Search

The author stated that the demonstration had been peaceful and that the police presence was illegal, adding that the Public Ministry had also told him so. He accused the government of Montenegro of lying and stated that they would have to come up with new justifications. https://t.co/rf8XXt0Vzn #Manifestação #Justiça #Governo #PT #ME (translated)

The author argued that when the PP was responsible for various tragedies, it responded with lies and, in many cases, insults to the victims. He cited the case of Pilar Manjón, mother of a victim of 11-M, and claimed that she was the target of a misogynistic insult and blamed for the PP losing the elections. #PP #tragedia #mentiras #ES (translated)

Sérgio Santos stated that avoiding engagement had some reasoning behind it, but it was not an absolute rule. He said that if it were followed in all cases, a fake video about the Northeast would not have been debunked. He also argued that one should not ignore the responsible person as long as they continued to act that way, claiming that this would be equivalent to endorsing lies, and he used derogatory language to refer to them. #fakeNews #desinformação #engajamento (translated)

I want to believe that Lula's situation is the beginning of something beautiful. That the world can still change course. That despite many bot farms, fake news, lies, and tons of hate being circulated, people have not lost the ability to think, to care, and to choose a better future. 👇 (translated)

The author claimed that Sánchez was facing a crushing electoral defeat and that he was aware of it. He maintained that his only option was to create noise to divert attention from the issues that harmed him and to rely on a miracle. He also attributed to him allowing violence to enter the campaign and spreading lies. #Elecciones2023 #PolíticaEspañola #Sánchez #ES (translated)

JH Fonseca stated that the Veritá survey showed the difference between Flávio and Lula dropping from 2.2 to 1.4 points, with Flávio at 50.7% and Lula at 49.3%. He attributed the change to a campaign of lies and the PT's spending to buy votes, which, he wrote, were having an effect. #Eleições2023 #Política #FatosEVersões (translated)

Rodrigo Constantino stated that Flávio has risen again and Lula has fallen, and predicted that Lula would suffer the most humiliating defeat in history. He said that despite what he described as machine abuses, dissemination of lies, electoral intimidation, and the alignment of the TSE, Lula would lose. https://t.co/KYIRGA0PKM #Eleições2024 #Brasil #Política (translated)

The author claimed that, in comments on GloboNews, Andreia Sadi had sided with Lula by comparing Vorcaro's fate in the two administrations: according to him, in the previous one, Vorcaro became a banker and, in the current one, a prisoner. He also said that Malu Gaspar had mentioned Felipe Barros, whom he described as a deputy from PL in Paraná who became a senator. He alleged that Barros sent official letters to the CVM and the Central Bank to protect Master and attacked those who tried to liquidate the bank. The author related these attacks to a "hate cabinet" and stated that people investigating former director Renato Gomes were their targets. The author also stated that those responsible for paving the way for Vorcaro, protecting him, and keeping in touch with him had been elected in the first round and were now awaiting the second. He said that, in his view, institutions such as the Police, the Public Ministry, the Central Bank, and the CVM were at stake. In the publication, he also listed slogans, hashtags, and references to Lula, Flávio, the Army, free buses, Ana Clara, Nikolas, Vorcaro, the Northeast, Felca, Fábio Porchat, Lulinha, the Lula Institute, and Northeasterners, among others. In the end, he compared the two administrations, stating that one had made Vorcaro a banker and the other, a prisoner, and asked for the publication to be shared. #Lula #Brasil #Política (translated)

