WRLD

Search

#Cruzmaltino
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 2w

Planeta do Futebol reported that a panel of 25 judges from the Justice Court of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) unanimously overturned a preliminary injunction obtained by the Fla-Flu Consortium to prevent Vasco from using Maracanã in the match against Boca Juniors, scheduled for the following day. The publication described the decision as a victory for Vasco by a score of 25 to 0. The information was attributed to Simpraisa, and the image to Matheus Lima/CRVG. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

3790
newscolina 2w

NewsColina, with information from Diogo Dantas, reported that Vasco was considering sending an official letter to Conmebol to question the choice of Piero Maza to officiate the first leg against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the club pointed out the red card issued to Andrés Gómez and controversial decisions in Boca's previous matches in the Sudamericana. Maza, a Chilean referee, had officiated three Boca home games against Recoleta, São Paulo, and Vasco, in consecutive knockout stages. According to Vasco, there were controversies in all three matches: against Recoleta, Maza allegedly allowed Boca to take the kickoff at the beginning of both halves; against São Paulo, a red card deemed incorrect was overturned by VAR; and against Vasco, the club questioned the lack of appropriate punishment for a tackle on Andrés Gómez in the first half. The team also demanded that the refereeing of the return game be impartial. #Vasco #Arbitragem #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

3573
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

The Football Planet reported, citing Gustavo Tutinha, that Vasco and the new investor Almirante should expand the dispute for the Maracanã. According to the publication, they would challenge the bidding and management of the Fla-Flu Consortium and seek to investigate possible irregularities and alleged breaches of the public notice, involving the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Attorney General's Office, and the Government. The publication added that the dispute could go beyond the match against Boca Juniors and reach the conditions of the concession. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

2999
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

Planeta do Futebol stated that Vasco was finalizing the signings of defender Robert Renan and left-back Cuiabano and planned to seek more reinforcements for 2027, after the completion of the sale of SAF to Marcos Lamacchia. According to the publication, the club would pay 8 million euros (R$ 47 million) for 70% of Robert Renan's rights and expected to receive larger offers for the player soon. Cuiabano would cost 10 million euros (R$ 60 million). The publication added that other names had been suggested and that the club was looking for a standout striker, with Richarlison possibly returning to the agenda. The planning would also include a goalkeeper to share the responsibility with Léo Jardim and a midfielder to reduce reliance on Thiago Mendes. Planeta do Futebol attributed the information to O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas, and credited the image to Matheus Lima/CRVG. #Vasco #Futebol #SAF (translated)

3000
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

The Football Planet reported that Vasco was preparing to buy Robert Renan and Cuiabano, on loan to the club until the end of the year, in operations whose options totaled more than R$ 100 million. According to the publication, Vasco informed Zenit that it would exercise the option to buy 70% of the defender's rights for 8 million euros (R$ 47 million). The club would have priority until October 31, and the documentation was being prepared. Regarding Cuiabano, the Football Planet stated that Vasco informed the full-back and his staff that they wanted to sign him permanently. The option was for 10 million euros (R$ 60 million), but the conclusion would depend on the investment from the SAF. The publication added that the player wanted to remain at the club. The text cited information from ESPN Brazil and Felipe Silva. #Vasco #Futebol #Transferências (translated)

3463
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

The Planet of Football stated that Vasco became the eighth Brazilian club to defeat Boca Juniors at La Bombonera. According to the publication, Santos, Cruzeiro, São Paulo, Paysandu, Internacional, Fluminense, and Palmeiras had already achieved this feat. Internacional won in 2008 and 2020; the other results cited were: Santos, 2-1 in 1963; Cruzeiro, 2-1 in 1994; São Paulo, 3-2 in 1995; Paysandu, 1-0 in 2003; Fluminense, 2-1 in 2012; and Palmeiras, 2-0 in 2018. The publication attributed the information to ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

