Search

Somaligate! The company "AfriTech GrowTh AB" was founded in 1987, but now the only board member is Mohamed Abdukadir Ali, apparently a so-called shelf company that Mohammad Ali has purchased for his grand business idea of selling bank ID systems to Somalia. The address leads to Agneta Nyvall's private address. An annual report exists but shows no assets, and there is no turnover. The figures for this company are 0 SEK. Expressen writes: "At the same time, he has made several business trips to Somalia to promote a project for the country's reform program, which is partially funded through a questionable agreement with the Swedish government." The company is registered neither for VAT, F-tax, nor for employer contributions. The company's operations are about "contributing technical solutions and new technology for sustainable state development in African countries, which supports a more just, efficient, and long-term sustainable state governance." Thus, very high ambitions. This company is also part of "Nyvalls IT Partner AB," that is, Agneta's company, she who in the clip describes her partner's nonexistent actions. Agneta's company also appears not to have conducted any business at all in the last six years. In her company, all figures are also 0 SEK. All of this has apparently been a setup to pocket Sida money, precisely the same scheme that occurs in the USA, by some Somali citizens. (translated)

It is strikingly quiet from the former leaders of the Tidö parties. Wise. Perhaps they have come up with the most effective strategy right now: sit in the stands, order popcorn, and watch the gladiatorial game while Magdalena Andersson tries to reign in her government support. (translated)

So it is Birgitta Ohlsson and not Elisabeth Thand-Ringqvist who decides in the Center Party. And there will be no government with the Social Democrats since Birgitta says no to both the Sweden Democrats and the Left Party. That’s how it is. The red-green nonsense continues. (translated)

A bit ironic anyway "The company's planned activities are completely linked to the criticized aid arrangement for Somalia...that the country would receive deported Somalis. Especially, the Left Party directed very harsh criticism and also reported the government to the constitutional committee." (translated)

What is this really about? Now more strange information is coming out about the Left Party's newly elected member of parliament, Mohamed Ali. Expressen reveals that for several years he has presented himself as the founder and CEO of a company that the newspaper cannot find. At the same time, documents regarding the company he has actually been involved in show that the equity at the end of 2024 was zero kronor, despite a registered share capital of 100,000 kronor. Additionally, no annual report for 2025 is said to have been submitted within the deadline. And then there’s Somalia. Business trips. Contacts with representatives of the Somali government. The project aimed at Somalia and the new connection to the country's reform program and the criticized agreement with Sweden. There is already an investigation into suspected electoral fraud regarding the campaign that led to him, from a non-eligible position and without any significant campaign of his own, suddenly being voted into the Swedish parliament. Mohamed Ali has suddenly become a very interesting person. How can so much seemingly revolve around a single person that his own party barely seemed to know? Debts and debt restructuring. An unexpected parliamentary mandate. An ongoing investigation into suspected electoral fraud. Companies and financial questions. Recurring business trips to Somalia and contacts with government representatives. What exactly are we seeing here? Mohamed Ali has gone from being a person that hardly anyone outside of Borlänge knew to a person who needs to be examined much more closely – his businesses, his companies, his contacts, and whether there are any connections between the various pieces of information. It is no longer enough to dismiss each new piece of information as just another strange coincidence. The entire story surrounding Mohamed Ali, his businesses, contacts, and path to the Swedish parliament needs to be thoroughly investigated. (translated)

Pedagogical challenge: 16 years ago, the Left Party was part of the planned red-green government, while SD was isolated by everyone and everything. Now, SD is two mandates away from their own departments, while V must accept a role in the periphery for the foreseeable future. Why? (translated)

"If those conditions are met, the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened after seven days and discussions will resume." Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi suggested on Friday during the UN summit in New York to reopen the important strait and resume nuclear talks with the US, provided that the American government agrees to the stated conditions. (translated)

We were part of those who said before the election that there was no red-green government alternative. Not least Viktor Barth Kroon and Simona Mohamsson. The Left and the Center cannot agree. The only thing surprising right now is that the Social Democrats have the poor judgment to promote the unloved Morgon Johansson as a candidate for the speaker position. The Social Democrats really have no self-awareness that they are no longer a 40-percent party with a Left Party as a support wheel. (translated)

"In a situation where one has not yet been elected Prime Minister - when one's government support seems more than shaky - to go out and raise questions about the continuity of Swedish security policy around the Baltic Sea, that is not a statement of strength. It should rather be sorted into the category of recklessness." (translated)

Now we are approaching 150,000 (!!!!) signatures and as the signatures increase, public service and the left are waking up. Instead of focusing on the election fraud that has occurred, they are attacking a movement that aims to demand secure elections. This is bad. But it is also an indicator that the pressure is increasing and that the signatures represent an existential threat to the current government formation. The discontent is becoming visible. I am an entirely ordinary family man in my 30s with three children, a family, and a permanent job. I expect a secure election and a Sweden where democracy is not just an illusion, for my children and for Sweden. But despite these low demands for law and order, trolls and bots are trying to discredit us and me. In everything from media, emails, or comments in the comment section. This is bad, freedom of expression is not functioning as it is intended. I have consciously declined all types of interview questions from the media because I do not believe there are good intentions behind the questions. Previously, you needed the media for visibility, but we have managed splendidly without them. We are the people! 🇸🇪👏🏻 I wish you all a great weekend! Thank you for your incredible engagement! Keep sharing and spreading the word. We are increasing the pressure and the debate continues. It must not go silent! //Leopold (translated)

It is not only the V that is a problem. "At a time when one has not yet been elected Prime Minister - when one's government support seems more than shaky - to go out and create questions about the continuity of Swedish security policy around the Baltic Sea, that is not a sign of strength." (translated)

I really mean this. I increasingly get the feeling that both the Arizona government and the Flemish government are deliberately provoking us. Not with one measure. But with one after another. There is always something that can be taken away. Pension. Salary. Benefits. Taxes. Child allowance, water bill. Work. A bit longer. Each time less and less for us. And in the meantime, one thing stands out to me: you hear no word about themselves. Nothing. As if saving is only a national emergency when someone else has to pay the bill. And maybe I'm wrong. But it increasingly looks less like policy and more like a test. Not the question of how much people can still bear. But how much they can take away before someone breaks. As if they are no longer looking for the limit of the budget. But for that of the population. (translated)