The profile "Só Quem é LULA 2026" stated that Dani Lima had disclosed information about Flávio Bolsonaro's economic plan. According to the author, an economic ally of Flávio, described as connected to the financial market and Paulo Guedes' right-hand person, advocated for a two-year transition to Bolsa Família and said that beneficiaries should not remain in the program indefinitely. The profile claimed that the ally recorded a second video to explain her statements and that media outlets published corrections. It also stated that Flávio classified the information as fake news invented by Lula, but maintained that it reflected the campaign's plan. The author alleged that the campaign promised benefits to billionaires while deceiving the population and that Bolsa Família and other social protection measures would be harmed. He further stated that people relying on the program were already facing difficulties and warned of potential effects on access to food, education, and medicines. #BolsaFamilia #LulaPeloBrasil #Voto13PeloBolsaFamilia (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 stated that Daniela Lima had exposed Flávio Bolsonaro as a friend of militiamen. The author said that, in Rio, militias were equivalent to factions like the Comando Vermelho and the PCC. He also stated that Google searches for Flávio, militia, and Ana Clara had surged and that an old video of Flávio defending militiamen had resurfaced. The profile said that the so-called "Janones Army" was setting the conversation agenda, that Lula was leading the searches amid a breach of secrecy, and that a general had sent an audio message from the hospital with instructions about hashtags and engagement. Among the topics and hashtags mentioned were #TheArmyOfLulaHasReturned, #ExplainAnaClaraFlavio, and #LulaOpenedSecrecyFlavioGaveIn. The author linked the outrage to the allegation that the right-wing candidate was a friend of militiamen and requested that the post be shared. #Milícia #FlávioBolsonaro #CrimeOrganizado (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 claimed that Daniela Lima was part of the so-called Lula's Army and that, during a broadcast on Pulso, she was passing information from Janones to the public. According to the author, a general advised supporters not to watch Nicolas's video or generate views or interactions. He also recommended that they quickly skip unwanted content, claiming that the algorithm measured the time spent on the screen. The author stated that Janones was hospitalized but continued to define the topics under discussion, and that supporters understood and applied the strategy. He also listed themes and hashtags that, according to him, were circulating, including #TheArmyOfLulaIsBack, #WithLulaThereWillBeFreeBuses, #ExplainAnaClaraFlavio, #Vote13ForBolsaFamilia, #LulaOpenedSecrecyFlavioGaveIn, and #NoAmnestyForCoupists. He further mentioned Lula, Flávio, Felca, Felipe Neto, Fábio Porchat, Revelando, Acorda Nordeste, and Willer Tomaz. In the end, he argued that supporters should avoid interacting with content they rejected and share the strategy. #OExercitoDoLulaVoltou #LULAPELOBRASIL #SemAnistiaPraGolpista (translated)

The profile "Só Quem é LULA 2026" stated that, five days before the first round, a digital mobilization linked to André Janones had boosted Google searches for Flávio Bolsonaro, militias, and the Ana Clara case. According to the publication, a speech by Flávio in defense of militiamen had started circulating again, while the candidate's campaign tried to contain the fallout. The profile also said that Daniela Lima had presented information about the subject and that Lula was managing to set the agenda with favorable themes for his campaign. The publication stated that the most searched topic on Google regarding Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was the authorization to break his and his family's banking secrecy. It attributed the online mobilization to Janones and said that he had sent, from the hospital where he was admitted the day before, an audio directing postings about Lula's interview with SBT and the Ana Clara case. According to the profile, Janones intended to request discharge at 1:13 PM. The profile also mentioned hashtags and expressions about Lula, the Ana Clara case, free transportation, and Bolsa Família among the circulating topics, in addition to mentioning Felca, Felipe Neto, Fábio Porchat, and Willer Tomaz. It stated that Flávio's campaign had felt the impact of the digital mobilization. #LULAPELOBRASIL #OExercitoDoLulaVoltou #Voto13PeloBolsaFamilia (translated)

Douglas Ruas asked people not to believe in fake news and to seek information about the proposals. He stated that Flávio Bolsonaro would not take the Bolsa Família from anyone and encouraged voters to vote for him, number 22, on Sunday. #FuturoDoBrasil #FakeNews #Eleições2022 (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 stated that Fábio Porchat had presented, on the Revealing program, allegations about relations between Flávio Bolsonaro and Antônio Carlos Camilo Antunes, known as Careca do INSS. According to the author, Antunes was identified by the Federal Police as the center of a scheme involving unauthorized deductions from pensions and had been imprisoned since September. The author also alleged that Lídia Mazelli, 61, appeared as responsible for 14 companies linked to Willer Tomaz, including one that was said to have acquired Richarlison's mansion. According to the report, when a reporter approached her, Mazelli claimed to work as a domestic worker at the location. According to the publication, Antunes's accountant handled the accounting for Flávio's law firm, managed by the accountant's sister, who had supposedly been recommended by Willer. The author stated that Willer defended the accountant in court and was being investigated for money laundering in the same scheme. The publication claimed that a helmet factory belonging to Flávio and his brother Carlos was registered at the same address in Águas Claras as at least 16 of Antunes's companies, and that Flávio was the master user of a company's account belonging to Willer. The author mentioned that there was no open investigation against Flávio regarding the case and requested that the content be shared. #FlávioBolsonaro #Corrupção #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

