The Cinghio described October 20 as a difficult day for Sempio's defense, stating that in various broadcasts regarding the Garlasco case three reconstructions presented in the previous weeks as certainties had been disputed. At Mattino Cinque, he reported, the reconstruction of the Prosecutor's Office had been illustrated, according to which the comment published on the podcast dated back to April 15, the day after the soliloquy of the three phone calls: this, according to the author, would have cast doubt on the hypothesis that the soliloquy had begun in response to that comment. In the afternoon, he continued, Skin had presented the Prosecutor's interpretation of the intercepts from 2017, deemed relevant to reconstruct what Sempio knew about the matter. The Cinghio noted that this reading contrasted with the statements made by lawyer Taccia and commentators Oliva and Longo, according to whom Sempio would not have been involved. In the evening, he added, Milo Infante had shown that he could wear two shoes, one size 43 and one size 42, even though he had size 44 and a half, after the video of "Cenerentolo" showed difficulties in putting on the shoe. The author clarified that the demonstration did not constitute definitive proof, also due to differences in shape, fit, and foot characteristics. The Cinghio criticized the defenses' reconstructions, arguing that they could weaken their credibility and appear misleading to the public. He also stated that the public had the right to question the defense's arguments, especially when they were repeatedly presented as indisputable. #Garlasco #Garlasco #Giustizia #Processo (translated)
