Search

Hayy stated that the Fantástico program from TV Globo reported on an interview with Roberta Luchsinger on CNN Brazil. According to him, the report aired on Sunday night after the presidential debate on Band, and this meant that "Lula was finished." https://t.co/cjkIZ5zxtU #Fantástico #CNNBrasil #DebatePresidencial (translated)

The Central Right evaluated that Flávio Bolsonaro started the debate better by greeting the participants and addressing public security, but Lula had a slight advantage in the first block by putting him on the defensive with questions. According to the author, Flávio avoided directly answering some of them and resorted to rhetorical questions to speak to the audience. In the evaluation of the Central Right, Flávio had a significant advantage in the second block and won the third by a small margin. The author highlighted the candidate's proposals on public security and family indebtedness and said that he also used the discussion to criticize Lula's statements about the people of Rio and his defense of early prison releases. In the final considerations, marked by interruptions, Flávio was said to have performed better, while Lula made mistakes and got flustered. The author stated that Lula dedicated a lot of time to attacks and presented few proposals. He said the president mentioned once the end of the 6x1 shift, but did not address the exemption of income tax for those earning up to R$ 5,000, the end of betting, the adjustment of Bolsa Família, or the free bus rides on weekends. The Central Right rated Flávio Bolsonaro 5.0 and Lula 4.0. Despite this, it stated that it did not expect the debate to significantly alter voting intentions. It also recommended that Flávio focus on the topics he masters and on presenting proposals. Regarding age, it said it preferred not to enter the merit but stated that the debate highlighted difficulties of one of the candidates related to that factor, which it considered concerning. #Debate2023 #SegurançaPública #EleiçõesBrasileiras (translated)

In an intense presidential debate in São Paulo, Jair Bolsonaro directly attacked his rival Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, while the latter chose a more technical and reflective approach, raising allegations of corruption and questioning his opponent's economic proposals. #EleccionesBrasil #DebatePresidencial #LulaVsBolsonaro (translated)

Cleber Lourenço wrote that searches for "Flávio miliciano" and "Flávio Comando Vermelho" skyrocketed after a debate on Band. According to him, the first expression reached the top of Google's trends, with over 1 million related searches. https://t.co/JpCdqLY8PF #FlávioMiliciano #PolíticaBR #Tendências (translated)

CHOQUEI reported that, according to GATE, there was no bomb in Flávio Bolsonaro's car. The publication stated that dogs detected a chemical element and that, as a precaution, the anti-bomb protocol was activated. #DebateNaBand https://t.co/PMmxmVqsb8 #Notícias #Segurança #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Guga Noblat stated that Flávio would have invented a bomb threat in his car and said that, in his view, it would be less pathetic to arrange a bread knife. He also stated that Flávio was next to Pablo Marçal, whom he called a crook, and said that he had left a debate by ambulance. https://t.co/fH292anhWQ #Flávio #debate #política (translated)

Deltan Dallagnol stated that, during the Band debate, Sidônio Palmeira, whom he described as the Minister of Secom and Lula's campaign strategist, interrupted the broadcast and disrespected journalists who were trying to maintain the program's rules. According to Dallagnol, the episode showed desperation behind the scenes of a campaign where Lula was confronted live and lost control of the narrative. He said that the end of the Lula era was scheduled for October 25. He also stated that Flávio finished the first round ahead and that the PT relied on the complacency of voters. Dallagnol urged votes for Flávio Bolsonaro, number 22, and for the video to be sent to people who did not vote or chose another candidate. #Lula #Eleição2023 #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

Tiago Barbosa wrote that the central issue was not to determine who won the debate nor to evaluate the format, but to reflect on what he considered the failure of Brazilian journalism over the decades, which had led a statesman to debate with a person whom he referred to in a derogatory manner. He also questioned where society had failed, as a civilization, by not preventing what he described as political degeneration. #debate #jornalismo #politica (translated)

Antonio Tabet stated that the institution of the presidential debate, the spectators, the voters, and democracy itself had lost with Flávio. He said that the defeat also included those who supported one of Jair's sons, whom he considered unqualified, and assessed that the level of the Bolsonaros was very low. https://t.co/xvmezFPX9I #Democracia #Política #Eleições (translated)

Jones Manoel evaluated the Band debate and accused Flávio Bolsonaro of not answering questions and lying about the privatization of the SUS, public security, the 6x1 schedule, and his relationship with militias. He also stated that Flávio would not have the courage to open his banking and telephone records. When talking about the schedule, he said that the senator had promised to end the 6x1 regime for billionaires. Manoel advocated for changes in communication for future debates. He suggested that supporters of President Lula in the studio produce live content from behind the scenes and that there should be more vigorous interventions, in addition to a real-time information checking and dissemination network. He proposed distributing this material through Janones' channel, via WhatsApp, and on other social media. He also stated that the 25th would be the day of the defeat of the Bolsonaro family and said that a "traitor of the homeland" should not occupy the presidency. #Debate2023 #EleiçõesBrasil #Lula (translated)