Search

🚨 NOW! Corinthians reaches an agreement with Caixa to suspend payment of a Neo Química Arena installment while negotiating settlement. According to officials, the bank has authorized Timão not to pay the installment of R$ 28 MILLION, due in September. The first two installments of the year, totaling R$ 56 million, have been paid. The officials understand that Caixa's decision not to charge the installment is a GOOD SIGN for the progress of the talks. The debt is about R$ 630 MILLION. To settle it, Corinthians proposes to give Caixa the naming rights of the Arena and other commercial assets, such as capitalization bonds, Fiel Torcedor cards, and banking services. Timão believes that the naming rights of the Arena are worth R$ 70 MILLION per year. Currently, Hypera Pharma pays R$ 15 MILLION annually, adjusted for inflation. (translated)

Searches were conducted in Estonia and four other European countries in connection with neo-Nazi music, during which the police investigated four main suspects and individuals related to their collaboration and distribution, who were accused of promoting far-right ideology. (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. (translated)

„Kapitán Smit Maččhar je hrdina. Tváří v tvář nejzávažnějšímu nebezpečí a navzdory vážným zraněním prokázal obrovskou odvahu a neochvějné odhodlání chránit životy ostatních,“„Kapitán Smit Maččhar je hrdina. Tváří v tvář nejzávažnějšímu nebezpečí a navzdory vážným zraněním prokázal obrovskou odvahu a neochvějné odhodlání chránit životy ostatních,“ napsal indický premiér Naréndra Módí na platformě X. #hrdinství #pilot #bezpečnost

The Football Association of the Czech Republic apologizes for the mistake when the incorrect national flag was displayed on the large screen during the Bulgarian national anthem before the qualifying match between the U21 teams of Czech Republic and Bulgaria. It was an individual failure, for which we, as the organizers of the match, take responsibility. We will take appropriate measures to ensure that a similar situation does not occur in the future. (translated)

Una giovane di 20 anni della provincia di Lecce è indagata per istigazione all'odio e alla violenza in un'inchiesta coordinata dalla Procura nazionale antimafia e antiterrorismo, dopo che le sue attività in chat neofasciste sono state scoperte dai carabinieri del Ros, che hanno anche sequestrato i suoi dispositivi informatici. #istigazioneallodio #neofascismo #antiterrorismo

Roberto Vannacci, along with Domenico Furgiuele and Lorenzo Gasperini, was photographed making the gesture of three with his fingers, a symbol historically associated with Serbian nationalism and neo-fascism, evoking the oath to Hitler and the motto God, homeland, and family. (translated)

Here is everything! The defender of the fugitive describes methods from the time of another fugitive, who is also a client of this lawyer and provides this entry. And all out of concern for neo (the beneficiary of the "reforms" during the rule of these fugitives), who ruled on the case of the fugitive. (translated)

The Hungarian appeals court reduced the sentence for German non-binary activist Maja Trux from eight to seven years for her involvement in an Antifa attack on neonazis during a march in Budapest, taking into account that Trux was not a direct accomplice, but only complicit. (translated)

The statement by the unnamed judge that Romanowski did not have a leading or initiating role in the conversations recorded by Tomasz Mraz is a blatant lie. Everyone has heard those conversations. It is terrible that someone is publishing a ruling containing obvious fraud with the stamp of the District Court in Warsaw. (translated)