Search

Ida Gabrielsson criticized the editorial page of Dagens Nyheter, stating that it often exhibited the same contempt for people that it accused its opponents of. She argued that DN portrayed itself as a mediator of decent truth and responded to people who disagreed with condescension. According to Gabrielsson, the newspaper's view of decency lacked class and equality. She also criticized the Center Party (C) for not wanting to discuss substantive issues or collaborate within the majority that had reached an agreement in the parliament. She wrote that C did not want to participate in joint preliminary meetings before the committees and that C had not answered affirmatively to the question of whether the Left Party (V) was included in the same government support. Gabrielsson called it common sense for V to want to know which parties would govern together before a government agreement was negotiated. She questioned how this could be interpreted as S coddling V. Gabrielsson wrote that DN's view of decency did not seem to encompass issues such as unemployment benefits, health insurance, working conditions, and funding for welfare. She also highlighted the working conditions in the gig economy, asking whether it was decent not to prioritize that nursing assistants could live off their pensions. She wondered if it was competent for the government to privatize the employment service, which she believed had opened the door to crime while job seekers were left without help. She asked whether a society could be built together without understanding how people were affected, for example, by the risk of being denied sickness benefits after decades of work. Gabrielsson argued that understanding was not the same as agreeing, and that it was necessary to effect change. She warned that voters might lose faith that their vote made a difference, and wrote that political opponents should try to win support for their direction rather than attempting to impose their will by condescension or circumventing compromises. #politik #samhälle #jämlikhet (translated)

Joachim B. Olsen wrote that the Social Democrats, SF, the Moderates, the Radical Left, the Alternative, and the Unity List, in his opinion, granted citizenship to individuals with MENAPT backgrounds, even though they knew that a large proportion would commit criminal acts. He described it as harmful to the country. https://t.co/XrkK4pyLnJ #Politik #Statsborgerskab #Kriminalitet (translated)

Unni Drougge wrote that Mohamed Ali, according to her, lacked income but still owned a car, which he repeatedly parked incorrectly. She also claimed that he neither paid the parking fines nor the traffic insurance. Drougge compared the behavior to that which she associated with minor criminals and questioned how it aligned with his role as a member of parliament. #Sverige #Kriminalitet #Politik (translated)

Hultsfred has transformed its previous fight against welfare crime into a successful model through extensive collaboration between the municipality and various authorities to combat criminal activities and restore justice in business. #Hultsfred #välfärdsbrott #kriminalitet (translated)

Carl Eos wrote that Paulus Abdelshahed had killed his two children and was sentenced to life imprisonment. According to Eos, Abdelshahed legally changed gender in prison, became Lily, and was transferred to the women's prison in Ystad. Eos also recounted an inmate's description of Lily as tall, broad, and bearded, and stated that the inmate said Lily walked around in a too-short nightgown with the genitals visible. https://t.co/4Otg8W9Rft #brott #rättvisa #kriminalitet (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson argued that the government formation should be based on the fact that S, V, MP, and C had campaigned for a change of power and had Magdalena Andersson as a common candidate for prime minister. She wrote that C could not count in parties that did not support Andersson and at the same time demand influence based on their mandates. According to Gabrielsson, voters had given C 7 percent and V 8.4 percent, and V would not accept C pursuing right-wing policies with the support of V's mandate. Gabrielsson stated that C could seek support from Ulf Kristersson or try to get KD and L to switch sides. If that did not happen, C needed to negotiate with S, V, and MP to get a majority behind Andersson, according to her. She wrote that V was willing to compromise, but that the parties supporting a prime minister candidate must also be able to accept each other as a government basis. She criticized C’s growth proposals, including continued privatization of the Employment Service and permanent tax subsidies to cleaning companies and large restaurant chains. Gabrielsson claimed that the Economic Institute, the Fiscal Policy Council, and others had assessed the proposals as ineffective, expensive, and ineffective in creating jobs. She also wrote that the proposals would be financed through cuts to unemployment benefits and sick pay as well as cuts in welfare. Gabrielsson asserted that the most voters preferred a red-green government, followed by the Tidö alternative, while C's centrist alternative lagged far behind. She wrote that more people had voted for S, V, and MP than for the previous Alliance if SD was excluded. Finally, she urged C to first clarify its political direction and implied that the party needed to choose a side if it could not find a centrist solution. #Regering #Sverige #Politik (translated)

Nancy Smoketoomuch wrote that Pelle had been involved with Torkil Lauesen for years, whom she described as a possible police murderer who knew who killed Jesper Egtved Hansen. She also wrote that Pelle had been in prison for vandalism and felt that he should be ashamed. #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/td5x0IREjj #dkpol #retssystemet #kriminalitet (translated)

Tom Jensen wrote that Berlingske had to pay 22,000 kroner plus VAT to access data that, according to him, was otherwise not publicly available. He wrote that male children of descendants from MENAPT countries, that is, the third generation, were also significantly overrepresented in crime statistics, and that this increased the political demands for full transparency regarding the numbers. https://t.co/wVJBGj4Hxz #åbenhed #kriminalitet #MENAPT (translated)

Magnus Barsøe criticized that the 31-year-old Nkumba Ludovic Tshiembe had supposedly received one year in prison for killing a family man. He wrote that Tshiembe had previously been convicted of rape and attempted murder, and called the sentence, as well as a one-year nightlife ban, insufficient. Barsøe called for minimum sentences inspired by the USA, although he did not advocate for the American legal system. He believed that greater alignment between the court’s sentences and the public’s wishes was necessary to maintain trust in the rule of law, and that the current gap harmed democracy and was deeply unfair to the victims of crime. #retsstat #strafferet #retfærdighed (translated)

Ann T. Red wrote that people saw patterns in weather, wind, precipitation, and temperatures and interpreted them as evidence of climate change. At the same time, she argued, they saw no patterns regarding rapes, crime, children carrying out contract killings, sexual abuse in elderly care, falls from balconies, or dominance behaviors in society. #klimatförändringar #brottslighet #samhälle (translated)

Mikkel Bjørn wrote that the government and the Social Democrats would reintroduce a bill on citizenship for over 3,000 individuals, even though the party had previously promised not to present it. He stated that over 70 percent of the applicants were from non-Western countries, including MENAPT, and that nearly 40 percent were from MENAPT. According to Bjørn, the largest single group was Syrian refugees, whom he described as temporary. Bjørn pointed out that the Social Democrats had previously referred to the reception of Syrian refugees as temporary, and wrote that Syrians who marched on the motorways in 2015 now constituted the largest group in the bill ten years later. He also claimed that the party had promised to introduce a new model designed to prevent Islamists, anti-democrats, and terror sympathizers from obtaining citizenship, as well as a new system to investigate applicants’ criminal records. According to Bjørn, the bill would be presented without screening, and he questioned whether the plans for criminal investigations had been abandoned. He wrote that Islamists, anti-democrats, criminals, and individuals with limited Danish skills could thus obtain citizenship. He called it a failure and criticized the Social Democrats for entering into government with the Radicals. #danskpolitik #flygtninge #statsborgerskab (translated)

Jessica Stegrud wrote that rapes, abuse, and neglect in elderly care must cease. She stated that the Sweden Democrats had long raised the issues and proposed, among other things, mandatory background checks, the option to choose the gender of care staff, voluntary camera surveillance, mandatory probationary employment when references were lacking, and investments in qualified staff. She also called for consequences for politicians and civil servants who, according to her, concealed the problems or did not take responsibility. Stegrud argued that a mission to BRÅ was not enough and demanded a disaster commission. #jessicastegrud #äldreomsorg #trygghet #kriminalitet (translated)