Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Carl Eos wrote that an extra election was not in itself a democratic problem. Instead, he believed that the problem was that the four red-green parties had misled voters by giving the impression that there was a government alternative on their side. #SvenskPolitik #Demokrati #Val2022 (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that it mattered how one voted and referred to a case where a man who had lived in Sweden since the age of five was to be deported after having put his partner in a chokehold and pressed her face against a pillow so that she had difficulty breathing. According to Eos, stricter rules for deportation due to crime had come into effect the day before the incident. He quoted Anders Larsson, the chief judge of Södertörn District Court, who said that the bar for deportation was now lower. https://t.co/lnrgJYJRA1 #brott #utvisning #röstning (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Mohamed Abdukardir Ali from Borlänge had unexpectedly been elected to the parliament for the Left Party with 648 personal votes, despite being in ninth place on the list. According to Eos, the police investigated suspected electoral fraud where voters were allegedly driven to polling stations and received ballots that had already been marked, and where payment may have been made with pizza. Eos stated that Ali was mentioned in the surveillance material but denied everything. Eos also wrote that Ali had previously been suspected of, among other things, assault and child peace offenses without being prosecuted. He stated that Ali had been denied citizenship in 2024 due to significant debts, but was granted it in February 2026 under circumstances that Eos questioned. Eos further claimed that it was unclear whether Ali could speak more than a few words in Swedish. In conclusion, he urged the Left Party to defend Ali. https://t.co/CFnmru5fhz #Valfusk #Riksdagen #Vänsterpartiet (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari (L) had rejected the Center Party's proposal for a centrist government led by Social Democratic Magdalena Andersson. According to Eos, Pourmokhtari referred to previous experiences of a lack of trust and an arrogant attitude when explaining why the Liberals could not trust the Social Democrats. https://t.co/R10jOilcWY #politik #Sverige #regering (translated)

Carl Eos claimed that the members of the trade unions were unaware that their membership fees were going to Daniel Suhonen's leftist propaganda and political activities. He wrote that the members deserved to know this. https://t.co/hEKoGktFAv #fackförbund #vänsterpolitik #transparens (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Paulus Abdelshahed had killed his two children and was sentenced to life imprisonment. According to Eos, Abdelshahed legally changed gender in prison, became Lily, and was transferred to the women's prison in Ystad. Eos also recounted an inmate's description of Lily as tall, broad, and bearded, and stated that the inmate said Lily walked around in a too-short nightgown with the genitals visible. https://t.co/4Otg8W9Rft #brott #rättvisa #kriminalitet (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that those who gave victory speeches, celebrated with cake, and claimed to have won an election could be expected to be prepared to lead the country. He claimed that Magdalena Andersson had neglected to come up with a plan and referred to a link. https://t.co/9bCQj6xmkC #politik #Sverige #val2022 (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that the Swedish Academy had decided to award Cecilia Uddén the Nobel Prize in Literature and described her Middle Eastern reporting for Sveriges Radio as fiction that had freed itself from reality. He claimed that events and causal relationships in her reporting were subordinated to an internal narrative logic and mentioned Gaza, Beirut, and Damascus as environments that served as backdrops. According to Eos, the award rewarded a literary development in which the outside world no longer corrected what was depicted. #Nobelpriset #Litteratur #Journalistik (translated)

Carl Eos agreed with Jimmie Åkesson's reasoning in Expressen about the Sweden Democrats' role in cooperation with the center-right parties. Åkesson had written that the Sweden Democrats (SD) had been driving many reforms, but that the parties holding ministerial positions had received visibility when the reforms were implemented. He also pointed out that the cooperation had limited SD and asked why voters would choose the party over the Moderates if the center-right was perceived as good enough even on issues where SD had taken the lead. Eos wrote that the center-right parties had been able to showcase successes within SD's strong policy areas, while SD had not made corresponding advances in other areas. He argued that the parliamentary election in 2026 would largely be about issues where SD was weaker and, to a large extent, not about policy issues. Eos also noted that both Ulf Kristersson and Jimmie Åkesson had said that the time after Tidö had begun, and wrote that this would likely create discussion. https://t.co/JWjMHlH2Ri #Sverigedemokraterna #politiskdebatt #val2026 (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Fredrik Lindström had referred to Swedish emigrants to the USA as refugees on På spåret the day before and asserted that the designation was incorrect. Eos referred to a definition of refugees as persons outside their country of citizenship due to well-founded fear of persecution, who cannot or will not seek the protection of that country. According to Eos, one did not become a refugee merely by leaving one's country. He described Swedish emigrants, such as those in Vilhelm Moberg's books, as emigrants and wrote that they primarily left Sweden for economic reasons. He added that it might be possible to argue that certain Christians in other European countries had fled religious persecution. Eos believed that it was politically motivated to call Moberg's emigrants refugees and described it as an attempt to rewrite history for political reasons. He called the reasoning "purely Orwellian." #flyktingar #utvandrare #historie (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Magdalena Andersson had, in a fit of rage, relinquished her assignment to form a government and was now forced to take it back. He questioned whether she was the right person to become prime minister and described the Social Democrats' behavior as immature, referring to the fact that, according to him, the party was unable to handle being contradicted. #politik #Sverige #Socialdemokraterna (translated)

