEC. El consumo privado total, en términos reales, alcanzó en 2025 el nivel más alto desde que se inició la serie del INDEC en 2004. Veintidós años de mediciones y ningún año por encima. El salto contra 2024 fue de 8,6%. El primer trimestre de 2026 continúa esa marca: el consumo privado desestacionalizado es el más alto de toda la serie, la tendencia-ciclo confirma lo mismo y ya van cinco trimestres consecutivos de suba —2,2 / 1,0 / 0,6 / 1,1 / 0,8—. El PIB acompaña con esos mismos cinco trimestres de crecimiento y una suba de 2,3% interanual. Hay un dato que ordena todo el resto. Mientras el consumo privado crece, el consumo público cayó 0,9% interanual y 2,4% desestacionalizado en el mismo trimestre. El Estado gasta menos y las familias consumen más. Durante veinte años nos explicaron que eso era imposible. Su tuit dice que "solo algunas pocas actividades crecen y el resto está muerto". Se miden dieciséis sectores y doce crecieron. Pesca 27,5%. Agricultura y ganadería 18,1%. Minas y canteras 12,3%. Intermediación financiera 7,5%. Hogares con servicio doméstico 6,3%. Hoteles y restaurantes 2,8%. Construcción 2,5%. Transporte y comunicaciones 2,3%. Cayeron cuatro: industria manufacturera 1,7%, administración pública 1,4%, electricidad, gas y agua 1,1% y comercio 0,3%. Doce contra cuatro. A eso le sumás exportaciones que crecieron 9,8% interanual, el componente que más subió de toda la demanda. Todo esto sale del INDEC. Para discutir el consumo, y a sabiendas que encajaba a la perfección en su relato, llevó un índice de humor social de una consultora privada. Un índice de optimismo mide optimismo. No mide consumo, no mide actividad, no mide producto. Una periodista que escribe de economía, con la responsabilidad que ello implica, conoce la diferencia, o debería conocerla. Eligió la única fuente que le servía para escribir lo que ya había decidido escribir. El INDEC estuvo intervenido casi una década por el kirchnerismo, justamente para que preguntas como la suya no tuvieran respuesta verificable. Hoy la tienen. Ahora falta que lo lea antes de escribir. #Economía #INDEC #Consumo

Bom, eu tinha conversado com algumas pessoas e dito que não postaria mais nada sobre isso. Mas, como voltou a postar, esse será o último texto que farei sobre o assunto. E, agora, nem vou tocar na questão de relacionamento, seja mentira ou verdade. Isso sequer deveria ser assunto envolvendo uma pessoa que não estava presente e não fazia parte da minha vida em nenhum desses momentos. O ponto importante agora é outro: a calúnia envolvendo o guichê do aeroporto, dizendo que eu estava lá e que fiz um escândalo. Além de ser mentira, isso foi utilizado de uma forma querendo me prejudicar profissionalmente. Foi exposto algo completamente calunioso e difamatório, baseado em uma mentira. Conversei com pessoas do clube que estavam no local naquele dia, com amigos e também tenho conversas no WhatsApp que mostram que eu nunca cheguei perto daquele local e como, de fato, foi a situação. Inclusive, falei um pouco sobre isso no print que publiquei mais cedo. Como sei que a pessoa é covarde e não vai se retratar, vamos parar com indiretas na internet e resolver isso como adultos. Fica até triste em ver uma “jornalista” em um portal tão grande, que fez uma linda cobertura na Copa do Mundo, soltando informações tão mentirosas assim na internet. Eu não neguei que aceitei, eu ainda postei e mostrei os motivos e as conversas que tive internamente com pessoas do Diário do Peixe. Mas, em nenhum momento, estive naquele local e aconteceu o que foi dito por ela. Quer falar sobre relacionamento? Fale. Talvez o seu esteja ruim e você tenha precisado, durante quatro anos, descontar suas frustrações e decepções em alguém. Agora, quando a mentira envolveu meu trabalho e o Lucas Barros profissionalmente, a história é outra. Ou prova o que está dizendo, ou vamos resolver como adultos, na Justiça. Chega de conversinha na internet. É isso. Agora bora que já já tem Santos! #Justiça #Calúnia #Mentira

