Sander Sassen wondered why protesters thought they had the right to loot stores and destroy property. He wrote that they might be harming people who supported their protest cause. https://t.co/ahutRYbKqf #protest #demonstratie #maatschappijkritiek (translated)
Columnist Kitty Herweijer outlines the chaos in Paris during recent riots, where boys with a prince complex use violence while their sisters build successful careers in the same society. #Parijs #rellen #politiegeweld (translated)
Hilda Spruit wrote that Laura Faber, who was mentioned in the NU.nl report, worked in the asylum chain and also had her own business in that sector. https://t.co/RzNPorQUuW #asiel #ondernemen #maatschappij (translated)
Meenu Vadera helps Indian women become taxi drivers and offers them essential training in driving, English, and self-defense, while challenging the gender norms and boundaries of freedom of movement within Indian society. #Vrouwenemancipatie #IndiaseVrouwen #SocialeOndernemingen (translated)
Weird Duk wrote that he posted a lot about it because he found the situation tragic and believed it was foreseeable. According to him, those in power turned a blind eye and denied and downplayed the situation, while they were, in his view, guilty of nonsensical demonization. #maatschappij #politiek #waarheid (translated)
Pieter Waterdrinker wrote that everyone, in his view, was on the edge, but he added that he wished people actually realized and felt that. He said that the situation disgusted him. #gevoelens #frustratie #maatschappij (translated)
Weird Duk asked why, according to him, there were always brave people from minority groups needed to determine how sick and anxious society had become. #maatschappij #minderheden #durf (translated)
Pepijn van Houwelingen wrote that, in his opinion, child protection could take a child out of the home based on a vague criterion regarding the threat to the child's development. He described that as concerning and stated that child protection refused to allow Members of Parliament to be present at discussions. According to him, the minister saw no problem with that. https://t.co/TsPIQpKl3d #jeugdbescherming #kinderen #maatschappij (translated)
Erik de Vlieger wrote that, in his opinion, the Netherlands was completely broken, orphaned, and mentally terminally ill. He urged readers to listen to something. #Nederland #maatschappij #geestelijkegezondheid (translated)
Harm Beertema presented the diptych and wrote that, in his opinion, it could be simple to expose one of the greatest injustices of our time. https://t.co/pr6BdRR2GL #kunst #maatschappijkritiek #bewustwording (translated)
Superjan wrote that, according to him, people should stop being outraged. He argued that nitrogen was a made-up problem used to harass farmers, deny housing or electricity to indigenous residents, and to bring in large numbers of newcomers to the Netherlands and build a barracks for them. He used a derogatory term for those newcomers. According to Superjan, people could only unite against leaders once they let go of their despondent amazement; he stated that it was not about nitrogen gas, but about the mischief of a cunning group of leaders. #verontwaardiging #stikstof #maatschappij (translated)
Ann Van Haute wrote that, in her opinion, it became increasingly clear how ridiculous Europe was making itself. https://t.co/7PP0quJxJo #Europa #belachelijk #maatschappij (translated)
Arthur van Amerongen wrote that he saw Arie Boomsma's sister as a bearded person and used a derogatory description of her gender identity. He said he understood why Boomsma's ex, Lize Korpershoek, made an NPO documentary titled *My Sex is Broken*. https://t.co/T6j2i5Fm9i #gender #documentaire #maatschappij (translated)
Bryan Roy wrote that this was, according to him, how communism worked. He described Douwe Filz as reserved and neat, but called the others, including Renze, very stupid. According to Roy, they seemed to play a role, but that was not the case; he referred to it as the bizarre aspect of this time. #communisme #gezondverstand #maatschappij (translated)
Joren Vermeersch wrote that he did not view the closure of Starlink for Ukrainian drone operations on Ukrainian territory as a lever to make Ukraine stop attacking Russian refineries. According to him, Ukraine had already unilaterally halted those attacks at Trump's request. Vermeersch suspected that Trump might want to force Ukraine to withdraw from the non-occupied parts of the Donetsk province and hand them over to Russia. He derived this from Trump's statements that Zelensky did not want to reach an agreement and that Putin was more focused on an agreement than Zelensky. According to Vermeersch, Trump seemed to think that Putin would be willing to negotiate a ceasefire after such a Ukrainian concession. He described that expectation as dangerous wishful thinking and pointed out that, in his view, Putin also claimed the non-conquered parts of Zaporizhia and Kherson. According to Vermeersch, Russia had constitutionally annexed those provinces; the claimed areas also included both provincial capitals. A Russian presence there would give Russia, according to him, a foothold on the right bank of the Dnipro in two places, in view of a possible third phase of the conquest war. As the main obstacle to a ceasefire, Vermeersch mentioned Putin's demand that Ukraine unilaterally disarm and demilitarize. According to him, that would amount to capitulation and certainly provoke a new invasion. He wrote that Putin had repeated that demand in every diplomatic round, including during the last round in Moscow the month before, with Witkoff and Kuchner. Vermeersch believed that Trump was wrongly thinking that Putin did not take that demand seriously. Vermeersch argued that Ukraine could not afford dangerous wishful thinking, as it was fighting for the survival of its society, people, and state. Because Putin continued to insist on unconditional capitulation, Ukraine was forced to keep defending itself. He wrote that it would continue to do so until it achieved a ceasefire that left it free in the part of the country it had successfully defended. #Oekraïne #Rusland #Vrede (translated)
Joost Jansen wrote that the man was no more an Edenian than he himself came from Pluto. https://t.co/23k5gNQpJ8 https://t.co/Ck6rwjkhD0 #Edenaar #Pluto #Maatschappij (translated)
Dr. Jan van de Beek wrote that, according to him, this also confirmed that those in power consistently gave asylum seekers priority over residents. #asielzoekers #integratie #maatschappij (translated)
Rik Torfs wrote that, in his opinion, the left nowadays often stands up for vulnerable groups without it costing the individuals involved anything. #maatschappij #solidariteit #verantwoordelijkheid (translated)
Bart Nijman wrote that according to him, it got a little worse every week and that the responsibility for it was increasingly out of sight. He stated that no one seemed accountable and that everyone was left to fend for themselves. #verantwoordelijkheid #maatschappij #samenleving (translated)
Kleis Jager responded to the claim that climate change leads to more child marriages and wrote that some have also succeeded in blaming the West for that problem. #klimaatverandering #kindhuwelijken #maatschappij (translated)
