Carmelo Neto

Carmelo Neto stated that Vorcaro would have confessed to paying R$ 30 million in cash for the Lula documentary and the Lula Institute. According to Neto, the condition would be to free up billion-dollar deals with pension funds. He classified the operation as corruption, influence peddling, and money laundering, and said that Vorcaro had described it as "on the side" and "wrong." Neto also accused the PGR of shelving the case and questioned the reason. #Corrupção #Lula #Justiça (translated)

Carmelo Neto stated that Alexandre de Moraes, upon realizing that there would be no agreement, had ordered the execution of the arrest of Eduardo Bolsonaro. According to Neto, Moraes attributed to Eduardo the responsibility for the sanctions imposed by Donald Trump against him and other Brazilian authorities. The author used insulting language to refer to the STF minister and said that, in a serious trial, Moraes should not be the rapporteur as he was directly involved in the process. Neto described the decision as a sign of despair, expressed solidarity with Eduardo, and stated that he hoped to witness his return to Brazil, along with his family, and the restoration of democratic normality in the country. #Democracia #Justiça #DireitosHumanos (translated)

Carmelo Neto stated that, at 25 years old, he became the youngest federal deputy elected in his state. He said he started his political action against the PT and in favor of Dilma Rousseff's impeachment at the age of 13, without support from political family members, changing sides, or buying votes. He also expressed gratitude by mentioning that Lula lost nearly half a million votes in the state. Neto said he hopes for Flávio Bolsonaro's election, the liberation of President Bolsonaro, and the liberation of the country. #Política #Ativismo #Eleições (translated)

This article is a painful reminder that four years after Mahsa Amini’s death the Iranian state’s violent machinery is largely unchanged, even if its tactics have become more high‑tech. That those who organised the brutal 2022 crackdown still control the security services is not just a moral outrage — it explains why protests, strikes and cultural resistance are met with the same patterns of arbitrary arrest, unfair trials and deadly force. The world cannot treat the formal “suspension” of a law as the end of the story when cafes, students and shopkeepers are still punished for ordinary freedoms. I applaud the Kurdish general strike and all Iranians who keep insisting on Woman, Life, Freedom despite the danger. Their courage has shifted public norms and exposed the regime’s fragility; we should listen to and amplify their demands for civil liberties, minority rights and democratic reform. The UN fact‑finding findings and Amnesty’s documentation are grave: allegations of killings, torture, sexual violence and enforced disappearances demand independent investigation and real accountability, not diplomatic platitudes. Western governments and institutions must move beyond symbolic statements. Targeted sanctions on officials responsible for repression, stronger asylum protections for dissidents, and support for independent human‑rights monitoring are minimum steps. Equally urgent is to curb the export of surveillance technology and facial‑recognition systems used to track and criminalise dissent — tech companies and their regulators cannot be neutral bystanders to repression. Finally, let’s not forget the individuals: the imprisoned, the exiled, the families still seeking justice. Solidarity means sustained pressure, funding for human‑rights groups and legal aid, and keeping these stories in the public eye until those responsible are held accountable and Iranians can freely decide how they live, dress and govern themselves.

These tragic deaths underscore why progressive voices demand that claims of targeting Hezbollah infrastructure not be used as a carte blanche for strikes that kill civilians—there must be independent investigations, an urgent ceasefire, full humanitarian access and a return to diplomacy instead of endless retaliatory escalation :)

Χαίρομαι που η οικογένεια του Τούπακ μπορεί να έχει, έστω και μετά από δεκαετίες, κάποιο είδος δικαίωσης και ότι ένα φρικτό έγκλημα δεν έμεινε ανεξιχνίαστο. Ταυτόχρονα όμως δεν μπορεί να μας αφήνει ικανοποιημένους το γεγονός ότι χρειάστηκαν σχεδόν 30 χρόνια για να φτάσουμε εδώ — αυτό δείχνει προβλήματα στη διαδικασία, στην έρευνα και στην προστασία μαρτύρων. Η έμφαση των εισαγγελέων στις δημόσιες παραδοχές και στην αυτοβιογραφία του Ντέιβις εγείρει εύλογα ερωτήματα για το πώς αξιολογούνται οι “ομολογίες” που μπορεί να είναι υπερβολές ή προσπάθειες αυτοπροβολής, αλλά το δικαστικό σώμα έκρινε διαφορετικά μετά από ενδελεχή εξέταση μαρτυριών και ηχογραφήσεων. Αυτό το περιστατικό δείχνει και κάτι βαθύτερο: η βία των συμμοριών και η διαμάχη που οδήγησε στην τραγωδία δεν εμφανίστηκε από το πουθενά — έχει ρίζες στη φτώχεια, στον αποκλεισμό, στο ρατσισμό και στην ευκολία κυκλοφορίας όπλων. Αν η δημοκρατία μας νοιάζεται πραγματικά για την ασφάλεια και τη δικαιοσύνη, η καταδίκη πρέπει να συνοδευτεί από μέτρα πρόληψης: επενδύσεις σε κοινότητες, προγράμματα εκπαίδευσης και ευκαιριών, καλύτερη προστασία μαρτύρων και ρεαλιστικές πολιτικές για μείωση της φυλάκισης και αποκατάστασης. Συμπαραστέκομαι στην οικογένεια του Τούπακ — αλλά δεν αρκεί να τιμωρούμε το αποτέλεσμα· πρέπει να αλλάξουμε τις συνθήκες που γεννούν τέτοιες τραγωδίες.

Como candidato a Deputado Federal, o que mais me marca nessa campanha é a esperança do povo cearense em Flávio Bolsonaro. Na primeira semana de campanha, já precisei dobrar a quantidade de material gráfico. Isso diz tudo. Vamos derrubar o PT no Ceará e no Brasil! https://t.co/7vhgoSqvi7 #FlávioBolsonaro #Ceará #Eleições2022

Malu Gaspar expõe Gilmar Mendes como nunca antes. Disse o que todo mundo já sabe: ele não é imparcial. Odeia delação… exceto a do Mauro Cid. No caso Vorcaro, o modus operandi de sempre: soltar quem precisa. Veja o que a Malu falou: “O comportamento dele no caso Vorcaro não surpreende. Votou pela manutenção da prisão em um caso, em outros pediu vista e agora quer o relaxamento. Tem histórico de ser crítico às delações desde a Lava Jato, mas a do Mauro Cid não foi. Tem uma guerra aí para ver quem vai prevalecer no controle desse processo.” #Justica #Imparcialidade #Politica