3464
Wesley Curty 3w

Wesley Curty stated that the presence of 4,000 Cruzmaltino fans at the Bombonera was the largest Brazilian invasion in the history of the stadium and said that they had silenced the feared territory of Boca. He also asked that the episode not be compared to others. https://t.co/WQcd509Ad5 #FutebolBrasil #BocaJuniors #Cruzmaltino (translated)

3235
Podcast Cruzmaltino 3w

The Cruzmaltino Podcast reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of the TJRJ, reinstated the authorization for Vasco to face Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the report, the decision was signed on Tuesday (13th) at 7:11 AM, and determined that Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. would make the stadium available. The podcast stated that the judge reconsidered a previous ruling that had suspended the authorization. Among the reasons, he pointed out that the prior decision was based on an outdated version of the Internal Regulations of the Court, without considering a change approved in September. The rule, according to the report, allowed the president of the Chamber to review urgent requests when the rapporteur was absent. Since the original rapporteur was on vacation and there was a deadline to inform Conmebol about the stadium, the judge recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to grant the authorization. The Cruzmaltino Podcast also reported that public safety weighed into the decision. The magistrate reportedly considered favorable technical assessments regarding Maracanã and the potential impacts of a stadium change on policing, access, fan separation, the press, and broadcasting. The document recorded, based on information presented by Vasco, the sale of 46,014 tickets. According to the podcast, the judge assessed that any material damages to the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to collective safety would be harder to repair. Regarding Conmebol's deadline, the report stated that the judge rejected the argument that the request had lost its purpose. The decision reportedly noted that the initial communication occurred within the deadline, and that, according to Vasco, the entity granted a new deadline: that same day at noon. The podcast added that Flamengo x Botafogo, scheduled to take place at Maracanãzinho on the same date, should be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans from the football match. It also reported that the process would continue in the Special Body, with consideration expected at the first in-person session the day before the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

3583
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

Planeta do Futebol reported that, after an unfavorable court decision, the Fla-Flu Consortium asked the court to reject a new appeal from Vasco regarding ticket sales for the match against Boca Juniors. The concessionaire stated that the club should assume the risks of having sold tickets while the injunction could still be suspended. The Consortium argued that the appeal had lost its object due to the proximity of the deadline and that it repeated already rejected arguments. It advocated for the match to be held at Nilton Santos Stadium and stated that there would still be time to reorganize the event. According to the publication, Vasco urgently requested reconsideration of the suspension and claimed that it had begun sales for Maracanã after receiving court authorization. The club argued that the capacity of Nilton Santos, which is 44,661 people, was less than the 46,014 tickets sold, which would require cancellations and refunds. It also pointed out the need to accommodate 4,000 visiting fans and maintain separation areas between the supporters. The appeal from Vasco and the statement from the Fla-Flu Consortium were awaiting analysis from Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, reported Planeta do Futebol, based on ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

3126
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 3w

The Football Planet reported that Vasco would appeal the court decision that overturned the injunction requiring the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the match against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the club would not publicly comment and would try to regain the stadium through behind-the-scenes negotiations. This information was attributed to ESPN Brazil and Pedro Ivo Almeida. #Vasco #Maracanã #FlaFlu (translated)

3475
Atenção, Vascaínos! 3w

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, determined that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. should make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The decision was granted this Friday (9), after a request from Vasco against the concessionaire's refusal, which had alleged technical issues related to the maintenance and restoration of the field. According to the publication, the magistrate considered statements from the Military Police and the Public Ministry of Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out the stadium as a preferred alternative due to structural, logistical, and operational conditions, as well as issues of safety and urban mobility. He also mentioned previous disputes between the club and the concessionaire regarding the use of the stadium. The decision also determined that the Maracanã should be offered to Vasco under commercial and operational conditions equal to those practiced for Flamengo and Fluminense, respecting legal, technical, and safety requirements. The publication stated that compliance was urgent, as Vasco needed to inform CONMEBOL by October 10 which stadium would host the match, and that the concessionaire could still present its defense. #Maracanã #Vasco #SulAmericana (translated)

