Search

Deputy Delegate Zucco questioned whether Lula would continue saying he knew nothing after an interview with Roberta Luchsinger. According to him, she presented details that raised questions about Lula and Lulinha. Zucco demanded explanations and stated that Brazil deserved answers. #Lula #Lulinha #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Pedro Menin wrote that Roberta Luchsinger called Lula a liar, senile, and misogynistic. According to Menin, she stated that Lula had protected all the men and left the only woman "to the lions," repeating the accusation of misogyny. #LulaMachista #Feminismo #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

A Central Reality reported that Carlinhos Maia asked a worker if he was Flávio Bolsonaro or Lula. The man replied that the Our Father was "up there" and Lula was here, and he said he believed that the president had done a lot for people of all social classes. https://t.co/8HimoKvScc #Lula #PolíticaBrasil #CarlinhosMaia (translated)

Biazita Gomes claimed that there was a report circulating on social media that supporters of Flávio would pose as supporters of the Workers' Party and would try to incite him to help him win the election. She also wrote that any event involving Flávio would be a false flag operation aimed at manipulating the electoral process. #Eleições2024 #FalsasFlagras #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Normose stated that Miguel Reale Jr., the author of Dilma's impeachment and a right-wing conservative, was focused on warning that Bolsonaro was much worse. He said that the issue was not a dispute between left and right and advocated for anti-PT supporters to back Lula, ending with a curse to dismiss objections. https://t.co/MqinepXC8y #Impeachment #Bolsonaro #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

The account Chappell Roan Brasil stated that, at that moment, supporters of Jair Bolsonaro dressed in red were pretending to be members of the Workers' Party at the location planned for Flávio Bolsonaro's rally, at the Farol da Barra, in Salvador. The account also asked users to respond to the post claiming that Flávio Bolsonaro would stage an attack. https://t.co/rEeC30LMx8 #Bolsonaro #PolíticaBrasil #FalsaRepresentação (translated)

The UpdateCharts released data attributed to IPESPE/ABRAPEL on valid votes in the second round: Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) had 51.2%, with a decrease of 1.5 points, and Lula (PT) had 48.8%, with an increase of 1.5 points. https://t.co/Tx7EeNkdiB #Eleições2023 #Votação #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

Xico Graziano said that Lula's successive promises reminded him of Paulo Maluf's campaign for the government of São Paulo in 1998, when Mário Covas was running for reelection. According to Graziano, Maluf's campaign massively and repetitively promoted works carried out during his terms as mayor and governor, from 1979 to 1982, at a time without the internet. He stated that the exaggerated marketing became a subject of mockery and gave rise to parodies. Graziano reported that a large billboard at the entrance to Santos, at the junction to Praia Grande, mocked the campaign by attributing the Atlantic Ocean to Maluf. He said that the photograph of the sign circulated in newspapers and had a demoralizing effect on the candidate, who lost to Covas. In Graziano's assessment, the electorate perceived when attempts were made to mislead them, even in the face of needs. He compared Lula's last-minute promises to jokes and said that the effect of those promises on the voters would still be seen. #Lula #PolíticaBrasil #Eleições2024 (translated)

Lula questioned the trust in Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign promises and said that voters should consider what he had already declared and defended. He stated that, in his assessment, one could not trust someone with connections to militias and who defended coup plotters, and he asked for votes for number 13. https://t.co/GDVjfMKdbB #FlavioBolsonaro #Eleições2024 #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Arthur Machado stated that if Lula lost the elections on the 25th, sectors of the right that defined themselves by anti-PT sentiment could be left without a central opponent, since, according to him, they had not built an alternative project for the country. Machado criticized a portion of the liberal right, which, in his view, repeated slogans without presenting proposals to attract investments, modernize laws, or promote coexistence with divergent views. He also mentioned that the PT could fragment and compete for space among leaders after Lula. As an example, he cited European sectors that, according to him, reorganized their political identity around fighting other groups, including the radical right. Machado stated that without a consistent national project, former opponents of the PT could start targeting Eduardo Bolsonaro and other movements in search of new adversaries. The author also said that the criticisms of the "5th element" came from groups without a project or knowledge about Brazil and claimed that political groups that treated law as a tool for control, rather than as a guarantee of rights and freedoms, were technocratic and promoted a Chinese governance model. He concluded that the problem for these sectors would be discovering that they never had a project to replace Lula as an opponent. #PolíticaBrasil #Antipetismo #Lula (translated)

