Search

The author wrote that an extra election, in their retrospective assessment, would be appropriate because the Social Democrats had been deliberately and tactically dishonest before the election. They added that a political party that expressed fear of an election and the voters' verdict does not inspire trust. (translated)

The sender wrote from southern Israel that the trauma after the Hamas massacre on October 7 marked the country. They described security as a matter of people's lives and daily life and stated that how the country would handle its vulnerability and the threats of terror were central issues ahead of tomorrow's election. https://t.co/gPkPuOtzKm #Israel #Säkerhet #Val2023 #IL (translated)

The writer wrote that they were glad that Vucic fell in Serbia and that Bolsonaro did not win in Brazil. They also said they were looking forward to the US midterm elections and the Spanish elections in November with some optimism. #politik #val2023 #demokrati #SR #BR #US #ES (translated)

The sender asked how Mohamed Ali could make it to the parliament and who in the Left Party had let him in. The post referred to an internal text message where the nominating committee's convener wrote that they had been "led behind the curtain" and urged readers to check out a DN report by Malena Rydell, Staffan Lindberg, and Moa Källström. https://t.co/3ECIfXf4B4 #politik #riksdag #val2023 #SE (translated)

Leopold stated that he had compiled and submitted 125 testimonies to the police after careful sorting and in accordance with the police's request to prioritize material with good prospects for investigation. According to him, the police had confirmed that 14 cases submitted in September had sufficient grounds for reports. He wrote that the material was now supplemented with what the police had requested and 111 new cases. Leopold also referred to the fact that 163,000 people had signed and that 77 percent of those surveyed did not trust how the election had been conducted. #Polisen #Vittnesmål #Val2023 (translated)

Therese Verdun predicted that Magda would be voted down today, followed by Elisabeth in the second round and Ulf in the third. In the final round, C and V would, according to her, reluctantly approve Magda since no one wanted a new election. She warned of four years of a government that she described in derogatory terms and ended with an ironic congratulations to Sweden. https://t.co/11UPrYqwio #Sverige #Politik #Val2023 (translated)

Stefan Stern wrote that the Social Democrats were now a 25-percent party and compared the level to the approximately 28 percent that he associated with Joholt. He described Andersson's levels at around 25 percent as uniquely low and wrote that the measurement indicated voter disappointment over the fact that the red-green government alternative, which he called nonexistent, had not been scrutinized more closely before the election. https://t.co/0aEgWIH4n3 #politik #val2023 #svenskpolitik (translated)

Compound interest asserted that Angry Aunt had been forced to concede that the Swedish people had been deceived during the election campaign and that the election could only be won due to the media's lack of scrutiny. The author described the discord as extensive and wrote that the progress she spoke of seemed to pertain to more than just the formation of a government. The post ironically called her a strong leader and criticized the Social Democrats' presidential campaign for demonstrating that Magdalena Andersson had done a poor job in preparation and lacked a plan. Compound interest believed that the Speaker should allow her to go for a quick vote so that she could formally be voted down. #Sverige #Politik #Val2023 (translated)

Viktor Barth-Kron wrote that it had soon been a month since the election and that the candidate for prime minister should indicate a direction. He asserted that the positions of the Center Party and Ida Gabrielsson (V) were already well known and added that a statement could worsen the atmosphere at the next seminar. https://t.co/1f5WmIMkWc #politik #val2023 #Centerpartiet (translated)

Lt. Torstenson wrote that trust had fallen from first to third place and was close to dropping to fourth. According to him, the decline was due to an increasing number of people realizing that she had built the entire election campaign on lies and could not form a government. https://t.co/9R1WlFtcRo #politik #val2023 #förtroende (translated)

Leopold claimed that Nyans votes in Herrgården and Rosengård had gone to the Left Party, rather than disappeared. He wrote that Ettfolk could show the same pattern in 17 municipalities and argued that the Swedish electoral system was built for a society with high trust, which Sweden once had. https://t.co/7msBmWTj4N #Vänsterpartiet #Val2023 #SvenskPolitik (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson wrote that she had difficulty understanding Thand Ringqvist's argument on Agenda that the Left Party and the Center Party were far apart. She claimed that the Center Party was not particularly close to any of the other parties with Magdalena Andersson as the prime ministerial candidate in economic policy. According to Gabrielsson, the Center Party had chosen the same prime ministerial candidate as the red-green parties to avoid governing with the Sweden Democrats, but the choice also meant that the party would have less influence on its bourgeois economic policy. Gabrielsson wrote that she did not want to decide which side the Center Party should choose, but felt that the party should have thought through the consequences before going to the election on Andersson. She argued that the Center Party's actions risked blocking both possible government alternatives. Since the election result, according to her, meant that the four parties' mandates were needed to choose Andersson as prime minister, she believed that the parties had to compromise. She emphasized that the business community had not voted and that each voter had had a vote. She also wrote that most red-green voters wanted to see a government with the Social Democrats, the Left Party, and the Green Party, while the voters of the Tidö parties had other favorites. According to Gabrielsson, parties should not negotiate with mandates from voters who had voted for another government alternative, and she believed that the election result must be reflected in politics. The Left Party wanted to be part of the government, according to her, to be able to implement reforms and agreements. Gabrielsson wrote that it was difficult to understand why the Center Party opposed the Left Party in the government and claimed that the Center Party's content in a possible agreement should be respected on the same terms. #politiksverige #val2023 #demokrati (translated)

Mats Yxhäll wrote that the right wing had long asserted that the Social Democrats were trying to scare voters with the possibility that the Sweden Democrats would get ministers in a Tidö government, instead of talking about their own policies. He referred to criticism from party members against the election strategy's focus on the party leader and SD ministers at the expense of policy issues. Yxhäll also criticized Anders Ygeman's statement that the party would calmly evaluate the election and probably find both things it had done right and things it had done wrong. He asked what the Social Democrats had done right, referring to the fact that the party, according to him, had its lowest support ever. #politk #val2023 #Sverige (translated)

Leopold stated that 609,190 eligible voters lived in a voting district where the Electoral Authority recorded a ballot disturbance on election day. He wrote that the blocks were separated by 49,484 votes, but that there was no record of how many votes were actually affected. https://t.co/C0QALDrPVc #Val2023 #Rösträtt #Demokrati (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that she had gone to the elections with a government alternative that was not real, as both KD and L had said no. He claimed that one could not promise a certain government when the intended coalition parties had rejected it from the start. https://t.co/HpI4JSmE4Z #politik #val2023 #regering (translated)

To acknowledge how the election has gone is not racism or misogyny. It is seeing reality for what it is. And the election result depends on clan voting. We have welcomed people here from cultures where family and clan are everything. And trust in outsiders is non-existent. We were one of the countries in the world with the highest trust in state institutions – and brought in people from countries without institutions or where the institutions are so corrupt that they are entirely justified in distrusting them. See the entire episode on YouTube. Link in the bio or comments. #val2023 #migration #samhälle (translated)

"In several cases, male relatives influenced how women in the family voted in Borlänge's largest early voting location. This is evident from the daily reports of the vote counters, which Bulletin has taken part in. No incident was reported to the Electoral Authority." https://t.co/Jei0KUsYKC #Val2023 #Borlänge #Demokrati (translated)