Oana Eftimie criticized the information that appeared "from sources" about the opening of a fourth criminal case against Călin Georgescu. She reported that Gândul had written that the case involved alleged illegal operations with devices or software programs and attempts to alter data or disrupt computer systems. According to the information presented by Eftimie, the alleged events would have taken place on September 26, five days after the search of Georgescu's residence, and he would have then called a company to check whether surveillance devices had been installed. Eftimie stated that Georgescu had been persecuted for nearly two years and questioned what constituted the crime. She requested clarification on whether there was a court warrant for installing devices in the home, what limitations it had, and what concrete reasons justified the surveillance. She also asked how Georgescu's wife and minor children were protected, as well as what evidence supported the accusations. Eftimie argued that checking for the existence of devices could not automatically be confused with sabotaging an investigation and questioned why Georgescu's wife did not mention the alleged surveillance in previous interviews. #Justiție #Securitate #Ancheta (translated)