The issue of Maricarmen, which is a problem with the PSOE's housing laws, was dead within 24 hours, and we were already back in Ceuta and the corruption scandals of Sánchez. They have resurrected it. Unnecessarily. No There Is No Need To React To The Psyops Of The PSOE (translated)
Spanish soldiers doing the same as the Americans in Guantánamo. Shadi Boukhari from Border Assistance: They forced them to dance naked with "Mohamed VI faggot" written on their foreheads. This is a democratic scandal. We demand an investigation. (translated)
Flávio Bolsonaro went to court arguing that this image, with this caption, would be illegal. Worse: the rapporteur of the case, André Mendonça, agreed with the request and censored the publication! This is a scandal! (translated)
This publication was removed by order of André Mendonça at the request of Flávio, both evangelicals. A fine of R$ 50 thousand per day in case of violation. The page simply asks that the Patroness of Brazil pray for us. This is a global scandal. Censorship and disrespect for Catholics! Hello @Pontifex It is necessary to take action. (translated)
Abuse of political power laid bare. If it were Bolsonaro... Lula has taken over the institutions over the course of 20 years. He formed networks of power that make up a system that works in his favor. Moreover, with the scandal involving the STF, the system also needs him. (translated)
This Friday, Lula made history in Recife with what seemed like a rock concert for 80,000, prohibited the BETS defending the country and its people, defended religious freedom. With the other candidate melting down in scandals and cynicism, a pathetic attempt at censorship on social media via a pastor-judge from the Supreme Court to erase a huge tail of fireworks: the disrespect for Our Lady Aparecida, patroness of Brazil, a sample of what bolsonarism thinks of our incredible and diverse country. (translated)
This decision by Minister André Mendonça, as presented, carries a serious and concerning dimension of prior censorship. When not only the removal of a specific publication is determined, but also the preemptive blocking of future content, supposedly "equivalent," it opens the door to preemptively preventing the circulation of criticisms, denunciations, comments, and political debates. In a democracy, especially during an election period, we cannot accept that platforms receive a sort of license to silence, in advance, anything that may displease a candidacy or a political group. Even more serious is that many of the facts treated as "disinformation" are part of the public debate and are notorious, documented, widely discussed by the press, and known by society. One cannot label as fake news that which is a public fact, political criticism, collective memory, or a legitimate question about the statements, alliances, positions, and conduct of public agents. The Electoral Justice must combat deliberate lies, but it cannot become an instrument of political shielding, erasure of facts, or intimidation of those exercising the constitutional right to inform, criticize, and express themselves. It is a scandal that, once again, in the final stretch of the electoral process, attempts are made to restrict public debate through broad and potentially silencing decisions. Freedom of expression does not only exist for comfortable or favorable speeches to the powerful: it exists, above all, to protect criticism, divergence, and the circulation of information of collective interest. We are already mobilized and preparing representations in defense of people who are being targeted by this type of measure. (translated)
Junts demands tax cuts and urgent measures against evictions from the PSOE following the scandal of Maricarmen's eviction, while social pressure against the government increases. (translated)
🚨 SCANDAL Lilly Téllez is absolutely right! They have reached the limit. Fines and jail for making MEMES. We have the WORST government in history, and they can no longer hide it. Raise your hand if you agree with her. @LillyTellez ✋🏼 (translated)
"And that is where my family comes in, my wife and my brother, and I regret to say that those are not cases of corruption or scandals, they are something else." Sánchez's response distinguished between the corruption cases that had affected his government and his party and those related to his family. (translated)
The Federal Police is investigating suspicions of influence peddling involving Lula's son, Luís Cláudio Lula da Silva (Lulinha), his wife Roberta, and Marcola, Lula's former chief of staff, in a contract with Petrobras. The investigation reveals possible intermediation in state business. This case adds to other allegations of closeness between the family core and power schemes. Meanwhile, the government tries to maintain the narrative of "combating selective corruption." The operation exposes the old PT practice of mixing family, power, and business. Lulinha has previously been involved in scandals; now he reappears connected to new scandals. The same PT that shouted "there will be no coup" and turned the Supreme Court into a shield now sees the Federal Police knocking at the door of its innermost circle. Selective judicial activism protects friends and pursues opponents. The Lava Jato was destroyed for this: so that lulismo could operate unpunished again. Brazil deserves better. (translated)
Those are not cases of corruption or scandals. Those are other matters. Sánchez acknowledged that his government and his party have faced cases of corruption and argued that, when these occur, the Executive must respond "effectively." (translated)
‼️ Begoña, Pegasus, Zapatero... The scandals follow Sánchez all the way to Harvard (translated)
📹 Sánchez, in response to a question from a Harvard student: "The cases of my wife and my brother are not cases of corruption or scandals. They are other things. The opposition and some extreme right associations have crossed some red lines." (translated)
"How can we be sure that this 'hacking' does not affect your policies?" "Months after the 'hacking', you overturned forty years of Spanish neutrality on Western Sahara, and more recently, defended Morocco after the invasion of Ceuta," Nicolás, a master's student, reminded him. (translated)
"I am curious to ask you about the fact that your wife, your brother, your former Attorney General, your former Secretary of Organization, or your wife's personal assistant are among the nine corruption cases currently affecting your government." (translated)
"They want us to be intimidated, they want us to surrender." At Harvard, at the Kennedy School of Government, a prestigious public policy center, Sánchez had a pleasant afternoon, during which he expressed his ambition to regulate artificial intelligence and many condemnations of the 'tech oligarchs': "Many of those algorithms have not been built to serve us, but to enslave us," "against AI we must fight or flee, I reject the latter," "we must abandon the fable of self-regulation," "don't believe the big companies," "we need regulations that no country, no company, no billionaire can escape"… (translated)
During his visit to Harvard, President Pedro Sánchez faced uncomfortable questions from students about corruption scandals linked to his administration, including the situation of his wife Begoña Gómez and the implications of the hacking of his phone with the Pegasus program. (translated)
Sánchez comes out poorly at Harvard: the students ask him about Begoña, David, the prosecutor, Pegasus, ZP, and Venezuela, and the president of the Government resorts to his usual excuses about the scandals. (translated)
"Those are not cases of corruption or scandals. Those are other matters, and, for me, the opposition and some far-right associations have crossed certain red lines that lead me to a reflection." Sánchez said that of course there have been some cases of corruption and that when they happen, regardless of the country, the government must be asked to respond effectively. (translated)
