Search

Lt. Torstenson wrote that trust had fallen from first to third place and was close to dropping to fourth. According to him, the decline was due to an increasing number of people realizing that she had built the entire election campaign on lies and could not form a government. https://t.co/9R1WlFtcRo #politik #val2023 #förtroende (translated)

Leopold claimed that Nyans votes in Herrgården and Rosengård had gone to the Left Party, rather than disappeared. He wrote that Ettfolk could show the same pattern in 17 municipalities and argued that the Swedish electoral system was built for a society with high trust, which Sweden once had. https://t.co/7msBmWTj4N #Vänsterpartiet #Val2023 #SvenskPolitik (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson wrote that she had difficulty understanding Thand Ringqvist's argument on Agenda that the Left Party and the Center Party were far apart. She claimed that the Center Party was not particularly close to any of the other parties with Magdalena Andersson as the prime ministerial candidate in economic policy. According to Gabrielsson, the Center Party had chosen the same prime ministerial candidate as the red-green parties to avoid governing with the Sweden Democrats, but the choice also meant that the party would have less influence on its bourgeois economic policy. Gabrielsson wrote that she did not want to decide which side the Center Party should choose, but felt that the party should have thought through the consequences before going to the election on Andersson. She argued that the Center Party's actions risked blocking both possible government alternatives. Since the election result, according to her, meant that the four parties' mandates were needed to choose Andersson as prime minister, she believed that the parties had to compromise. She emphasized that the business community had not voted and that each voter had had a vote. She also wrote that most red-green voters wanted to see a government with the Social Democrats, the Left Party, and the Green Party, while the voters of the Tidö parties had other favorites. According to Gabrielsson, parties should not negotiate with mandates from voters who had voted for another government alternative, and she believed that the election result must be reflected in politics. The Left Party wanted to be part of the government, according to her, to be able to implement reforms and agreements. Gabrielsson wrote that it was difficult to understand why the Center Party opposed the Left Party in the government and claimed that the Center Party's content in a possible agreement should be respected on the same terms. #politiksverige #val2023 #demokrati (translated)

Mats Yxhäll wrote that the right wing had long asserted that the Social Democrats were trying to scare voters with the possibility that the Sweden Democrats would get ministers in a Tidö government, instead of talking about their own policies. He referred to criticism from party members against the election strategy's focus on the party leader and SD ministers at the expense of policy issues. Yxhäll also criticized Anders Ygeman's statement that the party would calmly evaluate the election and probably find both things it had done right and things it had done wrong. He asked what the Social Democrats had done right, referring to the fact that the party, according to him, had its lowest support ever. #politk #val2023 #Sverige (translated)

Leopold stated that 609,190 eligible voters lived in a voting district where the Electoral Authority recorded a ballot disturbance on election day. He wrote that the blocks were separated by 49,484 votes, but that there was no record of how many votes were actually affected. https://t.co/C0QALDrPVc #Val2023 #Rösträtt #Demokrati (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that she had gone to the elections with a government alternative that was not real, as both KD and L had said no. He claimed that one could not promise a certain government when the intended coalition parties had rejected it from the start. https://t.co/HpI4JSmE4Z #politik #val2023 #regering (translated)

To acknowledge how the election has gone is not racism or misogyny. It is seeing reality for what it is. And the election result depends on clan voting. We have welcomed people here from cultures where family and clan are everything. And trust in outsiders is non-existent. We were one of the countries in the world with the highest trust in state institutions – and brought in people from countries without institutions or where the institutions are so corrupt that they are entirely justified in distrusting them. See the entire episode on YouTube. Link in the bio or comments. #val2023 #migration #samhälle (translated)

"In several cases, male relatives influenced how women in the family voted in Borlänge's largest early voting location. This is evident from the daily reports of the vote counters, which Bulletin has taken part in. No incident was reported to the Electoral Authority." https://t.co/Jei0KUsYKC #Val2023 #Borlänge #Demokrati (translated)

