Aivars expressed astonishment at what he thought was the large number of supporters of neomarxism, and he evaluated their ideology very disparagingly. He asked whether its supporters had accomplished anything good, claiming that their actions had left devastation and chaos. As examples, he mentioned the Briškena bridge, a bicycle bridge that he characterized as aimless, a newly constructed abandoned train station building, the state of Riga under Marta's leadership, and Staķis' posts. He also included RailBaltic, Airbaltic, intrigues in the Conservative party, the support of human trafficking, portraying people as impoverished refugees, as well as what he believed to be destruction and sabotage in the Ministry of Defense and many budget-funded NGOs. Aivars added that the list could go on. #ideoloģija #Rīga #neomarksisms (translated)