Today, SvD writes that Borlänge municipality does not see any signs of electoral fraud. "Our perception of the voting is that it has been a good early voting process without major incidents," says Fredrik Holm, deputy municipal director. At the same time, the newspaper Bulletin has gone through the daily reports from the vote receivers that present a completely different picture of the patriarchy that controls how women vote. The municipality has not reported this further and has no obligation to do so. Perhaps the municipality is technically doing the right thing. But can you understand that many Swedes are shaking their heads? This does not create a good impression. Something must be done. Sweeping this under the rug will lead to decreased trust in the electoral system and democracy. #valfusk #demokrati #Borlänge (translated)

"In several cases, male relatives influenced how women in the family voted in Borlänge's largest early voting location. This is evident from the daily reports of the vote counters, which Bulletin has taken part in. No incident was reported to the Electoral Authority." https://t.co/Jei0KUsYKC #Val2023 #Borlänge #Demokrati (translated)

If Tidö had won the election, one could have now moved on to the next step in the constitutional amendment to then enact a law stating that citizenship can be revoked if granted on false grounds or in cases of serious crimes. It is now not possible due to the small parties on the right outside of parliament. I propose that we call the rule that all criminal immigrants retain their citizenship Lex Kasselstrand-Allard. #medborgarskap #grundlag #politik (translated)

Two weeks of intensive reports about irregularities, election fraud, and bought votes culminate in the fact that the Social Democrats, who believe they have won the election, do not want their prime minister candidate to be tested in the parliament but instead walk away from the misery they have created. This is truly distressing. #valfusk #politiken #Socialdemokraterna (translated)

I think the Swedish people are quite tired of this now, actually. There is no exploratory assignment. Suggest prime minister candidates for the parliament so we can get something done. If no one has support, it will have to be new elections. #svpol #politik #riksdagen (translated)

Today's (so far) most important article is written by Sven Otto Littorin. He argues that Sweden has been a highly trusting society and that the electoral system is built for that. I, who can be a bit less diplomatic at times in public discourse, would say that our society and our democracy are in decline. Luckily, the decline is happening from a relatively high altitude. From the article: "The election administration has reported over 4,000 incidents to the Electoral Authority this year, compared to 489 in 2022. Part of the increase is due to the fact that reporting is now mandatory, but behind the numbers, there is a pattern that cannot be dismissed: Up until 4 PM on election day, over 300 incidents in the category of unlawful influence had been reported, of which around 90 involved group voting. The police have received 58 reports of improper conduct during voting. The National Anti-Corruption Unit is investigating suspected electoral fraud in Dalarna with pre-marked ballots, driven voters, and possible payments. In Stockholm, at least four vote collectors with ties to gang crime have received ballots, and no law prevents this. In four municipalities, nearly 600 votes have been lost or rejected. The Election Review Board has received nearly 12,000 appeals. The previous record from 2018 was 723." Regardless of everything else one might say about this, I agree with the author of the article on the need for "a parliamentary electoral integrity commission to be appointed immediately, with the task of presenting legislative proposals in time for the 2030 election." You can read about a number of proposals in the article. I don't know myself if I would support all of them, but it is a starting point. Personally, I can also add that it is a major problem that the left is currently trying to meet all discussions about shortcomings in the election with a dismissive attitude and attempts to discredit those who raise criticism or constructive proposals. The way in which debaters and the media have treated Peter Wennblad after his very concerning article about irregularities in Järva is in itself a sign of weaknesses in democracy. It tends to become a form of circular reasoning. If someone writes and talks about what sources report from Järva, Borlänge, or Rosengård, the criticism and reporting are labeled as a threat to democracy because questioning whether the election was conducted well is itself seen as a threat to democracy, which has the decidedly undemocratic consequence that the election and democracy cannot be discussed without democracy being threatened. Somehow, we must get over this. And move forward. Because I believe it is correct that our electoral system is not made for the society that Sweden has become. https://t.co/q9aqAMPRgE #Demokrati #Valfusk #Sverige (translated)

The reason I feel sympathy for V and actually a bit of contempt for S and C regarding government formation is that V talks about what they want to do, while S and C talk about what others should do. V has stated under what conditions a prime minister can gain their support. Now S and C are whining that V should do something else. It's exhausting and childish. If S and C cannot sit in government with V, that's how it is. But that does not give them the right to demand to decide what V should do. You have built your entire politics and your entire election campaign on the premise that you have the right to decide over V. You have deceived the Swedish people. #politik #svenskaord #regering (translated)