5076 is the number that the Electoral Authority has reported. These are all incidents from the Electoral Authority right now. They are uploaded at https://t.co/1w0eEHoWVY Search, filter, and read, good people! 🇸🇪🫶🏻 Don't forget to share for wide distribution. We need transparency and this concerns us all. https://t.co/hwKUEX2kHO https://t.co/hwKUEX2kHO #Val2023 #Transparens #Sverige (translated)

New electoral scandal: Several Somali associations in Borlänge claim to be politically independent. At the same time, they openly campaign for Social Democratic politicians. S-topper Maslah Omar has connections to several of the associations. As chair of the culture and leisure committee, he has also participated in decisions regarding millions of municipal kronor to associations where he has been personally involved. The connections go straight into this year's election campaign. An association that previously received municipal grants while Omar was a decision-maker has published a campaign video featuring him and spread calls to vote the government out. This must be investigated promptly. When association grants, political networks, and election campaigns merge, there is an obvious risk of undue influence and corruption. If the rule of law does not act, trust in democracy will be eroded. https://t.co/1QlTt5EDpI #val2023 #politik #korruption (translated)

Anders Ygeman and I were on Aktuellt. C did not want to come. Those of us who were there agreed that we must move forward now, even though we did not have quite the same view on how. But the alleged V and M bloc seems to have no one arguing for it for long. Good! Four parties have won the election, and therefore we should govern together. V has erased our stance towards C, now it's time for C to do the same job. Without V in the government, agreements on policy will not hold; it will just be nice words on paper. Before we negotiate policy, we must of course agree on who will implement the policy and in what way; otherwise, the negotiations will be blind. S and MP now need to put pressure on C so that they also erase their stance. It's not about bickering but about making sure that all four are respected equally. That V should solve this by themselves when C even declines the invitation for coffee does not feel reasonable. Mutual trust can only be built if all parties’ voters are respected. I sent this to S, and I also think that MP needs to step up. Otherwise, nothing will happen if C is just allowed to remain in their own room. That MP claims during the election campaign that they want V involved is good, also for MP, whose voters have that perception. But talking about something is not the same as working for it, and more than V needs to do that if there is going to be a new government. So far, all pressure has been directed at V, even though V does not say no to any party in Magdalena Andersson's support and that our "stance" only pertains to our own party's right to influence. To be "neutral" in a situation where one party does not respect another is not being a good "friend." And without pressure on C to accept V equally, we will get no government negotiations where we can start to give and take in the actual policy. I believe that is what the voters want to see and expect from us! #politik #regering #val2023 (translated)

To the voters, Magdalena Andersson said that she could manage to form a government. She asked for the Swedish people's trust to do it. The four parties she wanted to form a government with got 176 mandates. She declared the four opposition parties the winners of the election. Ordered cakes to Sveavägen. It is therefore Magdalena Andersson's responsibility to seriously try to deliver on the task she said she would manage. The result of that now needs to be accounted for. Voters need the result of her first exploration reported in black and white. My appeal to the Speaker today was therefore that the only reasonable thing is that Magdalena Andersson needs to be tested in a vote after a few additional days of exploration. #Sverige #politics #val2023 (translated)

Ett skäl att rösta i år har för många varit mot något, ni vet vad, men självklart räcker inte det. Man kan inte styra ett land för att man är emot något. De rödgröna måste nu skärpa sig och visa vad de är för och vill göra. Det reaktionära gänget lyckades trots allt styra landet. #rösta #politik #val2023 #SE

TV4 nådde just en ny bottennivå. Förra valet var det 400 överklaganden. Idag 15 000. Samtidigt utreds röstköp i Norrbotten, valfusk i Järva och vänsterhärvor i Borlänge. Gissa TV4:s analys? "Ökningen beror nog på SD:s nätkampanjer". Är det här årets sjukaste mediavinkling? https://t.co/g2t4ZDuFC4 #val2023 #media #politk