Search

Gabriel Sá criticized the decision to hold the game in Vila Belmiro, saying that the change would not solve the problem of the Morumbi pitch, which was in bad condition due to the BTS concert. He also doubted that when the covering was removed, the Morumbi field would be in much worse condition than that of Vila on that day. #Futebol #Morumbi #VilaBelmiro (translated)

Vasco da Gama announced that warming up activities were held on the Maracanã field, in a post related to #VASxBOC for the 2026 Sudamericana. The photo was credited to Matheus Lima. #VascoDaGama #VASxBOC #Sudamericana2026 https://t.co/k8ct2qNAtW #VascoDaGama #Maracanã #Sudamericana (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol page reported that fans of Vasco organized to bring a shirt to Maracanã as a provocation to Flamengo and Fluminense. According to the publication, the print showed Pedrinho, president of Vasco, watching Mário Bittencourt, director of Fluminense, and Bap, president of Flamengo, taking care of the pitch. The page said that vendors from Barreira do Vasco produced the shirts and were supposed to bring hundreds of units to sell at Maracanã that night. The publication mentioned O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Planet of Football reported that STJ minister Luis Felipe Salomão rejected Flamengo and Fluminense's attempt to prevent the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the publication, Salomão considered that the Consortium did not have legitimacy to bring the request to Justice and that its actions were linked to the economic exploitation of the stadium. The publication also stated that the minister dismissed the argument that three games in five days would harm the pitch, as he saw no risk of damage to public property as a whole. Salomão also reportedly criticized the use of a mechanism intended for exceptional situations, instead of the resource he deemed appropriate. #Futebol #STJ #Maracanã (translated)

The Pedrosa Channel reported that Luis Felipe Salomão, president of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), rejected the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. this Thursday (15) to suspend the decision that determined the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at the Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the channel, the court's order for the match to take place at the stadium remained valid. According to the published summary, Salomão considered that the managing company of the complex did not have standing to appeal through a request for suspension of security, an instrument that, according to him, was intended to protect collective interests. The minister assessed that the case involved private interests related to the exploitation of the Maracanã and that there was no demonstration of public interest that justified the measure. The channel reported that the manager claimed wear of the pitch, concentration of games within a short interval, and security risks due to the gathering of fans, as Flamengo and Botafogo would also be playing a basketball game at the Maracanãzinho. However, Salomão understood that no concrete evidence was presented of a serious threat to public order or safety. He also noted that the questioned decision already anticipated moving the basketball event to avoid overlapping audiences. According to the Pedrosa Channel, Salomão concluded that he did not consider the request as he understood it did not meet the requirements to be analyzed through this avenue. The minister added that any eventual questions regarding the actions of the judges should be presented through the appropriate appeals in the Court of Justice of Rio. The channel emphasized that the decision maintained the existing authorization but did not settle the dispute over the use of the stadium. #STJ #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

A newscolina reported that the president of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, rejected the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decisions that allowed the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the publication, in a 11-page decision, Salomão assessed that the company, managed by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not demonstrate a public interest that justified the request, nor proved concrete risks to safety or presented evidence that the sequence of games would harm the pitch. The minister also considered it inappropriate to use the judicial instrument as a substitute for an appeal and rejected the claim that the authorization could encourage new actions against the consortium. The newscolina added that the decision upheld the determinations favorable to the semifinal at the stadium, although there was still room for appeal. The publication mentioned A Vascainos and credited the photo to Matheus Lima. #STJ #Futebol #Vasco (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

