O Colapso Silencioso do Acesso ao Ensino Superior Enquanto o ministério trata da sua própria sobrevivência, dezenas de milhares de jovens continuam à espera de saber se têm futuro Há uns anos contrataram cá em casa um empreiteiro para resolver uma infiltração no tecto da sala. Ele chegou, olhou para a mancha, olhou para nós, e disse a frase que todo o português já ouviu de um profissional em apuros: "Isto não é nada, fica logo despachado." Três semanas depois, a mancha continuava lá, maior, mas a fachada do prédio, essa, tinha sido pintada de fresco. Perguntámos-lhe porquê. Respondeu que a fachada "era o que dava nas vistas". A sala, coitada, ficava para o "próximo orçamento". Este Verão, milhares de famílias portuguesas estão a viver a versão nacional dessa história. A fachada é um ministério. A infiltração é a crise no processo de acesso ao ensino superior. E quem vive por baixo dela, à espera que alguém a resolva, são dezenas de milhares de jovens. Os números, esses, não deixam grande margem para eufemismo: atrasos sucessivos na divulgação das notas do secundário, uma primeira fase de candidaturas que teve de ser adiada, uma auditoria externa anunciada ao processo de digitalização e uma factura de "poupança de dezenas de milhões de euros" que, entretanto, se transformou em custos de recrutamento urgente de trabalhadores para separar folhas de exame à mão. O ministro Fernando Alexandre garantiu, por escrito e em directo, que "nenhum aluno será prejudicado". Depois teve de desmentir-se a si próprio, adiar o calendário que jurava não precisar de tocar e, mais recentemente, anunciar uma época especial de exames em Setembro — a forma delicada de admitir, sem nunca o dizer nesses termos, que afinal houve alunos prejudicados. É a lógica do empreiteiro, aplicada à governação: quando a estrutura ameaça ruir, protege-se primeiro aquilo que os outros vêem — a narrativa, a demissão evitada, a moção de confiança contornada — e só depois, se sobrar tempo e argamassa, se olha para quem efectivamente vive dentro da casa. Os alunos que ficaram sem nota final na pauta, os professores acusados publicamente de "relatos falsos", os pais que telefonam para escolas sem resposta — esses são a infiltração que não dá nas vistas do lado de fora do prédio. Há qualquer coisa de muito português nesta cena, e não é preciso ir buscar Eça de Queirós para lhe encontrar antepassados — embora ele tivesse escrito páginas inteiras sobre funcionários públicos mais preocupados com a forma do que com a função. Basta lembrar como o Estado português, desde sempre, sabe fazer um requerimento perfeito para um problema que continua por resolver. A burocracia impecável como substituto da solução real: é quase uma tradição nacional, tão antiga como o carimbo. O secretário-geral do PSD, Hugo Soares, resumiu a coisa sem querer, quando disse que o ministro "não perdeu qualidade" e "nunca deixou de estar ao leme dos acontecimentos". Estar ao leme, note-se, não é o mesmo que estar a conduzir o barco a bom porto — é apenas a garantia de que alguém continua agarrado ao volante enquanto o barco vai por onde a corrente o leva. É uma frase de defesa política, não de gestão de crise, e a diferença entre as duas é precisamente o assunto desta crónica. Porque o que separa este episódio de um mero acidente técnico é a ordem de prioridades que ele revelou, sem disfarce. Quando confrontado sobre se tem condições para continuar no cargo, o ministro respondeu que "deu o seu melhor". Quando confrontado por estudantes que atravessaram o país para lhe falar, disse-se disponível para os ouvir — depois de o vídeo já ter corrido as redes sociais. A gestão da própria permanência veio primeiro; a gestão do problema dos alunos veio a reboque, empurrada pela pressão pública e não pela urgência que devia ter tido desde o primeiro dia. Aos alunos que esperam a nota que decide se entram no curso que escolheram, fica o convite a não confundir as duas coisas: uma coisa é o ministro estar preocupado com o futuro; outra, bem diferente, é saber de quem é esse futuro. O dele resolve-se com uma auditoria, uma conferência de imprensa e a paciência do primeiro-ministro. O vosso resolve-se com uma nota que ainda não chegou. #Educação, #Fernando Alexandre, #Exames Nacionais, #Ensino Superior, #Governo, #Política Portuguesa, #Reforma na educação
Saabs värde har stigit dramatiskt till över 310 miljarder kronor, vilket gör att Investors innehav nu är värt nästan 94 miljarder kronor och positionerar Saab som bolagets tredje största noterade innehav, tack vare en kraftig ökning av orderingången och försäljningstillväxt. #Saab #Investor #Ukraina
