Search

Mr. Husis wrote that Bukele was absolutely right and argued that no modern state was too weak to eliminate organized crime. He claimed that Sweden, Germany, the United Kingdom, or France could put an end to all crime in a week if they truly wanted to and mobilized their entire capacity. According to him, it fundamentally came down to political will. #politik #brottslighet #Sverige (translated)

Review wrote that the SVT broadcast appeared to have been interrupted due to threatening individuals and that the police's role and responsibility for the violence in France were disputed. According to Review, SVT seemed to share the protesters' and the left's view that the police were to blame for the violence. Review also referred to the fact that SVT's correspondent in Paris had previously stated during the broadcast that French police claimed far-left activists had gathered, but that SVT had been unable to confirm the information. Review noted that it was strange for SVT to question it. The post referred to the SVT News Direct broadcast "Paris is Burning" about ongoing violent protests in France, on October 17, 2026. #Frankrike #protester #journalistik (translated)

Free Ukraine wrote that Ukrainian drone operations had led to the closure of Moscow's airports during the week, with only brief periods when flights could land and take off. On the night of Saturday, Moscow's airspace had once again been cleared after a drone alarm, and five flights carrying Russian tourists returning from Turkish Antalya had been forced to turn around in the air. According to Free Ukraine, passengers received very little information and had to wait at the airport to board. They could then be left on the planes all night if a new alarm sounded. The author compared the situation to how civilians in Ukraine waited in shelters during the nights and wrote that Russia would have to feel the consequences of the invasion. Free Ukraine also wrote that Russian authorities did not urge people to seek shelter during the drone alarms, which the author interpreted as the authorities being confident that Ukraine was not targeting civilian sites. The author speculated that the greatest threat to the Russians might be their own air defense incompetence. #Ukraina #Ryssland #Drönare (translated)

InteSosse referred to the Center Party as Sweden's most stubborn obstacle and wrote that Sweden could have had a much more stable blue government if it weren't for the Center Partiers. In connection with that, they used a crude, pedophilia-related insult before correcting themselves. https://t.co/gyJg4dZEFI #Sverige #politik #Centerpartiet (translated)

Daniel Schatz referred to Fredrik Malm's text, where Malm claimed that Sweden and the Western world focused disproportionately on Palestine and neglected the vulnerability of other groups. He mentioned Kurds, Iranians, and Christians in the Middle East. Malm wrote that Kurds in Turkey had been forbidden to speak their language and identify as Kurds for 70 years, and that Kurds in Iraq had been subjected to war since the 1960s and genocide in the 1980s. According to Malm, Human Rights Watch had reported that 182,000 people had been killed. He also claimed that Yasser Arafat had supported the genocide and compared the war history of the Kurds with Palestinian factions, which he claimed had started ten wars in 60 years. Regarding Iran, Malm wrote that the opposition to the Islamic regime had protested for freedom, while the regime had tried to kill Iranians abroad. He accused the Swedish Palestine movement of supporting the mullahs and described how Iranians had, according to him, been silenced, tortured, and killed for more than 40 years. Malm stated that Christians constituted 20 percent of the population of the Middle East at the beginning of the 20th century, and at most 2.5 percent today. He also referred to ISIS persecution of Christian Assyrians and Syriacs in Mosul in 2014. Malm claimed that Islamism and war had driven Christians to flee and criticized Palestinian activists for celebrating the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamist terror. https://t.co/WUoOR5opO7 #Kurdistan #Mellanöstern #HumanRights (translated)

Isabelle Eriksson wrote that the identity of a member of parliament had not yet been established and that it could therefore not be ruled out that the person was pretending to be someone else. She described the situation as a banana republic. #bananrepublik https://t.co/Ium59dztFB #politik #riksdag #svenskpolitik (translated)

