Search

After 10 years of Macronism, we need a break: democratic, ecological, a fiscal and social revolution. Anger is rising in the country, and if we don't mobilize, it will be Marine Le Pen who will reap the benefits. I am a candidate to restore strength to the... (translated)

It's very simple: If what he claims is true, it is no longer just Mediapart that needs to be prosecuted. We must also challenge the bailiff who would have knowingly established a forgery. A public officer who would commit, in the exercise of their duties, a forgery in a public document would face up to 15 years of criminal imprisonment and a fine of 225,000 euros. So, if you are so sure of yourself, Jordan, go ahead. We're watching you. (translated)

FLASH | A statue of the Virgin Mary was VANDALIZED and torn from its pedestal during the night in Porto-Vecchio, Corsica. Several individuals have been identified, apprehended, and placed in police custody. Videos circulated on social media show a young man clinging to the statue and making sexual remarks. Mayor Jean-Christophe Angelini, who filed a complaint, demands a judicial response "of extreme severity." The statue will be replaced "as soon as possible" (Le Parisien) (translated)

Lydia Daniel and Marcus Rolloos on billions to foreign countries: 'Own children are starving' The Netherlands is sending 3.9 billion abroad, of which 383 million is for food security elsewhere, while 450,000 people live in food poverty here. Lydia Daniel: “It's like treating your neighbors to a meal while your own children are starving.” (translated)

A young trainee lieutenant from the Police Prefecture was chased, thrown to the ground, and assaulted by several individuals in the 20th arrondissement of Paris this afternoon. Attacking a representative of law enforcement in this way is intolerable. I offer my full support to this police officer, as well as to the 305 other police officers and military gendarmerie members injured during interventions this Thursday. The perpetrators of this aggression will be found and prosecuted. (translated)

🚨 Kevin Diaz: "OUSMANE DEMBÉLÉ 🇫🇷 IS NOT A STRIKER AND WILL NEVER BE A STRIKER! ❌ He is not a number 9, he will not be Giroud 🇫🇷. He is good at PSG because he plays in a setup where HE HAS THE FREEDOM TO MOVE BASED ON HIS PARTNERS." (translated)

🔴🇫🇷 𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 — The LFI mayor of Saint-Denis, Bally Bagayoko, is mentioned in the complaint of a police officer: several of his colleagues claim to have seen him STRIKE her car during the blockade of the Paul-Éluard high school. The officer, who was in plain clothes on her way to work, found herself blocked and then surrounded by around thirty individuals who hit her vehicle, damaging a door and the bodywork. According to the police officers present, Bally Bagayoko allegedly himself struck the rear door of the vehicle. A video of the scene shows several individuals kicking the car, and then the mayor running behind it with other people. The police officer filed a complaint against X for "damage or deterioration of another's property committed in a group." An investigation is open and no suspects have been identified at this stage. (Source: Le Figaro) (translated)

These are not just simple screenshots but the metadata of Jordan Bardella's Facebook account… Complicated. Very complicated. How can one believe, in 2026, that a French media outlet is having fun producing fakes or harboring them? Jordan Bardella will lose all the lawsuits he intends to file - and that’s probably why he will stall by not making any direct quotes. Having political opinions, preferences, is one thing; but defending him and claiming that Mediapart produces fakes to save him from his own troubles, and supporting his dubious explanations, is impossible. Those who are having fun defending him today and agreeing with him will have to justify themselves when the justice system dismisses him and confirms the authenticities. (translated)

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that the construction of a pipeline linking Alberta to the Pacific coast could begin after a final green light expected next summer, as part of a strategy to make Canada an energy superpower and reduce its dependence on the United States. (translated)

The Israeli army reacted to the documentary Naza by publishing a 17-page statement to contest the allegations regarding the use of artificial intelligence in its military operations in Gaza, labeling the filmmakers as traitors and stating that their film presents a false and misleading reality. (translated)

President Nawrocki signed a bill regarding the excess profits of fuel corporations and ended the process of placing Poles in the role of political hostages! The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices! Listen to an important message from the President of Poland. Every decision of the President is summarized by the sentence: "First of all Poland, first of all Poles." The President does not look at legal tricks and political calculations, but at the effects that a given solution brings to Poles. (translated)

Questions that come in: Are pilots checked the same way in the filters? YES (the only difference is that we can carry liquids of more than 100 ml) If a pilot becomes unconscious in the cockpit, can the other one fly the plane? Yes, the plane can be flown by one person only and we have sessions where we train that. Could a passenger land a commercial plane if they are given instructions on how to fly it from the control tower? The control tower has no idea how to fly the planes and would not be able to instruct them. (translated)

Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have gone directly to the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the fastest route to have the matter decided publicly by a court? (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. (translated)