Planet Football reported, citing UOL and Valentin Furlan, that Dorival Júnior was facing a process of wear and tear at São Paulo. According to the publication, the coach's criticisms of the pitches at the Barra Funda training center bothered directors and people close to president Harry Massis, who considered them justifications for the crisis. Members of the football department, on the other hand, supported the criticisms; a source from the training center stated that the group had been "suffering in silence for months." The publication added that the problem was seen internally as part of a broader crisis, involving a transfer ban and delays in payments. #SãoPauloFC #DorivalJúnior #FutebolBrasileiro (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that José Boto, an official from Flamengo, said he is concerned about the grass at Maracanã due to the possibility of Vasco playing at the stadium. Boto compared the situation to preparing and paying for a house for someone else to use for a party. https://t.co/MpT9uiQEVF #Flamengo #Vasco #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reconsidered, on the morning of Tuesday (13), the decision that suspended the release of Maracanã and reestablished the order for the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make the stadium available for Vasco x Boca, for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20. According to the profile, the magistrate recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to authorize the match, cited favorable opinions from security agencies, and took into account the sale of more than 46,000 tickets. The judge also considered that the preservation of the field should not take precedence over public safety and determined the change of location or time of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the same day at Maracanãzinho. Attention, Vasco fans! It was added that the process would still be analyzed by the Special Body of the TJRJ on the eve of the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reinstated the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to Tutinha, the magistrate considered that moving the match could pose public safety risks and disrupt the planning already in place, giving weight to the opinions of the Public Ministry and security agencies. Tutinha stated that the judge rejected the consortium's arguments regarding the preservation of the field, believing that any material damage could be compensated for as loss and damages. He also noted that the judge deemed the sale of 46,014 tickets to be significant and dismissed the claim that Vasco's request had become irrelevant with the end of the CONMEBOL deadline. According to the author, the magistrate recorded that the entity had set the new deadline for selecting the stadium as October 13 at 12 PM, Brasília time. Still according to Tutinha, the decision mandated that the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the Maracanãzinho on the same day, be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans. He added that the case would be analyzed by the Special Body of TJRJ in the first in-person session, scheduled for October 19, the eve of the match. #Maracanã #Vasco #SegurançaPública (translated)

Danteskoo said he had been criticizing daily, in OVOV and Expresso, what he called a loss for the consortium for hosting another football match in October, which he considered insignificant. He cited the assessment of a judge that any material losses incurred by the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to public safety caused by the change of stadium would be harder to remedy. The author criticized what he considered a lack of common sense in the decisions and mocked that it seemed as if Vasco was practicing another sport or would be doing work on the Maracanã lawn. #Futebol #Vasco #Consórcio (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Rio de Janeiro requested that the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro reconsider the suspension of the authorization for the semifinal of the Copa Sudamericana between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. The Attorney General, Antonio José Campos Moreira, advocated for the stadium to be made available to Vasco, subject to technical, legal, and security requirements. According to the publication, the Public Prosecutor's Office pointed out evaluations from the Military Police that indicated Maracanã as the preferred option, citing public safety, mobility, infrastructure, and crowd organization. The concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. had refused Vasco's request due to maintenance issues and the condition of the pitch; after a decision authorized the game to take place at the stadium, a court injunction suspended its effects. The publication added that, according to the statement, nearly 50,000 tickets had already been sold and fans from different states and Argentina were mobilized. The Public Prosecutor's Office warned of possible logistical difficulties and legal insecurity if the stadium were changed, in addition to mentioning the Conmebol deadline to confirm the venue and the possibility of transferring the match. Attention, Vasco fans! emphasized that this was a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office, not a final decision from the Court. #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco #Maracanã (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha requested that Almirantes S.A. terminate the contract with Greenleaf on the first day of his management, regardless of the cost. He stated that the company had produced evidence and reports against Vasco, with conclusions he considered controversial, during the legal dispute over Maracanã. He also blamed Greenleaf for the maintenance of the pitches at São Januário and Maracanã, which he evaluated negatively. #ForaGreenleaf #Vasco #GestãoTransparente (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the TJRJ, ordered the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at Maracanã and took into account the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. Tutinha stated that the magistrate pointed out that the club had already sought justice to use the stadium and that the concessionaire had repeated justifications related to the condition of the pitch, which could indicate a "personal issue" between the parties. According to Tutinha, Ibrahim also considered a Memorandum of Understanding between Vasco and the concessionaire. The club argued that the document guaranteed it four matches per season at Maracanã, excluding classics against Flamengo and Fluminense, and that any refusals should be based on objective technical and operational criteria. Tutinha added that Vasco pointed out a contradiction in how the concessionaire invoked the memorandum to restrict access but contested its binding force when it provided rights to the club. Ibrahim considered the document in his reasoning but did not make a definitive decision on the enforceability of all clauses. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Wesley Curty stated that they tried to ridicule and suffocate CRVG, but lost again. He asked for the announcement to be respected and described the public stadium as the second home of the Vasco fans. He also used derogatory language about unhoused people, demanded that the lawn be prepared for the "Bacalhau," stated that the manager was not the owner, and ended with a provocation. https://t.co/CwiQkmYd84 #CRVG #Vasco #Futebol (translated)