Marathon runner and health-conscious mother Danni Duncan, who was only 39 years old, received a diagnosis of bowel cancer, contradicting her story that a healthy lifestyle protects against serious diseases. (translated)

Marathon runner and health-conscious mother Danni Duncan, who was only 39 years old, received a diagnosis of bowel cancer, contradicting her story that a healthy lifestyle protects against serious diseases. (translated)

Flávio Bolsonaro sent an amendment for a non-existent company. In 2024, Flávio Bolsonaro allocated R$ 3.1 million for primary health care in the municipality of Mesquita (RJ), governed by PL. Of these funds, R$ 666,000 were paid to the Institute of Medicine and Project (IMP) in August 2025. In June of this year, the Federal Revenue Service classified the IMP as "non-existent in fact." According to a document from the agency, there are "reasons that evidence that the company was established for the purpose of tax fraud, including for the benefit of third-party companies." The IMP is under scrutiny from TCE-RJ. Only Mesquita signed contracts of over R$ 580 million with the IMP between 2019 and the end of 2024. Despite the volume of resources, the IMP has not had a website since 2021, the emails provided in the contracts do not work, and the phone registered with the Federal Revenue does not answer. Furthermore, the president of the IMP was an elderly person, a beneficiary of a social program, and lived for free, as reported by G1 in 2023 (uol). (translated)
After the Federal Prosecutor's Office announced yesterday that a Kuwait-born suspected IS fighter was arrested in Hesse and a Syrian suspected war criminal was arrested in Rhineland-Palatinate, I made a press inquiry. I wanted to know when the suspects entered Germany, whether they applied for asylum, and what residence status they had at and after entry as well as what they currently have. I also wanted to know whether the suspects had previously been known to the police for similar crimes or violent offenses or had a criminal record. Shortly after that, I received a call from a spokesperson for the Federal Prosecutor, who informed me that they did not want to provide any further information due to the protection of the suspects' personal rights. I took note of this and wrote a rebuttal, citing the necessary weighing between the public's interest in information and the specific, worthy interests of the affected suspects. I pointed out that my questions 1-3 exclusively concern the stay of the suspects in Germany, withdrew the fourth question (because one can argue here with the presumption of innocence and personal rights), and requested answers to questions 1-3. Lastly, I asked to at least name the year of entry and answer the question about the asylum application if more detailed responses are not possible. In case no response is given, I requested confirmation of the refusal to provide information as well as a concrete justification. I received the response earlier via email, see screenshot. They concluded, after weighing "all possible aspects," that the personal rights of a suspected IS fighter and a suspected war criminal, who is accused of executing three people with a close-range headshot, weigh more heavily than the legitimate public interest in knowing how long the suspects have been in Germany and whether they entered the country as asylum seekers. Well then. This does not correspond to my understanding of transparency. In this context, I would like to point out that you can also support my work. Any support helps to make research, court visits, on-site appointments, technical costs, and the further expansion of my portal Current Information possible. Unfortunately, at the moment, the costs are higher than the revenue. I would therefore be very pleased and grateful for any support. You can do that here: https://t.co/0RvVD8whhG (translated)
October means European Cybersecurity Month! Today’s Eurobarometer shows high awareness, but everyday habits need to catch up: 3 in 4 EU employees encountered suspicious emails, messages or links at work in the six months before the survey. Let’s turn awareness into action. https://t.co/RBYO7eToKZ #Cybersecurity #EUCybersecurityMonth #StaySafeOnline #EU
Why hasn't the MBL done a live with Emanuel for him to deny this whole story and put the doubts to rest once and for all? There’s already audio of the Phallic Man. If they let Emanuel speak, it will become clear once and for all whether the voice of the Phallic Man is his or not. Of course, this would only be a problem if Emanuel is the Phallic Man and if it becomes impossible to pretend that his voice can’t be recognized, because then it wouldn’t be possible to pretend that they themselves didn’t know who he was since the moment that audio leaked… But it is what it is, the MBL wouldn’t want to shield a possible Nazi who was with them, right? Can anyone find a reasonable reason why this live with Emanuel still hasn’t happened? Isn’t it better to settle the controversy once and for all in such a simple way? (translated)
I was really curious to know the official explanation from MBL and the first impression is horrible, as it already starts with an easily verifiable lie. I haven't watched the entire podcast yet, but in this excerpt here, Arthur is objectively lying. The case 1505278-93.2026.8.26.0454 is accessible to any lawyer. I was able to access it through mine and asked her to explain it to me. The case is NOT about Nazism and the profile The Phallic Man is NOT among the accused! In fact, it is exactly the OPPOSITE! The legal group of MBL says NOT TO INVESTIGATE Phallic Man because they already knew he was Emanuel and even say that he is with the movement! The reported profiles are: - Ian Lucas - Robberbaron - Hansa And the police report is for extortion, absolutely NOTHING TO DO with Nazism! If there really is a request for investigation into Nazism regarding the Phallic Man profile by MBL, this document has simply never been presented, at least as far as I know. The only document I know that talks about him is this one, and it seems to be the one Arthur is talking about because he cites the fact that the document identifies Phallic Man as Emanuel. “If Phallic Man was not accused, why is he in the document?” Because there were records of interaction between him and some investigated profiles, including participation in Spaces, and that is why the legal group of MBL appears to clarify that there is no need to worry about him because he is with MBL. In other words, the document that Arthur uses as “evidence” that they are not with the guy because they reported him actually proves exactly the opposite, that they did not want to report the guy because they are together! Arthur says in the podcast “don’t believe me, you can research” - but he knows that the party’s supporters will not research anything and will only repeat the lie. Those who really research will see that he is inverting reality. It's concerning that they are lying dramatically about something so serious. (translated)
Alors que des violences de part et d’autre émaillent les blocus de nombreux lycées en France, 119 élèves et employés de l’éducation nationale ont été blessées, selon le décompte ce mercredi soir du ministre de l’éducation nationale, Edouard Geffray. #Lycéens #ViolencesPolicières #LBD
Vasco won against Noroeste 4 to 1 in a training match held on the morning of this Wednesday at the Luso-Brasileiro stadium. Pedro Emanuel took advantage of the activity to test alternatives, especially in the offensive sector, aiming for the absence of Andrés Gómez, suspended for the match against Botafogo. The goals for Cruzmaltino were scored by Puma Rodríguez, Lucas Piton, Paulo Henrique, and Johan Rojas. (translated)
With the latest news, according to which Stasi's consultants were present during the analyses and informed of the negative results, after the numerous pages, consultations, and reports produced by the Giarda study to refute the hematological nature of the trace on the pedal, and after having denied it during the hearing before the PM, I would say it would be appropriate to call Professor Catanesi because evidently the problem is not Sempio. (translated)
No. There is nothing to discuss. There is nothing to ascertain. If there are two opposing scientific results, particularly one positive and two negative, that element cannot be used as evidence against the suspect or the accused. This is due to the principle that a conviction must be issued beyond a reasonable doubt, for the presumption of innocence, for the "favor rei." Because we live in a rule of law state. The DNA of Chiara Poggi on the pedals of Alberto Stasi's bicycle was one of the seven pieces of evidence that led to his conviction. Judicially and humanly. In the ruling of the Court of Appeal in 2014, it is clearly stated that according to the RIS interviewed during the first-degree trial in 2009, that DNA was significant, highly cellular, and compatible with blood substance. In fact, it was so significant that white blood cells could be seen with the naked eye. And that the tests conducted in 2009 yielded negative results regarding the blood presumably because two years had passed. All this was reported. But they forgot to mention that the day after the positive result, two additional tests (which were incomprehensible given the clear result of the first test) had yielded negative results. And when the experts appointed by the first-degree judge asked for all the laboratory results related to the pedals, they only provided the positive one. I want to believe that I live in a place where those who hold great responsibilities take on the consequences of their actions or omissions. I am not interested if, according to the law, the consequences will not be criminal because they have become statute-barred in their illegality. I care that those responsibilities be clarified and made known to everyone. To everyone. And I am sure that will happen. #garlasco (translated)
The article emphasizes how the participation of the Vice President of the Piedmont Region, Maurizio Marrone, in the rituals of a chivalric order linked to the House of Savoy is not just folklore, but a strategic action aimed at gathering support among monarchy nostalgics and representing a threat to the democratic constitutional order. (translated)

