Jakub Białek described Kamil Wójcik's account of the dispute in PZPN, which — according to Wójcik — intensified after his unsuccessful attempt to take the position of head of referees. Wójcik reportedly claimed that matches were taken away from him without justification, that injuries were attributed to him, his messages were ignored, and he was threatened. Białek presented this account as a depiction of an organization that reacted poorly to dissent. According to Białek, Wójcik informed PZPN authorities that he felt he was being mobbed, but Cezary Kulesza advised him not to take action, as similar cases dragged on for years. When Wójcik announced he would notify the prosecutor’s office, after several days, screenshots of his conversation with Adrian Siemieniec were leaked. Białek noted that on the same day Wójcik filed a report, and the screenshots — at Kulesza's request — ended up in the disciplinary department. Białek acknowledged that Wójcik violated ethical rules and should be punished, just like Siemieniec. However, he pointed out the difference between the penalties: two years for Wójcik and a month and a half for Siemieniec. In the account of the conversation, he also mentioned allegations regarding cheating on refereeing exams, Kulesza's behavior, and words that, according to Wójcik, were said by referee Raczkowski. Białek assessed that the story could explain the lack of a competitor for Kulesza in the recent elections but also allowed the possibility that Wójcik’s account was untrue. #PZPN #mobbing #sport (translated)