3825
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 4w

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that Vasco did not intend to request the Nilton Santos stadium from Botafogo and preferred Maracanã to face Boca Juniors, although it could also play at São Januário. According to the profile, after having a preliminary injunction denied by the Court of Rio de Janeiro, the club was preparing an appeal in Brasília and was counting on its good relationship with the CBF to try to obtain a favorable decision from the STF. The publication cited O Globo Esportes and journalist Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #Botafogo #Maracanã (translated)

2786
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 4w

The Planet of Football reported that a judge from Rio de Janeiro denied, on the 6th, an appeal from Vasco to play against Boca Juniors at the Maracanã. According to the publication, the decision could still be changed until Saturday, the deadline for the club to indicate the location to Conmebol. The judge reportedly considered a more in-depth analysis of the evidence regarding the pitch, the calendar, and the operation necessary, in addition to requesting a response from the Fla-Flu Consortium. Vasco claimed unequal treatment and selective application of criteria, according to the post. The publication added that the Public Ministry recommended the use of the Maracanã, but the judge considered the recommendation non-binding for the Fla-Flu Consortium and insufficient to replace the contractual, technical, and operational assessments. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

3020
News Almirante 4w

Admiral News reported that Vasco informed Conmebol that the match against Boca Juniors would be held in Rio de Janeiro. According to a report by Venê Casagrande cited by the profile, the club had until that day to notify whether they would play the match outside the city, and now they would have until the 10th to confirm the stadium. https://t.co/uzdVkkkxbP #Vasco #BocaJuniors #CopaLibertadores (translated)

3603
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 4w

Futebol Planet informed that Vasco consulted the Amazon Arena about the possibility of holding the semifinals of the Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors and the classic against Flamengo for the Brasileirão in Manaus. According to the publication, Sedel stated that the stadium was suitable and authorized the games if the club chose the location. The inquiry occurred after another denial from the Justice regarding the immediate release of Maracanã, which is still subject to appeal. #Vasco #ArenaDaAmazônia #SulAmericana (translated)

3255
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 4w

Planet Football reported that the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors for the semifinals of the South American Cup was set to take place at Nilton Santos. According to the publication, the courts had denied the use of Maracanã, while Vasco was waiting for a decision from the Military Police about increasing the capacity of São Januário to 24,000 spectators. Conmebol expected the stadium designation by Monday and required a capacity of over 30,000 people, the page added, attributing the information to Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #SulAmericana (translated)

19211
Planeta do Futebol 🌎 Oct 1

🚨 NOW! Vasco returns to court to face Boca Juniors at Maracanã. This measure was taken after another "no" from the Fla-Flu Consortium. In the lawsuit, Cruzmaltino claims that São Januário does not meet the minimum capacity required for the semifinals of the South American Cup. It also mentions an agreement signed in 2025 for the club to be able to use the Maracanã. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

16895
News Almirante Oct 1

ATTENTION! Vasco has filed a new lawsuit in court requesting the Maracanã for the game against Boca Juniors. The Cruzmaltino has the support of the Military Police of Rio, which stated that the game would be better at Maracanã. In addition to the authorities' suggestion, Conmebol and FERJ are also in favor of Vasco using the stadium. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

15380
News Almirante Oct 1

Vasco is the club with the fewest injuries among the teams in Series A. So far, there have been 15 injury absences this season, with the players involved missing a total of 54 matches. The most serious case is that of Brenner, who has been dealing with a ligament injury in his left foot since the beginning of August. He is the one who missed the most games for Cruzmaltino in 2026, with 15 matches. Cuiabano is right behind him, with 13. #Vasco #SérieA #Lesões (translated)

13283
newscolina Sep 30

Vasco won against Noroeste 4 to 1 in a training match held on the morning of this Wednesday at the Luso-Brasileiro stadium. Pedro Emanuel took advantage of the activity to test alternatives, especially in the offensive sector, aiming for the absence of Andrés Gómez, suspended for the match against Botafogo. The goals for Cruzmaltino were scored by Puma Rodríguez, Lucas Piton, Paulo Henrique, and Johan Rojas. #Vasco #futebol #jogotreino (translated)

17021