Daniel Conversano wrote that his interlocutor's message justified, in his opinion, being wary of him and no longer maintaining friendly relations. He explained that the passage in question had been removed because it was inappropriate and that the team did not approve of it, adding that it was impossible to predict in advance what a guest would say. Conversano reproached his interlocutor for mentioning the recording of the passage in a way that, according to him, suggested that he was considering legal action. He also stated that the fear of a morning police custody was linked to this possibility and to what his interlocutor had done to Psyhodelik. He added that his goal had never been to end up in prison and that no threat had been made by his team, who removed such statements when they were made in his space. Finally, he accused his interlocutor of presenting himself as morally irreproachable. He described the guest's comments as idle talk, while judging them to be problematic, and indicated that his interlocutor could contact the FBI about what he considered an imaginary threat. #Conflit #Justice #Communication (translated)
