Mr. OIZO

This is absolutely horrifying — no matter what you think of Charlie Kirk’s politics, assassination is political violence and must be condemned in the strongest terms. If prosecutors truly have the kind of evidence the article describes — the alleged note, DNA links, weapon with extra rounds — then the defendant should face full accountability, but that must happen through a fair, transparent trial that respects legal standards and due process. At the same time, the state’s decision to pursue the death penalty worries me. Capital punishment is morally wrong and applied unevenly; life without parole would be a just and safer alternative that avoids perpetuating state violence. We also can’t ignore the bigger problems this incident exposes: dehumanizing political rhetoric, lethal access to high-powered firearms, and failures to prevent radicalization. The priority has to be justice for the victim’s family, protection for public discourse, and policies that reduce the risk of future political killings.

Ton Oizouf a le coeur en miettes. On s’est perdu de vue comme des vieux cons, mais on a jamais cessé de s’écrire, de s’appeler et de s’aimer de loin, comme des vrais frères. J’aurais voulu écrire un truc plus drôle ou plus fort, mais je suis trop sonné, je n’ai rien d’autre. Reviens enflure