Tycker ni att Strandhälls utspel på X är koko? Nu erkänner hon själv att hon twittrar på partiets order. Det förklarar en hel del. https://t.co/y23a2LFyVQ #politik #svenska #socialamedier
| JULY 2026 | The Guard State How the largest Arab nation became a security contractor at the gates of its own people By Adham Hasanin Egyptian journalist and political writer, based in the Netherlands In June 2025, hundreds of activists from forty countries landed at Cairo airport. Doctors from France, lawyers from Australia, students from the United States, pensioners from the Netherlands. They carried no weapons and no banned slogans; they carried backpacks, walking shoes, and a single intention: to march from Arish to the Rafah crossing — entirely on Egyptian soil — to demand that food be allowed through to a people starving behind the gate. Not one of them reached Rafah. More than two hundred were detained before the march could begin. Around five hundred foreign nationals were deported from airports, hotels, and checkpoints. Passports were confiscated, activists were pulled out of downtown Cairo cafés, and the Global March to Gaza was cancelled on 16 June without taking its first step. And the world watched. This was no secret operation in a dark basement; it happened in the open, documented by the deportees’ own phone cameras, carried by every international news agency. The world watched an Arab state arrest Europeans, Americans, and Africans for wanting to walk towards Palestine. A state guarding the gate of a siege — from the side that was supposed to be the side of rescue. Hold that image, because it is the key to everything that follows. This was not an aberration in Egyptian policy, nor an isolated security decision. It is the function — the complete function around which the Egyptian state has been redefined over the past decade, and which it is time to call by its proper name: the Guard State. I. The Name — What Do We Mean by the Guard State? Political economy has long described states that live off the rent of their location rather than the production of their people. But what has crystallised in Egypt over the past decade goes beyond traditional geographic rent — the Suez Canal, say — into something far graver: the conversion of sovereignty itself into a commodity for hire. The Guard State does not sell its location; it sells its function. It collects its wages not for what it produces, but for what it prevents: it prevents the refugee from reaching Europe, the activist from reaching Gaza, its own people from reaching politics, and the resistance’s weapons from reaching their destination. Four gates, guarded by a single machine, whose wages are paid in loans, deposits, and perpetually renewed rescue packages. This is not a rhetorical metaphor; it is an economic structure with numbers attached. When the Egyptian economy collapsed in 2024, it was rescued not by productive reform but by a single deal whose subject was location: Ras el-Hekma — thirty-five billion dollars for a stretch of coastline. And whenever negotiations with the IMF stall, the tranches are unlocked by explicit European pressure whose subject is migration: nine billion euros from the European Union in the 2024 “Strategic Partnership,” whose own documents place “migration management” at its core. Europe does not pay Egypt to prosper. It pays Egypt to guard. Thus the model is complete: income in exchange for prevention, external legitimacy in exchange for guarding, and international silence about domestic tyranny in exchange for keeping the gates controlled. To see how the model works on the ground, consider the bloodiest gate of all: the gate of Gaza. II. The Gaza Gate — The Guard Who Is Himself Searched The first paradox must be nailed down with facts: Egypt is not a sovereign guard of its own crossing; it is a searched guard. Egyptian relief trucks — ninety-two thousand food parcels in a single convoy this month — are subject to Israeli inspection before entering the Strip: from Egyptian soil, through a crossing that bears an Egyptian name. The state that guards the gate does not hold its key. It owns the threshold, but not the door. Then the October 2025 truce added a new layer to the function. Under the fifteen-point roadmap sponsored by the international envoy together with the “guarantor states” — Egypt foremost among them — Cairo is to train the civilian police force that will replace Hamas in administering the Strip, under the slogan of “one authority, one law, one weapon.” Let us