“Jugando bien o mal siempre trabajé de la mejor manera” “La decisión fue de arriba, no del DT” “No está bueno estar encerrado en un contenedor” “A nadie le sirve que estemos encerrados ahí” “Nunca le faltamos el respeto al club” “Si llegas todos los días enojado a Cantilo te querías pegar un tiro” “El único que nos vino a visitar fue Ponzio, ningún dirigente ni nadie del CT” “Es mentira que Viña quiso pelear a Longoria, hablaron y Longoria se fue” Maxi Salas en @radiolared #Fútbol #Deportes #Opinión

Maestro Júnior critica José Boto, diretor de futebol do Flamengo: “Eu sou suspeito para falar desse senhor, porque quando ele chegou ao Flamengo, ele disse que convenceu o Filipe Luís a ficar. Mentira!” “E se você for olhar as contratações dele, eu tenho minhas dúvidas se elas foram tão favoráveis. Uma coisa é você ter capacidade de convencimento, outra coisa é ter a carteira cheia para pagar.” “Eu perguntei a amigos que são agentes na Europa se eles conhecem o José Boto, e todos falaram que não conhecem. E por que ele usa dessa arrogância e dessa prepotência?” 🎥 @sportv | @geglobo https://t.co/uxRNXlCLNg #Flamengo #Futebol #Crítica