The profile Only Who is LULA 2026 released a report from “Revelando,” titled “Republic of Oranges,” with Fábio Porchat, and stated that lawyer Willer Tomaz would be close to Flávio. According to the profile, the Federal Police entered Tomaz's office and found a money counting machine and stacks of reais hidden in books. The author linked the lawyer to an investigation into unauthorized discounts on INSS pensions and claimed that the embezzled money was laundered through companies, third-party accounts, and real estate. It was also stated that Tomaz had moved almost 5 billion reais on betting sites in 2025 and that the Federal Police were investigating whether the platforms were used for money laundering. According to the publication, there were over two thousand deposits at Blaze, amounting to hundreds of millions, and a VIP manager had deactivated facial recognition to facilitate operations. The profile also mentioned that Flávio denied any connection beyond friendship with Tomaz, but that the Federal Police had found in the lawyer's iCloud a registration of Flávio as a master user of Alcazar Holdings, with elevated access to financial management. According to the author, the Federal Police assessed that this data supported the hypothesis of actual partnership participation. The profile requested that the publication be shared. #PolíciaFederal #Corrupção #Laranjas (translated)

The account Só Quem é LULA 2026 stated that Rede Globo had brought to light a controversy involving the influencer Felca and asked the public to watch and share a video. It also described the Brazilian election as decisive for the country's future. In the post, the account claimed that Operation Linceu, conducted by the Federal Police and authorized by Alexandre de Moraes, targeted former STJ employee Humberto Fontoura Pradera, suspected of passing confidential information from the court to lawyer Willer Tomaz, whom they called a friend of Flávio Bolsonaro. According to the text, intercepted messages would indicate the sending of internal procedures and an image of a court document. The account asserted that Pradera was being investigated for violation of functional secrecy, electronic embezzlement, corruption, and money laundering. It also stated that Tomaz appeared in an STF investigation alongside Flávio, under suspicion of laundering, and that Flávio was registered as a possible user of an account belonging to the lawyer's company. The post also mentioned Janja, Haddad, Janones, Soraya, Fred Bruno, Mônica, Hyunjin, Vitinho, Marçal, Chay, Lua Blanco, and Lingard, as well as Porto Alegre, Manaus, UFRN, and Corinthians, without explaining the relationship of these names and locations to the allegations. #Política #Eleições2024 #Brasil (translated)

Ricard Sanmartín warned that, according to him, those who could not impose themselves in the field would try to do so through lies, pressure, harassment, threats, and coercion. He accused them of severely harming the sport, described them as a dangerous sect, and used a derogatory term to refer to nationalist madridismo. #Deporte #Verdad #Justicia (translated)

The PT in Brazil claimed to have challenged its opponent to break the banking secrecy and stated that it was tired of hearing about corruption without any investigation taking place. It also referred to the opponent as a militiaman and alleged that the number of lies he told was proven, citing the case of Voracaro, to whom he attributed 43 lies. https://t.co/VqLanIBsQf #Corrupção #Transparência #Justiça (translated)

The Liberal Party stated that Lula had cut the Bolsa Família for many mothers and Brazilian women and accused the left of trying to manipulate voters against Flávio Bolsonaro on the eve of the election. The party urged the public not to believe what it called fake news about Bolsonaro, said that voters could change Brazil's reality, and called for votes for the candidate on the 25th, with the number 22. #Lula #Eleições2023 #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)