Search

Žan Mahnič identified Marjan Jarkovič as Golobič's operative and general secretary of the Svoboda parliamentary group, suggesting to the police that they should first visit him and ask when and where he met Teo Košir and what he offered her. #policija #Svoboda #slovenija (translated)

The author of the post stated that in the final part of #arraiolos2026 they discussed with philosopher and sociologist Prof. Dr. Renata Salecl about how fear, anxiety, and uncertainty are changing societies and when intolerance becomes a dangerous political force. He also noted that politics must listen to science and attached a link. https://t.co/RWP8RXJY0p #politika #sociologija #filozofija #SI (translated)

"Our message to President Zelensky is very simple: the support of the European Union for Ukraine remains stronger than ever before," emphasized Antonio Costa in a statement to the media upon arriving at the summit alongside Ursula von der Leyen and Volodymyr Zelensky. #Ukrajina #EU #sankcije (translated)

Marko Dvornik wrote that he arrived at the National Council at 14:30 to report on the third item on the agenda, and at 18:00 an employee apologized to him for having never seen anything like that, suggesting he should go home. According to him, the unions, with what he deemed unnecessary points, lengthy debates, and procedural tricks, achieved a session break after five hours, which could have concluded in less than one hour. Dvornik assessed that the unions are no longer working for the workers, as they dedicate all their time and energy to undermining the power of elected politicians. He added that this is no longer unionism in his opinion. #sindikat #političnaura #delavci (translated)

Katja Kokot replied that almost all documents are taken for destruction, although some pages may have been lost among the magazines. She added that there are also offices of the Democrats, NSi, and some committees nearby, hinting that in the past there had evidently been something interesting, which made it worth reviewing the documents. She explained that these accumulate over time even in the computer age, as MPs note down what they want to say during sessions and meetings when it's their turn. These notes apparently should also be interesting. #papir #politika #zapiski (translated)

"With Rwanda being added to the racing calendar in the next decade, our sport will compete on all inhabited continents, bringing the World Championship closer to fans around the world than ever before," explained F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali, who has long advocated for the return of Africa to the racing calendar. #Formula1 #Ruanda #Šport (translated)

Franc Brili asked Zvonko Černač when the leadership of DVK will be changed and order will be established at RTV. He was also interested in why Jenull was allowed to bring a crowd to Moste, whether the eligible voters were gathered, and if this would be verified. He communicated to Černač that he should not contact him anymore if this is not arranged before the next referendum. #volitve #RTV #demokracija (translated)

The author of the post asked why the gathering is necessary and stated that, in his opinion, no one restricts the birth of children. He believed that women have the option to choose and that women who do not decide to have a child should not be judged. He added that the decision to have a child is personal and is not a matter for the Catholic Church, and he asked when the gathering will be dedicated to children who have died in wars, to the hungry, the poor, and the abused. (translated)

Dr. Nina Kojima wrote that it was justified to express dissatisfaction and distrust towards the political direction of RTV Slovenia and to call for a fundamental reform of the public service. She expected the government to implement the reform differently than former Prime Minister Golob, who had announced a "cleaning of RTV Janšism." She added that she was the first on the list herself. Kojima accused former Minister of Culture Asta Vrečko of not protecting her, even though, according to her, RTV Slovenia fell under the jurisdiction of the ministry. She wrote that Vrečko, based on the information she had, was looking forward to the list of those who were laid off. She claimed that they were politically removed, sidelined, and harmed, also describing the insulting attitude towards them. She emphasized that the abolition of the RTV fee would not in itself mean the reform for which, in her view, strategy, effort, and determination were needed. According to her, Slovenia needs a national media that serves the public, reports according to fundamental journalistic principles, and prioritizes facts over comments from ideological speakers. Kojima also wrote that she had lived and grown up with RTV for at least four decades and that the employees were mostly creative, hardworking, and decent intellectuals. Before the referendum, she urged people to consider the consequences of past layoffs for individuals, children, and families. She expressed a wish that she and her family would be among the few affected, and that her former colleagues and their families would not have to endure similar experiences. In conclusion, she called for a public service and government that would act virtuous and not vindictively. #Slovenija #RTV #javniservis (translated)

Erika Planinšec wrote that her mother asked her during breakfast when they would go to the polling station on Sunday. She explained that they would go in the morning, as she would be a member of the election commission in the afternoon, and then asked her how she would vote. Her mother replied that she would vote against four times, as she heard on television. Planinšec added the label "4 times FOR." #4kratZA #volitve #zajtrk #danes (translated)

On the twentieth anniversary of the murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, the question arises of when the background of her murder will finally be revealed, while in Ukraine, Russian attacks on Kiev continue, resulting in more dead and wounded. #Ukrajina #Putin #raketniNapad (translated)

Rok Ravnikar accused RTV Slovenia of not fulfilling its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. He wrote that more than which side it supports, he is concerned about the loss of space for the exchange of opinions and confrontation in a democratic republic. He compared two television debates. Last November, during the referendum on euthanasia, he participated in a debate where, according to him, the time was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. There were supposed to be considerably more opponents, so each was given about 45 seconds, while supporters had two minutes each. In a debate about one of the four current referendums, they announced that each participant would get 40 seconds. Ravnikar asked why RTV Slovenia changed the criteria for time distribution, as the same time for each side and the same time for each speaker with a different number of participants would mean a different ratio between the sides. He added that as an active citizen, he expects a response from the journalistic, media, and legal professions. In this context, he cited the stance of Levitsky and Ziblatt from the book *How Democracies Die?*, that changing the rules to one's own benefit and to the detriment of opponents is characteristic of authoritarian regimes. #mediji #demokracija #poročašnje (translated)