A Generation That Forgot the Shape of the Square On memory left to die alone By Adham Hasanin Egyptian journalist and political writer, based in the Netherlands In a house near mine, there is a boy of thirteen. Born in 2013 just a few months younger than the July coup itself, younger than the new republic under whose shadow we now live. I asked him once, with no preamble, no test, out of nothing more than passing curiosity: do you know what January was? He answered simply, without hesitation, without any sense that he was missing something: "An old revolution, against Mubarak, right?" Not entirely wrong. But it is everything he knows. The name Tahrir Square means nothing specific to him. The sound of the crowd chanting has no echo in his mind. He does not know that his own family whom he sees every day saying "thank God for stability," who warn him against "chaos" whenever a political headline crosses the screen once, at a moment two years before he was born, went down into the street, betting their entire lives on the possibility that something might change. This article is not about politics. It is about memory, and about who decides what gets told and what is left to die in silence. I. Who Erases the Picture? The first question that comes to mind is the easiest and most deceptive one: who erases this memory? And where do we begin holding them accountable? But the truth is too complex to reduce to a single actor. No one actually erases memory, in the literal sense of the act. There is no ministry called the "Ministry of Forgetting," no presidential decree ordering January struck from the collective consciousness. What happens is simpler than that, and more dangerous at once: the subject is simply never told. School says nothing. The textbook leaps from one period to another without pausing on January for more than two faded lines, composed with deliberate neutrality, devoid of any detail that might make the event feel alive to its young reader. Television no longer has any reason to return to it; the programmes that once hosted witnesses and activists stopped years ago, replaced by an official discourse that mentions January only in passing, as an unfortunate prelude to the "stability" that supposedly followed. And the home the most dangerous link of all has become afraid of the subject. Speech now carries a price, and many families, whether consciously or by sheer survival instinct, have decided that silence is safer than the story. The father who marched fears passing on to his son a curiosity that might one day lead him into trouble the family cannot afford. The mother who lost a friend in the events prefers not to reopen the wound before a child who does not yet grasp the weight of loss. And so, generation after generation, the circle of those who know shrinks, and the circle of those who do not even ask because they do not know there is anything worth asking widens. No one decided to erase the memory through an explicit decision. The memory was simply left to die alone, with no one tending it. And it is precisely this decentralised absence of responsibility that makes this kind of erasure more dangerous than any direct official ban: there is no single decision to challenge, no single body to hold accountable. Responsibility is distributed across thousands of small decisions made by thousands of individuals, each within their own context, each seeming reasonable when viewed in isolation. II. Why This Is More Dangerous Than Direct Repression An objection might be raised: is direct repression arrest, imprisonment, publishing bans not far more lethal than mere gradual forgetting? The answer is complex, and deserves calm unpacking. Direct repression can be seen. It can be documented, and the victim can know they are a victim, can tell their story, and their pain can become a testimony added to the collective memory, even if it never reaches justice. The political prisoner knows he is a political prisoner. The journalist banned from writing knows he is banned, and can tell the world he is banned. Direct repression, for all its cruelty, leaves a trace that can be followed. But a generation that has forgotten something happened at all does not even have a starting point from which to ask. This thirteen-year-old boy will never ask "why were we repressed?" because he does not know there is anything deserving that question in the first place. He feels no absence, because he does not know there is anything absent. He simply lives in a version of reality stripped of an entire chapter of his country’s history, and never for a moment suspects that this void is a void at all. Here lies the essence of the danger: direct repression creates victims who know they are victims. Erasure of memory, when it succeeds, creates a generation that does not even know it has been deprived of anything. And deprivation that is not felt cannot be resisted, because resistance always begins with an awareness of loss. The regime that came after 2013 does not need to convince the new generation that January was a mistake. That would be an arduous, costly task, requiring sustained propaganda and continuous effort to persuade each individual one by one. It is far easier, and strategically far more efficient, simply to ensure they never know it was anything at all. The void requires no defence; it requires only silence, and silence is free and always available. III. The Four Mechanisms of Erasure Four complementary mechanisms can be identified working together to produce this collective void not as an organised conspiracy, but as a system of incentives that pushes each party, consciously or not, to contribute to the same process. The first mechanism: formal education. The curriculum, as currently designed, treats January as a passing footnote rather than a founding event deserving detail and analysis. The student memorises two dates the start of the revolution and its presumed end without understanding why people took to the streets, what they were demanding, or how they felt in that pivotal moment. The second mechanism: broadcast media. The channels that once hosted live discussions on January, featuring varied perspectives, have gradually disappeared, or transformed their discourse entirely. Today’s televised image either ignores the anniversary altogether, or invokes it only to frame it as a prelude to chaos that must be avoided. The third mechanism: the silence of homes. This is the most dangerous of all, precisely because it is the most human and understandable. Parents who lived through the experience protect it with silence, not out of aversion to the story, but out of fear of its price. This silence, however legitimate its motives, achieves exactly the same effect as official censorship: it blocks the transmission of knowledge from one generation to the next. The fourth mechanism: the absence of alternative spaces. Even those among the new generation who wish to know cannot easily find places to look. Archives are scattered, trustworthy websites are blocked or require effort to reach, and personal testimonies are dispersed across corners of the internet that an ordinary student at an ordinary school will never stumble upon. These four mechanisms require no central coordination to work together. Each naturally serves the others, and all converge on a single result: a growing void in the consciousness of every new generation. IV. Memory as an Act of Resistance If erasure operates without a centre, then resisting it must also be decentralised. No one waits for a government decision to restore January to the curriculum, nor for a television programme to revive the testimonies. Resistance here is necessarily individual, happening in small details, in passing conversations, in the simple decision to tell rather than to stay silent. This is exactly what I try to do, without any claim to heroism, without any grand mission. I try, whenever I can, to tell the thirteen-year-old boy and others like him details that are never written in official reports or in schoolbooks: what the voices in the square sounded like, how someone felt the first time they realised change was possible, what that moment of hope was like before everything changed. The goal is not to bring back the past; the past cannot be brought back. The goal is that this boy, when he grows older and asks again and he will ask, because the questions always return at some point finds someone to tell him the full story, not two faded lines in a schoolbook. That he knows the stability he is told is the fruit of "wisdom" has a prior history, that this history carried other possibilities, and that real people bet their lives on those possibilities. V. Why This Matters Now Talking about the memory of a generation not yet aware might seem an intellectual luxury next to more urgent matters: arrests, a collapsing economy, regional wars. But the truth is that this issue is the foundation on which every other issue is built. A people who do not know they once rose up will not understand why they should ever think of rising again. A generation raised to believe "stability" is the only natural state possible will never ask itself what drove its own parents, shortly before it was born, to risk everything for an alternative that was never guaranteed. Memory is not a luxury; it is the reference point by which every generation measures its present, and through which it determines what is possible and what is not. And whoever understands this understands why erasing memory, not direct repression alone, is among the most important tools of any regime seeking to guarantee its permanence: because a people who have forgotten they were once free will not even know they are missing freedom. Memory, like the word, needs someone to tell it in order to survive. And when the tellers stop, memory does not die suddenly; it withers slowly, generation after generation, until the day comes when a boy asks an innocent question, and finds no one to answer him but two faded lines in a schoolbook.

