Search

"Education has provided me with opportunities that I might not have had due to being a refugee," said the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Barham Salih. "At a time when there is less money for humanitarian aid and development projects, reducing spending on education could negate previous progress and deprive an entire generation of young people of opportunities," Salih warned. (translated)

"It is very possible. Currently quite possible. If someone is trying to destabilize Finland, our sense of security, our support for Ukraine for example, then it has the opposite effect. It strengthens our unity," said Prime Minister Orpo, who also stated that the involvement of a foreign power cannot be ruled out. (translated)

This is already the nth entry in a row with the same quote? Maybe instead of another graphic, the Chancellery will finally add two things that are consistently missing: June 14, 2022 – the original statement about 5.19 PLN. 2026 – the prices you are comparing it to today. Dates really matter. And since you are serially holding others' promises accountable, I am still waiting for an equally impressive graphic about the promise to reduce electricity bills by 33% after 100 days 🤷‍♂️ (translated)

This is really starting to look comical. In the message, Mr. Nawrocki says directly - he signed the law, but he is NOT withdrawing the allegations regarding its unconstitutionality and will refer it to the Constitutional Tribunal for subsequent control 🫣 And just a moment later, the Chancellery produces a graphic: "The signature removes the alibi" and "The Constitutional Tribunal will examine the legal errors of the government." No. The Constitutional Tribunal does not examine some unspecified "legal errors of the government." It examines the compliance of the law with the Constitution 🤷‍♂️ If Nawrocki still believes that there are allegations of unconstitutionality against this law that are serious enough to refer it to the CT, then the signature alone does not magically make all objections disappear, and the government suddenly loses its alibi 🤦‍♂️ And if signing this very law is enough to state that the government already has all the tools and bears full responsibility for fuel prices, it would be appropriate to explain how this relates to simultaneously questioning the constitutionality of this instrument. However, the KPRP does not explain this. 🤷‍♂️ Instead, we get another graphic, another slogan, and another attempt to present the signing in such a way that simultaneously signs the law, still questions it, and shifts all responsibility for its effects onto the government 🫣 More and more graphics. Less and less logic 🤓 Think a little, gentlemen... (translated)

"I'm not saying that we will attack companies in countries that supply weapons to Ukraine, but that is a threat." During the same appearance, Putin also stated that Russia does not plan to attack European countries, but reiterated that in the event of an attack on Russian territory, including Kaliningrad, it will respond with all means at its disposal. (translated)

"If Russia attacks our factories on European territory, I would say that this would be Article 5. A Russian missile or airstrike on a weapons factory on the territory of a European NATO member would represent a case for activating Article 5 on collective defense," said European Commissioner for Defense and Space Andrius Kubilius. (translated)

European Commissioner Andrius Kubilius stated that a Russian attack on a weapons factory within NATO could activate Article 5 on collective defense, emphasizing that this poses a threat following comments from Russian officials about European plants producing weapons for Ukraine. (translated)

roberto FIELD loren FIELD gašper FIELD alja FIELD anja FIELD stefan FIELD luka kid FIELD (translated)

Many politicians from the ruling coalition, after President Nawrocki signed the law on excessive profits of fuel companies, instead of accepting it with satisfaction, started mocking the President for yielding and changing his mind. After all, you were the ones who appealed for this. Why are you doing this? It should be respected that the President finally agreed, and now we need to get to work on lowering fuel prices. Political gloating as if this is some victory over the President is infantile and foolish. And worst of all, it is shortsighted. The question is simple: were you concerned about fuel prices, or about feeling like winners over the President? The Poles won. Only that should matter. (translated)