Tolosa (France), alerted by neighbors who heard screams, the police raided the home of 93-year-old Marie-Louise, disabled after a stroke: her body was found naked in the bathroom, mutilated and covered in blood. Inside the home, a 30-year-old Sudanese undocumented immigrant was found asleep near the elderly woman's body. The autopsy later revealed injuries consistent with sexual violence and bruises on the neck attributed to strangulation. (translated)
Bruno Bosco, a former policeman and key witness in the Emanuela Orlandi case, revealed in an interview that everything that has been written in the reports about his involvement is all fabricated, claiming that he finally feels free after 40 years of silence. (translated)

The new doctoral thesis points out that Estonia's maternal care services do not form a cohesive whole, resulting in the availability of necessary support depending on a woman's place of residence and the cooperation of healthcare and social sector specialists, which has led to the need to improve these connections and the continuity of services. (translated)

4 ματς σε 6 μερες 4 νίκες οι 2 εκτος εδρας 1 τίτλος Κλαμα βαζελων για βαλιτσες και παραγκες Φουρνιε ο,τι πιο αρχοδατο και κλατς υπαρχει στην Ευρώπη💦💦💦💦 Φέρτε 3αρι να δαγκωνει στην αμυνα καράφλοι βαρδηδες🙏 #OlympiacosBC https://t.co/emab6tbKLc #μπάσκετ #Ολυμπιακός #τίτλος