They had all left voluntarily, this very chain told us. And it had been a huge success for Sánchez and the King of Morocco this return and the complete end of a crisis that neither of them saw coming, as we all know. Keeping up with the rhythm of lies to Chánchez has... (translated)

Russia is secretly expanding its "ghost fleet" for the transport of liquefied gas, adding second-hand ships and new locally manufactured oil tankers to challenge the European Union sanctions imposed on LNG exports, which will come into force in 2027, thus continuing to maintain its gas supplies despite the restrictions. (translated)

⚠️ ATENCIÓN ⚠️ Por nuestro derecho de audiencias, exigimos que sea cancelada la mañanera por su alto contenido de mentiras, odio y división. ¿Quién está de acuerdo? https://t.co/ZGQ8C0fba1 #LibertadDeExpresión #DerechosHumanos #JusticiaSocial

Presque tous les peuples du monde apprécient les touristes Français pour leur curiosité, leur ouverture d'esprit, leur volonté de sortir des circuits touristiques, goûter cette spécialité locale ou aller dans ce village particulier, à manifester de véritables signes d'intérêt pour leur culture et leur singularité. Pourtant, les Corses inondent mes mentions pour me dire que les Français sont des connards hautains qui prennent de haut, des abrutis méprisants etc etc ... Je suis désolé pour mes abonnés Corses, mais si vous êtes seuls à penser cela, c'est peut-être que c'est vous qui avez un problème avec nous ? Que les Français soient des pingres ou des radins, je peux l'entendre, le Français moyen est pauvre, il gagne 2100€ et a payé 400€/tête son billet d'avion, il ne va évidemment pas donner de pourboire pour une salade de chèvre chaud à 29€ incluant déjà le prix du service. Rn revanche, s'il existe un peuple qui manifestera la volonté de connaître votre culture, d'aller dans une grotte écouter des chants bizarres et gouter votre fromage plein de vers mélangé à du foie cru, avec un authentique respect de l'authenticité, pour l'artisanat, et le savoir-faire local, c'est bien le Français. #Tourisme #Culture #France

The article discusses the legal consequences faced in the event of arson in France, mentioning in particular the recent fires in Gironde and Aude, as well as the curfew imposed on minors in certain regions in response to an increase in fires in the context of extreme heat and arrests of involved individuals. (translated)

🚨PURGADA. El gobierno de España despide a una mujer tras la invasión de Ceuta. Lo que hizo desató la furia de las altas instancias... Pero no te puedes imaginar cuál fue realmente su error. Su nombre permanece anónimo. Pero era la encargada de las alertas de Seguridad Nacional. La funcionaria que el viernes solo hizo su trabajo: colgó en la web el dato oficial que le pasó Interior: 49.000 personas ilegales dentro de Ceuta. ¿Problema? Lo replicaron las agencias de medio mundo. Horas después, el informe había desaparecido de la página. Censurado. Y ella recibe una llamada. Estaba de vacaciones. La llama la jefa de Departamento. La general Loreto Hurtado. Cese inmediato por teléfono. Solo la dejan volver a por sus cosas. ¿Quién tomó la decisión? Órdenes de arriba. Se habla de gran malestar de Presidencia y del Ministerio del Interior de Marlaska. Ahí tienes la pista. Ahora la pregunta: ¿La echaron por mentir? NO. La cifra era correcta. La castigaron porque gracias a ella se supo lo que trataban de ocultar: la verdad. El CNI los avisó Marruecos los avisó Los periodistas locales lo sabían. Ellos lo ignoraron todo. Y ahí tienes el resultado: de toda la cadena de mando, repleta de incompetentes y negligentes, solo una persona ha pagado por Ceuta. Solo una... La única que dijo la verdad. Este es el país en el que vives. 7.500 disidentes ya estamos dentro Faltas tú → https://t.co/JtP6bmpKel PD: el "Manual del Disidente" te llega al correo en cuanto entras. No tienes que hacer nada más. #Censura #LibertadDeExpresión #Verdad