call things by their names: the state that could not — or would not — deliver a loaf of bread without Israeli permission is now qualifying to graduate the security apparatus that will oversee the disarming of the resistance. From guarding the siege to administering what comes after the siege — a promotion within the same project. And meanwhile, what is happening behind the guarded gate? Since the truce, more than one thousand one hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire — the latest, just two days ago, a ten-year-old boy named Motaz Abu Shaar, carried to his grave in Khan Younis by his mother, Warda. A United Nations commission of inquiry has concluded that Israel is “deliberately targeting children in an ongoing genocide.” This is what the guarantors’ official language calls a “ceasefire.” What meaning is left in the word “guarantor”? A guarantor that the gate stays firmly shut — however high the dead pile up behind it. III. The Mediterranean Gate — The Guard Europe Pays For The second gate faces north. Since 2016, Cairo has boasted — through its officials at every European forum — that “not a single irregular migration boat has departed from Egyptian shores.” This is very nearly true. But the forbidden question is: at what political price has this “efficiency” become an instrument of mutual blackmail? Europe — which condemns Egypt’s human rights record in its parliamentary resolutions — is the same Europe that signed the nine-billion-euro partnership, and the same Europe that stays silent about sixty thousand political prisoners because the alternative, in its calculations, is boats that never stop. And Cairo understands the game and has mastered it: whenever human rights pressure intensifies, the official discourse turns up the volume on “Egypt hosts millions of refugees” and “the last line of defence.” The result is a perfect structure of mutual blackmail: Europe buys its conscience’s silence, the regime sells its location, and the people — Egyptian and refugee alike — are the commodity in the transaction. The democracies that lecture on values are financing the guard who keeps the victims from knocking on their doors. This is not passing hypocrisy; it is a structural partnership in the Guard State model — one that makes Brussels and Berlin shareholders in everything this state produces, from domestic repression to external siege. IV. The Interior Gate — Guarding the People Against Politics But the most dangerous gate is not on any border; it is inside. The Guard State cannot perform its external function unless it first guards an internal gate: the people’s gate to politics. The function requires a people that does not ask: why are we guarding the siege of our brothers? Why are our trucks searched on our own soil? Why are guests deported for coming to walk in peace? To guarantee the question is never asked, the largest silencing machine in the country’s history was built: sixty thousand prisoners of opinion, a press ranked 166th out of 180 worldwide, and a state security case number waiting for anyone who writes. I write these lines from experience, not from reading reports. When I continued writing from my Dutch exile, the machine reached me across continents: accounts shut down by coordinated mass-reporting campaigns, documented threats, a family harassed inside Egypt as leverage — and my name entered into Case 1282 of 2024, not for any act I committed, but for opinions written from free European soil. This is not a personal complaint; it is a job description: the Guard State guards even beyond its borders, because the free word — wherever it is written — threatens the entire contract of guardianship. The logic is perfectly self-consistent: a regime that sells “stability” abroad cannot tolerate a voice revealing that the stability on offer is the stillness of graveyards. This is why the arrest of the foreign activists in June 2025 was inevitable, not incidental: a peaceful march reaching Rafah would have revealed, before the world’s cameras, that the gate opens when it is wanted open — and that the one keeping it shut is a partner, not a mediator. V. What Has Egypt Lost? — The Guard’s Bill An apologist might argue: what is the harm? A state monetising its location as Norway monetises its oil. The answer lies in the essential difference: Norway sells a resource; Egypt leases its will. And the difference between the two is the difference between trade and bondage. Let us tally what Egypt has paid for this model, in bare facts. It lost its water sovereignty: the Renaissance Dam was