The author argued that presenting Warning, whom they described as a friend of Putin, as a credible source was another Russian attempt to sow confusion in the West and make Ukrainians appear responsible for their deaths and the destruction of their country. #Ukraine #Russia #Disinformation #UA #RU
The author wrote that Russia’s leaders regarded public opinion polls as mere statistics and valued them no more than human lives. They said only Russia’s defeat in the war it had launched could make a difference. #Россия #война #общественноеМнениe #RU
The author wrote that supporting Ukraine did not require being Ukrainian and said that being human was enough. https://t.co/e9pgL0W7V4 #StandWithUkraine #Humanity #Peace #UA
The author argued that ending Russian domination led to rapid growth in prosperity and wrote that freedom mattered. https://t.co/nhq0dPz0IX #Свобода #Процветание #Рост #RU
The author said the post confirmed that Russia had not changed its ultimate strategic objective, which they described as the destruction of NATO. #NATO #Russia #Geopolitics #RU #NATO
The author called for a European coalition to deploy air defences in at least western Ukraine immediately, rather than wait for further Russian missile and drone strikes. They questioned whether enough had already been done. #Ukraine #AirDefence #Russia #UA #RU
The author argued that negotiating at this stage of the war with an aggressor who believed it was winning was an extraordinarily dangerous gamble, with potential consequences for entire nations and Europe’s future. #negotiations #Europe #war #EU
The author wrote that Putin’s remarks the previous day offered nothing beyond a promise to continue what they called genocide in Ukraine, pressure Europe to accept a “new security reality” and draw the United States into internal chaos through transactional deal-making. They also questioned whether this approach could achieve something just and lasting. #Putin #Ukraine #Geopolitics #UA #RU #EU #US
The author argued that rewarding aggressors could encourage further attacks by showing them that aggression could achieve their aims.
The post shared a link to a YouTube video about the future of the war, in which Marko Mikhelson stated that Russia must lose it. #війна #Росія #Міхельсон #RU (translated)
The author argued that diplomatic concessions, agreements and appeasement toward an aggressor would not bring peace, and said that rewarding aggression would only prolong the war.
The author wrote that efforts were underway in Oslo to find concrete solutions to end Russia’s aggression and said every step towards peace was welcome. They added that proposals made public so far, ranging from a 28-point plan to surrendering Donbas and leaving Ukraine at NATO’s doorstep, had been based on something, but the post ended before they completed the thought. #Oslo #Peace #Ukraine #NO #RU #UA #NATO
The author said they agreed with Boris Johnson, called for strategic clarity and argued that Russia’s defeat in its war of aggression was the only way forward. https://t.co/a6CQ2N7Us5 #Russia #War #Strategy #RU
The author wrote that President Trump’s decision sent Russia a message that it could bomb and kill without facing consequences. The author also said Russia’s aerial attacks on Ukraine and its shadow war against NATO countries were escalating, and referred to pressure on Russia’s war machine. #Trump #Russia #Ukraine #RU #UA #NATO
The author asked what would happen to those assets if Russia attacked a NATO member and whether Mr De Wever would give the same answer in that situation. #NATO #Russia #Geopolitics #RU #NATO
Claim it. Contact us at [email protected]