Pour obtenir un rendez-vous à la CAF, cet homme a trouvé la combine : sélectionner « réfugié » dans le menu des motifs. Un créneau apparaît. Avec un motif ordinaire ? Rien — et par téléphone, une heure d'attente. Avant de vous indigner contre lui, ou contre qui que ce soit d'autre, regardez ce que cette vidéo démontre réellement : dans un service public rationné, l'accès à un droit ordinaire passe désormais par la débrouille — et la débrouille consiste à se déclarer extraordinaire. Ce n'est pas une anecdote de guichet. C'est l'autopsie d'un principe constitutionnel. Suivez le raisonnement. D'abord, le rationnement — il est mesuré, officiellement. 61 % des citoyens déclarent rencontrer des difficultés dans leurs démarches administratives en 2025, contre 39 % en 2016 — le chiffre est repris par la Cour des comptes. Près d'un quart des Français a déjà renoncé à faire valoir un droit à cause de ces obstacles. À la CAF : des accueils physiques accessibles uniquement sur rendez-vous, des rendez-vous introuvables, un 3230 saturé où le Défenseur des droits documente depuis des années — « enquêtes mystère » à l'appui — des appelants renvoyés vers le site internet, y compris quand ils n'y ont pas accès. Un médiateur ? 47 jours de délai moyen. Le gouvernement a lancé en avril un « plan contre l'engorgement ». On lance des plans contre l'engorgement comme on écope un navire : ça dit surtout qu'il prend l'eau. Ensuite, la mécanique que la vidéo met à nu. Quand les créneaux sont rares, il faut les trier. Quand on les trie, on crée des motifs prioritaires. Et quand le tri repose sur un menu déroulant déclaratif, sans vérification au moment de la réservation, le passe-droit est servi sur un plateau : le créneau ne va plus au besoin le plus urgent, mais au clic le plus malin. Le réfugié n'est pas le scandale de cette histoire — un État peut légitimement organiser des parcours d'urgence. Le scandale, c'est qu'un allocataire ordinaire, avec un dossier ordinaire et des droits ordinaires, ne trouve plus de porte ordinaire — et que le système l'incite, de fait, à mentir pour exercer un droit. Savourez d'ailleurs l'ironie juridique : le code de la sécurité sociale sanctionne les fausses déclarations des allocataires par des pénalités — les tribunaux les confirment régulièrement. L'institution qui punit le mensonge a construit un guichet où le mensonge est la seule clé qui ouvre. Alors nommons ce qui meurt dans ce menu déroulant. L'égalité devant le service public n'est pas un slogan : c'est un principe de notre droit, l'une des lois fondamentales du service public à la française. Elle suppose une chose simple — que l'accès dépende du droit, pas de l'astuce. Un système où l'honnête attend une heure au téléphone pendant que le débrouillard passe par la bonne case n'est plus un service public : c'est une file d'attente à deux vitesses, où la vitesse se choisit dans un formulaire. Et chaque usager qui découvre la combine — cette vidéo se charge de la diffusion — dégrade un peu plus ce qui reste : demain, tout le monde cochera la case, les vrais prioritaires attendront comme les autres, et l'État s'étonnera que plus personne ne déclare rien d'exact. La fraude au guichet n'est pas née de la malice des usagers. Elle est née le jour où le guichet a cessé de s'ouvrir pour ceux qui disaient la vérité. Sources : Cour des comptes / Défenseur des droits (rapport d'octobre 2025 : 61 % d'usagers en difficulté contre 39 % en 2016, un quart renonçant à des droits), enquêtes mystère du Défenseur des droits et de l'INC sur l'accueil téléphonique (2016, 2023), CAF (accueil sur rendez-vous, 3230, médiation : 47 jours de délai moyen), plan gouvernemental d'avril 2026 contre l'engorgement, code de la sécurité sociale (art. L114-17, pénalités pour fausse déclaration). #ServicePublic #Droits #Égalité

Ingrid Daubechies, a Belgian physicist trained at VUB and now an emeritus professor at Duke University, is recognized for her major contribution to digital image compression through wavelets, earning her a nomination for the Nobel Prize and the National Medal of Science, while modestly downplaying the nickname of godmother of digital imaging given to her by the press. (translated)

Rapaz, vídeo extremamente necessário! A cientista Tatiana Roque desmontando a estratégia negacionista do Nikolas Ferreira e desmentindo as novas mentiras criminosas espalhadas pelo deputado turista. ASSISTAM ATÉ O FINAL E COMPARTILHEM https://t.co/OCiQbOuAxJ #Ciência #Desinformação #Verdade

ATENÇÃO!!! TSE humilha o Flávio Bolsonaro e mostra que a urna eletrônica não tem Bluetooth e nem conexão com a Internet!! É IMPOSSÍVEL de ser hackeado à distância!! Agora falta CASSAR O FLÁVIO BOLSONARO por ter mentido descaradamente!! https://t.co/3B4QWH0lhz #Eleições #UrnaEletrônica #FakeNews

🚨ÉPICO! Flávio Rachadinha é DESMASCARADO AO VIVO após ATACAR urnas eletrônicas Adriana Araújo ainda CHAMOU Rachadinha de “MENTIROSO” FLÁVIO PRECISA SER RESPONSABILIZADO! 🔥🚓 https://t.co/gvtnmwbnvt #Política #Justiça #Eleições