completed and filled without the state — owner of “the largest defence headquarters in the world” — daring anything beyond statements of concern; for the guard does not make trouble for the international order that employs him. It lost its regional standing: in the Iran–America war halted just weeks ago, Cairo was neither party nor mediator nor even consultant — Pakistan brokered the deal, while Egypt absorbed the economic shrapnel of Hormuz’s closure like a bystander caught in a battle whose parties it does not know. It lost its place in the conscience of its nation: the state that liberated its land in 1973 and led the Arab world for a century has become, in the eyes of the Arab street from the Atlantic to the Gulf, the gatekeeper of the siege. This loss, specifically, no loan or deposit can repay — because it is the only capital that cannot be printed. And it lost — here is the crux — the very national security in whose name the guarding is justified. The model proved its fragility at the moment of testing: when Israel feared an Iranian response last year, it cut off Egypt’s gas by unilateral decision within hours. The guard who believed himself a partner discovered he was merely a hireling whose wages stop the moment danger arrives. VI. The Alternative Is Not a Slogan — It Is the Recovery of the Original Function I will not close with an essay on “the solution lies in Arab unity”; worn-out words kill more surely than silence. The alternative is specific, and it begins with redefining the function. The state is not a guard; the state is the agent of its people’s will. Every foreign policy not derived from that will is — by definition — functional servitude, however it is wrapped in the language of wisdom and moderation. And the Egyptian will is known and needs no referendum: no people in this region accepts that its country serve as warden of the siege of Gaza, or as Europe’s border post. Practically, the recovery begins with three measurable steps. Open the Rafah crossing fully and sovereignly, by purely Egyptian decision — that alone would overturn the equation of the siege. Break the negotiating bondage by linking any cooperation on migration to concrete European positions on Palestine, not statements of concern. And open the interior gate — release the prisoners and lift the hand from the written word — because a state that fears an article will never dare face an occupier. I know the current regime will do none of this; guarding is its founding contract and its financial artery. But this article is not written for the regime. It is written for memory, and for the generation that will inherit the gates — so that it knows that what is presented to it today as “the fate of geography” is no fate at all. It is an employment contract, signed by a regime without a mandate from its people. And contracts, however long they run, end when one of their parties does. And the world — I return to where I began — is a witness that requires no further proof. It watched the deportees at Cairo airport; it watched the searched trucks; it watched Warda Abu Shaar carry her son to his grave behind a firmly guarded gate. The question is no longer: what is happening? The only question left is: who dares to name it? This article is a naming. Adham Hasanin is an Egyptian journalist and political writer based in the Netherlands, covering Arab and European political affairs.
Un hombre ha sido asesinado a apuñaladas en la Barceloneta tras incumplir una orden de alejamiento contra una mujer, durante un altercado ocurrido en la madrugada del martes, mientras los Mossos d'Esquadra investigan el caso y buscan al autor del ataque. #Barcelona #Barceloneta #Crimen

https://bjarnekimpedersen.blogspot.com/2026/07/21072026-metro-sikkerhed.html 21.07.2026 METRO SIKKERHED Dybt under jorden i Metroen er det sikkerhed for den russiske blitz. Hernede lever ukrainerne når missiler og Ayatollah-droner bringer terror fra Den Russiske Verden til Ukraine. De tre dages begrænsede militæraktion sender på sekstenhundredeogniende dag terror mod civile i Ukraine. Djævelen i krigen er nu de målrettede angreb mod Metrosikkerheden. Det er anden gang . Lukianivska bliver angrebet og en dansk journalist på News formoder at det er nedfald fra et ramt missil. Han kan i begge sider dækningens ånd ikke få ordet ’Russisk terror mod civile’ over sine læber og slet ikke ’Russiske Krigsforbrydelser’

Kiedy dzwonią z ambasady, że właśnie przyznali ci Order Imperium Brytyjskiego dla memiarzy i jednocześnie osiągnąłeś maksymalny poziom indeksu-MemHischa. https://t.co/9OGASAe5fa #OrderImperium #memes #humor