More than 2000 words blame how the public @rtvslo does not fulfill its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. You cannot make a bigger anti-ad. And it is the least important which side I support - what worries and saddens me the most is that as a democratic republic we are losing the space for exchange and confrontation. Why do you think of the "others" as so stupid? When did the attitude towards the "others" change so much? Yes, I ask you, who prepare the program. I understand, you have your own agenda and your own views, but in a democratic community mutual respect is a fundamental value. Twenty years ago, I worked as a PR person in politics. Even then, we knew who belonged where and which uncle from the background had more influence. But I felt that those of us on the ground, who were in direct contact – journalists, editors, and PR people – respected each other on a professional level. When I participated in a debate last November about the referendum on euthanasia, the time was evenly divided between the "FOR" side and the "AGAINST" side. There were significantly more opponents at that time, so each of us got, if I remember correctly, 45 seconds. Most barely managed to present one thought. On the other side, the supporters had two minutes. There were also some pretty bizarre embarrassments, as some could not come up with enough arguments for a two-minute speech. Last night, I heard an introductory announcement at a debate about one of the four current referendums that each speaker would get 40 seconds. Seriously? So back then equal time for both sides, now equal time for each speaker. These are different criteria, which with a different number of participants also mean a different distribution of time between both sides. Why did you change the criterion? I am just an active citizen, I expect that the journalistic, media, and legal professions will provide their criticism and assessment. "Changing the rules to your advantage and adjusting the conditions to the detriment of opponents is one of the basic characteristics of authoritarian powers." (Levitsky & Ziblatt: How democracies die?) #demokracija #mediji #poročanje (translated)

Oh come on, when does Anuška remember this. Just yesterday on TV, until then she was - regarding the Vonta commission - strictly silent as a mouse. Btw, @tamaravonta was not a PR person for Gen-I, but their somewhat covert media advisor, we only uncovered her employment with Golob later, as Vonta, Golob, and Gen-I deliberately concealed it. https://t.co/fDVkaJQ8vr #Slovenija #mediji #politika (translated)

🚨 OFICIAL 🚨 Fernando Alonso y Aston Martin confirman la continuidad del piloto español, al menos, hasta 2027 😍🇪🇸 #Alonso #F1 #DAZNF1 https://t.co/KdALGal3z4 #F1 #AstonMartin #FernandoAlonso

🤪 Včasih iz čisto antropoloških razlogov prižgem POP TV in se počutim, kot bi odkril nedotaknjeno grobnico iz leta 1998. To, kar nam danes prodajajo pod pretvezo informativnega programa, ni več novinarstvo – to je dobesedno živi muzej televizijske zgodovine. Naši televizijski junaki s Kranjčeve z izjemno resnimi obrazi še vedno naivno verjamejo, da so absolutni vrhunec vizualnega pripovedovanja zgodb. Celoten svet menda z zadržanim dihom čaka, da nam razložijo novice, ki so bile na spletu zastarele že prejšnji torek. Če bi te medijske "mage" vrgli na YouTube, kjer o vsebini ne odloča polspeči urednik, ampak neusmiljeni algoritem in gledalec z gumbom "preskoči", bi pogoreli hitreje kot poceni kitajski električni avto brez toplotne črpalke sredi hude zime. Na sodobnih platformah velja zakon džungle – če v prvih treh sekundah ne ponudiš substance ali jasne logike, si mrtev. Zbogom. Naši strokovnjaki pa nam strežejo formo iz devetdesetih, zavito v takšno podcenjevanje gledalčeve inteligence, da te ob gledanju fizično zaboli glava. Vse skupaj je zmontirano le zato, da se zapolni čas med oglasi za pralni prašek in čudežna zdravila za prostato. In ker se na POP TV na tihem seveda zavedajo, da se njihov Titanik potaplja, počnejo točno to, kar so pred propadom delali tiskani mediji. Luknje flikajo z organizacijo nekih "strokovnih" dogodkov, da poberejo tam kjer nam težko prodajo “vsebinsko oglaševanje” sredi informativnega programa. Ljudska modrost pravi: ko ladja tone, ne greš menjat tapet v salonu, ampak iščeš rešilni čoln. A najbolj zabavno pri vsem tem je njihovo prepričanje, da jih bo pred propadom rešila majhnost trga in slovenski jezik. Kakšna monumentalna zabloda! V Ameriki je YouTube že zdavnaj povozil kabelsko televizijo in ljudem vzame neprimerljivo več časa. In ne, globalna konkurenca ne bo ostala v angleščini in se ustavila na Karavankah. Umetna inteligenca je zbrisala meje. Že danes lahko Marka Roberja, najbolj znanega YouTube znanstvenika na svetu, gledate in poslušate s simultanim, popolnoma naravnim prevodom v slovenščino. In ni edini. Te vsebine je vsak dan vedno več. Vprašanje torej ni več, kdaj bo ta televizijski koncept propadel. Vprašanje je le, kdaj bodo dinozavri v uredništvih dojeli, da je komet že zdavnaj treščil na zemljo, medtem ko oni še vedno zrejo v temen ekran in poslušajo statični šum. #televizija #mediji #novinarstvo

.@KDanijel Najprej so spremenili besede. Potem začnejo spreminjati še zgodovino. Kako je prišlo do sprememb pri poimenovanju praznika, ki obeležuje vrnitev Primorske k matični domovini. Od soglasne odločitve Državnega zbora do kasnejših političnih poskusov preoblikovanja njegovega pomena. Ko pozabimo, kaj se je zgodilo, lahko nekdo drug napiše zgodbo namesto nas. 🇸🇮 #zgodovina #spremembe #slovenija