Search

Augusto Cesar reported that Vasco da Gama had filed a new request with the courts to play against Boca at the Maracanã. According to what he wrote, the club added that it had already sold 46,000 tickets and that this figure exceeded the capacity of the Nilton Santos Stadium, the other venue under consideration. Cesar indicated that a decision was expected and that the deadline to present the stadium to Conmebol had expired the day before, although the matter was still under judicial review. #VascoDaGama #Maracaná #Conmebol (translated)

Santos FC recalled that, 64 years ago, they defeated Benfica 5 to 2 at the Estádio da Luz, in front of over 70,000 people, and won the world for the first time. The club stated that the team had already won the first leg 3 to 2 at Maracanã. According to Santos, the team took the field with Gylmar, Olavo, Mauro, Calvet, Dalmo, Zito, Lima, Dorval, Coutinho, Pelé, and Pepe. Pelé scored three goals, Coutinho scored one, and Pepe netted the other. The club stated that this achievement made Santos the first Brazilian team to conquer the world and thanked the players who participated in the feat. #SantosFC #Pelé #Futebol (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that, after an unfavorable court decision, the Fla-Flu Consortium asked the court to reject a new appeal from Vasco regarding ticket sales for the match against Boca Juniors. The concessionaire stated that the club should assume the risks of having sold tickets while the injunction could still be suspended. The Consortium argued that the appeal had lost its object due to the proximity of the deadline and that it repeated already rejected arguments. It advocated for the match to be held at Nilton Santos Stadium and stated that there would still be time to reorganize the event. According to the publication, Vasco urgently requested reconsideration of the suspension and claimed that it had begun sales for Maracanã after receiving court authorization. The club argued that the capacity of Nilton Santos, which is 44,661 people, was less than the 46,014 tickets sold, which would require cancellations and refunds. It also pointed out the need to accommodate 4,000 visiting fans and maintain separation areas between the supporters. The appeal from Vasco and the statement from the Fla-Flu Consortium were awaiting analysis from Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, reported Planeta do Futebol, based on ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Vai Desmaiar reported that during a celebration of the Assembly of God at Maracanãzinho with the presence of Flávio Bolsonaro, Bishop Samuel Ferreira said that brothers should vote for brothers and stated that if he could ask for votes, he would ask for Flávio's. The author also mentioned Article 37 of Law No. 9,504/97, which he claimed prohibited any kind of advertising on public use properties, and referenced the Superior Electoral Court. #Eleições2024 #PropagandaEleitoral #AssembleiaDeDeus (translated)

Pri wrote that Douglas Ruas made his first speech as the elected governor of Rio at Maracanãzinho, during the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Assembly of God of Madureira, alongside Flávio Bolsonaro. According to her, it was Ruas's first public appearance, and the gym was packed. https://t.co/hS2UcRnrM8 #RioDeJaneiro #Governador #AssembleiaDeus (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Vasco would appeal the court decision that overturned the injunction requiring the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the match against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the club would not publicly comment and would try to regain the stadium through behind-the-scenes negotiations. This information was attributed to ESPN Brazil and Pedro Ivo Almeida. #Vasco #Maracanã #FlaFlu (translated)

An intern from VASCO stated that the acting president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro determined that the decision regarding Maracanã be made collegially in the following hours. The author supported the measure and said that the series of injunctions would not resolve the situation. He also predicted that the parties would reach an agreement and that the game would be played at Maracanã. #Maracanã #TJ_RJ #justiça (translated)

Helder Floret stated that the dispute over Maracanã was more political than sporting. According to him, Flamengo knew that a match involving Vasco would not cause losses, but wanted to demonstrate power and act as if it were above the official regulations. Floret said that Vasco was trying to regain a position of prominence and, therefore, did not give up the dispute, which in his assessment should continue in the coming years and went beyond the stadium. He added that, whatever the immediate result, the club needed to move past the passive stance that, according to him, accepted everything out of weakness, as the moment had changed. #Futebol #Maracanã #PolíticaEsportiva (translated)

Braga's central criticized the uncertainty regarding the venue for Vasco x Boca Juniors. He wrote that Vasco had been trying for weeks to obtain permission from the courts to play at Maracanã, got the approval the day before, and sold 45 thousand tickets in advance. According to the author, the courts suspended the decision, leaving the match without a defined location once again. #Vasco #Libertadores #Futebol (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that a decision by Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães suspended the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. According to the publication, the legal dispute continued. The judge reportedly understood that Marco Antônio Ibrahim could not alone review the decision of the rapporteur Alexandre de Carvalho Mesquita and that the appeal should be analyzed by the rapporteur himself or by a panel. She also reportedly pointed out the risk of having three rival fan bases in the same area, as Flamengo vs. Botafogo, for basketball, would be held that evening at Maracanãzinho. According to the report, Suely cited a report from BEPE that deemed Nilton Santos suitable to host the match and stated that the police's preference for Maracanã did not make its use indispensable for safety. The decision, the publication added, did not determine whether Vasco had the right to the stadium nor whether the consortium's refusal was legitimate. The writ of security would be forwarded to rapporteur Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, and the decision would be submitted to the Special Body of TJ-RJ. The publication attributed the information to the newspaper O Globo. #Maracanã #Vasco #Justiça (translated)

Pedrosa's channel stated that Vasco was very close to reaching 70 thousand club members and had already issued around 45 thousand tickets for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors at Maracanã. The author claimed that the stadium would be crowded. #CanaldoPedrosa https://t.co/W379jrk157 #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Sociotorcedor (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Fla-Flu Consortium appealed to the president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to try to reverse the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the profile, the consortium filed a writ of security and requested an urgent measure while the appeal was being analyzed. The consortium stated it had authorized six requests from Vasco since the start of the concession, including classics against Flamengo and Fluminense. The authorization for the match with Boca Juniors would remain valid, unless the court accepted the request, the profile added, citing O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Venê Casagrande stated that Vasco had won a legal dispute with the management of Maracanã, formed by Flamengo and Fluminense, and that they would play at the stadium. He also said that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue for the match against Boca Juniors. https://t.co/kAee8EPspv #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)