The author criticized Bogucki for publishing flattering posts about the Nawrocki family and accused him of lacking sensitivity towards the tragedies that, as he wrote, were occurring in Poland. He pointed to violence in schools, the persecution of children based on their nationality, and hatred towards Ukrainian families and their children. He asked why Agata Nawrocka, whom he portrayed as engaged in child protection, did not take a decisive public stance on these issues. He reminded that she established a foundation aimed at combating, among other things, hate, participated in international initiatives concerning children's safety, appeared alongside Melania Trump, and visited foreign aid institutions. He noted that he was aware of her earlier statement condemning violence against Ukrainian teenage girls, but he felt that a one-time comment was not a substitute for a response to ongoing tragedies. The author emphasized that he did not hold Nawrocka responsible for school violence but criticized the discrepancy between her declared commitment and her public activity in light of recent tragedies. He also wrote that she did not need special constitutional competencies or an invitation from the White House to condemn violence and advocate for the safety of Ukrainian children in Poland. He accused Bogucki of idealizing the presidential family and ended with a question of what further tragedy is needed to hear a decisive voice from the First Lady. #Polska #PrzemocWszkołach #ObronaDzieci (translated)
