Search

🚨 Now! Corinthians has accumulated 4 overdue installments of an agreement that reduced its debt with the Union from R$ 1.2 billion to R$ 679 million. Timão failed to pay the installments for June, July, August, and September, totaling R$ 27.3 MILLION overdue. The contract allows for CANCELLATION after 3 overdue installments. The Attorney General of the National Treasury notified the club in August but stated that the agreement remains in effect and that Corinthians has 30 days to pay or present a defense. If canceled, the ORIGINAL amount of the debt will return, deducting only the amounts paid. Corinthians will also be 2 YEARS unable to enter into new tax agreements. The club stated that it relies on its good relationship with the PGFN to resolve the situation. 🗞️ @geglobo (translated)

Jordan Bardella has made, according to the evidence published by Mediapart, foul, conspiratorial, and anti-Semitic remarks. Please, @J_Bardella, sue me for defamation. Really. Let's verify all this in court. Let's have a laugh. (translated)

Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have gone directly to the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the fastest route to have the matter decided publicly by a court? (translated)

Press Release: Defense statement from Antonio Tabet regarding the victory at the TSE The defense of actor, presenter, screenwriter, and comedian Antonio Tabet publicly celebrates the recent and paradigm-shifting victory in the Superior Electoral Court in favor of freedom of criticism, opinion, expression of thought, and religion. In judging the case, the TSE Collegiate overturned the concerning initial decisions made by Minister André Mendonça, which risked direct censorship of absolutely true content, humorous expressions, and, even more alarmingly, prayers and requests for blessings to Our Lady Aparecida. In line with the arguments upheld by this Defense from the beginning, the Electoral Court concluded the obvious; that is, it is not lawful for the State to censor factually true content; it is not lawful to censor prayers and acts of faith; it is not lawful to censor opinions or humor. The corrective action of Justice, expressed in the order to exclude content, should be strictly and exclusively limited to publications that are objectively false. We take this opportunity, in respect for the loyalty of public debate and to leave no doubts, to reiterate that: the legislative initiative to remove Our Lady Aparecida from the status of Patroness of Brazil is not authored or proposed by candidate Flávio Bolsonaro. On the other hand, it is a fact that allies (political and religious) of Flávio Bolsonaro publicly defend and promote such an initiative and, in public and notorious cases, promote attacks against institutions linked to the Catholic Church. The free scrutiny of the network of relationships of public figures is a pillar of democracy and cannot be silenced. Furthermore, let this October, the month of Our Lady Aparecida, be the time for the Brazilian people to make their own judgment. Lucas Mourão André Matheus Rodrigo Rollemberg (translated)

Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have filed directly with the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the quickest route to have the matter publicly decided by a court? (translated)

UEFA will only make a decision on the case if the Spanish court considers that there was sports corruption. Opening a new case or taking action on their own is ruled out. Inside Barça, they are calm. (translated)

Cándido Conde-Pumpido, president of the Constitutional Court, assures that the court will establish a clear doctrine on amnesty that will be binding for the Supreme Court, assigning it the appropriate implementation of this measure that affects figures such as Carles Puigdemont and Oriol Junqueras. (translated)

When neighbours remember the wounds of the past together, they open the way to a shared future. In Morinj, I joined Montenegro’s Deputy Prime Minister Ibrahimović and Croatia’s Foreign Minister Grlić-Radman to pay tribute to Croatian prisoners of war. The EU was built by https://t.co/XVkBmCjTDS #Pomirenje #ZajedničkaBudućnost #EvropskaUnija #ME #HR

⚠️⚠️ Amid applause, Anna Sofía Benítez and her mother entered the court to face the trial against her. "Let Cuba be free," she replied when asked about the solution she saw for the country. Brave. (translated)

Cándido Conde-Pumpido, president of the Constitutional Court, has reaffirmed the necessity for the Supreme Court to apply the amnesty urgently and preferentially, emphasizing the clarity and strength in the decisions of the Constitutional Court in defense of fundamental rights. (translated)