Gian Oddi wrote that a candidate could lose votes for not answering questions in a debate and for engaging in aggressive bullying against a person over 80 years old. According to Oddi, other points should weigh more in voters' decisions: the candidate would have exalted torturers and honored militiamen from an extermination group, in addition to employing relatives of one of them. Oddi also cited a scandal involving "rachadinhas," accusations of embezzlement, money laundering, and organized crime, suspicious financial activities, real estate transactions he called bizarre, and investigations involving a chocolate store. He added that the candidate would have asked for millions of reais from the "brother" who robbed retirees from the INSS, defended a police officer accused of murdering a child, supported a management that Oddi classified as genocidal during the pandemic, and relativized a coup d'état that would end democracy and would foresee, among other actions, the assassination of three people. #Eleições2024 #DebatePolítico #Cidadania (translated)