Roberto Reis evaluated Globo's interview with Lula and Flávio, assigning grades of 6 and 8, respectively. According to him, Lula avoided major mistakes and communicated his ideas, although his hoarse voice bothered some voters in qualitative assessments. Reis stated that the president did little to promote his proposals, attacked Flávio minimally, and did not highlight the bus fare issue. He also criticized Lula's tendency to overly contextualize his answers, which, in his evaluation, reduced the time to address the main points and hindered the production of snippets for social media. Regarding Flávio, Reis said he defended the continuity of social programs, attacked Lula, and accused the opposing campaign of spreading false information. He also emphasized the candidate's statement that Lula would have forgotten about Bolsa Família for four years, while he would remember the program every day. Reis assessed that Flávio dodged questions that could become traps but noted that Renata pressed for answers not given and was, at times, more incisive with him. Reis considered that Flávio achieved more objectives than Lula and won the interview. According to his evaluation, Lula made a serious mistake when responding about Bolsa Família, allowing the opponent to exploit the issue, while Flávio did not have serious flaws. Although he stated that Flávio did not have an extraordinary performance, Reis affirmed that the result was positive for him, who, according to the author, was leading the polls as he approached the final stretch of the campaign. #Eleições2023 #PolíticaBrasil #DebateEleitoral (translated)

Only Who is LULA 2026 stated that Natuza Nery, on GloboNews, disputed Flávio Bolsonaro's version about the change of the Federal Police superintendent in Rio. According to the author, Flávio said that the change occurred due to low productivity, while Jair Bolsonaro had stated, in a ministerial meeting in 2020, that he was trying to interfere in the Federal Police and wanted to replace the superintendent because the police were investigating the family in the "rachadinhas" case. The author said that Jair made this statement in front of Sérgio Moro and accused Flávio of lying to protect the family from the investigation. #Bolsonaro #GloboNews #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

Alan Lopes stated that the interviews of Lula, the day before, and Flávio Bolsonaro, that day, revealed opposite profiles. He described Lula as tired and worn out, said the president seemed uncomfortable with difficult questions, and criticized his language. He also stated that Lula was embarrassed when confronted about promises that Lopes considered false and assessed that he did not convey credibility as a statesman nor would he be able to convince people outside his circle of supporters. Regarding Flávio Bolsonaro, Lopes said that he conveyed lightness, hope, transparency, and emotional balance, in addition to demonstrating preparedness to negotiate with international leaders. The author also claimed that the senator inspired positive expectations and represented the possibility of overcoming a period that, according to Lopes, had taken the country to rock bottom after scandals and abuses against the population. #Lula #FlávioBolsonaro #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Jones Manoel compared Flávio Bolsonaro's interview on Rede Globo to the presidential debate of 1989 between Fernando Collor and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, which, according to him, the network manipulated to favor Collor. Manoel stated that the interview was not a rigorous inquiry but a public relations effort for Bolsonaro, asserting that the candidate was able to lie and evade questions without being challenged. As an example, he cited Bolsonaro's statements about the 6x1 scale and about not cutting pensions, the BPC, the minimum wage, health, and education. Manoel claimed that the interview presented a candidate as a defender of workers who, according to him, supported measures against Pix, pensions, the BPC, the minimum wage, the SUS, and education. He also criticized the lack of questioning regarding the subordination to the United States and about proposals attributed to people close to Bolsonaro, such as ending Pix, handing over rare earths to the United States, and allowing the presence of American military personnel in Brazil. The author said that the owners of Rede Globo had lunch with Bolsonaro that morning and asserted that the interview had apparently been arranged. According to Manoel, the candidate appeared calm and would already know the questions. He accused the network of defending the interests of the elite and imperialism and supporting Bolsonaro, to whom he attributed the promise to end investigations into Banco Master and prevent punishments for what he called the greatest fraud in the history of Brazilian capitalism. #1989 #Mídia #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)