Sara Nilsson wrote that she had accepted to participate in Afterlyst special but made it clear to the editorial team that she did not want to discuss issues that Dumpen had raised since its inception over five years ago. She stated that she could consider participating if the conversation was about offenders and shortcomings in children's protection. Nilsson wrote that she had hoped the editorial team would pay attention to the influx of judgments in neighboring countries and compare them with Swedish legislation, which she believed was insufficient to prosecute individuals who actively tried to involve children in their sex lives. She also argued that individuals confronted by Dumpen had gone beyond merely viewing abusive material and were willing to risk a lot to gain access to children. Instead, the production, according to Nilsson, had developed questions about, among other things, the risk of exposing innocent people, men who had taken their own lives after confrontations, responsibility for relatives, the police's role, and her own defamation verdict. She perceived the layout as a crime special focusing on criticism of Dumpen. Nilsson wrote that she became very angry when a contact person at TV3 said that they privately thought Dumpen was doing a good job. She criticized people who, according to her, only expressed support for children's right to protection when no one else was listening, and called for adults to stand up for children openly. She stated that Dumpen had a support team with, among others, conversation therapists and psychiatrists, and asked what support Afterlyst offered. Nilsson claimed that individuals Afterlyst published information about were not more convicted than those published by Dumpen, and referred to the principle that a person should be considered innocent until a guilty verdict is announced. She asked whose right to protection was prioritized when the program created a special episode criticizing its own coverage. #Barnsäkerhet #Rättvisa #Skydd (translated)

Daniel Schatz wrote that a 52-year-old man, who according to Schatz had been at the top of Gothenburg's organized crime for 25 years, was sentenced to prison and would lose his house, his car, and gold worth millions, as well as be deported for life. Schatz described it as a monumental failure that the man had been able to operate in Sweden for so long and wrote that the consequences had finally come. He deemed the development long overdue. https://t.co/48nnOytmou #brottslighet #Sverige #rättvisa (translated)

Mr. Husis wrote that the Sweden Democrats would never become Sweden's largest party. He referred to the stigma surrounding the party and the demographic composition of the population, which he believed made it practically impossible to surpass the Social Democrats. He also assessed that Vinge's, Eos's, Karlsson's, and Åkesson's ambition to make the Sweden Democrats more like the Moderates would fail. According to him, dissatisfied center-right voters could instead choose the Moderates, Christian Democrats, or Liberals, as the Moderates were perceived as a more reasonable and credible alternative on immigration issues. He explained that the Sweden Democrats approaching 20 percent in polls was due to dissatisfaction with immigration policy and the party's dominance in that issue. Husis posed the question of whether the Sweden Democrats should be satisfied with 10-15 percent and pursue policies that the Moderates, Christian Democrats, and Liberals could also implement, or maintain a distinct profile. He argued that the party should prioritize the interests of ethnic Swedes and stand up for the Swedes' right to their country. According to him, the future of the Sweden Democrats lay in distinguishing themselves from the other parties. #Sverige #politiken #demografi (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson argued that the government formation should be based on the fact that S, V, MP, and C had campaigned for a change of power and had Magdalena Andersson as a common candidate for prime minister. She wrote that C could not count in parties that did not support Andersson and at the same time demand influence based on their mandates. According to Gabrielsson, voters had given C 7 percent and V 8.4 percent, and V would not accept C pursuing right-wing policies with the support of V's mandate. Gabrielsson stated that C could seek support from Ulf Kristersson or try to get KD and L to switch sides. If that did not happen, C needed to negotiate with S, V, and MP to get a majority behind Andersson, according to her. She wrote that V was willing to compromise, but that the parties supporting a prime minister candidate must also be able to accept each other as a government basis. She criticized C’s growth proposals, including continued privatization of the Employment Service and permanent tax subsidies to cleaning companies and large restaurant chains. Gabrielsson claimed that the Economic Institute, the Fiscal Policy Council, and others had assessed the proposals as ineffective, expensive, and ineffective in creating jobs. She also wrote that the proposals would be financed through cuts to unemployment benefits and sick pay as well as cuts in welfare. Gabrielsson asserted that the most voters preferred a red-green government, followed by the Tidö alternative, while C's centrist alternative lagged far behind. She wrote that more people had voted for S, V, and MP than for the previous Alliance if SD was excluded. Finally, she urged C to first clarify its political direction and implied that the party needed to choose a side if it could not find a centrist solution. #Regering #Sverige #Politik (translated)

Rami Kurimo commented on the government's decision and wrote that in the future, people would have better opportunities to find out what the state, welfare areas, and municipalities purchased, from whom, and for what amount. He referred to Helsingin Sanomat as a source. https://t.co/8ALlDU3Vbc #hallitus #oikeudet #läpinäkyvyys (translated)