FOI PRA CIMA! Em discurso, @andredopradosp assumiu o compromisso firme de votar a favor do impeachment de ministros do STF que extrapolam suas funções, mostrando a coragem e a clareza de posicionamento que o eleitor paulista exige para o Senado. Essa atitude direta e sem rodeios prova que ele está pronto para exercer o papel fundamental de contrapeso constitucional, enfrentando os abusos de poder e atuando na defesa do equilíbrio entre as instituições. Pré-candidato a senador em São Paulo, ocupando a vaga que seria de @BolsonaroSP (que vem como suplente), André demonstrou compromisso com o povo brasileiro. E nosso estado precisa justamente de representantes que não se acovardem e tenham a firmeza necessária para resgatar a segurança jurídica e a ordem no país. #Impeachment #Justica #Senado
O artigo de Manuel Castello Branco discute como a ascensão da China como potência global é intrinsecamente ligada ao sistema internacional ocidental que ela critica, ressaltando a contradição de um país que, ao se fortalecer por meio da interdependência econômica, pode estar semeando as bases para sua própria decadência ao desafiar essa mesma ordem. #China #Interdependência #PoderEconômico
Tom Homan, el zar de la frontera de EEUU, responsabilizó a los inmigrantes hispanos Lorenzo Salgado y Joan Sebastián Guerrero, asesinados por agentes de ICE, de su propia muerte al no seguir las órdenes de las autoridades, desatando críticas hacia las políticas migratorias de la administración Trump. #Inmigración #ICE #PolíticasMigratorias

Donald Trump ha firmado una orden ejecutiva para imponer un arancel del 50 % a la mayoría de las importaciones de Canadá, argumentando que el país no gestiona adecuadamente sus bosques y ha afectado la calidad del aire en Estados Unidos con el humo de los incendios forestales, aunque la medida excluye productos como energía y minerales críticos. #Trump #Aranceles #RelacionesCanadá

Uno compara el #20deJulio de Petro en Bogotá... Con el #20deJulio de Abelardo en Antioquia... ¡Y qué diferencia tan abismal! El de Petro es un espejo de su desgobierno: Desorden, irrespeto, dejadez, verborrea, vergüenza ajena, una hp boleta absoluta. Esperemos que el de Abelardo sea un reflejo de su gobierno: Orden, respeto, esperanza, firmeza, orgullo, templanza. La diferencia se nota desde Júpiter. #Colombia #Política #20deJulio
I have signed an order imposing a 50% tariff on a wide range of goods imported from Canada, in retaliation for what I called "unequal treatment" of US cars, dairy and alcohol.
A Ordem dos Enfermeiros apoia a eliminação do termo violência obstétrica na nova lei dos direitos na gravidez e no parto, considerando que a mudança resulta em uma abordagem mais equilibrada e baseada em critérios clínicos e jurídicos que visam melhorar os cuidados prestados às mulheres. #SaúdeDaMulher #ViolênciaObstétrica #DireitosNaGravidez

Jhon Durán confirmado no Benfica. O avançado de 22 anos é cedido por empréstimo até ao final da temporada, proveniente do Al Nassr. A cedência prevê uma taxa de 6,1 milhões de euros e uma cláusula de opção de compra na ordem dos 30 milhões de euros. https://t.co/p2E5dXfpvV #Benfica #Transferências #Futebol
He transmitido esa orden al secretario de Defensa, Pete Hegseth, al jefe del Estado Mayor Conjunto, general Daniel Caine, y al resto de los mandos militares.
Irán se está preparando para una guerra a gran escala mientras Estados Unidos, bajo la orden de Trump, intensifica su campaña de represalias tras la muerte de varios militares estadounidenses en ataques iraníes, combinando bombardeos, bloqueos navales y presión económica para obligar a Teherán a cesar sus agresiones y aceptar renegociaciones sobre el acuerdo de navegación en el estrecho de Ormuz. #Irán #EEUU #guerra

Una jueza federal ha ordenado la suspensión de al menos dos semanas de la fusión de 81.000 millones de dólares entre Paramount y Warner Bros. Discovery, concediendo tiempo a 12 estados demócratas para presentar su caso en contra del acuerdo, que temen que elimine la competencia en Hollywood y reduzca las opciones para los consumidores. #FusiónParamountWarner #CompetenciaHollywood #RestricciónTemporal

Donald Trump ha defendido al primer ministro israelí Benjamin Netanyahu, afirmando que no será arrestado en Estados Unidos, en respuesta a las declaraciones del alcalde de Nueva York, Zohran Mamdani, quien considera la posibilidad de arrestarlo por una orden de la Corte Penal Internacional relacionada con crímenes de guerra en Gaza. #Netanyahu #Trump #CortePenalInternacional
